Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative evaluation of gastrointestinal transit and immune response between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in a porcine model

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Several reports have shown advantages of laparoscopic gastrointestinal (GI) procedures when compared with their open counterparts. The aim of this study was to assess the differences of GI transit and immune response between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in a porcine model. Fourteen pigs were assigned to undergo partial gastrectomy, either by laparoscopy (lap group) or by laparotomy (open group). GI transit was assessed using 24 markers and measured until half of markers were evacuated. To assess immune response, we used delayed-type hypersensitivity skin antigen testing (DTH) with vaccine antigen. DTH was evaluated at 48 hours after the primary injection for induration. After 2 weeks, all animals underwent necropsy and were evaluated for adhesion formation using a scoring scale. Operation time was significantly longer in the lap group. The GI transit in the postoperative phase was significantly prolonged compared with the preoperative measured times. Postoperatively, the GI transit in the open group was significantly prolonged compared with the lap group. Immune response measured by DTH was better preserved in the lap group than in the open group. Adhesion formation was significantly less in the lap group. We concluded that laparoscopic gastrectomy resulted in faster bowel recovery and less immune suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goh P, Tekant Y, Kum CK, Isaac J, Shang NS. Totally intra-abdominal laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 1992;6:160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Sugimachi K. Peritoneoscopic chorecystectomy opened the door to minimally invasive surgery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1993;8:476–482.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burpee SE, Kurian M, Murakami Y, Benevides S, Gagner M. The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic vs open liver resection. Surg Endosc 2002;16:899–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Naito T, Garcia-Ruiz A, Vladisavljevic A, Matsuno S, Gagner M. Gastrointestinal transit and stress response after laparoscopic vs conventional distal pancreatectomy in the canine model. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1627–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger D. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 2003;17:242–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marana R, Margutti F, Catalano GF, Marana E. Stress responses to endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000;12:303–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobi CA, Wenger F, Opitz I, Muller JM. Immunologic changes during minimally invasive surgery. Dig Surg 2002; 19:459–463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Luketich JD, Schatz S, Tran Q, Ho HS, Schauer PR. Effect of open and laparoscopic surgery on cellular immunity in a swine model. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1997;9:176–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naitoh T, Gagner M. Laparoscopically assisted gastric surgery using Dexterity Pneumo Sleeve. Surg Endosc 1997;11:830–833.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 2000; 135:806–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reyes CD, Weber KJ, Gagner M, Divino CM. Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. A retrospective review. Surg Endosc 2001;15:928–931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: An interim report. Surgery 2002;131(Suppl):306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber KJ, Reyes CD, Gagner M, Divino CM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 2003;17:968–971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. LeBlanc KA, Stout RW, Kearney MT, Paulson DB. Comparison of adhesion formation associated with Pro-Tack (US Surgical) vs a new mesh device, Salute (ONUX Medical). Surg Endosc 2003;17:1409–1417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Whelan RL, et al. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg Endosc 1997;11:430–477.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Whelan RL, et al. Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs. open bowel resection in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hensler T, Hecker H, Heeg K, et al. Distinct mechanism of immunosuppression as a consequence of major surgery. Infect Immun 1997;65:2283–2291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobi CA, Ordemann J, Zieren HU, et al. Increased systemic inflammation after laparotomy vs. laparoscopy in an animal model of peritonitis. Arch Surg 1998;133:258–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher KM, Lennon MB, Traynor O, Hyland J. Physiological and metabolic responses to open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1992;79:1061–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pober JS. Cellular and molecular immunology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994, p 262.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bessler M, Whelan R, Halverson A, Treat M, Nowygrod R. Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection? Surg Endosc 1994;8:881–883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hotokezaka M, Dix J, Mentis EP, Schirmer BD. Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Surg Endosc 1996;10:485–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ludwig KA, Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Grade KL. Mayoelectric motility patterns after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1996;3:461–466.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holmdahl L. The role of Fibrinolysis in adhesion formation. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:24–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whawell SA, Thimpson JN. Cytokine-induced release of plasminogen activator-1 by human mesothelial cells. Eur J Surg 1995;161:315–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sendt W, Amberg R, Schoffel U, Hassan A, von Specht BU, Farthmann EH. Local inflammatory peritoneal response to operative trauma: Studies on cell activity, cytokine expression, and adhesion molecules. Eng J Surg 1999;165:1024–1030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Gagner M.D., F.R.C.S.C, F.A.C.S..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ueda, K., Matteotti, R., Assalia, A. et al. Comparative evaluation of gastrointestinal transit and immune response between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in a porcine model. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 39–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.013

Key words

Navigation