Skip to main content
Log in

Limiting Underage Alcohol Purchases: An Application of the Consumer Decision Model

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consumer decision-making model is applied to store clerks faced with determining which customers should be carded for the purchase of alcohol. Manipulated decisional time pressure induced either a vigilant (high involvement) or hypervigilant (low involvement) decision state. Clerks (N = 256) rated four combined shopper–product profiles under conditions of high or low time pressure and assessed the likelihood that the shopper would be carded. Results indicated that increased time pressure reduced the likelihood of being required to present identification and that males were least likely to be asked for identification under high time pressure. The managerial implications and utility of the consumer decision model for enhancing compliance with minimum legal drinking age laws are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 3, 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, S., & Smith, S. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, G.C., & Pomazal, R.J. (1988). Problem recognition: The crucial first stage of the consumer decision process. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. H., Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1997). Vigilant and hypervigilant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 614–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, M., & Wicklund, R.A. (1988). Press and task difficulty as determinants of preoccupation with person descriptors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of Retailing (Winter), 48–64.

  • Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A.W., & Mayseless, O. (1988). Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations. Social Cognition, 6, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. (1993). Accuracy in detecting potential underage drinkers: The role of contextual effects in proofing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 11, 875–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. (1994). Decision theory and the sale of alcohol. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 18, 1593–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. (1997a). Physical attractiveness and access to alcohol: What is beautiful does not get carded. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(5), 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. (1997b). The effects of physical attractiveness on gaining access to alcohol: When social policy meets social decision making. Addiction, 92(5) 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. (1999). Physical attractiveness, mood, and the decision to card for the purchase of alcohol: Evidence for a mood management hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1172–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J.C., & Minor, M.S. (2001). Consumer Behavior: A Framework (pp. 170–194). Saddle-River NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (pp. 273–296). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshavsky, R., & Granbois, D. (1979). Consumer decision making: Fact or fiction, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 14, 534–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preusser, D. F., & Williams, A. F. (1992). Sales of alcohol to underage purchasers in three New York counties and Washington, D.C. Journal of Public Health Policy, 13, 3, 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J. M. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition, 5, 144–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (1976). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying versus optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael McCall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCall, M., Trombetta, J. & Nattrass, K. Limiting Underage Alcohol Purchases: An Application of the Consumer Decision Model. Journal of Business and Psychology 17, 19–29 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016258415184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016258415184

Navigation