Possible Approach to Modifying the Formula for Calculating the Effective Dose
- 17 Downloads
The purpose of this work is to provide justification for introducing a dependence on the age of an individual at the moment of irradiation into the definition of the effective dose and to estimate the numerical values of the age-weighting coefficients. A modified approach to defining the effective dose, taking account of the age at the moment of irradiation, is proposed. The numerical values of the age-weighting coefficients are determined using the basic models for extrapolating radiation risk for two different populations: the Russian population and part of the US population.
KeywordsRadiation Effective Dose Radiation Risk Russian Population
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Recommendations of an International Commission on Radiation Protection 1990, ICRP Publication No. 60 [Russian translation], Énergatomizdat, Moscow (1994), Part 1.Google Scholar
- 2.Recommendations of International Commission on Radiation Protection 1990, ICRP Publication No. 60 [Russian translation], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1994), Part 2.Google Scholar
- 3.V. F. Demin, V. A. Kut'kov, V. Ya. Golikov, et al., “Analysis of risk in adopting measures for radiation and social protection of the public,” At. Énerg., 87, No. 5, 384–395 (1999).Google Scholar
- 4.V. F. Demin, V. Ya. Golikov, E. V. Ivanov, et al., “Normalization and comparison of risk to human health from different sources of harm,” ibid., 90, No. 5, 385–398 (2001).Google Scholar
- 5.J. Stather and B. Wall, “Risks associated with the medical use of ionizing radiation at various ages,” in: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Radiation Research, Wurzburg, Germany (1995), Vol. 2, pp. 1159–1162.Google Scholar
- 6.Estimating Radiogenic Cancer Risks, EPA 402-R-93-076, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington (1994).Google Scholar
- 7.K. Eckerman, R. Leggett, and C. Nelson, “Cancer risk coefficients for environmental exposure to radionuclides,” Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA-402-99-001, US Environmental Protection Agency (1999).Google Scholar
- 8.Report of the National Institute of Health Ad Hoc Working Group to Develop Radioepidemiological Tables, NIH publication 85- 2748, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1985).Google Scholar
- 9.D. Preston, S. Kusumi, and M. Tomonaga, “Cancer incidence studies in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: Leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma, 1950- 1987,” Radiat. Res., 137, S68–S97 (1994).Google Scholar
- 10.D. E. Thompson, K. Mabuchi, E. Ron, et al., “Cancer incidence studies in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958- 1987,” ibid., pp. S17–S67.Google Scholar
- 11.“Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84,” Annals of the ICRP, 29, No. 4 (1999).Google Scholar