Abstract
More than half of the annual global concrete materials were produced in China due to the rapid developing construction industry, which partly led to the shortage of river sand. However, mining rate exceeds the natural replenishment rate of river sand recently, resulting in depletion of natural river sand accumulation. The increasing demand of river sand influences lots of aspects including altered landforms, increasing carbon emissions, ecological deterioration, international trades and disputes. To face the river sand resource shortage in China and to propose possible coping strategies, the data of river sand for construction in China and other related data were collected, and it is suggested that effective policy measures should be taken right now to protect river sand and strictly manage sand mining. Professional solutions for river sand shortage can be summarized as “5Rs” principle, which includes reduce, recycle. reuse, replace and recover. System dynamic model is established to predict the trend of river sand shortage and it was predicted that the gap between river sand supply and demand will come up to 63%. The impact of three policy scenarios is tested in the model, and the gap can be reduced to 35% by single policy scenario, while the scenario with all policy measures is able to reduce the contradiction between supply and demand to 4%. Suggestions are proposed from the aspects of structural and material technology, policy measures and international alliances. Attention should be paid to the shortage of river resources, to realize the sustainable development of the construction industry and other related industries, and to promote the harmonious coexistence of human and nature.
摘要
由于建筑业的蓬勃发展,每年在中国生产的混凝土占比全球一半以上,大量的建设一定程度上导致了河砂的短缺。此外,近年来河砂资源的自然补给速度超过了人类对河砂的开采速度,导致河砂自然资源的枯竭。河砂已成为仅次于水资源的第二大消费品,居高不下的河砂需求导致的过量开采影响了河岸地貌、碳排放、生态环境、国际贸易甚至引发国际争端。为了对我国河砂资源短缺问题提出可行的应对策略,收集了中国用于建筑的河砂数据和其他相关数据,并建议立即采取有效的政策措施以保护河砂资源、严格采砂管理。专业的解决方案可以概括为“5Rs”原则,包括减少(Reduce)、回收(Recycle)和再利用(Reuse)、替换(Replace)和恢复(Recover)。本文初步建立了系统动态模型,预测了河砂短缺的趋势,结果表明河砂的供需缺口将达63%,并在模型中检验了三种政策情景的影响,单一政策情景下的河砂供需差距可以缩小到35%,而采用所有政策的情景下,基本可以解决河砂供需矛盾(缩小到4%)。此外,本文建议从结构和材料、政策措施和国际联盟等方面采取相应措施,以实现建筑业等相关产业的可持续发展,促进人与自然的和谐共处。
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
River sand, as one of natural resources used by human beings for thousands of years, plays a key role in the development of multiple industries, especially in construction industries [1]. The use of sand has stood the test of time. From the ancient Great Wall to modern skyscrapers, sand and gravel are needed as raw materials due to its unique particle shape and irreplaceability as fine aggregates in concrete and mortar.
In the past two decades, the shifts in construction patterns, population growth, urbanization and infrastructure development have tripled river sand demand. About 50 billion tons of sands are consumed per year, with an average of 18 kg per person per day [2]. Alternative building materials have not alleviated the sand shortage. As for existing buildings in China, it is estimated that steel structure roughly accounts for 10% and timber structure accounts for 5%. Approximately 85% existing buildings consume natural sand. Every year over 10.5 billion tons of river sand are used in concrete and mortar all over the world [3, 4]. After decades of rapid development of the construction industry, the total amount of construction industry in China has gradually stabilized. Data of total completion area of all kinds of architectures and the cement consumption in 2003–2019 is summarized and shown in Fig. 1 [3]. The construction industry in China remained stable at a high level between 2014 and 2019 after the rapid development in 2003–2014. Judging from the current development trend of data, the high construction volume and the consumption of nature resource will still last for a long period in China, which makes the problem of sand resource shortage more urgent to be resolved. Compared with other industries, the shortage of sand resources in the construction industry is particularly acute worldwide.
Data of construction area and cement production in China (2003–2019) [3]. a Development of construction area and cement production in China; b Construction area for different functions in China
River sand is the best choice of fine aggregate for the civil engineering industry, which is related to the unique formation process of river sand. River sand is erosional product of geotechnical body over a long-term. Shattered geotechnical body and original sand enter rivers that are like conveyor belts [5]. The shape and particle size of river sand are appropriate and the content of impurities is low after the scouring of the river water, which makes river sand much suitable for constructions [6]. It is self-evident that the human demand for sand and gravel is as great as the demand for houses.
