Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are generated from diverse categories of plastic debris disposed in open. Its entry into the terrestrial ecosystem could not only impact soil physico-chemical attributes but also endanger the lives of biotas including the earthworms which play significant role in the decomposition of organics and sustaining the nutrient pool. There have been consistent efforts by various workers across the globe to study the impact of MPs on the terrestrial environment and exploring potential mitigation strategies to minimize contamination levels. This review presents a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on impact of MPs on the earthworms from 2017 to 2023. The primary objective is to discern trends among authors, institutions, and countries contributing to research on MPs, particularly concerning their interaction with earthworms. The analysis reveals a steady escalation in the number of publications up to 2022. The VOS viewer software was utilized for data visualization and cluster analysis, unveiling three clusters highlighting keyword groups associated with "microplastics", "soil", and "earthworms". Notably, "microplastics" and "earthworm" emerged as prominent research hotspots.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The production of plastics has increased significantly since the nineteenth century, rising from 1.5 million tons in the 1950s to 368 million tons in 2019 [1] which has been further projected to reach 1.2 billion tons by 2050 [2]. The rapid increase in plastic production has led to the generation of considerable amount of waste. Reports indicate that in 2015, 55% of plastic products were discarded, 25% recycled, and 20% destroyed. It has been predicted that the waste volume will increase by nearly 13% by 2060 [3]. The discarded plastics degrade into microplastics (MPs), ranging from 1 to 100 mm. The European Union alone is producing 75,000–300,000 metric tons of plastic debris annually, impacting various ecosystems and environmental components [4,5]. Information is available on how MP pollution has emerged as potent threat to the oceans, freshwater bodies, and soils at a global scale [6]. The impact of MPs on soil organisms varies based on factors such as particle size, shape, and polymer composition [7,8]. However, the ecological interactions play a crucial role in determining the fate and effects of MPs on terrestrial ecosystems [9]. The research on MPs has been directed towards several key aspects, such as examining the exposure of MPs to soil microbial communities, understanding bioaccumulation processes, assessing soil pollution levels, investigating oxidative stress responses, and evaluating heavy metal contamination [10,11,12]. None the less, understanding the dynamics of MP in soil requires knowledge of the soil's biodiversity and ecology. Research over the past decade has extensively explored the ecotoxicological effects of MPs on earthworms, vital contributors to soil ecosystem processes [13,14]. Earthworms play a crucial role in agricultural vermiremediation, improving soil ecosystem health [15]. They also act as biofilters, bioindicators, bioaccumulators, and transformers of MPs and other pollutant hydrocarbons [16,17]. Recent reports have indicated how the MPs alone and in combination with other soil contaminants impact the growth, behavior, avoidance and reproduction in diverse earthworm species [13,18]. Microorganisms in earthworms' gut help in the fixation, accumulation, and transformation of these toxicants, mitigating their impact [19]. MPs can influence the bioaccumulation of other contaminants in earthworms, such as heavy metals and organic chemicals [20,21]. Polyethylene and polystyrene, the predominant forms of MPs induce histopathological damage in earthworms and serve as carriers of complex pollutants via adsorption–desorption mechanisms [22,23,24]. It has been reported that MP toxicity induced oxidative stress, resulting in neural and DNA damage in earthworms [25]. Previous studies indicate that MPs can impair earthworm spermatogenesis, alter gut bacterial communities, and exhibit minimal short to long-term toxicity on earthworms [10,26]. It is noteworthy that surpassing MP content of 0.1% in soil detrimentally affects earthworm growth and triggers oxidative stress [27,28]. In contrast, Mondal et al. found that the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida exposed to low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs (≤ 125 μm) at concentrations ranging from 0 to 3% w/w showed no mortality or notable weight changes [29]. Nevertheless, elevated MP concentrations have been correlated with increased ingestion rates and skin damage, indicating potential long-term growth implications [29,30]. Both MP fibers and nanoplastics can be ingested by earthworms, affecting egestion rates and potentially accumulating in their tissues over time [18]. Earthworms show a preference for ingesting smaller MP particles, particularly those under 50 μm [13]. Their burrowing activity can facilitate the leaching of MPs into deeper soil layers and potentially into groundwater systems [9]. Higher concentrations of MPs tend to have more severe effects on earthworms [10,11,12,13]. These findings highlight the significant role of earthworms in MP distribution and the potential environmental risks associated with MP pollution in soil ecosystems. While numerous studies have explored the ecological risk posed by MP toxicity to earthworms, a systematic review of the literature is still absent. To explore the biological effects of the MPs notably their toxicity on soil organisms including earthworms, it is necessary to summarize the results from the previous studies. This review employs bibliometric analysis to delve into extensive scientific data, helping in understanding the evolutionary trends within a specific field and highlighting emerging areas. Despite numerous publications in this domain [10,22,24,27], there has not been an attempt to conduct bibliometric analysis on the relationship between microplastics, soil, and earthworms. By elucidating the interplay of keywords and evaluating the research impact, this review seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental risks associated with MP pollution in soil ecosystems.
