Abstract
Study Design
Retrospective cross-sectional assessment of radiographs of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Objective
To assess accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the central sacral vertical line (CVSL) on scoliosis radiographs and its influence on determining clinically relevant parameters: stable vertebra (SV) and lumbar modifier (LM).
Background Summary
The central sacral vertical line is frequently used on scoliosis radiographs for surgical planning. However, no studies have assessed how accurately and reliably a physician draws CSVL in routine clinical practice.
Methods
We provided 30 digital posteroanterior X-rays of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to 5 raters (3 fellowship-trained spine surgeons and 2 fellows) at 2 different times (3-week interval) to determine SVand LM. An independent observer then assessed the accuracy of CSVL drawn by the raters. The CSVL was considered accurate when it was drawn vertical from the middle of the S1 vertebra. To avoid conscious bias, we kept raters blinded as to the actual purpose of the study. To avoid technical bias, the study was conducted with research Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) software and raters used desktop computers similar to those in clinics or operating rooms.
Results
Based on absolute values, the CSVL was drawn on average 2.3 (±1.9) mm away from the center. Based on raw values, the lines were drawn on average 1.0 (±2.8) mm left of the center. We observed fair inter-rater reliability among the 5 raters, with an intra-class correlation of 0.23 (95% confidence interval,–0.33–0.59). Intra-rater reproducibility was moderate across 2 assessments, with an ICC of 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.62). Variation in drawing CSVL from center was not significantly associated with the selection of SV (r=–0.02; p=5.78) or LM (r=–0.02; p=.78).
Conclusion
Although, physicians draw CSVL significantly away from the center of the S1 vertebra (mean, 2.3 mm), its influence on determining SV or LM is not affected in routine practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, et al. Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:484–91.
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169–81.
Newton PO, Faro FD, Lenke LG, et al. Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:S217–23.
Takahashi J, Newton PO, Ugrinow VL, et al. Selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: factors influencing the selection of the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra. Spine 2011;36:1131–41.
Richards BS. Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve. Spine 1992;17(suppl):S282–6.
Benli IT, Tuzuner M, Akalin S, et al. Spinal imbalance and decompensation problems in patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Eur Spine J 1996;5:380–6.
King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302–13.
Duong L, Cheriet F, Labelle H, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Techn 2009;22:448–55.
Potter BK, Rosner MK, Lehman Jr RA, et al. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1658–63.
Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2008;61:29–48.
Warrens MJ. Inequalities between multi-rater kappas. Adv Data Anal Classif 2010;4:271–86.
Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, et al. Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screwsdwhich provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2005;30:2104–12.
Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, et al. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Spine 2003;28:1148–56; discussion 1156–7.
Ogon M, Giesinger K, Behensky H, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke’s new scoliosis classification system. Spine 2002;27:858–62.
Sangole A, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. The central hip vertical axis: a reference axis for the Scoliosis Research Society three-dimensional classification of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2010;35:E530–4.
Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J 2010;10:769–74.
Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O’Brien MF, et al. Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Techn 2005;18:152–9.
Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, et al. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:1240–6.
Scoliosis Research Society. Professionals, Glossary, 2012. Available at: http://www.srs.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author disclosures: DT (none); SSA (royalties from Lippincott Williams andWilkins); EE (employment by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center; RM (none); PFS (consulting for DePuy Spine).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thawrani, D., Agabegi, S.S., Eismann, E. et al. Accuracy and Reliability of Drawing Central Sacral Vertical Line on Scoliosis Radiographs in Clinical Practice. Spine Deform 1, 16–20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.003
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.003