Therefore, river sand has become the largest natural resource used in construction and the most extracted materials worldwide, exceeding fossil fuels and biomass [5]. However, unlike other resources, river sand is generally regarded as a non-rare natural resource, and it is generally taken locally without strict regulation. So, mining river sand can quickly bring considerable economic benefits, which in turn leads to excessive exploitation of river sand. This scenario directly leads to a much faster consumption than nature production in river sand resource. [7].
The hazards of over-exploitation are manifold. First of all, the large-scale mechanical sand mining will change the direction of the river, destroy the stability of the river bank and bed, increase soil erosion, and flood [7, 8]. In coastal areas, excessive sand mining can also cause problems such as rising sea levels and narrowing of beaches [9]. Secondly, large-scale sand mining will also exacerbate water scarcity [5]. River sand is part of the aquifer and maintains the connection between the river and groundwater. Excessive sand mining will cause the groundwater level to drop. River sand contains water and is mined blindly. A large amount of water is lost during mining and transportation [10]. In addition, destroying surface vegetation will weaken its water purification function, causing drinking water sources to be polluted.
The shortage of river sand resource and suffered hazards are regarded as looming crisis [7], and many studies have focused on the consequences of river sand shortage and how to alleviate this gap. As the supply of previously available river sand became scare, various countries and regions gradually began to restrict the arbitrary mining of river sand. The emphasis on sand resources has received widespread attention, and stricter resource conservation and utilization measures and trade restrictions have been proposed. However, the effect is not satisfactory. For example, the Yangtze River, the longest river in Asia, drainage area accounts for about one fifth of China's land area. For centuries, the Yangtze River has been irrigating this land and accumulating a lot of sand. According to “Yangtze Mud and Sand Bulletin” [7], the natural transportation amount of river sand in Yangtze River has been dropped significantly. The data of sediment transport from six hydrological stations along the Yangtze River in four provinces are summarized and illustrated in Fig. 2 [11]. From 2006 to 2017, the sediment transport in the main stream of the Yangtze River showed a significant downward trend. To cope with the excessive consumption of river sand, China began to implement the Yangtze River Sand Mining Management Regulations in 2002. But an inadequate regulatory system made this policy futile. Countless sand mining ships still stole river sand at night. According to the statistics, since 2002, the Yangtze River has contributed 840 million tons of sand, but only 80.46 million tons of those got permit. For decades, various human activities have almost used the accumulation up [11].
Sediment transport in Yangtze River [11]
At the same time, analogy with petroleum resources and biomass energy, the international disputes faced by river sand resources after the shortage should also be paid attention [12]. With the uneven increase in demand for river sand, the natural distribution of river sand resources has also been studied [13]. The distribution around the world of river sand resources and their natural replenishment are unable to obtain directly. In order to quantify and highlight the uneven distribution of river sand, the amount of sand transport can be roughly used to characterize the distribution of river sand resources in various regions. Based on the study of 957 rivers around the world, Asian rivers have the largest annual sand transport volume, accounting for more than half of the world [13]. However, Asian countries have relatively few management measures on the river sand. Whether this uneven distribution and utilization will exacerbate the shortage of river sand is still uncertain.
The importance of river sand and the impact of sand mining have been gradually realized, and a variety of solutions to the shortage problem of river sand have been proposed in most countries. The local and global impacts of river sand collection are deeply summarized to prove its damage to the environment. Existing and conceivable measures are classified and analyzed, and five scenarios are proposed to discuss the effects of these measures. Technical measures, policies and bans, which can be summarized as “5R” (Reduce, Recycle, Reuse, Replace, and Recover), could partially alleviate the negative influence caused by excessive mining of river sand and disorderly trade. Despite those efforts, a global river sand strategy for solving the shortage and using resources sustainably does not yet exist.
2 Excessive river sand mining and its impact
River sand resources are mined from freshwater lakes and rivers. During the process of mining, transportation, and trading, they have had an important impact on the environment, economy and society, both locally and globally.