1.1 Search strategy and data sources
Even though several workers across the globe have been working on the impact of MPs on soil biotas including earthworms, there is a lack of systematic description on the research trends in the field. Therefore, we tried to find out the hierarchical development of the field and current research hotspots using the Scopus core dataset for visualization and analysis of data from the existing literature. The key words selected were “microplastic”, “soil”, “biota”, and “earthworms” to retrieve relevant papers from the Scopus database. The type of documents was open and there was no restriction on the year of publication, author name, subject area, document type, source title, source, and language. About 38 records were obtained and the data set was exported to files in the “Comma Separated Values (.csv)” format. The extracted record was analyzed by Scopus database (https://www.scopus.com) for the period from 2017 to 2023.
1.2 Global research trends
A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on MPs and their impact on earthworms was conducted from 2017 to 2023. The analysis revealed a steady increase in the number of publications on MPs and earthworms up to 2022 (Table 1). The data further indicated that China was the first country to conduct research based on the selected keywords followed by India and Australia (Fig. 1).
The number of publications increased towards 2019, the trend continued in 2020 and 2021 and reached the maximum in 2023 (Fig. 2). Duarte and Pereira have published the highest number of articles in Scopus followed by Mishra and the group [24,31,32]. The VOS viewer software, version 1.6.20, was employed for the visualization of data and the execution of cluster analysis procedures. The keywords and co-author references of the published literature were analyzed by mapping social networks [33].
In bibliometric analysis, the research hotspots are reflected in two-dimensional graphics [34,35]. Specifically, in the VOS viewer, the created social network map shows nodes with varying thickness. The frequency of occurrence is shown by the node sizes, and the strength of the association between nodes is presented by the thickness of the lines between the nodes [24]. In prior bibliographic analyses concerning the ecological interaction of MPs, the extensively cited literature delves into the intricate relationship between MPs and earthworms, exploring the adaptation and survival of earthworms in response to pollutants and polyester fibers [36,37,38]. Nevertheless, the accumulation and biological impacts of organic pollutants and heavy metals within earthworms may undergo alteration due to MPs via the adsorption–desorption process [24,39]. However, our review of the highly cited literature revealed only five studies addressing this phenomenon.
1.3 Keyword co-occurrence and co-authorship analysis
Co-occurrence and keyword analyses were conducted to visualize the correlation and evolution of various research themes using bibliometric data (Fig. 3). Full counting methodology was implemented, with a minimum threshold of 5 occurrences for a keyword to be considered. Among 866 keywords, 65 met this criterion. Centrality measures the extent to which a specific node lies on the shortest path between other nodes. A higher centrality value signifies a stronger influence of that particular node.
