Abstract
Purpose
Postoperative pain management is a critical aspect of surgical care, significantly influencing patient recovery and outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of opioid use on hospital stay and mortality rates among patients undergoing abdominal surgeries in Brazil, where healthcare disparities may affect postoperative outcomes.
Methods
This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the University Hospital Onofre Lopes in Natal, Brazil. We included 385 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent abdominal surgery in 2023. Data were collected from medical records, focusing on analgesic therapy, opioid types, dosages, and patient demographics. Statistical analyses were performed using JAMOVI software.
Results
Opioid consumption was prevalent among the cohort, with 89.6% of patients receiving opioids postoperatively. Tramadol was the most frequently administered opioid, followed by nalbuphine and morphine. Patients treated with morphine had a significantly extended median hospital stay (15.5 days) compared to those receiving tramadol or nalbuphine (2 days). Morphine use was also associated with a higher mortality rate, with these patients being 16 times more likely to die compared to those on weaker opioids. Older age and extended hospital stays were additional risk factors for increased mortality.
Conclusion
Opioids were used extensively in this cohort as the main analgesic drug for postoperative pain management after abdominal surgeries. Use was associated with prolonged hospital stay and higher probability of death.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Postoperative pain management is a crucial part of surgical care, directly influencing patient recovery and outcomes. In Brazil, healthcare disparities [1, 2] may impact postoperative results, making it essential to explore the role of opioids in this setting. Despite being the primary analgesic for surgical pain [3], opioids are consumed at lower rates [4] in Brazil compared to developed countries. This discrepancy highlights the need to investigate the effects of opioid use on patient recovery, particularly in economically and healthcare-constrained environments.
Our study, conducted at the University Hospital Onofre Lopes (HUOL) in Natal, Brazil, examines how opioid use affects the length of hospital stay and mortality rates among post-surgical patients. These indicators are critical for assessing the implications of opioid management on recovery and safety [5, 6]. By examining these factors, we aim to provide insights that can inform the development of improved pain management protocols.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and population
This is a transverse observational study, which included participants aged 18 years or older who underwent abdominal surgery between January 1st and December 31st, 2023. Eligibility extended to patients treated by surgical teams specialized in general, gastrointestinal, or oncologic surgery and who had undergone either general or regional anesthesia. Patients who died during surgery and those who remained hospitalized at the end of data collection period were not included in the study.
Our primary aim was to delineate the epidemiological profile of opioid usage among patients undergoing surgery during the year 2023 and any impact on the convalescence period.
We used the STROBE cross sectional checklist when writing our report [7].
2.2 Data collection
We systematically gathered data from medical records, starting from the immediate postoperative period up to the point of medical discharge. This data collection included detailed records of analgesic therapy such as the types of opioids prescribed, the duration of opioid usage, daily dosages, and the use of any adjuvant analgesic drugs. We also recorded demographic and epidemiological information, including the patient's sex, age, and the surgical team involved.
2.3 Statistical analysis
We performed statistical analyses using JAMOVI software. Specific statistical tests are detailed in the table legends. Continuous variables were tested for normal distribution and summarized using means, standard deviations, medians, and interquartile ranges as appropriate. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Associations between opioid use and various patient characteristics were evaluated using logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders identified in the preliminary analysis.
3 Results
3.1 Characteristics of participants
Eligibility criteria returned 406 entries with abdominal surgeries. Three patients were excluded for being under 18 years old, five were excluded for being hospitalized when the data collection period ended and 13 refused to participate. Thus, we analyzed opioid consumption among 385 surgical patients at the HUOL throughout 2023 (Table 1). The cohort was predominantly female (61.2%) with 43.4% aged 41–60 years. Detailed demographic characteristics are provided in Table 1, which includes distributions by sex, age, and type of surgery. The general surgery team performed the largest portion of surgeries (41.3%), predominantly prescribing tramadol as the most robust analgesic during recovery. The median duration of hospital stay was two days, with an interquartile range of 5 days.
3.2 Opioid usage analysis
A significant majority of the patients (89.6%) used opioids during their postoperative hospital stay (Table 1). Tramadol was overall the most frequently administered opioid, followed by nalbuphine and morphine. A small subset of patients (10.4%) did not receive any opioids.
