Abstract
The consumer decision-making model is applied to store clerks faced with determining which customers should be carded for the purchase of alcohol. Manipulated decisional time pressure induced either a vigilant (high involvement) or hypervigilant (low involvement) decision state. Clerks (N = 256) rated four combined shopper–product profiles under conditions of high or low time pressure and assessed the likelihood that the shopper would be carded. Results indicated that increased time pressure reduced the likelihood of being required to present identification and that males were least likely to be asked for identification under high time pressure. The managerial implications and utility of the consumer decision model for enhancing compliance with minimum legal drinking age laws are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 3, 486–498.
Beatty, S., & Smith, S. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 84–89.
Bruner, G.C., & Pomazal, R.J. (1988). Problem recognition: The crucial first stage of the consumer decision process. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 53–63.
Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Johnston, J. H., Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1997). Vigilant and hypervigilant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 614–622.
Koller, M., & Wicklund, R.A. (1988). Press and task difficulty as determinants of preoccupation with person descriptors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 256–274.
Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of Retailing (Winter), 48–64.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Mayseless, O. (1988). Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations. Social Cognition, 6, 1–20.
McCall, M. (1993). Accuracy in detecting potential underage drinkers: The role of contextual effects in proofing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 11, 875–890.
McCall, M. (1994). Decision theory and the sale of alcohol. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 18, 1593–1611.
McCall, M. (1997a). Physical attractiveness and access to alcohol: What is beautiful does not get carded. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(5), 453–462.
McCall, M. (1997b). The effects of physical attractiveness on gaining access to alcohol: When social policy meets social decision making. Addiction, 92(5) 597–600.
McCall, M. (1999). Physical attractiveness, mood, and the decision to card for the purchase of alcohol: Evidence for a mood management hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1172–1190.
Mowen, J.C., & Minor, M.S. (2001). Consumer Behavior: A Framework (pp. 170–194). Saddle-River NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (pp. 273–296). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Olshavsky, R., & Granbois, D. (1979). Consumer decision making: Fact or fiction, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 98–105.
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 14, 534–552.
Preusser, D. F., & Williams, A. F. (1992). Sales of alcohol to underage purchasers in three New York counties and Washington, D.C. Journal of Public Health Policy, 13, 3, 306–317.
Rodin, J. M. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition, 5, 144–165.
Wright, P. (1976). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying versus optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 60–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCall, M., Trombetta, J. & Nattrass, K. Limiting Underage Alcohol Purchases: An Application of the Consumer Decision Model. Journal of Business and Psychology 17, 19–29 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016258415184
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016258415184