2.1 Environmental impact
River sand attached to the riverbed is defense of geotechnical body. Disorderly mining leads to irregular pits where the slope angles increase and mechanical strength of geotechnical body has decreased significantly. This can lead to local collapse or cracks, and the balance between water and sand is broken. Apart from the adjustment of riverbed, capillary water in the ground surface is destroyed, which in turn causes land desertification. The impact on topography is bigger than we ever thought [14].
Sand mining exposes groundwater and changes the condition of groundwater circle. The ability of riverbeds to store underground subsurface flow will disappear, the hydraulic connection between underground subsurface flow and shallow pipelines changes, and pipelines cannot be replenished, resulting in drying up of shallow wells, the death of trees, and the reduction of agricultural production [3]. Bridges and embankments were built according to long-term hydrological situation, and large-scale sand mining result in water level drop. Pile foundations will be exposed to harsh environment and easily damaged.
Besides, water bodies and biodiversity are also affected. Sand mining stirs up sediment and reduces water transparency of rivers and lakes, which weakens the underwater light condition. And then the photosynthesis of flora can be impaired which leading to its delay growth or even destruction [1].
2.2 Social impact
Scarce river sand resources are given the value of trade, and further through international trade caused a lot of social impact. Countries that cannot meet their own demand for river sand shifted their focus to other countries. According to China's natural sand import and export trade data (see Fig. 3) [15], such a large volume of trade activities will inevitably lead to energy consumption and environmental pollution. The uneven distribution of river sand resources between regions has caused a lot of expenditure to be consumed in the process of transportation and trading, which intensifies the economic impact of river sand resources.
The natural sand import and export data in China [15]
After the gradual expansion of regional influence, the shortage of river sand resources may trigger predatory development like other mineral resources that have been valued, which may gradually develop into international resource problems and even lead to international disputes. Cross-regional rivers will directly induce conflicts between countries in the basin, such as the Mekong River, while trade conflicts between regions will indirectly induce trade conflicts among countries [9, 12]. But so far, there are no relevant policies and regulations to prevent or resolve such disputes, which should be paid attention seriously.
3 5Rs principle and solution
The sand shortage is becoming a worldwide problem, to solve this problem, new “5Rs” principles was taken up with in this paper, and the strategies for river sand shortage solutions are summarized as “Reduce, Recycle, Reuse, Replace, and Recover”, which are explained in details in the following subchapters.
3.1 Reduce
This principle means reducing river sand consumption, and is the most basic measure to solve the river sand shortage. This principle requires that the amount of river sand should be reduced as much as possible while meeting the needs and requirements of humans for construction.
On the one hand, the demand for new buildings and repair the buildings should be reduced. It is estimated that the safety of about 30% ~ 50% of buildings has declined or entered a period of functional degradation [16]. However, the pursuit of economic development requires developing countries to adopt simple and cheap demolition methods in the short term [17]. Waste building materials cannot be used, and a brand-new building consumes a lot of river sand, which makes the gap between supply and demand of river sand increasingly widening. Therefore, in the long run, the profit of this demolition method is not worth the loss. In view of this situation, some research has been conducted on the renovation of the building. If new structures are not built and old ones are not demolished, building maintenance will consume fewer natural resources.
On the other hand, more consideration should be given to the structure with fewer consumables, such as the timber structures, bamboo, and rattan structures, etc. Timber structure is a simple structure that has good seismic behavior and excellent thermal insulation performance [18]. Due to forest degradation and the pursuit of high-rise buildings, the occupation rate of timber structures in some countries is now very low, but in some countries, the occupation rate of timber structure houses is as high as 90% [19]. Therefore, with the increase of plantation forests and the technology improvement of timber structure, it is also a very potential alternative in China. Similarly, bamboo and rattan have been used as building materials in various areas of residence and life since ancient times: pavilions, viewing platforms, etc., are not only resting places, but also unique ornament [20]. Bamboo and vine structure are easy to maintain, safe and comfortable. The most important reason is that the bamboos and vines grow rapidly, which proves that bamboo and vine structures are sustainable building types. In recent years, the International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) has cooperated with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to formulate relevant standards and specifications for bamboo buildings. With the active promotion of the development of bamboo and rattan structures by the government and international organizations, bamboo and rattan have been applied as green building materials in the construction industry. The application will have broad development prospects.