In the analysis of daily opioid requirements (Table 2), we observed that the morphine dosage varied significantly by age, with older patients aged 61–94 requiring higher doses (median 10 mg, range 3–12 mg) compared to other age groups (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in nalbuphine and tramadol dosages across genders, with medians around 80 mg morphine equivalent (MME) (range 36.2–160 MME) for nalbuphine and 60 MME (range 60–80 MME) for tramadol. Regarding surgical type, bariatric surgery patients required the lowest median morphine dose at 4 mg, while the same group needed higher tramadol doses, consistently at 80 MME. Conversely, oncological surgery was associated with the lowest nalbuphine doses (median 30 MME, range 30–40 MME), significantly lower than those for gastrointestinal surgeries (p < 0.001). These findings indicate distinct opioid requirements based on patient age and type of surgery, suggesting the need for tailored pain management approaches.
3.3 Hospital stay and opioid use
The length of hospital stay varied significantly depending on the type of opioid used (Table 3). Patients treated with morphine had a notably longer median stay (15.5 days) compared to those who received weaker opioids like nalbuphine or tramadol (2 days). However, the variation in hospital stay between patients receiving weaker opioids and those not receiving any opioids was not statistically significant.
Furthermore, linear regression revealed significant associations between opioid type and length of hospital stay (Table 3). Specifically, each additional milligram of morphine administered was associated with a nearly 7-h increase in hospital stay. Patients older than 50 experienced a hospital stay 28% longer than those younger than 50.
3.4 Mortality
There were 14 instances of mortality. The logistic regression analysis identified 3 predictors of increased mortality risk with statistical significance. In our analysis, morphine use was significantly associated with increased mortality risk (odds ratio [OR] = 16.85, standard error [SE] = 0.831, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.30–85.91, p < 0.001). For every additional day of hospitalization, the odds of mortality increased by 6.4% (OR = 1.064, SE = 0.022, 95% CI: 1.019–1.110, p = 0.005). Additionally, patients above the median age of 50 years were 8.23 times more likely to die compared to those below the median age (OR = 8.23, SE = 0.910, 95% CI: 1.38–48.92, p = 0.021).
4 Discussion
Our analysis reveals that administering opioids, specifically morphine, significantly prolongs hospital stay. Patients treated with morphine experienced notably longer median stays compared to those receiving weaker opioids like nalbuphine or tramadol. This finding is consistent with other studies [8, 9] that have reported both chronic and sporadic opioid use during hospitalization being associated with increased duration of stay and a higher number of readmissions within 30 days.
Prolongation of hospital length of stay (LOS) linked to opioid use stems from a range of morbid effects associated with these substances. Impacts on the immune system [10] and an elevated predisposition to acute infectious diseases [11,12,13] have been reported. Furthermore, opioids are associated with extended durations in intensive care stay, including delayed extubation times, as seen in previous studies [14].
Logistic regression analysis has shown that morphine use significantly increases mortality rates, indicating a critical need for careful opioid prescription. The academic debate on this association remains unresolved, with some studies confirming our results [15] and others reporting no such link [16,17,18]. Factors such as underlying health conditions, the reasons for opioid prescriptions, and treatment management are significant contributors that might confound direct associations with mortality. Regarding LOS, the data demonstrated a dose-dependent relationship between morphine administration and a substantial increase in LOS, along with additional factors such as advanced age that may influence recovery time and the need for extended care.
The increase in LOS associated with morphine use compared to weaker opioids is multifactorial. Patients requiring higher doses or more potent analgesia likely had a broader clinical background, necessitating longer assistance time [19, 20]. With respect to age treatments are more complex in older patients. This population typically presents a higher incidence of comorbidities and physiological changes that impact drug effects. Increased consumption or use of more potent opioids by older patients is hazardous, as this population often has reduced hepatic and renal function, leading to prolonged drug circulation and decreased blood volume, concentrating the dose in a smaller volume of blood [19, 20].