The analysis identified the top 10 keywords with high centrality, namely "microplastics," "soil," "pollution," "earthworm," "exposure," "accumulation," "toxicity," "oxidative stress," and “ecosystem". Among them, three clusters were identified, comprising 1855 links, which underscore keyword groups emphasizing the connection among " microplastics," "soil," and "earthworms." Notably, " microplastics " and "earthworm" emerged as research hotspots, exhibiting the highest frequency of occurrence. This observation suggests that research in this domain draws upon a multitude of disciplines, spanning engineering, metabolomics, and microbiology. Moreover, the analysis unveiled the interconnectedness of research trajectories, underscoring the significance and present developmental status of diverse research domains within this field.
Co-author analysis was conducted to visually depict the correlation and evolution of various research themes using bibliometric data (Fig. 4).
Each document involved a maximum of 25 authors, with at least one document attributed to each author. A total of 209 authors met these criteria, resulting in the identification of the largest connected set comprising 14 items, with two clusters and 55 links observed. Additionally, the interrelationship among countries concerning the same research domain is illustrated in Fig. 5, with 21 countries meeting the threshold criteria, each contributing at least one document.
Four clusters with 13 links were identified. Furthermore, citation analysis of documents revealed 38 documents meeting the threshold, organized into 11 clusters with 27 links (Fig. 6 and Table 2).
Rodriguez-Seijo et al., placed within cluster 3, exhibited a higher citation count relative to other documents [40]. The analysis revealed that the most representative types of MPs studied in relation to earthworm toxicity were polyethylene and polystyrene. In a previous section of the bibliography, a group of researchers disclosed their findings from a keyword co-word analysis, which categorized keywords into two principal themes: the implications of adsorption–desorption properties of MPs on the accumulation and bio-effectiveness of other contaminants in earthworms, and the adverse effects of ingested MPs on earthworms [24]. Furthermore, authorship distributions over the years represent a critical aspect of scholarly output and collaboration dynamics within scientific communities. The analysis of authorship trends provides insights into the evolution of research networks, collaboration patterns, and the dissemination of scientific knowledge over time. Through an analysis of author distribution across various publication years, the data unveiled a higher prevalence of publications involving multiple authors as opposed to joint or single-author contributions (Table 3).
This indicates emerging interdisciplinary collaborations, and the impact of individual researchers or research groups within their respective fields. The frequency of documents published across various journals and books utilizing specified keywords are mentioned in Table 4.
The vertical column denotes the sources of the published literature, while the horizontal row signifies the number of manuscripts published in these sources across different years, spanning from 2017 to 2023. Following data collection, a time series analysis was conducted based on the annual publication counts, as demonstrated in Table 5. Notably, there is a consistent upward trend in the number of publications each year. The peak volume of articles was observed in 2023. Particularly noteworthy are the journals "Environmental Pollution" and "Science of The Total Environment" which have contributed significantly to this body of literature. "Environmental Pollution" has contributed to this field annually, except in 2022, while "Science of The Total Environment" has maintained continuous publication from 2021 to 2023. The cumulative count of published articles across 20 different journals and books until 2023 amounts to 38, denoted as "y" in Table 5.
1.4 Time series analysis and forecasting for microplastic literature growth
The time series is a sequence taken at consecutive equally spread-out points in time. Time series analysis comprises methods for analyzing the data to extract meaningful statistics and other characteristics. Time series forecasting is the use of a mathematical model to predict future values based on the previously observed values.
In this study, time series analysis has been applied to forecast the growth of microplastic literature. The table number 5 shows the time series analysis of 7 years, from 2017–2023. The number of papers published is represented as “y” and “x” is the deviation from the median value which is 5. To arrive at the assessment for future growth, straight line equation is applied.
The straight-line equation is
where, Y= number of literatures published in future,
Here, y is number of papers published each year, N is maximum number of papers published and x is the deviation.
since Σx = 0,
Now applying the values in the straight-line equation, we can find the estimated literatures in 2030.
