Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rumination of different-sized particles in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces) on grass and browse diets, and implications for rumination in different ruminant feeding types

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The obligatory, periodic regurgitation of forestomach material and its subsequent re-mastication is the hallmark of the most diverse extant large herbivore group, the ruminants. Although the process of rumination is well understood in domestic species, differences between free-ranging wild ruminant species, for example of different body size or different feeding type, remain speculative to date. Here we investigate the proportion of plastic particles of varying size (1, 10 and 20mm) and density (1.03, 1.20 and 1.44 mg/ml) that are recovered intact or ruminated-upon after insertion into the reticulorumen (RR) of domestic cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus) on grass silage, and of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus; n=4) and moose (Alces alces; n=2) both fed browse and grass diets. In the three species, the proportion of particles leaving the RR intact depended on particle size, with density showing no effect in this study. The major proportion of 1 mm particles was excreted intact, whereas intact 10–20mm particles were only excreted sporadically, and not in all animals. Intact particles were mostly found in the initial samples after marker application, and mean retention times of intact particles were always shorter than those of ruminated particles. There were no differences between moose and muskoxen, but diet had a significant effect, with a higher proportion of 1 mm particles ruminated upon on the grass diet in both species, indicating a higher ‘filter-bed effect’ with entrapment of small particles in a fibre mat in the RR on a grass diet. Given that less particles were ruminated on the grass diet, one could either assume that free-ranging browsers ruminate less than grazers on similar food intakes (or that they have higher food intakes at similar levels of rumination). The existing data on time-budgets of free-ranging ruminants, however, does not suffice to test these hypotheses. The fact that indication of a ‘filter-bed effect’ was also detectable in moose raises the question whether adaptations described in ‘cattle-type’ ruminants really serve to re-inforce the processes of RR contents stratification and the ‘filter-bed’, or whether they are not rather directed at other aims, such as maximizing microbial yield from the RR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamczewski, J.Z., Chapin, R.E., Schaefer, J.A., Flood, P.F., 1993. Intake, digestibility and passage rate of a supplemented hay diet in captive muskoxen. Rangifer 13, 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamczewski, J.Z., Chaplin, R.K., Schaefer, J.A., Flood, P.F., 1994a. Seasonal variation in intake and digestion of a high-roughage diet by muskoxen. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamczewski, J.Z., Kerr, W.M., Lammerding, E.F., Flood, P.F., 1994b. Digestion of low-protein grass hay by muskoxen and cattle. J. Wildl. Manage. 58, 679–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, D.H., Welch, J.G., Gilman, B.E., 1983. Mastication and rumination in relation to body size of cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 2137–2141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, D.H., Welch, J.G., Smith, A.M., 1981. Efficiency of mastication in relation to hay intake by cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 52, 1371–1375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D.L., Hobbs, N.T., 1987. Strategies of digestion: digestive efficiency and retention times of forage diets in montane ungulates. Can. J. Zool. 65, 1978–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balch, C.C., 1958. Observations on the act of eating in cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 12, 330–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, P.S., Peltier, T.C., Forster, R.J., 2006. Ruminal fermentation and fill change with season in an Arctic grazer: responses to hyperphagia and hypophagia in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79, 497–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S., Brown, G.D., Calaby, J.H., 1963. Food regurgitation in the macropodidae. Aust. J. Sci. 25, 430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumont, R., Deswysen, A.G., 1991. Mélange et propulsion du contenu du réticulo-rumen. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 31, 335–359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G., Slade, J.B., 1986. Time budgets of grassland herbivores: body size similarities. Oecologia 70, 53–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, P., 2005. On lactation and rumination in bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis). J. Zool. 265, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C.S., Collins, W.B., Urness, P.J., 1996. Relationship of dietary browse to intake in captive muskoxen. J. Range Manage. 49, 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, D.P., Leek, B.F., 1997. Investigation of a “fibre appetite” in sheep fed a “long fibre-free” diet. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 52, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M., Streich, W.J., 2002. Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach tothe browser/grazer dichotomy from the other end. Oecologia 131, 343–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M., Streich, W.J., 2003. Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physicomechanical characteristics of forage. A reevaluation of an old debate and a new hypothesis. Oikos 102, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., et al., 2006. The macroscopic anatomy of the omasum of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and a comparison of the omasal laminal surface area in 34 ruminant species. J. Zool. 270, 346–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Dierenfeld, E.S., 2008. The nutrition of browsers. In: Fowler, M.E., Miller, R.E. (Eds.), Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine. Current Therapy 6. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, pp. 444–454.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., et al., 2009a. Physical characteristics of rumen contents in two small ruminants of different feeding type, the mouflon (Ovis ammon musimon) and the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Zoology 112, 195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., et al., 2009b. Physical characteristics of rumen contents in four large ruminants of different feeding type, the addax (Addax nasomaculatus), bison (Bison bison), red deer (Cervus elaphus) and moose (Alces alces). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 152, 398–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Hofmann, R.R., Fickel, J., Streich, W.J., Hummel, J., 2009c. The intraruminal papillation gradient in wild ruminants of different feeding types: implications for rumen physiology. J. Morphol. 270, 929–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Nunn, C., Fritz, J., Hummel, J., 2009d. Evidence for a tradeoff between retention time and chewing efficiency in large mammalian herbivores. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 154, 376–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Adamczewski, J., Hofmann, R.R., 2010a. Surface enlargement in the rumen of free-ranging muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Hofmann, R.R., Streich, W.J., Fickel, J., Hummel, J., 2010b. Convergence in the macroscopic anatomy of the reticulum in wild ruminant species of different feeding types and a new resulting hypothesis on reticular function. J. Zool. 281, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Hume, I.D., Hummel, J., 2010c. Evolutionary adaptationsofruminants and their potential relevance for modern production systems. Animal 4, 979–992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., et al., 2011. The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in the reticulorumen of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces). Br. J. Nutr. 105, 634–644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codron, D., Clauss, M., 2010. Rumen physiology constrains diet niche: linking digestive physiology and food selection across wild ruminant species. Can. J. Zool. 88, 1129–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codron, D., Lee-Thorp, J.A., Sponheimer, M., Codron, J., de Ruiter, D., Brink, J.S., 2007. Significance of diet type and diet quality for ecological diversity of African ungulates. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 526–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S.W., Hart, S.P., Sahlu, T., 2003. Relationships among forage chemistry, rumination and retention time with intake and digestibility of hay by goats. Small Rumin. Res. 50, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W.B., Smith, T.S., 1989. Twenty-four hour behaviour patterns and budgets of free-ranging reindeer in winter. Rangifer 9, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W.B., Urness, P.J., Austin, D.D., 1978. Elk diets and activities on different lodgepole pine habitat segments. J. Wildl. Manage. 42, 799–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, J.H.M., 1978. Observations on territorial behaviour of sprinbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) in the Bontebok National Park, Swellendam. Zool. Afr. 13, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • desBordes, C.K., Welch, J.G., 1984. Influence of specific gravity on rumination and passage of indigestible particles. J. Anim. Sci. 59, 470–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit, J.T., Yetman, C.A., 2005. Effects of body size on diurnal activity budgets of African browsing ruminants. Oecologia 143, 317–325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faichney, G.J., 2006. Digesta flow. In: Dijkstra, J., Forbes, J.M., France, J. (Eds.), Quantitative Aspectsof Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. CAB International, Wellingford, UK, pp. 49–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhar-i-Abbas, Akhtar, T., Mian, A., 2011. Time budgets and ethological observations of wild and enclosed grey goral. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 7, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J., Hummel, J., Kienzle, E., Arnold, C., Nunn, C., Clauss, M., 2009. Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos 118, 1623–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginnett, T.F., Demment, M.W., 1997. Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales. Oecologia 110, 291–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J.G., 1968. Rumination and its significance. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 9, 251–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J.G., McAllister, I.K., 1970. The circadian rhythm of rumination. J. Agric. Sci. 74, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., 1997. Interactions among forages and nonforage fiber sources. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 1438–1446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimsdell, J.J.R., Field, C.R., 1976. Grazing patterns of buffaloes in the Rwenzori National Park, Uganda. East Afr. Wildl. J. 14, 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J.E., Demment, M.W., Alkon, P.U., Kotzman, M., 1995. Feeding and chewing behaviors of Nubian ibex: compensation for sex-related differences in body size. Funct. Ecol. 9, 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, S., Côté, S.D., 2008. Trade-offs in activity budget in an alpine ungulate: contrasting lactating and nonlactating females. Anim. Behav. 75, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, T.A., 1982. Cervid activity patterns in relation to foraging constraints: western Washington. Northwest Sci. 56, 208–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebel, C., et al., 2011. Solute and particle retention in the digestive tract of the Phillip’s dikdik (Madoqua saltiana phillipsi), a very small browsing ruminant: biological and methodological implications. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 159, 284–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrichs, H., 1965. Vergleichende Untersuchung des Wiederkauverhaltens. Biol. Zentralbl. 84, 681–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrichs, H., Hendrichs, U., 1971. Dikdik und Elefanten. Ökologie und Soziologie zweier afrikanischer Huftiere. Piper, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J.J.N., 2010. Explaining patterns in modern ruminant diversity: contingency or constraint? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R.R., 1973. TheRuminant Stomach. East African Literature Bureau, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R.R., 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R.R., 2000. Functional and comparative digestive system anatomy of Arctic ungulates. Rangifer 20, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse, A.J., Semiadi, G., Stafford, K.J., Barry, T.N., Muir, P.D., 1995. Digestion and chewing behavior of young sambar and red deer consuming a low-quality roughage. J. Agric. Sci. 125, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J., et al., 2008. Differences in fecal particle size between free-ranging and captive individuals of two browser species. Zoo Biol. 27, 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J., et al., 2009. Physical characteristics of reticuloruminal contents of cattle in relation to forage type and time after feeding. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 93, 209–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J., Südekum, K.-H., Streich, W.J., Clauss, M., 2006. Forage fermentation patterns and their implications for herbivore ingesta retention times. Funct. Ecol. 20, 989–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, M.V., Jarman, P.J., 1973. Daily activity of impala. East Afr. Wildl. J. 11, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaster, E.H., Murphy, M.R., 1983. Effects of varying particle size of forage on digestion and chewing behavior of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 802–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaske, M., Hatiboglu, S., von Engelhardt, W., 1992. The influence of density and size of particles on rumination and passage from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 67, 235–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaske, M., von Engelhardt, W., 1990. The effect of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 63, 457–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K.E., Sinclair, B.R., 1989. Size and structure of leaf and stalk components of digesta regurgitated for rumination in sheep offered five forage diets. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 32, 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D.R., Bay, C., 1990. Foraging dynamics of muskoxen in Peary Land, northern Greenland. Holarctic Ecol. 13, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, K.K., Barboza, P.S., Bowyer, R.T., 2005. Growth in Arctic ungulates: postnatal development and organ maturation in Rangifer tarandus and Ovibos moschatus. J. Mammal. 86, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, K.K., Barboza, P.S., Bowyer, R.T., Blake, J.E., 2004. Nutritional development of feeding strategies in arctic ruminants: digestive morphometry of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Zoology 107, 315–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larter, N.C., Nagy, J.A., 1997. Peary caribou, muskoxen and Banks island forage: assessing seasonal diet similarities. Rangifer 17, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, I., et al., 2010. Differential passage of fluids and different-sized particles in fistulated oxen (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces): rumen particle size discrimination is independent from contents stratification. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 155, 211–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold, B.M., Leuthold, W., 1978. Daytime activity patterns of gerenuk and giraffe in Tsavo National Park, Kenya. East Afr. Wildl. J. 16, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, T., Redbo, I., 2000. Effect of feeding duration and rumen fill on behaviour in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70, 83–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M., 2001. Evidence for the occurrence of rumination-like behaviour, or merycism, in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J. Zool. (Lond.) 255, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M., 2003. Effect of tooth wear on the rumination-like behavior, or merycism, of free-ranging koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J. Mammal. 