In addition, research indicates that endogenous opioids are essential for pain modulation and stress responses. Furthermore, gonadal steroid hormones, particularly estrogen, are associated with reduced pain during periods of elevated blood concentration [21]. The complex pain signaling cascade begins in the spinal cord, ascends to the cortex, and involves various neural components, such as neurons, microglia, inflammatory reactions, and neurotransmitters [22]. A higher consumption among women was expected, given that this cascade performs differently between males and females, as men are less sensitive to pain and respond more intensely to opioids than women [22]. However, in our study, there was no statistically significant difference in the consumption of opioids between females and males, which contrasts with other studies [23, 24]. This suggests that although research indicates women are generally more sensitive to pain than men, the discrepancies observed are not always uniform, especially sex hormones and their immunological, inflammatory and neural activities [22]. We also noted a statistically significant association between opioid use and age, indicating a predilection of adults ≤ 60 years for analgesia with nalbuphine. There are various explanations and theories for this association. From a neurobiological point of view, it is common for older people to have higher pain thresholds and reduced sensitivity to pain, which can result in a lower demand for opioids [25]. The use of simple analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as adjuvants to opioids plays a crucial role in the management of postoperative pain [26]. These adjuvants are often prescribed to complement pain control and they can also reduce the need for high-dose opioids, thus minimizing the potential associated side effects, such as sedation, nausea, constipation, and the risk of addiction [27]. Our data showed a clear preference for dipyrone as an adjuvant analgesic, present in 85.2% of the prescriptions analyzed (supplementary file). There is a notable divergence in analgesic drug preferences between different countries, with Brazil standing out for its predominant use of dipyrone, while in other nations, paracetamol and NSAIDs are more common [28, 29]. These variations in use can be attributed to availability, cost, perceived effectiveness, and medical and cultural preferences. These findings support physicians in considering age, gender, and adjuvant analgesics in managing patients' postoperative pain, helping to direct resources appropriately and including a more targeted approach to improve patient comfort, but can also have significant benefits in terms of safety and postoperative recovery.
The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution; there are several limitations. The observational nature of the survey constrains our ability to deduce the causality between opioid consumption and increased mortality or prolonged hospital stays. Furthermore, the analysis did not fully adjust for potential confounders such as baseline health conditions and the indications for prescribing opioids. The absence of complete medical histories, particularly previous opioid use, may have influenced outcomes. Additionally, applicability of our results is limited by the specific demographic of HUOL and potentially may not reflect broader populations. Lastly, the dependency on hospital records for data extraction might have introduced bias due to possible inaccuracies or incompleteness.
5 Conclusion
Our findings indicated that nearly all patients used opioids in the postoperative period following abdominal surgeries. Weak opioids, tramadol, and nalbuphine were most commonly used. The use of morphine was associated with increased hospital stay and mortality. Strategies to reduce opioid use should be implemented for this patient group.
Availability of data and materials
Data for this study is gathered and stored in the institution’s internal network and is unavailable due to ethical restrictions imposed by the institutional review board.
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- HUOL:
-
University Hospital Onofre Lopes
- LOS:
-
Length of stay
- MME:
-
Morphine milligram equivalent
- NSAID:
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- SE:
-
Standard error
References
do Nascimento RCRM, Álvares J, Guerra Junior AA, Gomes IC, Costa EA, Leite SN, et al. [Availability of essential medicines in primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System]. Rev Saúde Pública. 2017;51(Suppl 2):10s. Portuguese.
Cataife G, Courtemanche C. Income-based disparities in health care utilisation under universal health coverage in Brazil, 2002–2003. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(4):394–410.
Bujedo BM, Santos SG, Azpiazu AU. A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in the management of postoperative pain. J Opioid Manag. 2012;8(3):177–92.
Berterame S, Erthal J, Thomas J, Fellner S, Vosse B, Clare P, et al. Use of and barriers to access to opioid analgesics: a worldwide, regional, and national study. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1644–56.
Edwards DA, Hedrick TL, Jayaram J, Argoff C, Gulur P, Holubar SD, et al. American society for enhanced recovery and perioperative quality initiative joint consensus statement on perioperative management of patients on preoperative opioid therapy. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(2):553–66.
Shen MR, Waljee JF. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: can they reduce postoperative opioid use. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):e72.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9.
Waljee JF, Cron DC, Steiger RM, Zhong L, Englesbe MJ, Brummett CM. Effect of preoperative opioid exposure on healthcare utilization and expenditures following elective abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):715–21.
Hardy N, Zeba F, Ovalle A, Yanac A, Nzugang-Noutonsi C, Abadier M, et al. Association of prescription opioid use on mortality and hospital length of stay in the intensive care unit. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250320.
Wang J, Barke RA, Charboneau R, Schwendener R, Roy S. Morphine induces defects in early response of alveolar macrophages to Streptococcus pneumoniae by modulating TLR9-NF-kappa B signaling. J Immunol. 2008;180(5):3594–600.