3.2 Recycle
The recycling utilization of river sand is the most sustainable way to solve the shortage of nature resources [21]. It is estimated that the total construction and demolition waste (C&D waste) generation was over 1.5 billion tons in 2017 (excluding construction spoil) and waste concrete accounted for 30% to 40% of the total C&D waste [22]. Over 40% of recycling production from waste concrete is suitable to use as recycled sand in preparing concrete or mortar.
Recycling of concrete waste has the potential to reduce the amount of building waste requiring to be disposed of at landfills and to preserve natural resources and energy. The Chinese government has already taken big steps to promote the recycling of waste concrete as secondary resources. China has carried out reclamation of waste concrete in more than 30 provinces and cities, and about 100 recycling plants with a capacity of more than 1 million tons per year have been built [23]. There have been many recycled concrete buildings rising in China successfully, such as the Shanghai Ecological House located in the 2010 Shanghai World Expo Park, residential buildings in Du Jiangyan City constructed in the post-earthquake reconstruction area and a 12-storey high-rise building in Shanghai [24]. It should be known that these successfully implemented cases do not represent the end of construction waste recycling. These examples are only a good start in terms of current construction waste utilization rate.
3.3 Reuse
To reduce the demand for river sand and dispose of old buildings, new ideas and technologies are proposed. Nowadays a new way dealing with overage buildings, called deconstruction, has been proposed [25]. Like building blocks, old buildings are deconstructed into components and regroup new buildings with building blocks. With this solution, the continuing service of buildings rarely requires natural materials. An old building could be reassembled again and again, with little or no natural materials. Buildings suitable for deconstruction must undergo a reasonable design for disassembly and assembly during the entire construction. The implementation of such new technologies can enable building components to be reused in the future, which will save the consumption of natural sand and other resources [26].
3.4 Replace
This principle means replacing natural river sand with substitutions, which could be divided into three main categories. The first category is natural sand and gravel that is less developed and will not have much impact on the environment. The second category is artificially manufactured or modified sand and gravel, while the third category is solid waste after crushed, sieved, and pre-treated.
The first category of natural sand and gravel includes gravel from excavated soil waste and marine aggregates. Sand and gravel in the excavated soil waste produced by engineering construction replace natural river sand. Studies have shown that the similarity of chemical composition between the excavated soil waste and natural river sand is 60% ~ 85%. The available utilization rate of the treated excavated soil waste is as high as 98.4% [27]. When the replacement rate of this kind of sand and gravel is lower than 50%, the mechanical properties of the. concrete have not been significantly affected [28].
The application of marine aggregates in the construction industry is not uncommon, but because sea sand contains chloride ions, it will accelerate the corrosion of steel bars in the concrete building, which may cause damage to the building in severe cases. It is necessary to clean and desalinate sea sand before applying it in the concrete building [26]. Therefore, a large amount of sea sand is often used as a fill project. If the scale and technology are expanded and the cost is reduced, sea sand will be a very potential substitute [29, 30].
With huge reserves and low cost, desert sand is widely concerned and it is expected to replace river sand in concrete in the future. The area of desert around the world has exceeded 36 million square kilometers, accounting for about 20% of the global land area. The average thickness of the world desert is about 3.5 m. It is roughly estimated that the desert sand volume is 1.26 × 1014 m3 [31]. Large area of desert has caused various environmental problems, including sandstorms and climate deterioration. The total amount of construction sand is limited compared to the total amount of desert sand. Therefore, the use of desert sand can not only solve the problem of the shortage of construction sand, but also solve the environmental problem to a certain extent [32].
Despite these advantages, desert sand cannot completely replace river sand in construction because of its physical and chemical properties [33]. Compared with river sand, desert sand has a finer particle size with more than 80% of the grains smaller than 0.16 mm, which does not meet the size range for fine aggregate in the concrete standard in China, Europe and the USA. The extra fine particle size of desert sand brings higher water requirement, higher air content, lower workability, and lower strength of concrete [34]. In terms of chemical properties, corrosive elements in the desert sand can cause corrosion of reinforcing steel in building components, which in turn reduces the durability of concrete structure and cannot be widely promoted. Studies show that desert sand can replace part of the river sand in construction with measures, including sieving to acceptable grades, using efficient admixture and finding suitable applications in construction materials [35]. Applications with lower strength requirements for cement-based materials, such as masonry materials, are expected to use desert sand instead of river sand [36].