Here, X = The time duration between 2030–2019 which is 11 years.
Putting the values of a, b and X in the straight-line equation we find,
From the results, it is evident that there is an increasing trend of research literature in the future years. Here, the time series predicts the future trend in upcoming 11 years. This increasing trend signifies the future scope and availability of more literature resources in the mentioned area and has been depicted in Fig. 7.
1.5 Future research perspectives
The results of majority of research on MP-earthworm interactions are from laboratory short duration experiments in controlled environmental conditions. In the natural environment, the soil properties and earthworm types are widely variable so also the environmental factors which could impact the interaction of MPs with other potent contaminants and their intake by the earthworms. The epigeic, endogeic and anecic earthworms too could respond differently to these contaminants since they inhabit different soil strata. It will also be interesting to observe the fate of the adsorption–desorption of MPs with pesticides, heavy metals and other contaminants in the field conditions over a long period of time. Whether long term exposure of earthworms to the MPs and the co-contaminants in the soil environment could cause irreparable DNA damages need to be explored further. Therefore, future studies should focus more on field experiments with emphasis on the long-term impact of MPs in soil with or without co-contaminants on earthworms inhabiting diverse terrestrial habitats with a wide range of environmental variables.
2 Conclusions
The current review delves into the temporal dynamics of MP research, spanning 2017–2023, employing bibliometric and time series analyses. A meticulous scrutiny of Scopus data underscores escalating global contributions, with a preeminence from China. VOS viewer elucidates thematic clusters, spotlighting interrelations among "microplastics," "soil," and "earthworms." The nuanced examination of cited literature unveils divergent research focus. Concurrently, time series analysis prognosticates sustained growth in MP literature, yielding an estimated 23.107 publications by 2030. This integrative methodology not only discerns current MP research paradigms but also prognosticates future trajectories, serving as a roadmap for environmental science stakeholders and policymakers in this burgeoning domain.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Verla AW, Enyoh CE, Verla EN, Nwarnorh KO. Microplastic–toxic chemical interaction: a review study on quantified levels mechanism and implication. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(11):1–30.
Finnegan AMD, Gouramanis C. Projected plastic waste loss scenarios between 2000 and 2030 into the largest freshwater-lake system in Southeast Asia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–12.
Ncube LK, Ude AU, Ogunmuyiwa EN, Zulkifli R, Beas IN. An overview of plastic waste generation and management in food packaging industries. Recycling. 2021;6(1):12.
Bermúdez JR, Swarzenski PW. A microplastic size classification scheme aligned with universal plankton survey methods. MethodsX. 2021;8:10–5.
Kannan K, Vimalkumar K. A review of human exposure to microplastics and insights into microplastics as obesogens. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12: 724989.
Sarker A, Deepo DM, Nandi R, Rana J, Islam S, Rahman S, Hossain MN, Baroi A, Kim JE. A review of microplastics pollution in the soil and terrestrial ecosystems: a global and Bangladesh perspective. Sci Total Environ. 2020;733: 139296.
Lin D, Yang G, Dou P, Qian S, Zhao L, Yang Y, Fanin N. Microplastics negatively affect soil fauna but stimulate microbial activity: insights from a field-based microplastic addition experiment. Proc Biol Sci B. 1934;2020(287):20201268.
Liu H, Yang X, Liu G, Liang C, Xue S, Chen H, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V. Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. Chemosphere. 2017;185:907–17.
Du S, Zhu R, Cai Y, Xu N, Yap PS, Zhang Y, He Y, Zhang Y. Environmental fate and impacts of microplastics in aquatic ecosystems: a review. RSC Adv. 2021;11(26):15762–84.
Wang Q, Adams CA, Wang F, Sun Y, Zhang S. Interactions between microplastics and soil fauna: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2022;52(18):3211–43.
Li M, Liu Y, Xu G, Wang Y, Yu Y. Impacts of polyethylene microplastics on bioavailability and toxicity of metals in soil. Sci Total Environ. 2021;760: 144037.
