Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and prognostic aspects of gastric carcinoma in the elderly

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze the influence of various factors on the prognosis for elderly patients with gastric carcinoma. Forty-eight patients aged =>65 years admitted to Padova General Hos-pital were divided into two groups by age (<75 or >75 years). They all had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Information on their clinicopathological characteristics was col-lected from the Padova Hospital medical records. On univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors in the two age groups were gender, stage, histotype (Lauren’s intestinal type), Charlson index, and type of surgery (curative resection, palliative resection, and no surgery). On multivariate analysis, inde-pendent prognostic factors were the Charlson index, tumor stage, and age group. The 52-month survival rate was 72.7% for females and 12.5% for males for patients =>75 years (P = 0.01), while for the whole series of patients it was 67.5% for females and 29.9% for males (P = 0.003). The 17-month survival rate was 55.6% for surgically treated patients and 0% for the untreated cases in stage 4 (P = 0.03). Gastric cancer should be treated with conventional surgery even in the very elderly, since the survival rate for this age group does not differ significantly from the figures for younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fratino L, Ferrario L, Gianni W, et al. Approccio multidis-ciplinare al paziente oncologico anziano. Argomenti Oncol 1999;20:115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica: Caratteristiche Demogra-fiche. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seconda Assemblea Mondiale sull’Invecchiamento. Popula-tion aging 2000. Madrid: Rapporto delle Nazioni Unite, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pilotto A. Aging and upper gastrointestinal disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:S73-S81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pastore P, Prece V, Montesano G, et al. Il Carcinoma Gas-trico nella terza età: Considerazioni Clinico: Diagnostiche e di Tecnica Operatoria. Università degli Studi "La Sapien-za" di Roma, 2002.

  6. Ershler WB, Longo DL. Aging and cancer: issues of basic and clinical science. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1489–1497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lonardi F. Tumori dell’anziano: la valutazione del paziente e le scelte terapeutiche. Medico Paziente 2001;8:16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campisi J. Aging and cancer: the double-edged sword of rep-licative senescence. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:482–488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonadonna G, Robustelli Della Cuna G. Carcinoma dello stomaco. In: Bonadonna G, Robustelli Della Cuna G, eds. Medicina Oncologica, 6th ed. Milan: Masson Milano, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Termuhlen PM, Kemeny MM. Surgery in the older patient. Cancer in the older patient. Oncology 2002;16:183–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lise M. Surgical decisions in elderly cancer patients. Tumori 2002;88:S51-S52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu CW, Lo SS, Shen KH, Hsieh MC, Lui WY, P’eng FK. Surgical mortality, survival, and quality of life after resection for gastric cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 2000;24:465–472.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hitoshi K, Mitsuru S, Takeshi S, Takeo F. Gastric cancer surgery in the elderly without operative mortality. Surg Oncol 2004;13:235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tersigni R, Alessandroni L, Baiano G, et al. The surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. Evolution in surgical tech-nique and staging in a series of 194 patients. Minerva Chir 2004;59:479–487.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yokota T, Kunii Y, Saito T, et al. Prognostic factors for gastric cancer in the elderly. EJSO 2001;27:451–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oohara T, Johjima Y, Yamamoto O, Tohma H, Ondo Y. Gastric cancer in patients above 70 years of age. World J Surg 1984;8:315–320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edelman DS, Russin DJ, Wallack MK. Gastric cancer in the elderly. Am Surg 1987;53:170–173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arai T, Esaki Y, Inoshita N, et al. Pathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in the elderly: a retrospective study of 994 surgical patients. Gastric Cancer 2004;7:154–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubota H, Kotoh T, Dhar DK, et al. Gastric resection in the aged (80 years) with gastric carcinoma: a multivariate anal-ysis of prognostic factors. Aust N Z J Surg 2000;70:254–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubino M, Memeo V, Di Corcia MG. Carcinoma gastrico. In: Fegiz G, Marrano D, Ceccarelli G, eds. Manuale di Chir-urgia Generale, Vol 2. Padova: Piccin, 1996, p. 2103 2114.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Extermann M, Overcash J, Lyman GH, Parr J, Balducci L. Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1582–1587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goodwin JS, Samet JM, Hunt WC. Determinants of survival in older cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1031–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawley CL. Is it ever enough to die of old age? Age Ageing 2003;32:484–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buonadonna A, Lombardi D, De Paoli A, Bidoli E, Frustaci S. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival. Tumori 2003;2:S31-S34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Medina-Franco H, Heslin MJ, Cortes-Gonzalez R. Clinico-pathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young and elderly patients: a comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:515–519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fox RA, Puxty J. Medicine in the frail elderly: a problem ori-ented approach. Vol. 1. London: Edward Arnold, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Piso P, Werner U, Lang H, Mirena P, Klempnauer J. Prox-imal versus distal gastric carcinoma: what are the differences? Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:520–525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Registro tumori del Veneto. Incidenza dei tumori nell’ A.S.L.16 di Padova 1995–1996. Padova: A.S.L. 16, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsushita I, Hanai H, Kajimura M, et al. Should gastric cancer patients more than 80 years of age undergo surgery? Comparison with patients not treated surgically concerning prognosis and quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;35:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. A critical review. Tumori 2003; 2:S35-S38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fujiya T, Endoh K, Mikuni J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcome of gastric carcinoma with regard to aging. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1997;30:1699–1705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emine Meral Inelmen M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasparini, G., Inelmen, E.M., Enzi, G. et al. Clinical and prognostic aspects of gastric carcinoma in the elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 395–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.002

Key words

Navigation