The second category of sand and gravel includes machine-made sand, waste plastic modified lightweight aggregate and so on. Manufactured sand refers to sand processed by machines and other auxiliary equipment. The raw material can be natural stone or tailings. Compared with natural river sand, the manufactured sand has less impact on the environment.
The third category is using solid waste to replace sand and fillers in concrete, which has been suggested by some researchers [37, 38]. For instance, waste glass can be used as a replacement for river sand in concrete after crushing and sieving [37], while it can also be used as a high value-added supplementary cementitious material after grounded to fine powder [39]. On another note, the marine clay may also be used as filler substitution in concrete [38]. After calcined at 700 °C, the crushed marine clay can replace the filler in ultra-high performance concrete.
In addition, some industrial waste can also be used as substitutes for sand and gravel. In recent years, some scholars have processed waste plastics into aggregates and used them to prepare concrete or mortar [40]. Relevant studies have shown that using waste plastic particles to modify ordinary concrete can not only realize the renewable utilization of waste plastics, but also improve the performance of ordinary concrete. Studies have shown that plastic particles can significantly improve the flexural toughness and fatigue properties of concrete, and replacing lightweight aggregates with plastic particles with a replacement rate of less than 8% can increase the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and flexural strength of concrete [41]. The volume of waste plastics is huge and difficult to degrade. When used to prepare sand and gravel, it not only solves the problem of sand shortage, but also solves the problem of environmental pollution caused by waste plastics.
3.5 Recover
Alleviating the shortage of river sand requires not only reducing consumption, but also increasing natural replenishment. Excessive sand mining has induced great impact and harm to the natural environment. In turn, the deterioration of nature has also caused a negative impact on human beings. Therefore, to solve the problem of the shortage of sand and gravel, it is important to recover the natural environment. River sand is erosional product of geotechnical body over a long-term. Shattered geotechnical body and original sand enter rivers that are like conveyor belts. Therefore, river sand can be divided into replenishing sand and geological deposits. Excessive sand mining not only exhausts replenishing sand, and consume a lot of deposits in just a few decades [42]. In order to solve the environmental degradation caused by excessive sand mining, in principle, natural restoration should be the main method and artificial restoration is supplemented. Therefore, the most basic and most important measure is to at least stop the increase in mining, so that the natural environment can regain river sand replenishment. In addition, some artificial restoration measures should be taken into account. For example, the restoration of the coastline is mainly through the methods of beach berm sand replenishment, artificial dune integration, underwater sand dams and sand dike filling [43]. Through these methods, it is possible to restore natural river sand and achieve sustainable development of sand and gravel mining. At the same time, the impact of restricting sand mining is multifaceted. For example, China is enforcing a ten-year fishing ban in the Yangtze River [11]. Sand mining will destroy the living environment of organisms of the river, which will greatly reduce the effect of the ban on fishing. If the ten-year policy of exhausting sand can be implemented at the same time, at least the effect of the fishing ban will be significantly improved.
4 Policy scenario and system dynamic modelling
4.1 Local policy
It is a prerequisite for maintaining available river sand resource to balance the sand collection and natural replenishment of sand. Compared with China, developed countries such as the USA and UK have paid more attention to river sand resources. Sand mining generally happens in aquatic ecosystems, due to excessively disordered mining. It will bring serious ecological and environmental problems, in addition to destroying sand resources.
In response to the negative impact of sand mining, the Chinese government issued regulations on river management in 1988 [44]. Recently, the relevant departments have been strengthening rectification throughout the country. The sand mining industry ushered in a storm of rectification across the country, and many local governments have issued documents to prohibit random sand mining activities. According to incomplete statistics, there are more than 20 municipalities, nearly 200 prefecture-level cities, and more than 1,000 county-level cities, which prohibit and restrict sand mining [45]. However, as it can be seen, these measures have had limited effect. Probably we should improve management strategies.
Sand mining vessels are easier to supervise, and control vessels often regulate sand mining behavior indirectly [46]. In the past, these measures may not be effectively implemented. However, QR code and base station positioning technology may be able to solve this problem well. As we have seen, in the fight against the epidemic, these technologies can not only indicate the place of departure and destination, but also can roughly track the itinerary, which can better manage the sand mining ship.
