Skip to main content
Log in

Possible Approach to Modifying the Formula for Calculating the Effective Dose

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to provide justification for introducing a dependence on the age of an individual at the moment of irradiation into the definition of the effective dose and to estimate the numerical values of the age-weighting coefficients. A modified approach to defining the effective dose, taking account of the age at the moment of irradiation, is proposed. The numerical values of the age-weighting coefficients are determined using the basic models for extrapolating radiation risk for two different populations: the Russian population and part of the US population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Recommendations of an International Commission on Radiation Protection 1990, ICRP Publication No. 60 [Russian translation], Énergatomizdat, Moscow (1994), Part 1.

  2. Recommendations of International Commission on Radiation Protection 1990, ICRP Publication No. 60 [Russian translation], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1994), Part 2.

  3. V. F. Demin, V. A. Kut'kov, V. Ya. Golikov, et al., “Analysis of risk in adopting measures for radiation and social protection of the public,” At. Énerg., 87, No. 5, 384–395 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. F. Demin, V. Ya. Golikov, E. V. Ivanov, et al., “Normalization and comparison of risk to human health from different sources of harm,” ibid., 90, No. 5, 385–398 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Stather and B. Wall, “Risks associated with the medical use of ionizing radiation at various ages,” in: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Radiation Research, Wurzburg, Germany (1995), Vol. 2, pp. 1159–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Estimating Radiogenic Cancer Risks, EPA 402-R-93-076, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington (1994).

  7. K. Eckerman, R. Leggett, and C. Nelson, “Cancer risk coefficients for environmental exposure to radionuclides,” Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA-402-99-001, US Environmental Protection Agency (1999).

  8. Report of the National Institute of Health Ad Hoc Working Group to Develop Radioepidemiological Tables, NIH publication 85- 2748, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1985).

  9. D. Preston, S. Kusumi, and M. Tomonaga, “Cancer incidence studies in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: Leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma, 1950- 1987,” Radiat. Res., 137, S68–S97 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. Thompson, K. Mabuchi, E. Ron, et al., “Cancer incidence studies in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958- 1987,” ibid., pp. S17–S67.

  11. “Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84,” Annals of the ICRP, 29, No. 4 (1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhukovskii, M.V., Pavlyuk, A.V. Possible Approach to Modifying the Formula for Calculating the Effective Dose. Atomic Energy 92, 448–450 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019959814006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019959814006

Keywords

Navigation