Skip to main content
Log in

The Idea of “Ethical Accounting” for a Livestock Farm

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the idea of a decision-support system for a livestock farm, called “ethical accounting”, to be used as an extension of traditional cost accounting. “Ethical accounting” seeks to make available to the farmer information about how his decisions affect the interests of farm animals, consumers and future generations. Furthermore, “ethical accounting” involves value-based planning. Thus, the farmer should base his choice of production plan on reflections as to his fundamental objectives, and he should make his final decision only after having seriously considered the various consequences for the affected parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackoff, R. L., Creating the Corporate Future (New York: John Wiley, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Agger, J. F. and P. Willeberg, “Production and Mortality in Dairy Cows from 1960-1991: Time Series Analysis of Ecological Data,” Proc. 6. ISVEE. Symp. (Ottawa, 1991), pp. 357-360.

  • Barry, B., “Intergenerational Justice in Energy Policy,” in D. MacLean and P. G. Brown (eds.), Energy and the Future (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., “Two Departures from Consequentialism,” Ethics 100 (1989), 54-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft, P. and P. Pruzan, Planning with Multiple Criteria. Investigation, Communication, Choice (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J., Weighing Goods. Equality, Uncertainty and Time (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J., Counting the Cost of Global Warming. A Report to the Economic and Social Research Council on Research by John Broome and David Ulph (Cambridge: TheWhite Horse Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., “Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair,” Environmental Ethics 2 (1980), 311-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J., Managerial Uses of Accounting Information (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. E., “Faking Nature,” Inquiry 25 (1982), 81-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. R., Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach (Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E., “On Being Morally Considerable,” Journal of Philosophy 78 (1978), 308-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., Well-Being. Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberg, N., E. S. Kristensen and I. S. Kristensen, “Nitrogen Turnover on Organic and Coventional Mixed Farms,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8-1 (1995), 30-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. K., “The Trade-off between Animal Welfare and Human Interests,” Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Animal Sci. Suppl. 27 (1996), 104-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., Value-Focused Thinking. A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (New York: John Wiley, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, 1974).

  • O'Neill, J., Ecology, Policy and Politics. Human Well-Being and the Natural World(London: Routledge, 1993).

  • Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. and O. Thyssen, “Conflict and Consensus. Ethics as a Shared Value Horizon for Strategic Planning,” Human Systems Management 9 (1990), 135-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J., The Elements of Moral Philosophy, Second Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1972).

  • Regan, T., The Case for Animal Rights (London: Routledge, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E., Animal Rights and Human Morality (New York: Prometheus, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. III, Environmental Ethics. Duties to and Values in the Natural World (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandøe, P. and F. Hurnik (eds.), Welfare of Domestic Animals. Concepts, Theories, and Methods of Measurement. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Animal Sci. Suppl. 27 (1996).

  • Sandøe, P., L. Munksgaard, N. P. Bådsgård and K. H. Jensen, “How to Manage the Management Factor - Assessing Animal Welfare at the Farm Level,” in J. T. Sørensen (ed.), Livestock Farming Systems, More than Food Production, EAAP Publication No 89, 1997, pp. 221-230.

  • Scheffler, S., The Rejection of Consequentialism, Revised Edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., Animal Liberation (Wellington, Northamptonshire: Thorsons Publishers Ltd., 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics (Princeton University Press, 1986).

  • Vallentyne, P., “The Teleological/Deontological Distinction,” Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (1987), 21-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallentyne, P., “Gimmicky Representations of Moral Theories,” Metaphilosophy 19 (1988), 253-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, J. D., “Rural Sociology and the new Agrarian Question. A Perspective from the Netherlands,” Sociologia Ruralis 33-32 (1993), 240-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R., Microeconomic Analysis, Third Edition (New York: W. W. Norton, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp. 75-150.

  • de Wit, C. T., H. Huisman and R. Rabbinge, “Agriculture and its Environment: Are There Other Ways?,” Agricultural Systems 23 (1987), 211-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, K.K., Sørensen, J.T. The Idea of “Ethical Accounting” for a Livestock Farm. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11, 85–100 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009519131191

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009519131191

Navigation