Massive demand makes the value of sand and stone rise rapidly and remain high, and high profits give birth to disorderly mining, and it is infeasible to blindly prohibition, which has been confirmed in many other countries like Nepal, India, etc. [47]. China is positively looking for alternatives. Manufactured sand has recently been vigorously promoted in China. Besides, with the support of policies, the production scale has rapidly changed from a simple dispersed artificial or semi-mechanical workshop to a large-scale intensive mechanized automated factory, and the industry has made great progress. Manufactured sand gradually replaces natural sand to make up for the market demand. At present, it accounts for nearly 70% of construction sand. In addition to manufactured sand, recycled sand and other alternatives got promoted and related technical specifications have been issued and applied in production.
Although regulations including “Water Law of the People's Republic of China” have been enacted in China, the status of river sand resources has not been elevated to the level of national strategic. The collection of river sand has been prohibited by law and the penalties for pirate sand mining have been increased. But due to the lack of effective supervision, there are still many unreasonable phenomena existing from river sand mining to application in the construction industry. More stringent supervision and attention to river sand resource are expected [48]. In addition to maintaining sand available curve through law and regulations, encouraging policies for new technologies are expected to reduce the local demand for sand resources.
4.2 Global policy around the world
In addition to local policy restricting the unsustainable development of river sands, international policies are also crucial. After local policy restricts domestic river sand mining, the market will greatly increase imports, thus implementing excessive sand mining in countries that do not restrict river sand mining, called predatory sand mining. Predatory mining will have a major impact on the environment, energy and international trade in regions where sand resources are currently abundant, further exacerbating the global unsustainable use and shortage of sand resources [1]. Obviously, the shortage of sand resources and predatory sand mining will further trigger international disputes. But unlike oil, natural gas and rare metals resources that have been highly valued, river sand is not restricted by international conventions. Restricted mining and export bans in some countries cannot solve the global shortage of sand resources. In the sand resource international disputes, regional-scale sand resource mediation agreements were adopted.
The USA has made a good demonstration about this. The House of Representatives in USA passed The National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2015 [49]. The bill stipulates that gravel aggregates and related minerals used in infrastructure construction are recognized as key strategic resources in the United States. This bill aims to establish a market monitoring mechanism to avoid under-capacity or over-capacity in the strategic mineral resources industry, which will greatly protect the domestic gravel resources. Therefore, international sand resource contracts are suggested to be formed. Referring to the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions Limitation, the International Union of River Sand Resources should restrict sand mining in all countries and make recommendations on river sand trade from a macro perspective.
4.3 System dynamic modelling
The system dynamics (SD) model is commonly used to study changes of related variables in dynamic changes [50]. Seven different kinds of data have been considered to predict the demand of river sand, including economic, population, structure, policy, recycled and replaced subsystem (Fig. 4). In each subsystem, the original facts of impacts, the transmission factors of impacts and the main impacts that directly affect river sand demand are summarized in green, blue and brown box diagrams, respectively. Besides, the relationships between different factors are represented by arrows and serve as the basis for building the system dynamic model.
First, the demand of river sand without any solutions taken has been predicted by the system dynamics model as demonstrated in Fig. 5. In this model, the river sand price, concrete and masonry structure ratio, replacement ratio of recycled sand and regeneration speed of river sand are considered unchanged, thus simulating a situation where no river sand restriction measures are taken. GDP growth rate, birth rate and death rate are set to change over time, and its change trend is based on changes in previous years and government plan. The relationship between building demand and its factors is obtained by linear regression.
Another system dynamics model was set to explore the impact of various strategies for solving the problem of river sand shortage on the demand of river sand, as shown in Fig. 6. In this model, the data of building demand was originated in the original model. The price of river sand is considered to be influenced by the proportion of imports and mining policies, and affects the proportion of sand for structural use, the proportion of river sand substitutes used, and the recycled rate.
All data were collected from database of China National Bureau of Statistics (data.stats.gov.cn), database of China Aggregates Association (www.zgss.org.cn/index.html), and database of Yangtze River Hydrological Station (www.cjh.com.cn).
