Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pitching Moment Generation in an Insect-Mimicking Flapping-Wing System

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike birds, insects lack control surfaces at the tail and hence most insects modify their wing kinematics to produce control forces or moments while flapping their wings. Change of the flapping angle range is one of the ways to modify wing kinematics, resulting in relocation of the mean Aerodynamic force Center (mean AC) and finally creating control moments. In an attempt to mimic this feature, we developed a flapping-wing system that generates a desired pitching moment during flapping- wing motion. The system comprises a flapping mechanism that creates a large and symmetric flapping motion in a pair of wings, a flapping angle change mechanism that modifies the flapping angle range, artificial wings, and a power source. From the measured wing kinematics, we have found that the flapping-wing system can properly modify the flapping angle ranges. The measured pitching moments show that the flapping-wing system generates a pitching moment in a desired direction by shifting the flapping angle range. We also demonstrated that the system can in practice change the longitudinal attitude by generating a nonzero pitching moment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weis-Fogh T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1973, 59, 169–230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering flight. I V. Aerodynamic mechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 1984, 305, 79–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickinson M H, Gotz K G. Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1993,174, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickinson M H. The effects of wing rotation on unsteady aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1994, 192, 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2002, 214, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedrick T L, Daniel T L. Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: The inverse problem of hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209, 3114–3130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu H, Aono H. Size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics: An integrated computational study. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2009, 4, 015002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Le T Q, Byun D, Saputra P, Ko J H, Park H C, Kim M J. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a hovering Coleopteran insect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2010, 266, 485–495.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Truong Q T, Nguyen Q V, Truong V T, Park H C, Byun D, Goo N S. A modified blade element theory for estimation of forces generated by a beetle-mimicking flapping wing system. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 036008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1087–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phan H V, Nguyen Q V, Truong Q T, Truong V T, Park H C, Byun D, Goo N S, Kim M J. Stable vertical takeoff of an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system without guide implementing inherent pitching stability. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2012, 9, 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor G K. Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect fight control. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2001, 76, 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horsmann U, Heinzel H G, Wendler G. The phasic influence of self-generated air current modulations on the locust flight motor. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 1983, 150, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann F, Dickinson M H. The control of wing kinematics and flight forces in fruit flies (drosophila spp.). Journal of Experimental Biology, 1998, 201, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arbas E A. Control of hindlimb posture by wind-sensitive hairs and antennae during locust flight. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1986, 159, 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinterwirth A J, Daniel T L. Antennae in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) mediate abdominal flexion in response to mechanical stimuli. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2010, 196, 947–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blondeau J. Aerodynamic capabilities of flies, as revealed by a new technique. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1981, 92, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nachtigall W, Roth W. Correlations between stationary measurable parameters of wing movement and aerodynamic force production in the blow fly (Calliphora vicina R.-D.). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1983, 150, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Finio B M, Wood R J. Distributed power and control actuation in the thoracic mechanics of a robotic insect. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2010, 5, 045006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park J H, Yang E P, Zhang C, Agrawal S K. Kinematic design of an asymmetric in-phase flapping mechanism for MAVs. Proceeding on IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, 2012, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuD1WKHsggs

  24. Keennon M T, Klingebiel K R, Andryukov A, Hibbs B D, Zwaan J P. Air Vehicle Flight Mechanism and Control Method, US Patent, Pub. No. US 2010/0308160 A1, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Characteristics of beetles free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight’. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park H C, Nguyen Q V, Byun D, Goo N S. Flapping Apparatus with Large Flapping Angles, US Patent, Registration # 12/571,945, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hedrick T. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 034001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Truong Q T, Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Modification of a four-bar linkage system for a higher optimal flapping frequency. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2011, 22, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Syaifuddin M, Park H C, Yoon K J, Goo N S. Design and evaluation of LIPCA-actuated flapping device. Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, 15, 1225–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Whitney J P, Wood R J. Aeromechanics of passive rotation in flapping flight. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 660, 197–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Truong T Q, Phan V H, Park H C, Koh J H. Effect of wing twisting on aerodynamic performance of flapping wing system. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51, 1612–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Phan V H, Truong T Q, Park H C. Assessment of initial pitching moment stability for an uncontrolled free flying flapping-wing micro-air-vehicle. Journal of Aircraft, 2013 (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sun M, Wang J K. Flight stabilization control of a hovering model insect. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 2714–2722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson Jr J D. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, McGraw Hill, New York, USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lock R J, Vaidyanathan R, Burgess S C, Loveless J. Development of a biologically inspired multi-modal wing model for aerial-aquatic robotic vehicles through empirical and numerical modelling of the common guillemot, Uria aalge. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2010, 5, 046001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matlab® User’s Guide, MathWorks Inc, 2006.

  37. Bjorck A. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1996.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUJTjQKO9M4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomimetics and Intelligent Microsystem Laboratory & Artificial Muscle Research Center, Konkuk University, Seoul, 143-701, Korea

    Tri Quang Truong, Vu Hoang Phan & Hoon Cheol Park

  2. Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Seoul, 143-701, Korea

    Tri Quang Truong, Vu Hoang Phan & Hoon Cheol Park

  3. National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India

    Sanjay P. Sane

Authors
  1. Tri Quang Truong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vu Hoang Phan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay P. Sane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hoon Cheol Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoon Cheol Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Truong, T.Q., Phan, V.H., Sane, S.P. et al. Pitching Moment Generation in an Insect-Mimicking Flapping-Wing System. J Bionic Eng 11, 36–51 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60018-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60018-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation