Abstract
The morphometric analysis of the watersheds is essential for the conservation of natural resources, including soil, water, and vegetation. The Morphometric analysis defines the linear, areal and relief aspects of the watershed. It involves the comprehensive analysis of various factors such as drainage network, surface water flow, and other topographical features. The aim of this study is to develop a sustainable watershed management strategy for the Nayar watershed based on morphometry and Land Use Land Cover (LULC) change dynamics. The Nayar watershed has a total area of 1956.33 km2. The multispectral satellite imagery, Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, and Survey of India (SOI) Toposheets were used for understanding the topographical and morphological characteristics along with the LULC change dynamics. The findings of this research conclude that the Nayar watershed has parallel and dendritic drainage patterns with high relief. According to the LULC change dynamics, the Nayar watershed's area change comprising 57.60 km2 and 57.15 km2, are from Agricultural Land to Wasteland and from Forest Cover to Wasteland, respectively. This shift in the hilly region will increase the risks of landslides and erosion. Furthermore, the change of 110.03 km2 area of Forest Cover to Agricultural Land raises further challenges due to loss of natural vegetation in long run. In summary the change in LULC of Nayar watershed is vulnerable to risk of natural calamities like landslide, erosion. This work would be helpful to many experts and decision-makers for sustainable watershed management and natural resource management.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In this common era, the rivers are experiencing a multitude of challenges across the globe [1]. Critical issues like water stress or insufficiency of fresh water and ceaseless pollution are majorly increasing due to the acceleration of rapid urbanization [2]. The swift development of socio-economic and demographic structure of any country have led to different serious impact on the riverine ecosystem such as alteration of land covers, reduction of river beds, and transformation of river morphology and topography [3]. India is a land of rivers, there are four major water resource regions in this river-irrigated country [4]. The rivers of India have made a valuable contribution towards civilization and its enlargement. Human population which is more closely dependent on rivers in many ways like water supply, ecological services, and agricultural usage indicate the dominant role of rivers in urbanization and industrialization. In India, river preservation efforts and sustainable water resource management are crucial to preserving the health of rivers and a steady flow of fresh water [5]. In this instance morphometric analysis plays vital role in recognizing the characteristics of the watershed, the potential of groundwater, and river flow [6, 7].
It can also be very useful for studying the soil erosion management of upstream and channel siltation problems downstream [8, 9]. The morphometric analysis is one of the best ways to investigate the fluvial structure and its different aspects [10]. Morphology is the part of geography that covers the physical structure of a portion of land and the processes that create it [11]. The main themes of geomorphology are fluvial, aeolian, tectonics, and glacial processes [12].
In this study, channel morphology is considered, which is a comprehensive study of the geography aspect and channel flow dynamics aspect of a river [13]. A drainage basin is a fundamental aerial unit of hydrology that accumulates precipitation and directs it towards a shared outlet like a lake, river, or ocean. It includes all surface water flow within its boundaries, playing an essential role in water cycle regulation and resource management. In a simple way, it can be defined as a portion of land where water from precipitation and flow will end up in a common water outlet [14, 15]. The channel or river morphometric study typically helps to understand channel patterns, geometry, water discharge, surface runoff, channel gradient, stream orders, stream frequency, stream length, bifurcation ratio, compactness ratio, channel stability, and movement [16, 17].
Remote Sensing and GIS are the most appropriate techniques for morphometric analysis, watershed delineation, and monitoring to protect river functionality and ecology [18]. Multispectral satellite imagery from various GIS-based platforms combined with remote sensing data, has a significant effect on natural resource management [19]. Numerous researchers have investigated watersheds in diverse terrains using GIS and remote sensing technologies [20,21,22,23].
According to Singh et al., the accuracy of remote sensing DEM data utilized for watershed's hydrological analysis is significantly higher than that of older conventional approaches [24]. Bajirao et al. in their study looked at how various issues at the watershed scale, such as deforestation, urbanisation, drought, flood proneness etc. can be identified and resolved by utilizing GIS and remote sensing technologies to analyze the hydrology and morphometry of the watershed [25]. Another study by Mani et al., shows that the areal, linear, and relief features of a watershed are explained by GIS and remote sensing-based morphometric analysis, which is useful in understanding the hydrology of the area [26]. Prabhakar et. al., reported that morphometric analysis and satellite imagery show Land Use Land Cover (LULC) changes in the Champua watershed, affecting its hydrologic performance [27]. The LULC coverage over the river catchment is studied in various landscape. Das et. al. (2018) reported LULC changes in eastern India's river basins which resulted to decrease evapotranspiration and increase of runoff and base flow, affecting water resources management [28]. Tena et al. reported that LULC changes in the Chongwe River catchment negatively impacted its hydrological components [29]. As per Khiavi and Mostafazadeh, their study reveals significant land use changes in Meshginshahr, Iran, with notable increases in residential areas and declines in forest and rangeland, highlighting the need for urgent attention to sustainable land management [30]. Another study by Mostafazadeh and Talebi, predicts significant land-use changes in Meshgin-Shahr, Iran, using the CA–Markov model, highlighting the need for effective policies to conserve landscape integrity and connectivity by 2032 [31].
The morphological characteristics of the Nayar watershed have not previously been studied. Using geospatial techniques, this study will investigate the morphological features and LULC change dynamics of the Nayar watershed. The affecting factors of LULC change in the study area are anthropological dependencies on river. Through this assessment, we aim to improve the Nayar watershed for sustainable watershed management. These scientific databases can also be useful sources for upcoming hydrological research. The findings of this study will also help decision makers and the policy makers to improve their understanding of the earth's resources.
2 Methodology
2.1 Study area
The Nayar River, which flows fully within the Pauri Garhwal region, is the second-largest perennial spring-fed river in the state of Uttarakhand after the Ramganga River [32, 33]. Its two main branches, Purvi Nayar River and Pashchimi Nayar River originates in the dense Dudhatoli Reserved Forest. Purvi Nayar River is approximately 94 km long, while Pashchimi Nayar River is around 91 km long [34]. Near Satpuli, they eventually combine to form the 20 km-long Nayar River. After joining of these two rivers with each other, the river travels to Vyas Ghat where it finally confluences with Ganga River. According to Rashid et al., the Nayar River's watershed is bounded by districts of Uttarakhand, Tehri Garhwal to the north, Chamoli to the east, Almora to the south-east, Nainital to the south, and Dehradun to the west [35]. Horn peaks, serrated canyons, hanging valleys, and waterfalls make it unique. Paithani, Thalisain, Pathisain, Pabo, and Satpuli are significant cities in the Nayar watershed. Its latitude and longitude boundaries are, respectively, 29°45ʹN to 30°15ʹN and 78°32ʹE to 79°12ʹE. The Nayar watershed covers an area of 1956.33 km2, which has elevations ranging from 428 to 3102 m and receives about 1700 mm of rainfall on average annually. Also, the area’s yearly average temperature ranges from 25 °C to 30 °C. The location has a pleasant summertime climate. Figure 1 below shows a study area map.
2.2 Data and methods
In the present study, the integrated use of multispectral satellite imagery, Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, and Survey of India (SOI) Toposheets are carried out for the generation of a geodatabase and assessment of various hydrological analysis. The Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) DEM data [36] along with SOI Toposheets was used for the delineation of topographical and morphological features of the Nayar watershed. The Pre-processed NRSC multi-temporal Advanced Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS) LULC data was utilized for LULC change dynamic [37, 38]. The Morphometric analysis method was used to analyze the Linear, Areal, and Relief aspects of the watershed. Further, the Spatial Analysis Tools (SATs) in ArcGIS desktop software were used for the delineation of watershed boundary and drainage network. Additionally, the watershed, slope, aspect, LULC change, elevation, and drainage density maps, all were created using ArcGIS desktop software. The formulas for performing morphometric analysis, data source information and flowchart of the methodology were define below in Tables 1, 2 and Fig. 2 respectively. Also, the formulas of user’s accuracy, producer’s accuracy, overall accuracy (OA), and kappa coefficient (k) are mentioned in Eq. 1, Eq. 2, Eq. 3 & Eq. 4.
3 Results
3.1 Morphometric analysis
The morphometric analysis explains the linear aspects, areal aspects, and relief aspects of the drainage basin, which is useful to understand its hydrological and morphological characteristics [45]. Morphometric analysis is used in this watershed study to evaluate landforms' form and shape, which influences hydrological behavior. It facilitates comprehension of runoff potential, sediment output, and drainage patterns. This analysis is crucial for managing sustainable watersheds, preventing erosion, and forecasting floods. It also helps with land use planning and the preservation of natural resources.
3.1.1 Linear aspect
The linear aspect of Nayar watershed is one-dimensional in nature. It contains stream length, stream number, stream order, bifurcation ratio, and length ratio. The Nayar watersheds have 1426 streams in total (Table 3). According to Horton's first law, which is illustrated by the graph in Fig. 3, the number of streams in the watershed reduces as stream order advances. Figure 4 depicts the total stream order for the Nayar watershed, which ranges from 1 to 6 [40]. The mean value of the bifurcation ratio is 4.05. The various drainage pattern types in the watershed are explained by the bifurcation ratio. The patterns used in this research are parallel and dendritic. Sediment movement, erosion rates, and water flow patterns are all impacted by linear features in watershed study. They calculate flood hazards, groundwater recharge, and the effectiveness of drainage networks. Comprehending these linear characteristics helps efficient land use planning, management of natural resources, and reduction of hazards, hence advancing sustainable watershed management and environmental resilience.
3.1.2 Areal aspect
A two-dimensional areal aspect is utilized for the evaluation of the areal characteristics of the Nayar watershed. These include the watersheds' perimeter, area, drainage texture, drainage density, circularity ratio, compactness coefficient, frequency of streams, form factor, and elongation ratio. The 1956 km2 and 236.16 km comprise the Nayar watershed area and perimeter, respectively (Table 4). According to Schumm, the elongation ratio can be divided into four categories: circular (> 0.9), oval (0.9–0.8), less elongated (0.8–0.7), and elongated (0.7) [41]. With a value of 0.77, the watershed's shape is less elongated. The circularity ratio of 0.44 also indicates that the watershed is less elongated. The form factor influences the watershed's flow intensity. 0.46 is the form factor value. According to Horton, drainage density and stream frequency are associated with each other [40]. For the Nayar watershed, the stream frequency value is 0.73. The watershed's mean drainage density is 0.97 km/km2. The Nayar watershed has a drainage texture value of 4.67, indicating a coarse drainage texture [46]. The compactness coefficient determines the watersheds' overall compactness. The compactness coefficient has a value of 1.51. According to Farhan et al. [47], a compactness coefficient value of more than 1 corresponds to a higher risk of landslides and erosion; as a result, the Nayar watershed is susceptible to landslides and erosion. reduced values of the elongation ratio, form factor, and circulation ratio imply less permeability, less infiltration, and higher runoff potential, whereas greater values suggest high permeability, more infiltration, and reduced runoff potential [48,49,50]. Morphometric characteristics help achieve successful management methods by efficiently identifying locations in watersheds that are prone to erosion.
3.1.3 Relief aspect
Relief is the third-dimensional aspect. The Nayar watershed has a basin relief value of 2674 m, which indicates significant elevation in the watershed (Table 5). 41.14 is the relief ratio value. According to Shit et al., a high relief ratio indicates that the watershed's maximum area has a steep slope and is therefore susceptible to landslides [51].
3.2 Slope
Understanding slope, a key concept in hydrology is necessary to comprehend how water moves across the Earth's surface. Typically, it implies the steepness or gradient of the landscape. According to Fig. 5a, there are five different classes of slope for the Nayar watershed: very gentle (< = 15°), gentle (> 15°–25°), moderate (> 25°–35°), steep (> 35°–45°), and extremely steep (> 45°–74.58°). The majority of the watershed has moderate, steep, and very steep slopes. A steep slope suggests that the watershed has more runoff and less infiltration, which increases the risk of soil erosion and landslides in the area [24].
3.3 Aspect
The aspect indicates the slope's direction. It identifies the predominant vegetation types in the area. Also, Aspect improves erosion modelling. The aspect value is north at 0° and 22.5°, northeast at 22.5 and 67.5°, and so on (Fig. 5b). The aspect for this study is south-facing on the right bank and north-facing on the left bank of the Nayar River. Both slope and aspect maps indicate that Nayar River is a hilly region that is susceptible to landslides and erosions.
3.4 Elevation
Another topographical feature important for the study of the watershed is elevation. It is a fundamental part of the research of hydrology and is important for managing water resources and understanding the environmental changes that will affect hydrological processes. The Elevation of Nayar Watershed is classified into five classes (Fig. 5c). Class 1: (< = 800 m), Class 2: (> 800 m–1200 m), Class 3: (> 1200 m–1600 m), Class 4: (> 1600 m–2000 m), and Class 5: (> 2000 m to 3102 m). Most of the watershed area has a higher elevation which means that Nayar River and its tributaries flow through the valley region. Elevation data analysis is crucial for characterizing a region's topography and comprehending how it affects the flow, storage, and availability of water [26].
3.5 Drainage density
The shape and drainage flow of drainage networks in a particular region are described using the drainage density, an important parameter in hydrology study. It is calculated by dividing the entire length of the rivers or stream channels in a watershed by the watershed's entire area. As indicated in Fig. 5d, the drainage density of Nayar watershed is classified into 5 classes: (< = 1 km/km2) is very Low, followed by low (> 1 km/km2–2 km/km2), medium (> 2 km/km2–3 km/km2), high (> 3 km/km2–4 km/km2), and very high (> 4 km/km2–5.48 km/km2). The majority of the watershed's areas have very low to low drainage density, which indicates a higher slope, less infiltration, and increased potential for runoff because of the valley region. Drainage density is a crucial parameter for hydrology researchers and water resource managers because it gives information about the spatial distribution of drainage networks, which has an impact on hydrological practices and is crucial for assessing and managing water resources, particularly in the context of sustainable watershed management [52].
3.6 LULC change dynamics
Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) change dynamics refer to the methods, trends, and components that influence changes in the land's utilization over time in a particular geographic location [53]. Effective land management, sustainable development, and informed decision-making all depend on an understanding of LULC change dynamics [54]. To address the complex issues caused by LULC change, a multidisciplinary strategy combining data analysis, GIS and Remote Sensing technologies, and policy development is required. The Pre-processed NRSC multi-temporal Advanced Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS) LULC data at 56 m spatial resolution for the years 2008–09 and 2018–19 were used to understand the LULC change dynamics of the Nayar Watershed. The LULC of the watershed was classified into five classes: Built-up, Agricultural Land, Forest Cover, Wasteland, and Waterbodies (Fig. 6). The most significant area changes in the Nayar watershed are from Forest Cover to Wasteland and from Agricultural Land to Wasteland, totaling 57.60 km2 and 57.15 km2, respectively (Table 6). The landslides and erosion risks will increase as the Wasteland area in the steep or hilly region expands. Also, landslide and erosion activities near water bodies like rivers, lakes, and waterfalls in the region will threat regions biodiversity [55]. The overall accuracy (OA) of the LULC of year 2018–19 is 0.86 with the kappa coefficient (κ) value is 78.43% (Table 7). According to rating criteria of kappa coefficient, the 78.43% κ value is substantial [56]. Long-term challenges are exacerbated by the shift of 110.03 km2 of Forest Cover to Agricultural Land which is a threat to the biodiversity of the area. The area nearby Pabo and between Pathisain to Satpuli area under stress due to human and environmental processes. As per Joshi et al., the sub watersheds 6, 9, 10 and 11 of Pashchimi Nayar River are from moderate to high environmental risk and prioritized for conservation [34]. In addition, the significant shift of working class people from agriculture sector to non-agriculture sector in Purvi Nayar Watershed will eventually increases urbanization and infrastructure development in the region [57].
4 Discussion
This study highlights the importance of morphometric analysis in watershed management by revealing how variations in linear, areal, and relief aspects influence runoff, erosion potential, and watershed stability. The findings suggest that the nayar watershed requires an immediate conservation actions to address its erosion susceptibility. These insights are crucial for informing sustainable watershed management practices in the region, ultimately contributing to the conservation of soil, prevention of floods, and efficient planning for water resource utilization [58]. The LULC change dynamics highlight substantial transformations in the Nayar Watershed, raising environmental concerns such as increased erosion risk and biodiversity threats [59, 60]. For sustainable development, it is crucial to address these changing LULC dynamics through effective monitoring and management [61]. The findings from this study offer a crucial resource for watershed management, focusing on the morphometry and land use/land cover (LULC) of the Nayar River watershed to support sustainable planning. The water resource management in the study area can be executed by safeguarding biodiversity, land resources and other natural resources of the area. Experts and decision-makers involved in sustainable natural resource management will be benefitted with the findings of this study. It is recommended to implement immediate conservation actions, monitor LULC changes, and safeguard natural resources in the Nayar Watershed to support sustainable development and effective watershed management.
