Abstract
Japan offers its aid recipients an approach to legal reform that in some ways mirrors, and in others diverges, from the Western approaches to rule of law aid. As a consequence, Japan challenges Western legal assistance generally, and rule of law aid in particular. More particularly, after close scrutiny of the history of Japanese ODA and its mode of legal sector support developed over the last twenty years, we argue that Japanese legal assistance exhibits a range of traits including: in-crementalism; comparativism; different aid personnel; focus on self-help; budget restraint; and humility. This approach has attracted robust critics. Nevertheless, this paper asks the question whether the East Asian model of rule of law assistance challenges the West’s apparent addiction to rule of law aid.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Samantha Hinderling for her research assistance. This paper benefitted from comments offered at the 2013 Folke Bernadotte Rule of Law Research Group Workshop: ‘Addicted to Law’.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicholson, P., Kuong, T. Japanese Legal Assistance: An East Asian Model of Legal Assistance and Rule of Law?. Hague J Rule Law 6, 141–177 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404514001079
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404514001079