Li K, Xiu X, Hao W. Microplastics in soils: production behaviour process impact on soil organisms and related toxicity mechanisms. Chemosphere. 2024;350: 141060.
Cui W, Gao P, Zhang M, Wang L, Sun H, Liu C. Adverse effects of microplastics on earthworms: a critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;850: 158041.
Ding L, Huang D, Ouyang Z, Guo X. The effects of microplastics on soil ecosystem: a review. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2022;26: 100344.
Zeb A, Li S, Wu J, Lian J, Liu W, Sun Y. Insights into the mechanisms underlying the remediation potential of earthworms in contaminated soil: a critical review of research progress and prospects. Sci Total Environ. 2020;740: 140145.
Datta S, Singh J, Singh S, Singh J. Earthworms pesticides and sustainable agriculture: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(9):8227–43.
Sinha RK, Sunil H, Karmegam N, Chauhan K, Chandran V. Vermitechnology-the emerging 21st century bioengineering technology for sustainable development and protection of human health and environment: a Review. DSDP. 2010;4(1):22–47.
Zhang M, Zhang Y, Wang W, Cui W, Wang L, Sun H, Liu C. Combined effects of microplastics and other contaminants on earthworms: a critical review. Appl Soil Ecol. 2022;180: 104626.
Houida S, Yakkou L, Chelkha M, Bilen S, Bhat SA, Raouane M, Harti AE, Amghar S. Exposure to emerging contaminants: ecotoxicological effects on earthworms and the potential of gut-associated microorganisms in bioremediation. Earth Technol Org Waste Manag Recent Trends Adv. 2023;257:292.
Xu G, Yang Y, Yu Y. Size effects of polystyrene microplastics on the accumulation and toxicity of (semi-)metals in earthworms. Environ Pollut. 2021;291: 118194.
Sobhani Z, Fang C, Naidu R, Megharaj M. Microplastics as a vector of toxic chemicals in soil: enhanced uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid by earthworms through sorption and reproductive toxicity. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;22: 101476.
Siddiqui SA, Singh S, Bahmid NA, Shyu DJH, Domínguez R, Lorenzo JM, Pereira JAM, Câmara JS. Polystyrene microplastic particles in the food chain: Characteristics and toxicity—a review. Sci Total Environ. 2023;892: 164531.
Shang G, Zhai J, Xu G, Wang L, Wang X. Ecotoxicological effects of co-exposure biodegradable microplastics polylactic acid with cadmium are higher than conventional microplastics polystyrene with cadmium on the earthworm. Sci Total Environ. 2023;903: 166953.
Guo S, Wang Q, Li Z, Chen Y, Li H, Zhang J, Wang X, Liu J, Cao B, Zou G, Zhang B, Zhao M. Ecological risk of microplastic toxicity to earthworms in soil: a bibliometric analysis. Front Environ Sci. 2023;11:1126847.
Baihetiyaer B, Jiang N, Li X, He B, Wang J, Fan X, Sun H, Yin X. Oxidative stress and gene expression induced by biodegradable microplastics and imidacloprid in earthworms (Eisenia fetida) at environmentally relevant concentrations. Environ Pollut. 2023;323: 121285.
Kwak JI, An YJ. Microplastic digestion generates fragmented nanoplastics in soils and damages earthworm spermatogenesis and coelomocyte viability. J Hazard Mater. 2021;402: 124034.
Gautam K, Anbumani S. Recent trends in analytical measures of microplastic in soil and toxicopathological risk assessment in earthworms. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2023;2023(168): 117292.
Yang X, Zhang X, Shu X, Gong J, Yang J, Li B, Lin J, Chai Y, Liu J. The effects of polyethylene microplastics on the growth reproduction metabolic enzymes and metabolomics of earthworms Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;263: 115390.
