Skip to main content
Log in

A Mechanical Model for the Adhesion of Spiders to Nominally Flat Surfaces

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In dry attachment systems of spiders and geckos, van der Waals forces mediate attraction between substrate and animal tarsus. In particular, the scopula of Evarcha arcuata spiders allows for reversible attachment and easy detachment to a broad range of surfaces. Hence, reproducing the scopula’s roughness compatibility while maintaining anti-bunching features and dirt particle repellence behavior is a central task for a biomimetic transfer to an engineered model. In the present work we model the scopula of E. arcuata from a mechano-elastic point of view analyzing the influence of its hierarchical structure on the attachment behavior. By considering biological data of the gecko and spider, and the simulation results, the adhesive capabilities of the two animals are compared and important confirmations and new directives in order to reproduce the overall structure are found. Moreover, a possible suggestion of how the spider detaches in an easy and fast manner is proposed and supported by the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autumn K, Peattie A M. Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42, 1081–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattie A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T, Fearing R, Israelachvili J N, Full R J. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99, 12252–12256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kesel A B, Martin A, Seidl T. Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 206, 2733–2738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kesel A B, Martin A, Seidl T. Getting a grip on spider attachment: An AFM approach to microstructure adhesion in arthropods. Smart Materials and Structures, 2004, 13, 512–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003, 100, 10603–10606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, Mecke K, Jacobs K, Gorb S N, Arzt E. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula and nanomechanical measurements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005, 102, 16293–16296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niederegger S, Gorb S N. Friction and adhesion in the tarsal and metatarsal scopulae of spiders. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2006, 192, 1223–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasparetto A, Seidl T, Vidoni R. Passive control of attachment in legged space-robots. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, in press.

  9. Gao H, Wang X, Yao H, Gorb S, Arzt E. Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mechanics of Materials, 2005, 37, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 405, 681–685.

  11. Sitti M, Fearing R S. Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures for future wall-climbing robots. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’ 03), 2003, 1, 1164–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Persson B N J. Biological adhesion for locomotion on rough surfaces: Basic principles and a theorist’s view. MRS Bulletin, 2007, 32, 486–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spolenak R, Gorb S, Arzt E. Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. Acta Biomaterialia, 2005, 1, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Autumn K, Majidi C, Groff R E, Dittmore A, Fearing R. Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209, 3558–3568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson K L, Kendall K, Roberts A D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 1971, 324, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huber G, Gorb S N, Spolenak R, Arzt E. Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy. Biology Letters, 2005, 1, 2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim T W, Bhushan B. Adhesion analysis of multi-level hierarchical attachment system contacting with a rough surface. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2006, 21, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhushan B, Peressadko T W, Kim A G. Adhesion analysis of two-level hierarchical morphology in natural attachment systems for “smart adhesion”. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2006, 20, 1475–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foelix R F. Biology of Spiders, Oxford University Press, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schargott M. A mechanical model of biomimetic adhesive pads with tilted and hierarchical structures. Journal of Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2009, 4, 026002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schargott M, Popov V L, Gorb S. Spring model of biological attachment pads. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2006, 243, 48–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Gasparetto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasparetto, A., Seidl, T. & Vidoni, R. A Mechanical Model for the Adhesion of Spiders to Nominally Flat Surfaces. J Bionic Eng 6, 135–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60110-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60110-9

Keywords

Navigation