Abstract
Four hypotheses that could explain the elaborate species-specific morphology of the clasping organs on the front legs of male Archisepsis diversiformis flies were tested: direct male–male combat, mechanical fit, male–female conflict of interests, and male stimulation of the female. Experimental modification of the shape of the male clasper and of the female wing base where the male clasped the female both strongly reduced the chances that a mount would result in copulation. This reduction was not predicted by the male–male combat hypothesis but was predicted by the others. Males in the field did nave to fight other males to remain mounted on females, as expected by the male–male combat hypothesis. Reduced male copulatory success was not due to inferior male ability to grasp and hold onto the female's wings, as predicted by the mechanical fit and male–female conflict hypotheses but to a reduction in the likelihood that the female would allow intromission, as predicted by the stimulation hypothesis. By a process of elimination, and in combination with data from a previous morphological study, the data support the hypothesis that the species-specific aspects of grasping organs in these flies function to stimulate females. Further behavioral data will be needed to test alternative possibilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alexander, R. D., Marshall, D., and Cooley, J. (1997). Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In Choe, J., and Crespi, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 4–31.
Allen, G. R., and Simmons, L. W. (1996). Coercive mating, fluctuating asymmetry and male mating success in the dung fly, Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 52: 737–741.
Andersson, (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818–820'.
Arnqvist, G. (1997). The evolution of water strider mating systems: Causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In Choe, J., and Crespie, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arnqvist, G., and Rowe, L. (1995). Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: A morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 261: 123–127.
Basolo, A. (1990a). Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav. 40: 332–338.
Basolo, A. (1990b). Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in the swordtail fish. Science 250: 808–810.
Battin, T. J. (1993a). The odonate mating system, communication and sexual selection. Boll. Zool. 60: 353–360.
Battin T. J. (1993b). Revision of the puella group of the genus Coenagrion Kirby, 1890 (Odonata, Zygoptera), with emphasis on morphologies contributing to reproductive isolation. Hydrobiologia 262: 13–29.
Belk, D. (1984) Antennal appendages and reproductive success in the Anostraca. J. Crust.Biol. 4: 66–71.
Blankenhorn, W.,Müuhlhäuser, C., Morrf, C., Reusch, T., and Reuter, M. (2000). Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106: 1–17.
Briceñno, R. D., and Eberhard, W. G. (2002). Courtship in the medfly Ceratitis capitata includes probable tactile stimulation with the male's aristae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).
Crean, C. S., and Gilburn, A. S. (1998). Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly, Coelopa ursina (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 56: 1405–1410.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Modern Library, New York.
Duda, O. (1925). Monographie der Sepsiden (Dipt.) I. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 39: 1–153.
Duda, O. (1926). Monographie der Sepsiden (Dipt.) II. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 40: 1–110.
Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Eberhard, W. G. (2000). Behavior and reproductive status of Microsepsis armillata flies away from oviposition sites. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 966–971.
Eberhard W. G. (2001a). The functional morphology of species-specific clasping structures on the front legs of male sepsid flies. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 335–368.
Eberhard, W. G. (2001b). Courtship and multi-stage transfer of material to the female's wings during copulation in Microsepsis armillata (Diptera: Sepsidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 74: 23–31.
Eberhard, W. G. (2002). Female resistance or screening? Male force vs. female collaboration in intromission in sepsid flies. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 485–505.
Eberhard, W. G., and Huber, B. A. (1998). Copulation and sperm transfer in Archisepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) and the evolution of their intromittent genitalia. Stud. Dipt. 5: 217–248.
Fraser, F. C. (1943). The function and comparative anatomy of the oreillets in the Odonata. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 18: 50–56.
Freitag, R. (1974). Selection for nongenitalic mating structure in female tiger beetles of the genus Cicindella (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Can. Entomol. 106: 561–568.
Hennig, W. (1949). Sepsidae. In Linder, E. (ed.) Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region, D. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nagele), Stuttgart.
Holland, B., and Rice, W.R. (1998). Chase-away selection: Antagonistic seduction vs. resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.
Jackson, R. R. (1981). Relationship between reproductive security and intersexual selection in a jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). Evolution 35: 601–604.
Jennions, M. D., and Petrie, M. (1997). Variations in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283–327.
Kreiger, F., and Kreiger-Loibl, E. (1958). Beiträge zum Verhalten von Ischnura elegans und Ischnura pumilio (Odonata). Z. Tierpsychol. 15: 82–93.
Linley, J. R., and Adams, G. M. (1974). Sexual receptivity in Culicoides melleus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 126: 279–303.
Linley, J. R., and Hinds, M. J. (1975). Quantity of the male ejaculate influenced by female unreceptivity in the fly Culicoides melleus. J. Insect Physiol. 21: 281–285.
Linley, J. R., and Mook, M. S. (1975). Behavioural interaction between sexually experienced Culicoides melleus (Coquillett) (Diptera Ceratopogonidae). Behaviour 54: 97–110.
Lloyd, J. E. (1979). Mating behavior and natural selection. Fla. Entomol. 62:17–23.
Loibl, E. (1958). Zur Ethologie un Biologie der deutschen Lestiden (Odonata). Z. Tierpsychol. 15: 54–81.
Mø ller, A. P. (1994). Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow, Oxford University Press, New York.
Parker, G. (1972). Reproductive behaviour of Sepsis cynipsea (L.) (Diptera: Sepsidae). I. Preliminary analysis of the reproductive strategy and its associated behaviour patterns. Behaviour 41: 172–206.
Pont, A. (1979). Sepsidae. Diptera Cyclorrhapha Acalyptrata. Handbook for the Identification of British Insects, Vol. 10,5(c), pp. 1–35.
Robertson, G. G., and Paterson, H. E. H. (1982). Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36: 243–250.
Rodriguez, R. L. (1998). Possible female choice during copulation in Ozophora baranowskii (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): Female behavior, multiple copulations, and sperm transfer. J. Insect Behav. 11: 725–741.
Shapiro, A. M., and Porter, A.H. (1989).The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 231–245.
Schulz, K. (1999). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Black Scavenger Flies (Diptera: Sepsidae), Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Šulc K. (1928). Biologicky vyznam vyzbroje prednich samcich nohou u sepsid (Muscidae). Biol. Spisy Vysoke Skoly Zverolekarske Brno. 7: 181–194.
Thornhill, R., and Sauer, K. P. (1991). The notal organ of the scorpionfly (Panorpa vulgaris): An adaptation to coerce mating duration. Behav. Ecol. 2: 156–164.
Toro, H., and de la Hoz, E. (1976). Factores mecánicos en la aislación reproductive de Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Arg. 35: 193–202.
Ward, P. I. (1983). The effects of size on the mating behaviour of the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 75–80.
Ward, P. I., Hemmi, H., and Roösli, T. (1992). Sexual conflict in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Funct. Ecol. 6: 649–653.
Zerbe, F. (1993).Innerartliche Grössenvariabilität und Paarungsverhalten bei Sepsis punctum (Fabricius, 1794) [Diptera, Sepsidae], Diplomarbeit, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Wüurzburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eberhard, W.G. Physical Restraint or Stimulation? The Function(s) of the Modified Front Legs of Male Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera, Sepsidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 15, 831–850 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161915227
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161915227