Abstract
The determination of solution-phase protein concentration ratios based on ESI-MS intensity ratios is not always straightforward. For example, equimolar mixtures of hemoglobin α- and β-subunits consistently result in much higher peak intensities for the α-chain. The current work explores the origin of this effect. Under mildly acidic conditions (pH 3.4) α-globin is extensively unfolded, whereas β-globin retains residual structure. Because of its greater nonpolar character, the more unfolded α-subunit can more effectively compete for charge. This leads to suppression of β-globin signals under conditions where the protein ion yield is limited by the charge concentration on the initially formed ESI droplets. More balanced intensities are observed when operating under charge excess conditions and/or in a solvent environment where both proteins are unfolded to a similar degree (pH 2.2). However, even in these cases the overall α-globin peak intensity is still twice as high as that of the β-subunit. The persistent imbalance under these conditions originates from the different declustering behaviors of the two proteins. A considerable fraction of β-globin undergoes incomplete desolvation during ESI, thereby reducing the intensity of bare [β + zH]z+ ions. When including the contributions of incompletely desolvated species, the overall α:β ion intensity ratio is close to unity. The α:β intensity imbalance can also be eliminated by a strongly elevated declustering potential in the ion sampling interface. In conclusion, important factors that have to be considered for the ESI-MS analysis of protein mixtures are (1) conformational effects, resulting in differential surface activities, and (2) dissimilarities in the protein desolvation behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fenn, J. B. Electrospray Wings for Molecular Elephants (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3871–3894.
Loo, J. A. Noncovalent protein—ligand complexes. In: The Encyclopedia of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005; vol. 2, pp 289–299.
Heck, A. J. R.; Van den Heuvel, R. H. H. Investigation of Intact Protein Complexes by Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2004, 23, 368–389.
Wales, T. E.; Engen, J. R. Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Protein Dynamics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2006, 25, 158–170.
Kaltashov, I. A.; Engen, J. R.; Gross, M. L. Hydrogen Exchange and Covalent Modification: Focus on Biomolecular Structure, Dynamics, and Function. 18th Sanibel Conference on Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, i-ii.
Konermann, L.; Simmons, D. A. Protein Folding Kinetics and Mechanisms Studied by Pulse-Labeling and Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2003, 22, 1–26.
Chik, J. K.; Schriemer, D. C. Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry of Actin in Various Biochemical Contexts. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 334, 373–385.
Chowdhury, S. K.; Katta, V.; Chait, B. T. Probing Conformational Changes in Proteins by Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9012–9013.
Invernizzi, G.; Samalikova, M.; Brocca, S.; Lotti, M.; Molinari, H.; Grandori, R. Comparison of Bovine and Porcine β-Lactoglobulin: A Mass Spectrometric Analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 41, 717–727.
Eyles, S. J.; Kaltashov, I. A. Methods to Study Protein Dynamics and Folding by Mass Spectrometry. Methods 2004, 34, 88–99.
Boys, B. L.; Konermann, L. Folding and Assembly of Hemoglobin Monitored by Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Using an On-line Dialysis System. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 8–16.
de la Mora, F. J. Electrospray Ionization of Large Multiply Charged Species Proceeds via Dole’s Charged Residue Mechanism. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 93–104.
Kaltashov, I. A.; Mohimen, A. Estimates of Protein Surface Area in Solution by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5370–5379.
Dobo, A.; Kaltashov, I. A. Detection of Multiple Protein Conformational Ensembles in Solution via Deconvolution of Charge-State Distributions in ESI MS. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4763–4773.
Cech, N. B.; Enke, C. G. Practical Implication of Some Recent Studies in Electrospray Ionization Fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2001, 20, 362–387.
Iavarone, A. T.; Udekwu, O. A.; Williams, E. R. Buffer Loading for Counteracting Metal Salt-induced Signal Suppression in Electrospray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 3944–3950.
Gustavsson, S. A.; Samskog, J.; Karkides, K. E.; Langstrom, B. Studies of Signal Suppression in Liquid Chromatography—Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using Volatile Ion-pairing Reagents. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 937, 41–47.
Xu, N.; Lin, Y.; Hofstadler, S. A.; Matson, D.; Call, C. J.; Smith, R. D. A Microfabricated Dialysis Device for Sample Cleanup in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3553–3556.
Pan, P.; McLuckey, S. A. Electrospray Ionization of Protein Mixtures at Low pH. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1491–1499.
Wang, G.; Cole, R. Mechanistic Interpretation of the Dependence of Charge State Distributions on Analyte Concentrations in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 2892–2900.
Kuprowski, M. C.; Konermann, L. Signal Response of Co-existing Protein Conformers in Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 2499–2596.
Schmidt, A.; Karas, M.; Dülcks, T. Effect of Different Solution Flow Rates on Analyte Signals in Nano-ESI MS, or: When Does ESI Turn into Nano-ESI. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 492–500.
Smith, R. D.; Shen, Y.; Tang, K. Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Analyses from Combined Separations—Mass Spectrometry for the Characterization of Proteomes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 269–278.
Tang, K.; Page, J. S.; Smith, R. D. Charge Competition and the Linear Dynamic Range of Detection in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 1416–1423.
El-Faramawy, A.; Siu, M. K. W.; Thomson, B. A. Efficiency of Nano-Electrospray Ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1702–1707.
Kebarle, P.; Peschke, M. On the Mechanisms by Which the Charged Droplets Produced by Electrospray Lead to Gas Phase Ions. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 11–35.
Duft, D.; Achtzehn, T.; Muller, R.; Huber, B. A.; Leisner, T. Coulomb Fission: Rayleigh Jets from Levitated Microdroplets. Nature 2003, 421, 128.