84, 897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M., Sanson, G.D., 2003. The effects of lactation on the feeding behaviour and activity patterns of free-ranging female koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Aust. J. Zool. 51, 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.D., 1994. A descriptive account of capybara behavior. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 29, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl, J.-M., Pond, K.R., Burns, J.C., Fisher, D.S., 2000. Intake and chewing behavior of steers consuming switchgrass preserved as hay or silage. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 1983–1989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, S.D., Sormo, W., Haga, O.E., Norberg, H.J., Utsi, T.H.A., Tyler, N.J.C., 2000. The oral anatomy of Arctic ruminants: coping with seasonal changes. J. Zool. (Lond.) 251, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, I., et al., 2011. Regurgitation and remastication in the foregut-fermenting proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). Biol. Lett. 7, 786–789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M.N., Kennedy, P.M., Minson, D.J., 1990. Resistance of leaf and stem fractions of tropical forage to chewing and passage in cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 63, 105–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, C., Kennedy, P., 1992. Influence of dietary particle size on chewing activity and reticulo-ruminal motilityingoats and sheep fed wheaten hay. Small Rumin. Res. 9, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K., Hummel, J., Clauss, M., 2010. The relationship between forage cell wall content and voluntary food intake in mammalian herbivores. Mammal Rev. 40, 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, R.J., Somers, M., Waring, H., 1956. Studies on marsupial nutrition. I. Ruminantlike digestion in a herbivorous marsupial. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 293–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mollison, B.C., 1960. Food regurgitation in Bennett’s wallaby and the scrub wallaby. CSIRO Wildl. Res. 5, 87–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D.W.H., Bingaman Lackey, L., Streich, W.J., Fickel, J., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2011a. Mating system, feeding type and ex situ conservation effort determine life expectancy in captive ruminants. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2076–2080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D.W.H., et al., 2011b. Phylogenetic constraints on digesta separation: variation in fluid throughput in the digestive tract in mammalian herbivores. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 160, 207–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M.R., Baldwin, R.L., Ulyatt, M.J., Koong, L.J., 1983. A quantitative analysis of rumination patterns. J. Anim. Sci. 56, 1236–1240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, K., Hofmann, R.R., 1990. Seasonal variations of food particle size in moose. Alces 26, 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, K., Lechner-Doll, M., Hofmann, R.R., 2001. Influence of papillae on postruminal regulation of ingesta passage in moose (Alces alces). J. Zool. Lond. 254, 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, E.J., Harmsen, R., Eberl, C., 1992. Sex, age and seasonal differences in the diets and activity budgets of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Can. J. Zool. 70, 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellew, R.A., 1984. The feeding ecology of a selective browser, the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi). J. Zool. 202, 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltier, T.C., Barboza, P.S., Blake, J.E., 2003. Seasonal hyperphagia does not reduce digestive efficiency in an Arctic grazer. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 76, 471–483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poppi, D.P., Norton, B.W., Minson, D.J., Hendricksen, R.E., 1980. The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 94, 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renecker, L.A., Hudson, R.J., 1989. Seasonal activity budgets of moose in aspendominated boreal forests. J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renecker, L.A., Hudson, R.J., 1990. Digestive kinetics of moose, wapiti and cattle. Anim. Prod. 50, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Wolf, C., Clauss, M., 2009a. No distinct difference in the excretion of large particles of varying size in a wild ruminant, the banteng (Bos javanicus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 55, 531–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Wolf, C., Streich, W.J., Clauss, M., 2009b. More efficient mastication allows increasing intake without compromising digestibility or necessitating a larger gut: comparative feeding trials in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 152, 504–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C.C., 1992. Physiological and nutritional adaptations of moose to Northern environments. Alces Suppl. 1, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semiadi, G., Barry, T.N., Stafford, K.J., Muir, P.D., Reid, C.S.W., 1994. Comparison of digestive and chewing efficiency and time spent eating and rumination in sambar deer (Cervus unicolor) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). J. Agric. Sci. 123, 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, R.D., Nytes, A.J., Satter, L.D., Jorgensen, N.A., 1988. Influence of feed intake, forage physical form, and forage fiber content on particle size of masticated forage, ruminal digesta, and feces of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 1566–1572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spinage, C.A., 1968. A quantitative study of the daily activity of the Uganda Defassa waterbuck. East Afr. Wildl. J. 6, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staaland, H., Adamczewski, J.Z., Gunn, A., 1997. A comparison of digestive tract morphology in muskoxen and caribou from Victoria Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Rangifer 17, 17–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staaland, H., Olesen, C.R., 1992. Muskox and caribou adaptation to grazing on the Angujaartorfiup Nunaa range in West Greenland. Rangifer 12, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staaland, H., Thing, H., 1991. Distribution of nutrients and minerals in the alimentary tract of muskoxen (Ovibos maschatus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 98, 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft Inc, 2007. STATISTICA Version 8.0 (Data Analysis Software System). Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, https://doi.org/www.statsoft.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetter Neel, J.P., Prigge, E.C., Townsend, E.C., 1995. Influence of moisture content of forage on ruminal functional specific gravity and passage of digesta. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 3094–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, T.M., 1988. Particle separation in the forestomach of sheep. In: Dobson, A., Dobson, M.J. (Eds.), Aspects of Digestive Physiology in Ruminants. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W.A., Skinner, J.D., Krecek, R.C., 2006. The activity budgets and activity patterns of sympatric grey rhebok and mountain reedbuck in a highveld grassland area of South Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 44, 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschuor, A., Clauss, M., 2008. Investigations on the stratification of forestomach contents in ruminants: an ultrasonographic approach. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 54, 627–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymyslická, P., Hejcmanová, P., Antonínová, M., Stejskalová, M., Svitálek, J., 2010. Daily activity pattern of the endangered Swayne’s hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei) in the Nechisar National Park, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Ecol. 49, 246–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J.G., 1982. Rumination particle size and passage from the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 54, 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J.G., Smith, A.M., 1969a. Effect of varying amounts of forage intake on rumination. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 827–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J.G., Smith, A.M., 1969b. Influence of forage quality on rumination time in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 813–818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J.G., Smith, A.M., 1970. Forage quality and rumination time in cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 53, 797–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenninger, P.S., Shipley, L.A., 2000. Harvesting, rumination, digestion, and passage of fruit and leaf diets by a small ruminant, the blue duiker. Oecologia 123, 466–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winterbach, H.E.K., Bothma, J.d.P., 1998. Activity patterns of the Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer) at the Willem Pretorius Game Reserve, Free State. South Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 28, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, S.T., Murphy, M.R., 1988. Effect offorage physical formon chewing activity dry matter intake and rumination of dairy cows in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 674–686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland

    Murielle Lauper, Isabel Lechner, Daryl Codron & Marcus Clauss

  2. Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA

    Perry S. Barboza

  3. Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA

    Perry S. Barboza

  4. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1800 Glenn Highway, Suite 4, Palmer, AK, USA

    William B. Collins

  5. Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany

    Jürgen Hummel

  6. Florisbad Quaternary Research, National Museum, 9300, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Daryl Codron

Authors
  1. Murielle Lauper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabel Lechner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Perry S. Barboza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William B. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jürgen Hummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daryl Codron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marcus Clauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Clauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauper, M., Lechner, I., Barboza, P.S. et al. Rumination of different-sized particles in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces) on grass and browse diets, and implications for rumination in different ruminant feeding types. Mamm Biol 78, 142–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.06.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.06.001

Keywords

Search

Navigation