Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of high-dose steroids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

This review was designed to determine whether “high-dose” steroid therapy (≥20 mg prednisone/day) increases the likelihood of anastomotic complications after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The hospital records of 100 patients undergoing proctocolectomy with IPAA were reviewed. Patient characteristics were analyzed to determine what factors were associated with higher rates of anastomosis-related complications. Seventy-one of our patients were given diverting ileostomies, whereas the remaining 29 underwent a single-stage procedure. Fifty-four percent of the patients in our review were taking steroids preoperatively, 39 of whom were on high-dose therapy. The overall anastomosis-related complication rate was 14%. There was no significant difference in complication rates with respect to age, steroid use, steroid dose, use of a diverting ileostomy, type of anastomosis, duration of disease, or presence of backwash ileitis. A trend toward higher leakage rates was found in patients undergoing single-stage procedures (10.3% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.14) as well as in patients undergoing single-stage procedures on high-dose steroids (22% vs. 5.0, P = 0.22). Nevertheless, neither of these trends was found to be statistically significant, which was likely infiuenced by the small sample size. Our data suggest that there may be an increase in anastomotic leakage rates in patients on high-dose steroids undergoing a single-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA. Nevertheless, our rate was not as high as the rates seen by other investigators and did not reach statistical significance. During preoperative counseling, patients on high-dose steroids should be informed of this uncertain but real risk of anastomotic leakage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonoda T, Fazio VW. Controversies in the construction of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000;11:33–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scotte M, Del Gallo G, Steinmetz L, et al. Ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: Results of an evolutionary surgical procedure. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:2123–2126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, O’Connor BI, Ton EN. Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:257–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Farouk R, Pemberton JH. Surgical options in ulcerative colitis. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:85–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziv Y, Church JM, Fazio VW, King TM, Lavery IC. Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:504–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Oakley JR, Fabre JM. Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy—Is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1007–1014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;2:85–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW. Ileal pouch-anal anstomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: Long-term results. Annals of Surgery 1987;206:504–513.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, et al. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 2002; 235:207–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gullberg K, Liljeqvist L. Stapled ileoanal pouches without loop ileostomy: A prospective study in 86 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001;16:221–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM, Bauer JJ, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:188–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grobler SP, Hosie KB, Keighley MRB. Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 2002;79:903–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galandiuk S, Wolff BG, Dozois RR, Beart RW. Ileal pouchanal anastomosis without ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:870–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: Multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002;26:499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stephen W, Stern HS, O’Connor B, Reznick R. Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure. Ann Surg 1992;216:506–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugerman HJ, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, Newsome HHJr, Kellum JM Jr, DeMaria EJ. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg 2000;232:530–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF, Peppercorn MA. Ileoanal pouch operation: Long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:463–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Lucas M, Heuschen G, Herfarth C. One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: Rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2001;788:234–794.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution. Diseases of the Colon Rectum 1997;40:1019–1022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Beart Jr. M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lake, J.P., Firoozmand, E., Kang, JC. et al. Effect of high-dose steroids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 8, 547–551 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.01.002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.01.002

Key words

Navigation