5 Conclusion
The assessment of watersheds' morphometry is crucial for conserving precious natural resources. The topographical and morphological characteristics along with LULC change dynamics of the Nayar watershed are thoroughly analysed using morphometric analysis in this study. The Nayar watershed displays a complex hydrological morphology with parallel and dendritic drainage patterns with higher relief. The identification of LULC changing dynamics is a significant outcome of this study. Notably, a substantial area transitioned from agricultural land to wasteland and forest cover to wasteland and agricultural land. This shift raises concerns about increased landslides and erosion risks in the region between Pathisain and Satpuli and the surrounding area of Pabo. The study highlights to the mitigation measures of landslides in the area by promoting plantation activities to protect soil erosion. Additionally, this change poses long-term challenges to the region’s ecological balance. The research finding is limited to the watershed and catchment scale as data used derived from DEM. The insights gained from this study provide a valuable resource for experts and decision-makers involved in sustainable natural resource management. They will be crucial for developing strategies for reducing environmental threats, protecting natural resources, and maintaining the long term sustainability of the Nayar watershed.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript files.
References
Strayer DL, Dudgeon D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2010;29(1):344–58.
Grill G, et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature. 2019;569(7755):215–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9.
Siddha S, Sahu P. Impact of climate change on the river ecosystem. Ecol Signif River Ecosyst. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85045-2.00014-5.
Jain SK, Agarwal PK, Singh VP. Hydrology and water resources of India. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
Afroz R, Masud MM, Akhtar R, Duasa JB. Water pollution: challenges and future direction for water resource management policies in Malaysia. Environ Urban ASIA. 2014;5(1):63–81.
Choudhari PP, Nigam GK, Singh SK, Thakur S. Morphometric based prioritization of watershed for groundwater potential of Mula river basin, Maharashtra, India. Geol Ecol Landscapes. 2018;2(4):256–67.
Yadav SK, Singh SK, Gupta M, Srivastava PK. Morphometric analysis of upper tons basin from Northern Foreland of Peninsular India using CARTOSAT satellite and GIS. Geocarto Int. 2014;29(8):895–914.
Bewket W, Teferi E. Assessment of soil erosion hazard and prioritization for treatment at the watershed level: case study in the Chemoga watershed, Blue Nile basin. Ethiopia Land Degrad Dev. 2009;20(6):609–22.
Castellia G, Minellib A, Teferab ML, Brescia E, Hagosc EY, Embayec TAG, Sebhatleabd M. Impacts of rainwater harvesting and rainwater management on upstream downstream agricultural ecosystem services in two catchments of Southern Tigray Ethiopia. Chem Eng Trans. 2017;58(10):3303.
Melton MA. Correlation structure of morphometric properties of drainage systems and their controlling agents. J Geol. 1958;66(4):442–60.
Strahler A, Strahler A. Physical geography. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Gustavsson M, Kolstrup E, Seijmonsbergen AC. A new symbol-and-GIS based detailed geomorphological mapping system: renewal of a scientific discipline for understanding landscape development. Geomorphology. 2006;77(1–2):90–111.
Rinaldi M, Gurnell AM, Del Tánago MG, Bussettini M, Hendriks D. Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration. Aquat Sci. 2016;78:17–33.
Brinson, M. M. (1993). A hydrogeomorphic clasification for wetlands.
Hornberger GM, Wiberg PL, Raffensperger JP, D’Odorico P. Elements of physical hydrology. Baltimore: JHU Press; 2014.
Kumar A, Darmora A, Sharma S. Comparative assessment of hydrologic behaviour of two mountainous watersheds using morphometric analysis. Hydrol J. 2012;35(3&4):76–87.
Fenta AA, Yasuda H, Shimizu K, Haregeweyn N, Woldearegay K. Quantitative analysis and implications of drainage morphometry of the Agula watershed in the semi-arid northern Ethiopia. Appl Water Sci. 2017;7:3825–40.
Patel DP, Gajjar CA, Srivastava PK. Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Environ Earth Sci. 2013;69(8):2643–56.
Singh P, Thakur JK, Kumar S, Singh UC. Assessment of land use/land cover using geospatial techniques in a semi-arid region of Madhya Pradesh, India. In: Thakur S, Prasad G, editors. geospatial techniques for managing environmental resources. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer and Capital Publication; 2012. p. 152–63.
Hlaing TK, Haruyama S, Aye MM. Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago River Basin of Lower Myanmar. Front Earth Sci China. 2008;2:465–78.
Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R. Prioritization of subwatershed based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing. 2009;37:261–74.
Mani A, Kumari M, Badola R. A GIS-based assessment of Asian River Basin for watershed management of In proceedings 42nd INCA international congress on digital cartography to harness blue economy. Dehradun: INCA; 2023.
Mani A, Kumari M, Badola R. Landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) mapping of Doon Valley using multi-criteria analysis method based on remote sensing and GIS techniques. Discov Geosci. 2024;2:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00044-y.
Singh P, Gupta A, Singh M. Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Egypt J Remote Sensing Space Sci. 2014;17(2):111–21.
Bajirao TS, Kumar P, Kumar A. Application of remote sensing and GIS for morphometric analysis of watershed: a review. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(2):709–13.
Mani A, Kumari M, Badola R. Morphometric analysis of Suswa River Basin using geospatial techniques. Eng Proc. 2022;27(1):65.
Prabhakar A, Singh K, Lohani A, Chandniha S. Study of Champua watershed for management of resources by using morphometric analysis and satellite imagery. Appl Water Sci. 2019;9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1003-z.
Das P, Behera M, Patidar N, Sahoo B, Tripathi P, Behera P, Srivastava S, Roy P, Thakur P, Agrawal S, Krishnamurthy Y. Impact of LULC change on the runoff, base flow and evapotranspiration dynamics in eastern Indian river basins during 1985–2005 using variable infiltration capacity approach. J Earth Syst Sci. 2018;127:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-018-0921-8.
Tena T, Mwaanga P, Nguvulu A. Impact of land use/land cover change on hydrological components in chongwe river catchment. Sustainability. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226415.
Talebi Khiavi H, Mostafazadeh R. Land use change dynamics assessment in the Khiavchai region, the hillside of Sabalan mountainous area. Arab J Geosci. 2021;14:2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08690-z.
Mostafazadeh R, Talebi Khiavi H. Landscape change assessment and its prediction in a mountainous gradient with diverse land-uses. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024;26:3911–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02862-x.
Dobhal PK, Kohli RK, Batish DR. Evaluation of the impact of Lantana camara L invasion, on four major woody shrubs, along Nayar river of Pauri Garhwal in Uttarakhand Himalaya. Int J Biodiversity Conserv. 2010;2(7):155–61.
Tyagi S, Singh P, Sharma B, Singh R. Assessment of water quality for drinking purpose in district Pauri of Uttarakhand. India Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2014;2(4):94–9.
Joshi M, Kumar P, Sarkar P. Morphometric parameters-based prioritization of a Mid-Himalayan watershed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Web of Conf. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128010004.
Rashid M, Sagir M, Dobriyal AK. Age and growth analysis of the fish Mastacembelusarmatus (Lacepede) from River Nayar, Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand. J Appl Natl Sci. 2021;13(1):137–44.
Takaku J, Tadono T, Doutsu M, Ohgushi F, Kai H. Updates of ‘AW3D30’ALOS global digital surface model with other open access datasets. The Int Archiv Photogram Remote Sensing Spatial Inform Sci. 2020;43:183–218.
Land Use Land Cover. National Remote Sensing Centre. Hyderabad: ISRO Government of India; 2008.
Land Use Land Cover. National remote sensing centre. Hyderabad: ISRO Government of India; 2018.
Strahler AN. Quantative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks In Hand Book of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company; 1964.
Horton RE. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1945;56:275–370.
Schumm SA. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at perth amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1956;67:597–646.
Strahler AN. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union. 1957;38:913–20.
Miller VC. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, vol. 3. New York: Columbia University; 1953.
Strahler AN. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1952;63:1117–42.
