Abstract
A number of breeding institutions developed a project to assess importance of participatory plant breeding approaches for rainfed rice improvement in eastern India. The results of the first two years of participatory varietal selection are reported here. The objective was to evaluate the respective effects of participation of farmers in varietal evaluation and decentralization of varietal testing from breeding stations to farmers' fields on varietal ranking. Fields representing various hydrological situations were chosen in two to three villages at four rainfed lowland sites and one upland site. Sets of 15 to 25 varieties were tested both in farmers' fields and on-station in 1997 and 1998 and ranked by both farmers and breeders. The effect of participation was judged by comparing the rankings attributed by farmers and breeders to a given set of material in a given trial. The effect of decentralization was determined through comparisons between individual breeders' rankings across trials. Farmers' rankings were not randomly allocated, but agreement within the farmers' group was not always very strong. Except at one site, concordance among breeders' ranking was high, but, because of the limited number of breeders involved, it was seldom significant. In about two-thirds of the trials, there was a good agreement between farmers' and breeders' mean rankings. The consensus was particularly strong when severe constraints induced contrasting behavior in the genotypes. The decentralization effect appeared to be moderate, but variations due to a breeder effect were recorded. The part of genotype by environment interactions for grain yield due to location within one site and year was evaluated through various methods, showing more effect of G × E interactions at some sites than at others. Crossover interactions inducing changes in ranks represented a limited part of the yearly G × E interactions at all sites. Both farmer participation and decentralization of varietal testing in farmers' field would help in best matching the varieties to the needs, although their combined contribution would be more useful in some sites than in others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cecarelli, S., 1989.Wide adaptation: how wide?Euphytica40:197–205.
Cecarelli, S.,E. Bailey, S. Grando & R. Tutwiler, 1997. Decentralized, participatory plant breeding; a link between formal plant breeding and small farmers. In:New Frontiers in Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, pp.65–74. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
Cooper, M., I.H. DeLacy & K.E. Basford, 1996.Relationships among analytical methods used to analysegenotypic adaptation in multi-enviroment trials. In: M. Cooper & G.L. Hammer (Eds.), Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement, pp.193–224.CAB International, IRRI & ICRISAT, Oxford, UK.
Courtois, B., R.K. Singh, S. Pandey, T. Paris, S. Sarkarung, S.S. Baghel, R.K. Sahu, V.N., Sahu, S.K. Sharma, S. Singh, H.N. Singh, A. Singh, O.N. Singh, B.V.S. Sisodia, C.H. Misra, J.K. Roy, D. Chaudary, K. Prasad, R.K. Singh, P.K. Sinha & N.P. Mandal, 2000.Breeding better rainfed rice varieties through farmer participation: some early lessons from Eastern India. In: J.A. Ashby & N. Lilja (Eds.), Assessing the Impact of Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, pp. 212–230. CIAT, Cali, Columbia.
De Lacy, I.H., M. Cooper & K.E. Basford,1996.Relationships among analyticalmethods used to study genotype x environment interactions and evaluation of their impact on response to selection. In: M.S. Kang. & H.G. Gauch (Eds.), Genotype x Environment Interaction: New Perspectives, pp.51–84.CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Feder, G., R.E. Just & D. Zilberman, 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations indeveloping countries: a survey.Econ Dev Cult Changes 33:255–298.
Garrity, D.P., V.P. Singh & M. Hossain,1996.Rice ecosystem analysis for research prioritization. In: R.E. Evenson, R.W. Herdt & M. Hossain (Eds.), Rice Research in Asia: Progress and Priorities, pp.35–58. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, CAB, United Kingdom.
Hossain, M. & A. Laborte,1996. Differential in rice production in eastern India: agro-ecological and socio-economicconstraints. In: V.P. Singh et al. (Eds.), Physiology of Stress Tolerance in Rice, pp.221–239. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.
Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe,1995.Farmer participatory research for the selection of rainfed ricecultivars. In:Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems, pp. 825–842. Proc. Intern. Rice Research Conference, 13–17 Feb. 1995, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.
Kshirsagar, K.G. & S. Pandey, 1995. Diversity of rice cultivars in a rainfedvillage in the Orissa state of India. In: Proc. Seminar 'Using diversity: enhancing and maintaining genetic resources onfarm', June 19–21, 1995, International Development Research Center, New-Delhi, India.
McLaren, G., 1994. Bstat.IRRI, LosBaños, Philippines.
Paris, T.R., A. Singh, J.S. Luis, M. Hossain, H.N. Singh & O.N. Singh,2000.Incorporatinggender concerns in participatory rice plant breeding and varietal selection: Preliminary results from eastern India. In:J.A. Ashby & N. Lilja (Eds.), Assessing the Impact of Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, pp. 113–125.CIAT, Cali, Columbia.
Rogers, E.M., 1995.Diffusion of Innovations.Free Press, Macmillan, New York.
Sall, S.,D. Norman & A.M. Featherstone,1997.Adoption of improved rice varieties in the Casamance, Senegal: farmer preferences. In:Proc. Conf. 'Food Security, Diversification and Resource Management; Refocusing the Role of Agriculture, August 10–16, 1997. Sacramento, California.
Sarkarung, S. 1995. Shuttle breeding for rainfed lowland riceimprovement. In: K.T. Ingram (Ed.),Rainfed Lowland Rice Agricultural Research for High Risk Environments, pp.119–126. IRRI, Manila, Philippines.
Siegel, S., 1956.Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.MacGraw Hill, New York, 312 pp.
Singh, R.K., K. Prasad, N.P. Mandal, R.K. Singh, B. Courtois & V.P. Singh,2000.Sensorial evaluation of rice varieties with farmers. In: Proceedings of the Asian Symposium for Participatory Plant Breeding, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000 (in press).
Singh, R.K., V.P. Singh & C.V. Singh,1994. Agronomicassessment of 'beushening' in rainfed lowland rice cultivation in Bihar, India. Agric Ecosyst & Env 51:271–280.
Snell, M.C., 1983.Recent literature on testing for intergroup concordance. Appl Statist32(2):134–140.
Virk, D.S., 1998. The regulatory framework for varietal testing and release in India. In: J.R. Witcombe, D.S., Virk, & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice: Making the Most of New Varieties for Small Farmers, pp. 69–84. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK.
Wade, L.J., C.G. McLaren, B.K. Samson, K.R. Regmi & S. Sarkarung,1996. The importance of environmental characterization for understanding genotype by environment interactions. In: M. Cooper & G.L. Hammer (Eds.),Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement, pp.549–562. CAB International, IRRI & ICRISAT, Oxford, UK.
Witcombe, J.R., 1997. Decentralization versus farmer participation in plant breeding: somemethodological issues. In:New Frontiers in Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, pp. 135–154. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.I. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit,1996.Farmer participatory crop improvement. I.Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on crop biodiversity.Exp Agric32: 445–460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Courtois, B., Bartholome, B., Chaudhary, D. et al. Comparing farmers and breeders rankings in varietal selection for low-input environments: A case study of rainfed rice in eastern India. Euphytica 122, 537–550 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017994906544
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017994906544