Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
For decades, etomidate has stood out among other hypnotic agents for its remarkable hemodynamic stability and minimal respiratory depression [1]. However, etomidate-induced adrenocortical suppression has been proved to increase morbidity and mortality, especially in critically ill patients [2, 3], and these concerns have greatly limited its use. Thus, there is still an urgent clinical need for a general intravenous anesthetic with a beneficial cardiovascular and respiratory profile like etomidate, but with no or minimal adrenocortical suppression.
Methoxyethyl etomidate hydrochloride (ET-26) is one of the novel etomidate analogues designed and synthesized by the Laboratory of Anesthesia & Critical Care Medicine of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. It differs from other etomidate analogues by a modification of the ester side chain instead of replacement to keep its metabolite to etomidate acid, thus minimizing or eliminating its adrenocortical inhibition [4, 5]. The major structural change in the ET-26 molecule compared to etomidate is presented in Fig. 1. Preclinical studies conducted in beagle dogs and rats have demonstrated that ET-26 has very favourable pharmacological advantages, including rapid-onset with short-lasting sedative-hypnotic effects, superior myocardial performance, stable hemodynamic, minimal respiratory depression, and virtually no adrenocortical suppression [4]. In a phase I, single-centre clinical trial on healthy volunteers, ET-26 exhibited an excellent safety profile and tolerability up to a single-administration dose of 2.8 mg/kg. A bolus dose of ET-26 0.8 mg/kg was found to have a comparable sedative-hypnotic effect and slight cortisol inhibition versus etomidate. These superior anesthetic advantages and non-suppression of adrenal function have quickly promoted ET-26 into clinical practice for anesthesia induction in surgical patients. Here, we present our latest clinical research findings on ET-26.
A phase II clinical trial was conducted from June 30, 2022 through February 3, 2023. This study was approved by the Clinical Trial Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University and registered on National Medical Products Administration (registration number, CTR20221102) and Chinese Clinical Trial Register (registration number, ChiCTR2400083190).
The phase IIa part of the study was designed as a single-centre, non-randomized, single-blind, positive control, dose-exploration study to find optimal dosage of ET-26 for the safety and effective induction of anesthesia. Patients 18–65 years of age, with a body mass index between 18 and 30 kg/m2, ASA physical status 1–2 and scheduled for an elective surgery (without cardiothoracic and neurosurgical surgery) longer than 0.5 h were included. Etomidate at 0.3 mg/kg was used for the positive control group according to current practice. The optimal dosage was determined on the basis of the success rate of anaesthesia induction following the sequential design and up-and-down method. A total of 34 patients were enrolled with 10 in the 0.3 mg/kg etomidate group, 10 in the 0.8 mg/kg ET-26 group, 10 in the 0.6 mg/kg ET-26 group, 2 in the 0.5 mg/kg ET-26 group and 2 in the 0.4 mg/kg ET-26 group. Loss of consciousness (LOC) maintained for more than four minutes was defined as successful induction. LOC was assessed by both the loss of eyelash reflex and no response to verbal. All patients in the 0.3 mg/kg etomidate group showed LOC within one min after administration and achieved for a 100% induction success rate. For ET-26, 100% induction success was achieved in both the 0.6 mg/kg and 0.8 mg/kg dose groups, but in the 0.4 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg dose groups, further exploration was terminated at the second patients because the doses did not produce anesthesia effect that could maintain LOC. Based on the results, we choose 0.8 mg/kg ET-26 as the recommended dosage for preferred depth of anesthesia with a higher proportion of bispectral index values maintained between 40 and 60 during the post-administration observation period and only mild adrenocortical inhibition compared with etomidate. For the purpose of preliminarily confirming the efficacy and safety of ET-26 at a dosage of 0.8 mg/kg, the phase IIb clinical trial was designed as a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled study. Eighty patients were randomly allocated to either the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) or the ET-26 group (0.8 mg/kg). The trial was conducted at five centres in China, including the First Affiliated Hospital of Peking University, the Shenzhen People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The successful induction of anesthesia was defined as the achievement of a MOAA/S score ≤ 1 and the completion of tracheal intubation within seven minutes after administration. Both groups achieved a successful induction rate of 100%. Most importantly, ET-26 presented promising advantages in causing only a slight and transitory adrenocortical suppression and a rapid adrenocortical recovery profile within 24 h in the surgical patients. No myoclonus was observed in any patient, as the anesthetic was used in combination with pre-administration of midazolam and sufentanil, as clinical routine. A lower incidence of nausea and vomiting were also observed in the ET-26 group than in the etomidate group. No AEs of grade ≥ 3 or SAEs were reported. To the best of our knowledge, this phase II clinical trial was the first study of etomidate analogues for anesthesia induction in surgical patients, and ET-26 showed highly promising potential.
Based on the preliminary findings from Phase II clinical studies, we concluded that the satisfactory sedative-hypnotic properties and minimal adrenocortical suppression profile of ET-26 warranted further investigation. The phase III clinical trial was designed to involve a larger sample size to verify the efficacy and safety of ET-26 for induction in patients undergoing elective surgery. It was designed as a multicentre, randomized, double-blinded, and double-simulation study, with a total of 270 subjects planned to be enrolled. The study was initiated in October 2023 and being carried out at nine centres in China. The overview of the study design and research process is displayed in Fig. 1. We expect that ET-26 will prove to be a promising, effective and safe etomidate analogue for clinical application.
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Adverse event
- ASA:
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists
- ET‑26:
-
Methoxyethyl etomidate hydrochloride
- LOC:
-
Loss of consciousness
- MOAA/S:
-
Modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation
- SAE:
-
Serious adverse event
References
Criado A, Maseda J, Navarro E, Escarpa A, Avello F. Induction of anaesthesia with etomidate: haemodynamic study of 36 patients. Br J Anaesth. 1980;52(8):803–6.
Absalom A, Pledger D, Kong A. Adrenocortical function in critically ill patients 24 h after a single dose of etomidate. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(9):861–7.
Allolio B, Stuttmann R, Leonhard U, Fischer H, Winkelmann W. Adrenocortical suppression by a single induction dose of etomidate. Klin Wochenschr. 1984;62(21):1014–7.
Wang B, Yang J, Chen J, Kang Y, Yang LH, Liu J, et al. An etomidate analogue with less adrenocortical suppression, stable hemodynamics, and improved behavioral recovery in rats. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(2):442–50.
Yang J, Kang Y, Wang B, Yang L, Liu J, Zhang W. Metabolite-inactive etomidate analogues alleviating suppression on adrenal function in Beagle dogs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;99:343–9.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Wensheng Zhang, Jin Liu, and Weiyi Zhang conceived and designed the body. Xiaojuan Jiang wrote the original draft and complete the submission. Qinqin Yin and Xiaoqian Deng were responsible for the review of overall content and revised version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Dr. Jin Liu (Editor-in-Chief) and Dr. Wensheng Zhang are Editorial Board members of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science. The manuscript was handled by an Editor of no competing interest at all and was undergone the equivalent standards of peer review process. Both of the two authors were not involved in the journal's peer review of, or decisions related to, this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, X., Yin, Q., Deng, X. et al. Advance of a new etomidate analogue — methoxyethyl etomidate hydrochloride (ET-26) for anesthesia induction in surgical patients. APS 2, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00062-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00062-6