4.4 Policy scenarios
The introduction demonstrated the strategic significance of sand resources and the urgency of solving the problem of river sand shortage. To obtain a feasible solution and analyze the effects, some related data was collected and prediction model was established. Using the method in the Sect. 4.3, the curve of sustainable sand resources supplies and the demand of sand resource have been predicted. The data including natural replenishment of river sand in Yangtze River, building area of completed constructions, birth and death rate, GDP per capita, etc. are used to establish the model.
Based on the above discussions, five scenarios with different measures were developed to estimate the change in river sand demand over the period 2020–2035. The compositions of the policy scenarios are showed in Fig. 7. Scenarios were settled by three technical measures (recycle, reduce, and replace) and market policy to promote technology applications. The details of five policy scenarios are as follows:
-
1)
WoPS: Without policy scenarios, business as usual;
-
2)
HreuPS: Promote building construction reduction, with low recycled and replaced rate;
-
3)
HrecPS; High recycled rate, with high urban renewal rate and low replaced rate;
-
4)
HrepPS, High replaced rate, with normal urban renewal rate and low recycled rate;
-
5)
WAPS, With all policy scenarios, minimize the gap between supply and demand.
5 Results and discussions
The results of the SD model are summarized in Fig. 8. WoPS highlights the future development of river sand shortage and provides a baseline for comparing the effectiveness of policy scenarios. Three scenarios (HreuPS, HrecPS, HrepPS) compare the effects of policy scenario with single measure. WAPS combines all the measures to reduce the demand for river sand and considers the interaction between the individual measures to estimate the extent to which the shortage of river sand could be alleviated by the setting measures.
It has been shown in the results that the four types of technology and policy measures can partly serve the purpose of reducing the demand for river sand. In the case of a single policy scenario, the gap can be reduced to 52%, 43%, and 35% respectively in 2035. In the case of WAPS, the gap will be reduced to 4%, which is almost equivalent to the contradiction between conventional supply and demand of river sand resources.
It is noted that the effect of HRecPS in the early stage is not as good as that of HRepPS. This is because the application of river sand substitutes has been accepted by the market, while recycled sand has not been completely recognized and accepted. However, in the later stage, the river sand substitutes are still natural non-renewable resources, which also has contradiction between supply and demand. On the contrary, the recycled sand products from construction waste will have a wider source in the future. The gap between supply and demand will further expand (up to 62.70%) if no measures are taken into account. The implementation of single measure can fill up to 16% of the gap, while for compound measures, it can fill up to 27.20% of the gap. The model tested the situation where all measures were implemented vigorously, and proved that the demand for river sand could be maintained at the current level and slightly decreased.
5.1 Potential solutions
5.1.1 Decrease the ratio of concrete structure consuming less sand
Compared to the concrete structure, the timber structure and steel structure more in line with renewable requirements. Production process without sand and reusability greatly reduces the demand for sand.
5.1.2 Complete industry specification and solve technical problems
As mentioned, some European countries consumed lots of marine aggregates without obvious adverse effects. However, due to the lack of technical support and regulatory system, marine aggregates are used only as filling materials in China. With the innovation of technology, desalinated sea sand can not only be used as building aggregate, but the performance of the building is almost the same as that of ordinary buildings. What should governments do is issuing technical guidance and providing policy support. Thus, more alternatives could be used at acceptable cost, such as FRP-reinforced concrete with sea sand.
5.1.3 Establish an international river sand sustainable development alliance
Predatory exploitation of sand resources, long-distance transportation, and international trade are exacerbating the environmental impact and triggering international disputes. In order to curb the global shortage of sand resources, a global organization of sand resources like the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) need be established. The alliance can reach a unified import and export agreement, stipulate rules for mediating disputes, and restrict excessive sand mining caused by international trade.
5.2 Impact and contribution of the above solutions to the construction industry
In addition to studying the impact of the above solutions on the supply and demand of river sand, the impact on the construction industry needs to be discussed. The impact can be divided into the following three parts:
Development of sustainable structural systems. The promotion of new technologies will gradually move the construction industry towards sustainability and environmental protection. More sustainable materials will be used in construction, gradually changing from the people-oriented development concept to the idea of harmonious coexistence between human and nature, which is beneficial to the sustainable development of construction industry.
