Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

S2 Alar Iliac Fixation in Long Segment Constructs, a Two- to Five-Year Follow-up

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective review of patients having undergone S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation for long fusions with a minimum two-year follow-up.

Objectives

To report on fusion rates, complications, technique-specific complications of patients having undergone S2AI fixation.

Summary of background data

Sacropelvic fixation continues to be a challenge when performing long fusions to the pelvis. S2AI screws have been found to provide solid biomechanical fixation and have been found to have good clinical results in short-term follow-up for pediatric and adult patients.

Methods

Cases were retrospectively reviewed in patients who had placement of S2AI screws for long fusions with at least a two-year follow-up. Demographic data, complications, and reoperations were reviewed. Complications were broken into minor and major categories similar to previous series on pelvic fixation.

Results

There were 86 cases identified. Minor and major complications occurred in 29% and 24% of patients, respectively, with the majority of minor complications being intraoperative dural tears. Revision surgery for all causes was performed in 23% of the cohort. Fusion rate at L5—S1 for patients without preoperative pseudarthrosis was 95.3%. Preoperative L5—S1 pseudoarthrosis was identified in 20 patients, 17 (95%) of these went onto fusion after one surgery. There was evidence of S2AI screw lucency in 10.4% of cases. However, the majority of these were asymptomatic.

Conclusions

Sacropelvic fixation using the S2AI technique provides safe, durable fixation with low rates of technique-specific complications and limited need for hardware removal. Complication rates in this series were similar to other series on long fusions to the pelvis. Additionally, fusion rates were high at L5—S1 for both patients with and without preoperative L5—S1 pseudarthrosis. It appears that the S2AI technique is a powerful option for patients with previous L5–S1 pseudarthrosis.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devlin VJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford DS, et al. Treatment of adult spinal deformity with fusion to the sacrum using CD instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 1991;4:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuklo TR, Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, et al. Minimum 2-year analysis of sacropelvic fixation and L5-S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws. Spine 2001;26:1976–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 2006;31:2329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridwell KH, Kuklo T, Edwards 2nd CC, et al. Sacropelvic fixation. Memphis, TN: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: Luque-Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:776–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, et al. Minimum 5-year analysis of L5–S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine 2006;31:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang TL, Sponseller PD, Kebaish K, et al. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation. Spine 2009;34:436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien JR, Warren DY, Bhatnagar R, et al. An anatomic study of the S2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement. Spine 2009;34:E439–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien JR, Matteini L, Warren DY, et al. Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation. Spine 2010;35:460–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sponseller PD, Zimmerman RM, Ko PS, et al. Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2010;35:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wind JJ, Burke LM, Kurtom KH, et al. Minimally invasive lumbopelvic instrumentation for traumatic sacrolisthesis in an elderly patient. Eur Spine J 2012;21(Suppl 4):S549–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, Balseiro S, et al. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation. Spine J 2010;10:595–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strike S, Hassanzadeh H, Naef F, et al. Sacro-pelvic fixation using the S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screws in adult deformity surgery: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up. Presented as a poster exhibit at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society 2013. p. 18–21.

  14. Kebaish KM. Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications. Spine 2010;35:2245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards CC, Bridwell KH, Patel A, et al. Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine 2004;29:1996–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill KR, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Extension of spine fusion to the sacrum following long fusions for deformity correction. Spine 2014;39:953–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papadopoulos EC, Cammisa Jr FP, Girardi FP. Sacral fractures complicating thoracolumbar fusion to the sacrum. Spine 2008;33:E699–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and complications in primary versus revision adult scoliosis surgery. Spine 2012;37:393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapp MA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Long-term complications in spinal deformity patients having combined surgery: a comparison of primary to revision patients. Spine 2001;26:973–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linville DA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications in the adult spinal deformity patient having combined surgery. Does revision increase the risk? Spine 1999;24:355–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilyas H, Place H, Puryear A. A comparison of early clinical and radiographic complications of iliac screw fixation versus S2 alar iliac (S2AI) fixation in the adult and pediatric populations. Clin Spine Surg 2015;28:E199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashmun RD, et al. Immediate complications of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to the sacro-pelvis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:932–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Shaughnessy BA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum? Spine 2012;37:1175–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, et al. Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, et al. Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to L4, L5, and the sacrum. Spine 2001;26:E182–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan J. Smith MD.

Additional information

IRB Approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the George Washington University research ethics board.

Author disclosures

EJS (none); JK (none); RD (none); WY (none); JO’B (personal fees from Globus, NuVasive, Stryker, and Relivent; nonfinancial support from Globus; stocks and private investments in Spinicity, K2 Medical, and ISD, all unrelated to this work).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, E.J., Kyhos, J., Dolitsky, R. et al. S2 Alar Iliac Fixation in Long Segment Constructs, a Two- to Five-Year Follow-up. Spine Deform 6, 72–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.05.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.05.004

Keywords

Navigation