Mondal T, Jho EH, Hwang SK, Hyeon Y, Park C. Responses of earthworms exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastic fragments. Chemosphere. 2023;333: 138945.
Franzellitti S, Canesi L, Auguste M, Wathsala RHGR, Fabbri E. Microplastic exposure and effects in aquatic organisms: a physiological perspective. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;68:37–51.
Mishra AK, Singh J, Mishra PP. Microplastics in polar regions: An early warning to the world’s pristine ecosystem. Sci Total Environ. 2021;784:147149.
Paço A, Duarte K, Costa JP, da Santos PSM, Pereira R, Pereira ME, Freitas AC, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TAP. Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fungus Zalerion maritimum. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:10–5.
Cowhitt T, Butler T, Wilson E. Using social network analysis to complete literature reviews: a new systematic approach for independent researchers to detect and interpret prominent research programs within large collections of relevant literature. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2020;23(5):483–96.
Liu C, Yu R, Zhang J, Wei S, Xue F, Guo Y, He P, Shang L, Dong W. Research hotspot and trend analysis in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease: a machine learning bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2021. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 972079.
Yu Y, Wang S, Yu P, Wang D, Hu B, Zheng P, Zhang M. Abibliometric analysis of emerging contaminants (ECs) (2001–2021): evolution of hotspots and research trends. Sci Total Environ. 2024;907: 168116.
Astner AF, Gillmore AB, Yu Y, Flury M, DeBruyn JM, Schaeffer SM, Hayes DG. Formation behavior properties and impact of micro- and nanoplastics on agricultural soil ecosystems (a review). NanoImpact. 2023;31: 100474.
Surana D, Vinay P, Ghosh P, Sharma S, Kumar V, Kumar S. Microplastic fibers in different environmental matrices from synthetic textiles: ecotoxicological risk mitigation strategies and policy perspective. J Environ Chem Eng. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112333.
Chang X, Fang Y, Wang Y, Wang F, Shang L, Zhong R. Microplastic pollution in soils plants and animals: a review of distributions effects and potential mechanisms. Sci Total Environ. 2022;850: 157857.
Song W, Du Y, Li D, Xiao Z, Li B, Wei J, Huang X, Zheng C, Wang J, Wang J, Zhu L. Polyethylene mulch film-derived microplastics enhance the bioaccumulation of atrazine in two earthworm species (Eisenia fetida and Metaphire guillelmi) via carrier effects. J Hazard Mater. 2023;455: 131603.
Rodríguez-Seijo A, da Costa JP, Rocha-Santos T, Duarte AC, Pereira R. Oxidative stress, energy metabolism and molecular responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastics. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(33):33599–610.
Kim D, Kim H, An Y-J. Species sensitivity distributions of micro- and nanoplastics in soil based on particle characteristics. J Hazard Mater. 2023;452: 131229.
Li T, Lu M, Xu B, Chen H, Li J, Zhu Z, Yu M, Zheng J, Peng P, Wu S. Multiple perspectives reveal the gut toxicity of polystyrene microplastics on Eisenia fetida: Insights into community signatures of gut bacteria and their translocation. Sci Total Environ. 2022;838(Pt 4): 156352.
Wang H-T, Ding J, Xiong C, Zhu D, Li G, Jia X-Y, Zhu Y-G, Xue X-M. Exposure to microplastics lowers arsenic accumulation and alters gut bacterial communities of earthworm Metaphire californica. Environ Pollut. 2019;251:110–6.
Surya Prakash DV, Gupta I, Mallu MR, Munawar TM. Soil pollution by micro- and nanoplastics: sources, fate, and impact. In: Maddela NR, Reddy KV, Ranjit P, editors. Micro and Nanoplastics in Soil Threats to Plant-Based Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 11–34.
Rodríguez-Seijo A, Santos B, Ferreira da Silva E, Cachada A, Pereira R. Low-density polyethylene microplastics as a source and carriers of agrochemicals to soil and earthworms. Environ Chem. 2019;16(1):8–17.