Mani A, Kumar D. Morphometric analysis of Manali watershed of beas River Basin for watershed management. VayuMandal. 2020;46:21–9.
Smith KG. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci. 1950;248:655–68.
Farhan Y, Anbar A, Al-Shaikh N, Mousa R. Prioritization of semi-arid agricultural watershed using morphometric and principal component analysis, remote sensing, and GIS techniques, the Zerqa River Watershed. Northern Jordan Agric Sci. 2016;8(1):113–48.
Ali K, Bajracharya RM, Sitaula BK, Raut N, Koirala HL. Morphometric analysis of Gilgit river basin in mountainous region of Gilgit-Baltistan Province, Northern Pakistan. J Geosci Environ Protect. 2017;5(07):70.
Singh N, Jha M, Tignath S, Singh BN. Morphometric analysis of a badland affected portion of the Mandakini River sub-watershed, central India. Arab J Geosci. 2020;13:1–14.
Jirjees S, Seeyan S, Hassan IO. Morphometric analysis of the Rawandoz River Basin, Erbil, Kurdistan Region Iraq. Iraqi Geological J. 2022;55:157–72.
Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Maiti R. Potential landslide susceptibility mapping using weighted overlay model (WOM). Modeling Earth Syst Environ. 2016;2:1–10.
Rai PK, Mishra VN, Mohan K. A study of morphometric evaluation of the Son basin, India using geospatial approach. Remote Sensing Appl Soc Environ. 2017;7:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.05.001.
Yesuph AY, Dagnew AB. Land use/cover spatiotemporal dynamics, driving forces and implications at the Beshillo catchment of the Blue Nile Basin, North Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 2019;8(1):1–30.
Mani A, Bansal D, Kumari M, Kumar D. Land use land cover changes and climate change impact on the water resources: a study of uttarakhand state river conservation and water resource management. Springer Nature: Singapore; 2023. p. 1–16.
Mandal S, Mani A, Lall AR, Kumar D. Slope stability assessment and landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lesser Himalaya, Mussoorie. Uttarakhand Discov Geosci. 2024;2:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00055-9.
Islami FA, Tarigan SD, Wahjunie ED, Dasanto BD. Accuracy assessment of land use change analysis using Google Earth in Sadar watershed Mojokerto Regency. Earth Environ Sci. 2022;950(1):012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/950/1/012091.
Bhandari H, Mishra M. The Eastern Nayar watershed: a study of occupational change. Int J Creative Res Thoughts. 2023;11(3):115–23.
Rai PK, Chandel RS, Mishra VN, Singh P. Hydrological inferences through morphometric analysis of lower Kosi river basin of India for water resource management based on remote sensing data. Appl Water Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0660-7.
Gupta K, Satyam N. Co-seismic landslide hazard assessment of Uttarakhand state (India) based on the modified newmark model. J of Asian Earth Sci X. 2022;8: 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaesx.2022.100120.
Omar H, Cabral P. Ecological risk assessment based on land cover changes: a case of Zanzibar (Tanzania). Remote Sensing. 2020;12(19):3114.
Debnath J, et al. Geospatial modeling to assess the past and future land use-land cover changes in the Brahmaputra Valley, NE India, for sustainable land resource management. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;30:1–24.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to the Director General, NMCG. We also want to thank the Director, Wildlife Institute of India.
Funding
This study was carried out under the project ‘Planning and management for aquatic species conservation and maintenance of ecosystem services in the Ganga River basin for a clean Ganga’ (Grant No. B-03/2015-16/1077/NMCG-New proposal), funded by the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.M. Conceptualization, A.M. Data curation, A.M., S.G. and S.Z.A. Formal Analysis, A.M., S.G., S.S. and S.Z.A. Methodology, A.M., S.G., S.S. and S.Z.A. Software, A.M., S.G., S.S. and S.Z.A. Validation, A.M. and S.G. Writing—Original Draft, S.Z.A., R.B. and S.A.H. Writing—Review and Editing, R.B. and S.A.H. Funding acquisition, R.B. and S.A.H. Investigation, R.B. and S.A.H. Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mani, A., Guha, S., Sharma, S. et al. Morphometric analysis and LULC change dynamics of Nayar watershed for the sustainable watershed management. Discov Geosci 2, 63 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00064-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00064-8