Skip to main content
Log in

Spinal imbalance and decompensation problems in patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The basic principles of current idiopathic scoliosis treatment are three-dimensional correction and rigid fixation. Although it is accepted that Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (CDI) meets these goals, there is concern about the potential risk of trunk imbalance and spinal decompensation during the derotation manoeuvre. The results of 45 patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with CDI between December 1988 and August 1992 were retrospectively analysed. Mean age was 14.3 years and mean follow-up period was 48.6 months. An average correction of 49.6% was achieved in the major curves. The best results were obtained in King type III curves, with a 69.4% correction. Spinal imbalance was evaluated by measuring lateral trunk shift (LT), shift of head (SH) and shift of stable vertebra (SS). Decompensation was measured by the increase in secondary curves. When all curve types were included, the average preoperative LT value of 1.96 vertebral units (VU) was brought down to 0.91 VU postoperatively, achieving a 55.9% correction. Fourteen patients had an SH value of zero preoperatively and remained balanced after instrumentation. Of the 41 remaining patients, 21 achieved an SH value of zero postoperatively. When all cases were included, the average preoperative SH value was 1.0 VU, which was corrected to 0.42 VU with CDI (69% correction). An average correction of SS of 75.5% was obtained, with the mean preoperative value of 0.73 VU being corrected to 0.19 VU. At the last follow-up visit, a secondary curve had formed above the major curve in one patient, and three patients had a junctional kyphosis. Loss of correction in the frontal plane correlated with loss of correction of LT. The rigid and semiflexible lumbar curves had a tendency to progress when they were not instrumented, especially in type II curves. Junctional kyphosis could be prevented when concave laminar claws were used in the thoraco-lumbar region. It was concluded that spinal decompensation and imbalance could be minimized with careful preoperative planning, avoidance of overcorrection and use of long instrumentation in double major curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akbarnia BA, Scheid KD, Merenda JT, Graviss E (1987) The three dimensional correction of CD Instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. In: Proceedings of the fifth International Congress of CDI, Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 39–43

  2. Benli İT, Akalm S, Tüzüner M, et al (1993) Three plane analysis of idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation. Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) 1993, Seoul

  3. Bridwell KH, Betz R, Capelli AM, et al (1988) Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Cotrel-Cubousset Instrumentation, Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 65–71

  4. Bridwell KH (1992) Idiopathic scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, vol 1, 1st edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 97–162

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chopin D, Morin C (1992) Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for adolescent and pediatric scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, vol1, 1st edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 183–217

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1992) CD instrumentation in spine surgery. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray JM, Smith BW, Ashley RK, et al (1991) Derotational analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 16[Suppl]:303–391

    Google Scholar 

  8. King HA (1988) Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mason DE, Corango P (1991) Spinal decompensation in Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation. Spine 16:394–403

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moe JH, Byrd JA (1989) Idiopathic scoliosis. In: Bradford DS, et al (eds) Moe's textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 191–232

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagata H, Onomura T, Watanabe H, et al (1987) Study on derotational effect of CD Instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation, Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 75–86

  12. Richards BS, Birch JG, Herring JA, et al (1989) Frontal plane and sagittal plane balance following Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 14:733–737

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stagnara P (1988) Spinal deformity, English edn. Butterworth, Somerset, pp 1–86, 185–287, 299–325

    Google Scholar 

  14. Transfeldt EE, Bradford DS, Coscia M, et al (1989a) Changes in segmental coupling and vertebral rotation following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Trans 13:80

    Google Scholar 

  15. Transfeldt E, Thompson J, Bradford D (1989b) Three dimensional changes in the spine following Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation, Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 73–80

  16. Wood KB, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie SW, et al (1991) Rotational changes of the vertebral-pelvis axis following Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation. Spine 16 [Suppl]:404–408

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benli, İ.T., Tüzüner, M., Akalin, S. et al. Spinal imbalance and decompensation problems in patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Eur Spine J 5, 380–386 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301965

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301965

Key words

Navigation