Skip to main content
Log in

Design and experiments of biomimetic stubble cutter

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fore claws of the nymph of Cryptotympana atrata have excellent ability to cut and dig soil. Inspired by this, we designed a biomimetic stubble cutter to reduce the cutting resistance. Reverse engineering and 3D print technology were applied to design the biomimetic stubble cutter. Two types of biomimetic corn stubble cutters with different tooth heights (5 mm and 2.5 mm) were designed. The cutting ability of biomimetic corn stubble cutters was compared to the conventional design by the quadratic regression orthogonal test. Tooth height, dip angle of cutting edge, and cutting velocity were chosen as orthogonal test factors. The biomimetic stubble cutters show lower cutting resistance than the conventional one. Cutting velocity exerts the least effect on cutting resistance, followed by tooth height and dip angle of cutting edge. Optimal combination with the least cutting resistance is tooth height of 2.5 mm and dip angle of cutting edge of 40° while the cutting resistance does not vary remarkably with cutting velocity. Test results indicate the serrated structure design as a principal factor for cutting resistance reduction. The biomimetic stubble cutter design, inspired by the soil-cutting mechanism of Cryptotympana atrata nymph, remarkably improves the performance of stubble cutter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sang Z T. Agricultural Machinery, China Machine Press, Beijing, China, 1988. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu T, Ma X, Chen J W, Wei K X. Present state and development trends on technology of corn stubble mechanical processing. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2014, 36, 238–242. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tagar A A, Ji C, Ding Q, Adamowski J, Chandio F A, Mari I A. Soil failure patterns and draft as influenced by consistency limits: An evaluation of the remolded soil cutting test. Soil and Tillage Research, 2014, 137, 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maciejewski J, Mróz Z. Analysis of deformation and damage processes in soil-tool interaction problems. Bifurcations, Instabilities and Degradations in Geomaterials, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 325–345.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X, Chen X S, Qi L, Chen G R, Lai Y Z. Design and experiment of root stubble harvester for corn. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quan L Z, Tong J, Zeng B G, Chen D H. Optimization design of sliding cutting edge curve of corn rootstalk cutting tool. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27, 13–17. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu Y X. Significance and progress of bionics. Journal of Bionics Engineering, 2004, 1, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent J F V, Mann D L. Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2002, 360, 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui X X, Zhang N, Wang Y M, Ren L Q, Xu X B, Chen B C, Li A Q. Constitution of pangolin scales and mechanism of reducing adhesion of soil to their cuticle. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1990, 6, 15–22. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ren L Q. Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance reduction of terrain machines. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ji W F, Chen D H, Jia H L, Tong Jin. Experimental investigation into soil-cutting performance of the claws of mole rat (Scaptochirus moschatus). Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S166–S171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tong J, Moayad B Z, Ma Y H, Sun J Y, Chen D H, Jia H L, Ren L Q. Effects of biomimetic surface designs on furrow opener performance. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia H L, Li C Y, Zhang Z H, Wang G. Design of bionic saw blade for corn stalk cutting. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li M, Chen D H, Zhang S J, Tong J. Biomimetic design of a stubble-cutting disc using finite element analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li M. Design of Bionic Stubble-Cutting Blade Based on the Structure Characteristic of Praying Mantis (Mantis religiosa Linnaeus)’s Foreleg, doctoral dissertation, Jilin University, China, 2013. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bouwer N, Midgley J M, Timm A E, Villet M H. Successful identification of the final instar nymph of Quintilia carinata (Thunberg) (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) by DNA extraction from the exuvium. Journal of Natural History, 2014, 48, 937–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clay K, Shelton A L, Winkle C. Differential susceptibility of tree species to oviposition by periodical cicadas. Ecological Entomology, 2009, 34, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu L, Lin M X, Li J Q, Wang Z L, Chirende B. Three-dimensional geometrical modelling of wild boar head by reverse engineering technology. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Gu D X, Yu Z Y, Tan, C B, Zhou L S. A framework for 3D model reconstruction in reverse engineering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 63, 1189–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weir D J, Milroy M J, Bradley C, Vickers G W. Reverse engineering physical models employing wrap-around B-spline surfaces and quadrics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 1996, 210, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seo J, Lee H C, Park S. Reconstruction of a composite surface by reverse engineering techniques. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2001, 17, 639–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S W, Tong J, Zhang S J, Chen B C. Reverse engineering and engineering bionics. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering Machinery, 2004, 35, 109–112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baxter I D, Mehlich M. Reverse engineering is reverse forward engineering. Science of Computer Programming, 2000, 36, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee I K. Curve reconstruction from unorganized points. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2000, 17, 104–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Díaz-Vilarino L, Khoshelham K, Martínez-Sanchez J, Arias P. 3D modeling of building indoor spaces and closed doors from imagery and point clouds. Sensors, 2015, 15, 3491–3512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith J J, Hasiotis S T. Traces and burrowing behaviors of the cicada nymph Cicadetta calliope: Neoichnology and paleoecological significance of extant soil-dwelling insects. Palaios, 2008, 23, 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Box G E P, Behnken D W. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 1960, 2, 455–475.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghui Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, Z., Liu, W., Tong, J. et al. Design and experiments of biomimetic stubble cutter. J Bionic Eng 13, 335–343 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60306-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60306-2

Keyword

Navigation