Gomez, A.; Tang, K. Charge and Fission of Droplets in Electrostatic Sprays. Phys. Fluids 1994, 6, 404–414.
Tang, K.; Smith, R. D. Physical/Chemical Separations in the Break-up of Highly Charged Droplets from Electrosprays. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 343–347.
Null, A. P.; Nepomuceno, A. I.; Muddiman, D. C. Implications of Hydrophobicity and Free Energy of Solvation for Characterization of Nucleic Acids by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1331–1339.
Cech, N. B.; Enke, C. G. Relating Electrospray Ionization Response to Nonpolar Character of Small Peptides. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 2717–2723.
Enke, C. G. A Predictive Model for Matrix and Analyte Effects in Electrospray Ionization of Singly-Charged Ionic Analytes. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4885–4893.
Fenn, J. B. Ion Formation from Charged Droplets: Roles of Geometry, Energy, and Time. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 4, 524–535.
Eaton, W. A.; Henry, E. R.; Hofrichter, J.; Mozzarelli, A. Is Cooperative Oxygen Binding by Hemoglobin Really Understood. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 351–358.
Griffith, W. P.; Kaltashov, I. A. Mass Spectrometry in the Study of Hemoglobin: From Covalent Structure to Higher Order Assembly. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 535–553.
Griffith, W. P.; Kaltashov, I. A. Highly Asymmetric Interactions between Globin Chains during Hemoglobin Assembly Revealed by electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 10024–10033.
Simmons, D. A.; Wilson, D. J.; Lajoie, G. A.; Doherty-Kirby, A.; Konermann, L. Subunit Disassembly and Unfolding Kinetics of Hemoglobin Studied by Time-resolved Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 14792–14801.
Hossain, B. M.; Konermann, L. Pulsed Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange MS/MS for Studying the Relationship between Noncovalent Protein Complexes in Solution and in the Gas Phase after Electrospray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 1613–1619.
Rai, D. K.; Landin, B.; Alvelius, G.; Griffiths, W. J. Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Intact β-Chain Hemoglobin Variants. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 2097–2102.
Griffith, W. P.; Kaltashov, I. A. Protein Conformational Heterogeneity as a Binding Catalyst: ESI-MS Study of Hemoglobin H Formation. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 2020–2026.
Schmidt, A.; Karas, M. The Influence of Electrostatic Interactions on the Detection of Heme-Globin Complexes in ESI-MS. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 1092–1098.
Versluis, C.; Heck, A. J. R. Gas-phase Dissociation of Hemoglobin. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 210/211, 637–649.
Mekecha, T. T.; Amunugama, R.; McLuckey, S. A. Ion Trap Collision-induced Dissociation of Human Hemoglobin α-Chain Cations. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 923–931.
Antonini, E.; Brunori, M. Hemoglobin and Myoglobin in Their Reactions With Ligands; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, 1971; p 21.
Glasoe, P. K.; Long, F. A. Use of Glass Electrodes to Measure Acidities in Deuterium Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 64, 188–190.
Hossain, B. M.; Simmons, D. A.; Konermann, L. Do Electrospray Mass Spectra Reflect the Ligand Binding State of Proteins in Solution? Can. J. Chem. 2005, 83, 1953–1960.
Kyte, J.; Doolittle, R. A Simple Method for Displaying the Hydropathic Character of a Protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 157, 105–132.
Englander, S. W. Hydrogen Exchange and Mass Spectrometry: A Historical Perspective. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 1481–1489.
Krishna, M. M. G.; Hoang, L.; Lin, Y.; Englander, S. W. Hydrogen Exchange Methods to Study Protein Folding. Methods 2004, 34, 51–64.
Bai, Y.; Milne, J. S.; Mayne, L.; Englander, S. W. Primary Structure Effects on Peptide Group Hydrogen Exchange. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1993, 17, 75–86.
Katta, V.; Chait, B. T. Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: A Method for Probing Protein Conformational Changes in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6317–6321.
Creighton, T. E. Proteins; W. H. Freeman & Co: New York, 1993.
Thomson, B. A. Declustering and Fragmentation of Protein Ions from an Electrospray Ion Source. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 8, 1053–1058.
McKay, A. R.; Ruotolo, B. T.; Ilag, L. L.; Robinson, C. V. Mass Measurements of Increased Accuracy Resolve Heterogeneous Populations of Intact Ribosomes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11433–11442.
Frahm, J. L.; Muddiman, D. C.; Burke, M. J. Leveling Response Factors in the Electrospray Ionization Process Using a Heated Capillary Interface. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 772–778.
Wyttenbach, T.; Liu, D.; Bowers, M. T. Hydration of Small Peptides. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 240, 221–232.
Wang, W.; Kitova, E. N.; Klassen, J. S. Influence of Solution and Gas Phase Processes on Protein-Carbohydrate Binding Affinities Determined by Nanoelectrospray Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4945–4955.
Peschke, M.; Verkerk, U. H.; Kebarle, P. Features of the ESI Mechanism That Affect the Observation of Multiply Charged Noncovalent Protein Complexes and the Determination of the Association Constant by the Titration Method. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 1424–1434.
Tahallah, N.; Pinkse, M.; Maier, C. S.; Heck, A. J. R. The Effect of the Source Pressure on the Abundance of Ions of Noncovalent Protein Assemblies in an Electrospray Ionization Orthogonal Time-of-Flight Instrument. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15, 596–601.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online April 15, 2007
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuprowski, M.C., Boys, B.L. & Konermann, L. Analysis of protein mixtures by electrospray mass spectrometry: Effects of conformation and desolvation behavior on the signal intensities of hemoglobin subunits. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18, 1279–1285 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.04.002
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.04.002