Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting the activity of a nocturnal species: The wild boar

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last century, the wild boar (Sus scrofa) has become an important wildlife species in both economic and ecological terms. Considered a pest by some and a resource by others, its rapid increase in population and distribution has raised management concerns. Studies on activity rhythms may provide useful insights into its overall ecology and help develop effective management strategies. By examining highly detailed activity data collected by means of accelerometers fitted on GPS-collars, we studied wild boar daily activity rhythms and the effect of environmental conditions on their diurnal and nocturnal activity. We thus provided evidence of the predominantly nocturnal and monophasic activity of wild boars. All year round, we reported low activity levels during the day, which opportunistically increased under the most favourable environmental conditions. Activity was found to be significantly affected by such weather conditions as temperature, precipitation and air relative humidity. Moreover, we found that nocturnal activity slightly increased as moonlight increased. Part of our analysis was focused on the hunting period in order to investigate whether wild boars modify their activity levels in response to hunting disturbance. Our results suggested that wild boar nocturnal habits are not directly influenced by the current hunting disturbance, though we hypothesised that they may have evolved over several decades of hunting harassment. Alternatively, but not exclusively, nocturnal habits may have evolved as a low-cost strategy to achieve an optimum thermal balance (i.e., behavioural thermoregulation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, P., Vicente, J., Höfle, U., Cassinello, J., Ruiz-Fons, F., Gortazar, C., 2007. Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol. Amplif. Infect 135, 519–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allwin, B., Swaminathan, R., Mohanraj, A., Suhas, G.N., Vedaminckam, S., Gopal, S., Kumar, M., 2016. The wild pig (Sus scrofa) behavior- a retrospective study.J. Vet. Sci. Technol 7, 333–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amici, A., Serrani, F., Rossi, C.M., Primi, R., 2011. Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L): the refuge effect. Agron. Sustain. Dev 32, 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman, R., 2010. European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff, J., 1966. Circadian activity pattern with two peaks. Ecology 47, 657–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff, J., 1979. Circadian rhythms: influences of internal and external factors on the period measured in constant conditions. Z. Tierpsychol 49, 225–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballari, S.A., Barrios-García, M.N., 2014. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mamm.Rev 44, 124–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K., 2013. Package MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference for R. R Package Version 195, 45–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, E., Donaggio, E., Marcon, A., Scandura, M., Apollonio, M., 2012. Trophic niche overlap and wild ungulate consumption by red fox and wolf in a mountain area in Italy. Mamm. Biol. - Z. Für Säugetierkd 77, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G.E., Slade, J.B., 1986. Time budgets of grassland herbivores: body size similarities. Oecologia 70, 53–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briedermann, L., 1971. Ermittlungen zur Aktivitätsperiodikdes Mitteleuropäischen Wildschweins (Sus s. scrofa L). Zool Gart 40, 302–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brivio, F., Bertolucci, C., Tettamanti, F., Filli, F., Apollonio, M., Grignolio, S., 2016. The weather dictates the rhythms: alpine chamois activity is well adapted to ecological conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 70, 1291–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinderink, G.W.T.A.G., Hazebroek, E., 1996. Wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. For. Ecol. Manag 88, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, C.G., Alados, C.L., Gómez-García, D., Barrio, I.C., García-González, R., 2009. Understanding the main factors in the extent and distribution of wild boar rooting on alpine grasslands.J. Zool 279, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., Llimona, F., Gràcia, J., 2003. Spacing and nocturnal activity of wild boar Sus scrofa in a mediterranean metropolitan park. Wildl. Biol. 9 (Suppl. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., Llimona, F., Cabaneros, L., Calomardo, F., 2012. Characteristics ofwild boar (Sus scrofa) habituation to urban areas in the Collserola Natural Park (Barcelona) and comparison with other locations. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv 35, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caley, P., 1997. Movements, activity patterns and habitat use of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a Tropical Habitat. Wildl. Res 24, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canu, A., Scandura, M., Merli, E., Chirichella, R., Bottero, E., Chianucci, F., Cutini, A., Apollonio, M., 2015. Reproductive phenology and conception synchrony in a natural wild boar population. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal 26, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevali, L., Lovari, S., Monaco, A., Mori, E., 2016. Nocturnal activity of a diurnal species, the northern chamois, in a predator-free alpine area. Behav. Processes 126, 101–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T., 1998. Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford University Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Core Team, R., 2014. R: A Language and Environment forStatistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, M.T., Lovari, S., Sonnino, S., 1995. Temporal activity patterns of crested porcupines Hystrix cristata.J. Zool. (Lond.) 236, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousse, S., Janeau, G., Spitz, F., Cargnelutti, B., 1995. Temporal ontogeny in the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): asystemic point ofview. IbexJ. Mt. Ecol 3, 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croney, C.C., Adams, K.M., Washington, C.G., Stricklin, W.R., 2003. A note on visual, olfactory and spatial cue use in foraging behavior of pigs: indirectly assessing cognitive abilities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci 83, 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daan, S., Aschoff, J., 1982. Circadian contributions tosurvival. In: Aschoff, J., Daan, S., Groos, G.A. (Eds.), Vertebrate Circadian Systems. Springer, pp. 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, N., 1998. The influence of pasture distribution and temperature on habitat selection by feral pigs in a semi-arid environment. Wildl. Res 25, 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensing, E.P., Ciuti, S., de Wijs, F.A.L.M., Lentferink, D.H., ten Hoedt, A., Boyce, M.S., Hut, R.A., 2014. GPS based daily activity patterns in european red deerand North American elk (Cervus elaphus): indication for a weak circadian clock in ungulates. PLoS One 9, e106997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, G., Wallin, K., 1996. The impact of hunting on moose movements. Alces 32, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque, E., 2003. Influences of moonlight, ambient temperature, and food availability on the diurnal and nocturnal activity of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 54, 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid, A., Dill, L., 2002. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol 6, art. 11.

  • Gort ázar, C., Ferroglio, E., Höfle, U., Frölich, K., Vicente, J., 2007. Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. Eur. J. Wildl. Res 53, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grignolio, S., Merli, E., Bongi, P., Ciuti, S., Apollonio, M., 2011. Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area. Biol. Conserv 144, 641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursky, S., 2003. Lunar philia ina nocturnal primate. Int. J. Primatol 24, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, L., Raschke, G., 1980. Die Wildsauen. Paul Parey Verlag, Hamburg und Berlin, 216 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, R., 1998. Schwarzwild, BLV Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. ed. Aufl., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, T.D., Singer, F.J., Ackerman, B.B., 1981. Forage relationships of European wild boar invading northern Hardwood forest. J. Wildl. Manag 45, 748–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hut, R.A., Kronfeld-Schor, N., van der Vinne, V., De la Iglesia, H., 2012. In search of a temporal niche: environmental factors. Prog. Brain Res 199, 281–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay, E., et al., 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc 77, 437–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuling, O., Stier, N., Roth, M., 2008. How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L? Eur. J. Wildl. Res 54, 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronfeld-Schor, N., Dominoni, D., de la Iglesia, H., Levy, O., Herzog, E.D., Dayan, T., Helfrich-Forster, C., 2013. Chronobiology by moonlight. Proc. Biol. Sci 280, 20123088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, J.C, Marchinton, R.L., 1972. Radiotelemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manag 36, 1240–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labudzki, L., Wlazełko, M., 1991. Saisonale dynamik dervom schwarzwild im feldanbau verursachten schäden im forschungsgebiet zielonka. Z. Für Jagdwiss 37, 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, L., Picos, J., Valero, E., 2012. Temporal pattern ofwild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain. Eur. J. Wildl. Res 58, 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemel, J., Truve, J., Soderberg, B., 2003. Variation in rangingand activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl. Biol 9, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, P., Garel, M., Bourgoin, G., Dubray, D., Maillard, D., Loison, A., 2014. Impacts of tourism and hunting on a large herbivore’s spatio-temporal behavior in and around a French protected area. Biol. Conserv 177, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei, G., Genov, P.V., Staines, B.W., Gorman, M.L., 1997. Factors influencing home range and activity ofwild boar (Sus scrofa) in a mediterranean coastal area.J. Zool 242, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelle, K., Podgórski, T., Prévot, C., Keuling, O., Lehaire, F., Lejeune, P., 2015. Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach. Mamm. Rev 45, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, E., Benatti, L., Lovari, S., Ferretti, F., 2017. What does the wild boar mean to the wolf? Eur. J. Wildl. Res, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1060-7 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi, H., Saito, M., Horie, R., Tsunoda, H., Noba, H., Ishii, H., Kuwabara, T., Hiroshige, Y., Koike, S., Hoshino, Y., Toda, H., Kaji, K., 2013. Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance. Eur. J. Wildl. Res 59, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollivier, F.J., Samuelson, D.A., Brooks, D.E., Lewis, P.A., Kallberg, M.E., Komaromy, A.M., 2004. Comparative morphology of the tapetum lucidum (among selected species). Vet. Ophthalmol 7, 11–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, B.E., Wallander, R.T., 2002. Influence ofwinterweatherand shelteron activity patterns of beef cows. Can.J. Anim. Sci 82, 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, N., 1998. How high ambient temperature affects the daily activity and foraging time of a subtropical ungulate, the greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). J. Zool 246, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagon, N., Grignolio, S., Pipia, A., Bongi, P., Bertolucci, C., Apollonio, M., 2013. Seasonal variation of activity patterns in roe deer in a temperate forested area. Chronobiol. Int 30, 772–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, K.L., 1988. Effects of heat, cold, and rainon coastal black-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool 66, 2475–2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M.J., Zucker, I., Schwartz, W.J., 2008. Tracking the seasons: the internal calendars of vertebrates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363, 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipia, A., Ciuti, S., Grignolio, S., Luchetti, S., Madau, R., Apollonio, M., 2008. Influence of sex, season, temperature and reproductive status on daily activity patterns in Sardinian mouflon (Ovis orientalis musimon). Behaviour 145, 1723–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittendrigh, C.S., 1993. Temporal organization: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher. Annu. Rev. Physiol 55, 16–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podgórski, T., Baś, G., Jędrzejewska, B., Sönnichsen, L., Snieżko, S., Jędrzejewski, W., Okarma, H., 2013. Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity ofwild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area.J. Mammal 94, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh, L.R., Golden, C.D., 2014. Does moonlight increase predation risk? Meta-analysis reveals divergent responses of nocturnal mammals to lunar cycles. J. Anim. Ecol 83, 504–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reebs, S.G., 2002. Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish 12, 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refinetti, P., 2016. Circadian Physiology, third edition. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S., Whittingham, M., Stephens, P., 2011. Model selectionand model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 65, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S.C., Dunbar, R.I.M., 1991. Climatic influences on the behavioral ecology of Chanler Mountain Reedbuck in Kenya. Afr. J. Ecol 29, 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, L., Massei, G., Genov, P.V., 1997. Daily home range and activity ofwild boar in a mediterranean area free from hunting. Ethol. Ecol. Evol 9, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, G., Kay, B., 1991. Movements of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) at sunny corner, New South Wales. Wildl. Res 18, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B., Helfrich-Forster, C., Yoshii, T., 2011. A new ImageJ plug-in ActogramJ forchronobiological analyses.J. Biol. Rhythms 26, 464–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V.K., 2003. Adaptive significance of circadian clocks. Chronobiol. Int 20, 901–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, D., 1968. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, ACM ’68, ACM, New York, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Dunbar, R.I.M., Li, D., Xiao, W., 2006. Influence of climate and daylength on the activity budgets of feral goats (Capra hircus) onthe isle of Rum, Scotland. Zool. Res 27, 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, K., Beest, F.M., van Wal, E.V., Brook, R.K., 2015. Diurnal and nocturnal activity patterns of invasive wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Can. Field-Nat 129, 76–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrien, J., Perret, M., Aujard, F., 2011. Behavioral thermoregulation in mammals: a review. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed 16, 1428–1444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theuerkauf, J., Jędrzejewski, W., Schmidt, K., Okarma, H., Ruczynski, I., Snieżko, S., Gula, R., 2003. Daily patterns and duration of wolf activity in the Białowieza forest, Poland. J. Mammal 84, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurfjell, H., Spong, G., Ericsson, G., 2014. Effects of weather, season, and daylight on female wild boar movement. Acta Theriol 59, 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Vinne, V., Riede, S.J., Gorter, J.A., Eijer, W.G., Sellix, M.T., Menaker, M., Daan, S., Pilorz, V., Hut, R.A., 2014. Cold and hunger induce diurnality in a nocturnal mammal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 111, 15256–15260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., Brenneman, R., 1977. Research and management of feral hogs on Hobcaw Barony. In: Wood, G. (Ed.), Research and Management of Wild Hog Populations. Belle Baruch Forest Science Institute of Clemson University, Georgetown, South Carolina, pp. 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S.N., 2013. A Simple Test for Random Effects in Regression Models. Biometrika, ast038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A.A., Smith, G.M., 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Stat. Biol. Health.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Grignolio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brivio, F., Grignolio, S., Brogi, R. et al. An analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting the activity of a nocturnal species: The wild boar. Mamm Biol 84, 73–81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.01.007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.01.007

Keywords

Navigation