Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transnational Financial Markets Regulation — A Conference

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Business Organization Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most important lesson to be learnt from the financial crisis perhaps is that nation states cannot deal with the challenges of global financial markets on their own. As markets become more and more connected, sovereignty becomes increasingly fictitious. Although there seems to be little dispute about this, the implications for legal scholarship are far from clear. How can legal scholars contribute to solving the issues of global financial markets? Do we need a shift of paradigm in how to think about securities regulation? Which theoretical backgrounds should we rely on?

An answer to these questions might be found in the growing body of literature on transnational law. Transnational law defines a fourth category of law beyond the triad of national, international and supranational law which evolves beyond the nation state due to private ordering, social convenience and non-legal convention. Transnational law scholarship embraces the idea that nation states are in decline and that, as a result, legal scholars should turn their attention to such phenomena as soft law and indirect regulation, private ordering and self-regulation, regulatory competition, legal convergence and legal transplants.1 All of these phenomena can be seen as consequences of the globalisation of markets and as signs of the decline of the nation state. Although they are part of virtually any advanced securities regulation worldwide, they seem to be little explored from a legal perspective.

From 3 to 5 March 2010, the German Association for Law and Society and the University of Bremen hosted a conference on transnationalism in law, state and society. Part of this conference was a panel on transnational financial markets regulation. The aim of this panel was to ask some renowned experts on national, European and international securities regulation to analyse their fields of research from the perspective of transnational law.2

This paper serves as an introduction to the topic and to the presentations given at the conference. It seeks to define the term ‘transnational financial markets regulation’ and to show why the study of transnational financial markets law promises to be rewarding. It concludes with a short summary of the presentations given at the conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. For a recent in-depth proposal of a theory of transnational private law, see G.-P. Calliess and P. Zumbansen, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford, Hart 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the following, see G.-P. Calliess, ‘Reflexive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law’, 23 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie (2002) p. 185; G.-P. Calliess, Grenzüberschreitende Verbraucherverträge (Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck 2006) at pp. 212–219; P. Zumbansen, ‘Transnational Law’, in J. Smits, ed., Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2006) p. 738; C. Tietje and K. Nowrot, ‘Laying Conceptual Ghosts of the Past to Rest: The Rise of Philip C. Jessup’ s “Transnational Law” in the Regulatory Governance of the International Economic System’, in C. Tietje, et al., eds., Philip C. Jessup’s Transnational Law Revisited — On the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of Its Publication (Halle, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 2006) p. 17.

  3. P.H. Jessup, Transnational Law (New Haven, Elliots Books 1956) at p. 2 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Horn, ‘The Use of Transnational Law in the Contract Law of International Trade and Finance’, in K.P. Berger, ed., The Practice of Transnational Law (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2001) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calliess, supra n. 3, Grenzüberschreitende Verbraucherverträge, at p. 215.

  6. Ibid., at p. 219.

  7. Cf. K.P. Berger, ‘Einheitliche Rechtsstrukturen durch außergesetzliche Rechtsvereinheitlichung’, 54 Juristenzeitung (1999) p. 369; M.J. Bonell, ‘The UNIDROIT Principles and Transnational Law’, in Berger, ed., supra n. 5, p. 23; Calliess, supra n. 3, Grenzüberschreitende Verbraucherverträge, at p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, e.g., P. Zumbansen, ‘Lex mercatoria: Zum Geltungsanspruch transnationalen Rechts’, 67 Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht (2003) p. 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. the definition of transnational law offered by Calliess, supra n. 3, ‘Reflexive Transnational Law’, at p. 188: ‘a third-level autonomous legal system beyond municipal and public international law, created and developed by the law-making forces of an emerging global civil society, founded on general principles of law as well as societal usages, administered by private dispute resolution service providers, and codified (if at all) by private norm formulating agencies.’

  10. See, for example, J.-M. Guéhenno, The End of the Nation-State (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press 1995); K. Ohmae, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (New York, Free Press 1996); A. Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.D. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, Princeton University Press 1999); S.D. Krasner, ‘Abiding Sovereignty’, 22 International Political Science Review (2001) p. 229; J.D. Levy, ed., The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Zürn and S. Leibfried, ‘A New Perspective on the State: Reconfiguring the National Constellation’, 13 European Review Supp. 1 (2005) p. 1; A. Hurrelmann, et al., ‘The Golden-Age Nation State and Its Transformation: A Framework for Analysis’, in A. Hurrelmann, et al., eds., Transforming the Golden-Age Nation State (New York, Palgrave Macmillan 2007) p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zürn and Leibfried, supra n. 13.

  14. The starting point of EC Securities Regulation is the Segré Report of 1966, see European Economic Community Commission, The Development of a European Capital Market, Report of a Group of Experts Appointed by the EEC Commission (Brussels 1966). The origin of the ‘second wave’ of financial markets regulation is the Financial Services Action Plan of 1999, COM (1999) 232.

  15. See, e.g., A.M. Fleckner, ‘Stock Exchanges at the Crossroads’, 74 Fordham Law Review (2006) p. 2541; R. Aggarwal, et al., ‘U.S. Securities Regulation in a World of Global Exchanges’, December 2006, available at: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=950530>.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Pistor, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds, Banks and Governments in the Global Crisis: Towards a New Governance of Global Finance’, 10 European Business Organization Law Review (2009) p. 333; R. Beck and M. Fidora, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds — Before and Since the Crisis’, 10 European Business Organization Law Review (2009) p. 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. El-Erian, When Markets Collide (McGraw-Hill, 2008) at p. 5, also refers to a collision of the markets of yesterday with the markets of tomorrow.

  18. See E. Tafara and R.J. Peterson, ‘A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework’, 48 Harvard International Law Journal (2007) p. 31, and the other papers printed in Vol. 48, No. 1 of this journal. There is a bilateral agreement on mutual recognition between the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) (see: <http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_mututal_recognition/australia/enhanced_enforcement_mou.pdf>). For some facts about the extent of the internationalisation of US securities markets, see H.S. Scott, International Finance, Transactions, Policy, and Regulation, 16th edn. (New York, NY, Foundation Press 2009) at pp. 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For a pioneering study in German, see B. Rost, Die Herausbildung transnationalen Wirtschaftsrechts auf dem Gebiet der internationalen Finanz- und Kapitalmärkte (Berlin, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Engert, ‘Transnational Hedge Fund Regulation’, infra p. 329.

  21. T. Möllers, ‘Sources of Law in European Securities Regulation’, infra p. 379.

  22. R. Veil, ‘Enforcement of Capital Markets Law in Europe’, infra p. 409.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Law, Comparative Law and Law & Economics, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany

    Lars Klöhn LLM (Professor of Civil Law)

Authors
  1. Lars Klöhn LLM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Klöhn LLM.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klöhn, L. Transnational Financial Markets Regulation — A Conference. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 11, 319–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752910300024

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752910300024

Keywords

Search

Navigation