Wang J, Barke RA, Ma J, Charboneau R, Roy S. Opiate abuse, innate immunity, and bacterial infectious diseases. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2008;56(5):299–309.
Wang J, Barke RA, Charboneau R, Roy S. Morphine impairs host innate immune response and increases susceptibility to Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection. J Immunol. 2005;174(1):426–34.
Roy S, Wang J, Kelschenbach J, Koodie L, Martin J. Modulation of immune function by morphine: implications for susceptibility to infection. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2006;1(1):77–89.
Liu D, Lyu J, Zhao H, An Y. The influence of analgesic-based sedation protocols on delirium and outcomes in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184310.
McCarthy CP, Bhambhani V, Pomerantsev E, Wasfy JH. In-hospital outcomes in invasively managed acute myocardial infarction patients who receive morphine. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(2):150–8.
Puymirat E, Lamhaut L, Bonnet N, Aissaoui N, Henry P, Cayla G, et al. Correlates of pre-hospital morphine use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and its association with in-hospital outcomes and long-term mortality: the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction) programme. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(13):1063–71.
Maher DP, Wong W, White PF, McKenna R, Rosner H, Shamloo B, et al. Association of increased postoperative opioid administration with non-small-cell lung cancer recurrence: a retrospective analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:i88–94.
Wu HL, Tai YH, Chang WK, Chang KY, Tsou MY, Cherng YG, et al. Does postoperative morphine consumption for acute surgical pain impact oncologic outcomes after colorectal cancer resection? Medicine. 2019;98(18):e15442.
Urman RD, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Neville BA, Harry EM, Weiner SG, et al. The burden of opioid-related adverse drug events on hospitalized previously opioid-free surgical patients. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(2):e76–83.
Jones MR, Brovman EY, Novitch MB, Rao N, Urman RD. Potential opioid-related adverse events following spine surgery in elderly patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;186:105550.
Leresche L. Defining gender disparities in pain management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(7):1871–7.
Sorge RE, Totsch SK. Sex differences in pain. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(6):1271–81.
Peck CJ, Carney M, Chiu A, Park KE, Prassinos A, Allam O, et al. Sex, race, insurance, and pain: do patient sociodemographics influence postoperative opioid prescriptions among hand surgeons? Hand. 2022;17(6):1133–8.
Mobini A, Mehra P, Chigurupati R. Postoperative pain and opioid analgesic requirements after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(11):2285–95.
Cummings S, Scime NV, Brennand EA. Age and postoperative opioid use in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(10):1371–7.
Kumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A review of opioid-sparing modalities in perioperative pain management: methods to decrease opioid use postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(5):1749–60.
Buvanendran A, Kroin JS. Useful adjuvants for postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21(1):31–49.
Song Y, He Q, Huang W, Yang L, Zhou S, Xiao X, et al. New insight into the analgesic recipe: a cohort study based on smart patient-controlled analgesia pumps records. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:988070.
Durmus M, Kadir But A, Saricicek V, Ilksen Toprak H, Ozcan EM. The post-operative analgesic effects of a combination of gabapentin and paracetamol in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(3):299–304.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to all those who work at the Clinical Research Center and the Division of Teaching and Research of HUOL, as their contributions and expertise in providing the necessary resources and a conducive research environment, were indispensable for this study.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lucas Maia and Isabella Chaves conceived the idea, and performed the data collection, background research and contributed to the final manuscript. Heitor Medeiros reviewed the data, the preliminary findings, analytical methods, statistical analysis and contributed to the final manuscript. Glauco Francisco Silva performed the statistical analysis of the data. Wallace Andrino da Silva supervised the entire research process, providing guidance on data collection, statistical analysis and the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
After adhering to the ethical guidelines approved by the Institutional Review Board of HUOL, ensuring all necessary patient consents as outlined with a Certificate of Presentation and Ethical Appreciation (CAAE) number 71062223.0.0000.5292 (supplementary file), we conducted this observational cross-sectional study at the HUOL/Natal, Brazil. We conducted the study under the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the HUOL ethical committee. Since the study involved de-identified data from existing medical records, it was exempt from the requirement for further ethical review.
Consent for publication
All authors have granted authorization for submitting this paper for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maia, L., Chaves, I., Medeiros, H. et al. Impact of opioids on hospital stay and mortality in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. APS 2, 33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00071-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00071-5