Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid design and performance tests of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hovering ability is one of the most desired features in Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles (FW-MAVs). This paper presents a hybrid design of flapping wing and fixed wing, which combines two flapping wings and two fixed wings to take advantage of the double wing clap-and-fling effect for high thrust production, and utilizes the fixed wings as the stabilizing surfaces for inherently stable hovering flight. Force measurement shows that the effect of wing clap-and-fling significantly enhances the cycle-averaged vertical thrust up to 44.82% at 12.4 Hz. The effect of ventral wing clap-and-fling due to presence of fixed wings produces about 11% increase of thrust-to-power ratio, and the insect-inspired FW-MAV can produce enough cycle-averaged vertical thrust of 14.76 g for lift-off at 10 Hz, and 24 g at maximum frequency of 12.4 Hz. Power measurement indicates that the power consumed for aerodynamic forces and wing inertia, and power loss due to gearbox friction and mechanism inertia was about 80% and 20% of the total input power, respectively. The proposed insect-inspired FW-MAV could endure three-minute flight, and demonstrate a good flight performance in terms of vertical take-off, hovering, and control with an onboard 3.7 V-70 mAh LiPo battery and control system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sane S P. Steady or unsteady? Uncovering the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann F O, Pick S. The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings. Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 1362–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellington C P. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: Applications to microair vehicles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1999, 202, 3439–3448.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shyy W, Aono H, Kang C K, Liu H. An introduction to flapping wing aerodynamics. In: Shyy W, Yang V, eds., Cambridge Aerospace Series, Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zdunich P, Bilyk D, MacMaster D, Loewen D, DeLaurier J, Kornbluh R, Low T, Stanford S, Holeman D. Development and testing of the mentor flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44, 1701–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DelFly Micro, [2015-10-02], http://www.delfly.nl.

  7. Lentink D, Jongerius S R, Bradshaw N L. The scalable design of flapping micro-air vehicles inspired by insect flight. In: Floreano D, Zufferey J C, Srinivasan M V, Ellington C, eds., Flying Insects and Robot, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009, 185–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. De Wagter C, Tijmons S, Remes B D W, de Croon G C H E. Autonomous flight of a 20-gram flapping wing MAV with a 4-gram onboard stereo vision system. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nano Hummingbird, [2015-10-02], http://www.avinc.com.

  10. Festo BionicOpter, [2015-10-02], https://www.festo.comcms/en_corp/13165.htm.

  11. Festo eMotionButterFly, [2015-10-02], https://www.festo.comcms/en_corp/14253.htm.

  12. van Breugel F, Regan W, Lipson H. From insects to machines: A passively stable, untethered flapping-hovering micro-air vehicle. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2008, 15, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richter C, Lipson H. Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3D-printed mechanical insect. Artificial Life, 2011, 17, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood R J. Liftoff of a 60mg flapping-wing MAV. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, USA, 2007, 1889–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pornsin-sirirak T N, Tai Y C, Nassef H, Ho C M. Titanium- alloy MEMS wing technology for a micro aerial vehicle application. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2001, 89, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madangopal R, Khan Z, Agrawal S. Biologically inspired design of small flapping wing air vehicles using four-bar mechanisms and quasi-steady aerodynamics. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005, 127, 809–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller D, Gerdes J, Gupta S K. Incorporation of passive wing folding in flapping wing miniature air vehicles. Proceedings of ASME Mechanism and Robotics Conference, San Diego, USA, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu C K, Evans J, Vytla S, Huang P. Development of flapping wing micro air vehicles - Design, CFD, experiment and actual flight. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, USA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang L J, Esakki B, Chandrasekhar U, Hung K C, Cheng C M. Practical flapping mechanisms for 20 cm-span micro air vehicles. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2015, 7, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park J H, Yoon K J. Designing a biomimetic orthnithopter capable of sustained and control flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackenzie D. A flapping of wings. Science, 2012, 335, 1430–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ristroph L, Childress S. Stable hovering of a jellyfish-like flying machine. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2014, 11, 20130992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tiny Surveillance Aircraft to Fly in Tucson, [2015-10-02], http://www.sciencedaily.com.

  24. Application of hummingbird physics, [2016-03-31], http://blogs.bu.edu.

  25. Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D Y. Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karasek M, Hua A, Nan Y H, Lalami M, Preumont A. Pitch and roll control mechanism for a hovering flapping wing MAV. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2014, 6, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robotic Hummingbird of Texas A&M University, [2015-10-02], http://spectrum.ieee.org.

  28. Nguyen Q V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. An insect-inspired flapping wing micro air vehicle with double wing clap-fling effects and capability of sustained hovering. Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2015, 9429, 94290U.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goldsworthy G J, Wheeler C H. Insect Flight, CRC Press Inc., Florida, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Doman D B, Tang C P, Regisford S. Modeling interactions between flexible flapping wing spars, mechanisms, and drive motors. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34, 1457–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vanella M, Fitzgerald T, Preidikman S, Balaras E, Balachandran B. Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weis-Fogh T. Unusual mechanisms for the generation of lift in flying animals. Scientific American, 1975, 233, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lighthill M. On Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 60, 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Bennett L. Clap and fling aerodynamics — An experimental evaluation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1977, 69, 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leadingedge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2002, 214, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temasek Laboratories, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117411

    Quoc-Viet Nguyen, Woei Leong Chan & Marco Debiasi

Authors
  1. Quoc-Viet Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Woei Leong Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Debiasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quoc-Viet Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, QV., Chan, W.L. & Debiasi, M. Hybrid design and performance tests of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. J Bionic Eng 13, 235–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60297-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60297-4

Keyword

Search

Navigation