Zhu D, Bi Q-F, Xiang Q, Chen Q-L, Christie P, Ke X, Wu L-H, Zhu Y-G. Trophic predator-prey relationships promote transport of microplastics compared with the single Hypoaspis aculeifer and Folsomia candida. Environ Pollut. 2018;235:150–4.
Fajardo C, Martín C, Costa G, Sánchez-Fortún S, Rodríguez C, de Lucas Burneo JJ, Nande M, Mengs G, Martín M. Assessing the role of polyethylene microplastics as a vector for organic pollutants in soil: Ecotoxicological and molecular sapproaches. Chemosphere. 2022;288: 132460.
Holzinger A, Mair MM, Lücker D, Seidenath D, Opel T, Langhof N, Otti O, Feldhaar H. Comparison of fitness effects in the earthworm Eisenia fetida after exposure to single or multiple anthropogenic pollutants. Sci Total Environ. 2022;838(Pt 3): 156387.
Lackmann C, Velki M, Šimić A, Müller A, Braun U, Ečimović S, Hollert H. Two types of microplastics (polystyrene-HBCD and car tire abrasion) affect oxidative stress-related biomarkers in earthworm Eisenia andrei in a time-dependent manner. Environ Int. 2022;163: 107190.
Rodriguez-Seijo A, Lourenço J, Rocha-Santos TAP, da Costa J, Duarte AC, Vala H, Pereira R. Histopathological and molecular effects of microplastics in Eisenia andrei Bouché. Environ Pollut. 2017;220:495–503.
Okoffo ED, O’Brien S, Ribeiro F, Burrows SD, Toapanta T, Rauert C, O’Brien JW, Tscharke BJ, Wang X, Thomas KV. Plastic particles in soil: state of the knowledge on sources, occurrence and distribution, analytical methods and ecological impacts. Environ Sci Proc Impacts. 2021;23(2):240–74.
Zhang L, Xie Y, Liu J, Zhong S, Qian Y, Gao P. An overlooked entry pathway of microplastics into agricultural soils from application of sludge-based fertilizers. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(7):4248–55.
Rezaei Rashti M, Hintz J, Esfandbod M, Bahadori M, Lan Z, Chen C. Detecting microplastics in organic-rich materials and their potential risks to earthworms in agroecosystems. Waste Manage. 2023;166:96–103.
Sobhani Z, Panneerselvan L, Fang C, Naidu R, Megharaj M. Chronic and transgenerational effects of polystyrene microplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations in earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(8):2240–6.
Khalid N, Aqeel M, Noman A. Microplastics could be a threat to plants in terrestrial systems directly or indirectly. Environ Pollut. 2020;267: 115653.
Liu M, Feng J, Shen Y, Zhu B. Microplastics effects on soil biota are dependent on their properties: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;178: 108940.
Liwarska-Bizukojc E. Effect of (bio) plastics on soil environment: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;795: 148889.
Ferreira-Filipe DA, Paço A, Natal-da-Luz T, Sousa JP, Saraiva JA, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T, Patrício Silva AL. Are mulch biofilms used in agriculture an environmentally friendly solution?—an insight into their biodegradability and ecotoxicity using key organisms in soil ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2022;828: 154269.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the School of Life Sciences at Sambalpur University and OUAT for their support and resources during the course of this research.
Funding
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.M.: Writing—original draft, drawing illustrations & editing, A.P.: Review and editing the draft, C.S.M.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—Review & Editing, B.P.B.: Editing the original draft, S.S. and R.R.S.: Writing and editing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publication
All authors viewed and agreed with the final version of this manuscript and gave their explicit consent for it to be submitted for consideration to be published.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moharana, T., Patnaik, A., Mishra, C. et al. Global research landscape of microplastics and their impact on earthworm: a bibliometric analysis. Discov Environ 2, 115 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00152-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00152-z