Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic vs open liver resection

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver surgery is a field in its infancy, and scientific evidence of its benefits over those of traditional open techniques has not been shown. Various applications from wedge resections to formal segmental resections have been reported, but the technical ability does not necessarily translate into improved patient outcomes. There is an abundance of evidence reflecting the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [9, 12, 23], and some of these benefits have been linked to the decreased metabolic and immune responses involved [24, 27]. There is also accumulating evidence that tumor growth may be slower after laparoscopic surgery than after comparable open surgery, and that this is a result of less immune suppression [1]. It is not known whether laparoscopic liver surgery will convey similar benefits.

Methods

In this study, 14 pigs were assigned randomly to undergo a liver resection either by a laparoscopic or an open approach. Operative stress was assessed via cortisol, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein. The immune response was evaluated through delayed-type hypersensitivity skin antigen testing. Adhesion formation also was assessed at 6 weeks.

Results

Immune response as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity is better preserved after laparoscopic than after open liver resection. The average diameter of induration was 46% greater in the laparoscopic group (20.71±2.7 mm versus 14.14±1.5 mm). Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor levels showed a significantly greater rise after open surgery. No difference was observed in the levels of C-reactive protein or cortisol. Adhesion formation was considerably less after laparoscopic resection.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic liver resection results in a diminished stress response, as compared with that of open resection, which translates into greater preservation of immune function. This finding may well have a beneficial effect on infection and tumor growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Kayton ML, Oesterling SD, Treat MR, Nowygrod R, Whelan RL (1995) Increased tumor establishment and growth after laparotomy versus laparoscopy in a murine model. Arch Surg 130: 649–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Kayton ML, Whelan RL, Treat MR, Nowygrod R (1995) Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 9: 49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bessler M, Treat MR, Halverson A, Nowygrod R, Whelan RL (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy induces a hormonal stress response. Surg Endosc 8: 447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessler M, Whelan RL, Halverson A, Treat MR, Nowygrod R (1994) Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection? Surg Endosc 8: 881–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho JM, La Porta AJ, Clark JR, Schofield MJ, Hammond SL, Mallory PL II (1994) Response of serum cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 1380–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruikshank IS, Fraser WD, Burns HJG, Shenkin A (1996) Response of serum IL-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity. Clin Sci 79: 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Paul A, de Brauw LM (1995) Limited laparoscopic liver resection of benign tumors guided by laparoscopic ultrasonography: report of two cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 396–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham JD, Katz LB, Brower ST, Reiner MA (1995) Laparoscopic resection of two liver hemangiomata. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 277–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 16: 385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas RE, Johnson MD, Spencer MP (1994) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy: a comparative study of the systemic stress response. Surg Endosc 8: 447

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferzli G, David A, Kiel T (1995) Laparoscopic resection of a large hepatic tumor. Surg Endosc 9: 733–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gadacz TR (1993) U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gugenheim J, Mazza D, Kathkouda N, Goubaux B, Muoiel J (1996) Laparoscopic resection of solid liver tumors. Br J Surg 83: 334–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alevy A, Lin G, Gold-Deutsch R, Lavi R, Negri M, Vans S, Cotariu D, Sackier JM (1995) A comparison of C-reactive protein concentrations for laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 280–282

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harmon GD, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, Warzynski MJ (1994) IL-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 754–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T (1996) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 120: 468–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kloosterman T, von Blomberg BM, Borgstein P, Cuesta MA, Scheper RJ, Meijer S (1994) Unimpaired immune functions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 115: 424–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maruszynski M, Pojda Z (1995) IL-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 9: 882–885

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perlmutter DH, Dinarello CA, Punsal PI, Coltan HR (1986) Cachectin/tumour necrosis factor regulates hepatic acute phase gene expression. J Clin Invest 78: 1349–1354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pullicino EA, Carli F, Poole S, Rafferty B, Malik ST, Elia M (1990) The relationship between the circulating concentrations of IL-6, TNF, and the acute phase response to elective surgery and accidental injury. Lymphokine Res 9: 231–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rau HG, Meyer G, Cohnert TU, Scardey HM, Jauch K, Schildberg FW (1995) Laparoscopic liver resection with water-jet dissector. Surg Endosc 9: 1009–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Samama G, Chiche L, Brefort JL, LeRoux Y (1998) Laparoscopic anatomic hepatic resection. Surg Endosc 12: 76–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sawyers JL (1996) Current status of conventional cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectony. Ann Surg 223: 1–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schauer PR, Sirinek KR (1995) The laparoscopic approach reduces the endocrine response to elective cholecystectomy. Am Surg 61: 106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stoner HB, Frayn KN (1979) The relationship between plasma substrates and hormones and the severity of injury in 277 recently injured patients. Clin Sci 56: 563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaughan GM, Becker RA (1982) Cortisol and corticotrophin in burn patients. J Trauma 22: 263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vittimberga FJ, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP (1998) Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227: 326–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Iseki S, Horiuchi A, Kashu Y, Kawachi K (1997) Laparoscopic hepatic resection: a new safe procedure by abdominal wall lifting method. Hepato gastroenterology 44: 143–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Laparoscopic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY, USA

    S. E. Burpee, M. Kurian, Y. Murakame, S. Benevides & M. Gagner

Authors
  1. S. E. Burpee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kurian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Murakame
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Benevides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Gagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Online publication: 27 February 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burpee, S.E., Kurian, M., Murakame, Y. et al. The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic vs open liver resection. Surg Endosc 16, 899–904 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8122-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8122-x

Key words

Search

Navigation