Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of droplets of biological fluids on smooth superhydrophobic surfaces under electrostatic actuation

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the dynamic behaviour of droplets of biological liquids on hydrophobic surfaces under electrostatic actuation, to devise sample handling in lab-on-chip diagnostic tools. Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) is taken as a representative biomolecule, since it is often used in adsorption studies. Green Fluorescence Protein (GFP) is also considered, given its natural fluorescence. Several effects such as sample concentration and pH are discussed. The results show negligible effects of proteins concentration in electrowetting, although increased concentrations endorse passive adsorption mechanisms, which alter the local wettability of the substrates precluding droplet motion. Bioinspired surfaces promote the largest spreading diameter, which is beneficial for droplet motion. However, surface roughness promotes energy dissipation limiting the receding droplet motion. Hence, the most effective approach is altering the surface chemistry. The coating is applied to a surface with a mean roughness smaller than 20 nm and does not alter significantly the topography, thus leading to the so-called smooth superhydrophobic surface. This coating also reduces passive proteins adsorption, as confirmed by Confocal Microscopy (CM), which is beneficial for droplet motion. Evaluating absorption spectra of protein solutions evidences an increase in protein concentration ascribed to droplet evaporation as confirmed by theoretical analysis and time resolved infrared visualization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pollack M G, Pamula V K, Srinivasan V, Eckhardt A E. Applications of electrowetting-based digital microfluidics in clinical diagnostics. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2011, 11, 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuo J S, Spicar-Mihalic P, Rodriguez I, Chiu D T. Electrowetting-induced droplet movement in an immiscible medium. Langmuir, 2003, 19, 250–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park J K, Lee S J, Kang K H. Fast and reliable droplet transport on single-plate electrowetting on dielectrics using nonfloating switching method. Biomicrofluidics, 2010, 4, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong L, Pan T. Surface microfluidics fabricated by photopatternable superhydrophobic nanocomposite. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2011, 10, 991–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garza M A M. Characterization of the Adsorption of Biomolecules in Open Electrowetting on Dielectrics Microfluidic-Tool Platform for Bioanalytical Applications. PhD Thesis, Institute of mycrosystems technology, Department of Sensors, Albert-Ludwig University, Freiburg, Germany, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yager P, Domingo G J, Gerdes J. Point-of-care diagnostics for global health. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2008, 10, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mugele F, Baret J C. Electrowetting: From basics to applications. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 2005, 17, R705–R774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Young T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1805, 95, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lippmann G. Relation entre les phénomènes électriques et capillaires. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 1875, 5, 494–549. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, T B. An electromechanical interpretation of electrowetting. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2005, 15, 1184–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahadur V, Garimella S V. An energy-based model for electrowetting-induced droplet actuation. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2006, 16, 1494–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mugele F. Fundamental challenges in electrowetting: From equilibrium shapes, to contact angle saturation and drop dynamics. Soft Materials, 2009, 5, 3377–3384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan V, Pamula V K, Fair R B. An integrated digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical diagnostics on human physiological fluids. Lab on a Chip, 2004, 4, 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wheeler A R, Moon H, Kim C J, Loo J A, Garrell R L. Electrowetting-based microfluidics for analysis of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 2004, 76, 4833–4838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rupp F, Axmann D, Ziegler C, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Adsorption/ desorption phenomena on pure and Teflon® AF-coated titania surfaces studied by dynamic contact angle analysis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002, 62, 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoon J Y, Garrell R L. Preventing biomolecular adsorption in electrowetting-based biofluidic chips. Analytical Chemistry, 2003, 75, 5097–5102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horbett T A, Brash J L. Proteins at interfaces: Current issues and future prospects. In Proteins at Interfaces: Physicochemical and Biochemical Studies. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, USA, 1987, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bayiati P, Tserepi A, Petrou P S, Misiakos K, Kakabakos S E, Gogolides E, Cardinaud C. Biofluid transport on hydrophobic plasma-deposited fluorocarbon films. Microelectronic Engineering, 2007, 84, 1677–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bayiati P, Tserepi A, Petrou P S, Misiakos K, Kakabakos S E, Gogolides E, Cardinaud C. Biofluid transport on hydrophobic plasma-deposited fluorocarbon films. Microelectronic Engineering, 2007, 84, 1677–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ray S, Mehta G, Srivastava S. Label-free detection techniques for protein microarrays: Prospects, merits and challenges. Proteomics, 2010, 10, 731–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooney C G, Chen C Y, Emerling M R, Nadim A, Sterling J D. Electrowetting droplet microfluidics on a single planar surface. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2006, 2, 435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sefiane K. On the formation of regular patterns from drying droplets and their potential use for bio-medical applications. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S82–S93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Girard F, Antoni M, Sefiane K. Infrared thermography investigation of an evaporating sessile water droplet on heated substrates. Langmuir, 2010, 26, 4576–4580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patankar N. Consolidation of hydrophobic transition criteria by using an approximate energy minimization approach. Langmuir, 2010, 26, 8941–8945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patankar N. Consolidation of hydrophobic transition criteria by using an approximate energy minimization approach. Langmuir, 2010, 26, 8941–8945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bourdon B, Di Marco P, Rioboo R, Marengo M, De Coninck J. Enhancing the onset of pool boiling by wettability modification on nanometrically smooth surfaces. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 45, 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao N, Yan Y Y, Chen X Y, Mee D J. Superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structure. Materials Letters, 2011, 65, 2902–2905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koch K, Schulte A J, Fisher A, Gorb Barthlott W. A fast, precise and low-cost replication technique for nano-andhigh-aspect ratio structures of biological and artificial surfaces. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 046002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Liu J, Li S, Liu J, Han Z, Ren L. Biomimetic superhydrophobic surface on high adhesion fabricated with micronano binary structure on aluminum alloy. Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 8907–8914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pereira P, Moita A S, Monteiro G, Prazeres, D M F. Characterization of the topography and wettability of English weed leaves and biomimetic replicas. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 346–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Restolho J, Mata J L, Saramago B. Electrowetting of ionic liquids: Contact angle saturation and irreversibility. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113, 9321–9327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramos J A, Moita A S, Prazeres D M F, Moreira A L N. Dynamics of droplets of biological fluids over enhanced surfaces with and without electrostatic actuation. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, 2014, Bremen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kietzig A M. Comments on “An essay on contact angle measurements” -An illustration of the respective influence of droplet deposition and measurement parameters. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2011, 8, 1003–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kato M, Tanaka A, Sasagawa M, Adachi H. Durable automotive windshield coating and the use thereof. US Patent, 2008, 8043421 B2.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moita A S, Moreira A L N. Scaling the effects of surface topography in the secondary atomization resulting from droplet/wall interactions. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 52, 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koch K, Bushan B, Barthlott W. Diversity of structure, morphology and wettinng of plant surfaces. Soft Materials, 2008, 4, 1943–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marmur A. Measures of wettability of solid surfaces. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2011, 197, 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Koch K, Barthlott W. Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: An inspiration for biomimetic materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2009, 367, 1487–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bhushan B, Jung Y C. Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low anhesion and drag reduction. Progress in Materials Science, 2011, 56, 1–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Berge B. Electrocapillarity and wetting of insulator films by water. Academie des Sciences, Series II: Mecanique, 1993, 317, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Verheijen H J J, Prins M W J. Reversible electrowetting and trapping charge: Model and experiments. Langmuir, 1999, 15, 6616–6620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chevalliot S, Kuiper S, Heikenfeld J. Experimental validation of the invariance of electrowetting contact angle saturation. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2012, 26, 1909–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quinn A, Sdev R, Ralston J. Contact angle saturation in electrowetting. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005, 109, 6268–6275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Annapragada S R, Dash S, Garimella S V, Murthy J Y. Dynamics of droplet motion under electrowetting actuation. Langmuir, 2011, 27, 8198–8204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pan Z, Dash S, Weibel J A, Garimella S V. Assessment of water droplet evaporation mechanisms on hydrophobic and superhydrophobic substrates. Langmuir, 2013, 29, 15831–15841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh S K, Khandekar S, Pratap D, Ramakrishna S A. Wetting dynamics and evaporation of sissile droplets on nano-porous alumina surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 432, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kelly-Zion P, Batra J, Pursell, C J. Correlation for the convective and diffusive evaporation of a sessile drop. International Journal of Heat and Mass, 2013, 64, 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hu H, Larson R G. Evaporation of a sessile droplet on a substrate. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2002, 106, 1334–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. McHale G, Rowan S M, Newton M I, Banerjee M K. Evaporation and the wetting of a low-energy solid surface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102, 1964–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Maxwell J C. Diffusion Collected Scientific Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1890, 2, 625–650.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barash, L Y, Bigioni T P, Vinokur V M, Shchur L N. Evaporation and fluid dynamics of a sessile drop of capillary size. Physical Review E, 2009, 79, 046301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Picknett R G, Benson R. The evaporation of sessile or pendant droplet in still air. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1977, 61, 336–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Orejon D, Sefiane K, Shanahan M E R. Evaporation of nanofluids droplets with applied DC potential. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 407, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Sofia Moita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moita, A.S., Laurência, C., Ramos, J.A. et al. Dynamics of droplets of biological fluids on smooth superhydrophobic surfaces under electrostatic actuation. J Bionic Eng 13, 220–234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60296-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60296-2

Keyword

Navigation