Development of construction retrofit and deconstruction. The method of urban renewal has gradually changed from building reconstruction to building retrofit after disassembly, which greatly reduced the amount of initial construction work. With the economic progress, the proportion of building repair and strengthening in China has been greatly increased, and the architectural deconstruction is gradually being accepted as a new sustainable building renewal way.
Usage of replacement and recycled production of river sand. The further research will bring more suitable and sustainable substitutes for river sand and more efficient recycling technology, which will further reduce the cost of raw materials in the construction industry. The industry has more profits to support the practice of new technologies and promote comprehensive progress in the construction industry in materials, design, and construction.
6 Concluding remarks
River sand has been widely used in variety industries, and has been proven to be in short supply currently and during the coming decades. The status of river sand has been evaluated as a strategic resource by many countries. Moreover, local and global problems, including geological, environmental, and economic issues, were caused in the process of mining, transportation, trading and use of river sand.
The supply of river sand affects the development of economy, modernization, and urbanization while the mining of river sand influences the local geology and the global environment. Therefore, it is necessary to balance the production and utilization of river sand resources. 5Rs, including reduce, recycle, reuse, replace, and recover, were summarized as strategies to obviously alleviate the shortage of river sand resources.
Through the prediction of multiple-linear-regression and system dynamics model, the demand for river sand will keep increasing in the next 15 years with a decreasing growth rate. System dynamics model was settled with seven subsystems to predict the impact of policy measures on the demand of river sand. Technical solutions and policy measures have been sorted out and summarized in five situations. The model evaluated the impact of different scenarios on river sand demand, which was proved that can remain unchanged under high policy strategies.
Three suggestions are put forward, from the perspectives of structural material selection, industry technical specifications, and the International Sustainable Development Alliance, to jointly solve the local and global river sand shortages problem. The problem has been particularly prominent in China in the past decades, but it will become a worldwide problem in the future. Achieving sustainable development of the construction industry requires global collaboration, the promotion of new technologies, and agreements on comprehensive solutions for river sand resources.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Padmalal, D., & Maya, K. (2014). Sand Mining: Environmental Impacts and Selected Case Studies. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9144-1
National data search. China National Burau of Statistics. Retrieved January 26, 2022, from http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htm
Kondolf, G. M. (1997). Hungry Water: Effects of Dams and Gravel Mining on River Channels. Environmental Management, 21, 533–551.
Zhang, J. F., Li, D., & Wang, Y. H. (2020). Toward intelligent construction: Prediction of mechanical properties of manufactured-sand concrete using tree-based models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120665
Hackney, C. R., Darby, S. E., Parsons, D. R., Leyland, J., Best, J. L., Aalto, R., Nicholas, A. P., & Houseago, R. C. (2020). River bank instability from unsustainable sand mining in the lower Mekong River. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 217–225.
Chaparro, M. A. E., Gnanasaravanan, S., & Rajkumar, P. (2021). Trace and major minerals of (natural and manufactured) sand: the importance of manufactured sand for construction purposes and the preservation of rivers. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6(2), 52.
Torres, A., Brandt, J., Lear, K., & Liu, J. G. (2017). A looming tragedy of the sand commons. Science, 357, 6355. https://doi.org/10.11126/science.aao0503
Zhong, X. Y., Deetman, S., Tukker, A., & Behrens, P. (2022). Increasing material efficiencies of buildings to address the global sand crisis. Nature Sustainability, 5(5), 389–392.
Eslami, S., Hoekstra, P., Nguyen Trung, N., Ahmed Kantoush, S., Van Binh, D., Duc Dung, D., Tran Quang, T., & van der Vegt, M. (2019). Tidal amplification and salt intrusion in the Mekong Delta driven by anthropogenic sediment starvation. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55018-9
Yao, J., Zhang, D., Li, Y. L., Zhang, Q., & Gao, J. F. (2019). Quantifying the hydrodynamic impacts of cumulative sand mining on a large river-connected floodplain lake: Poyang Lake. Journal of Hydrology, 579, 124156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124156
Yangtze River Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. (2018). Changjiang Sediment Bulletin (2006–2017). Changjiang Publishing House.
Anthony, E. J., Brunier, G., Besset, M., Goichot, M., Dussouillez, P., & Nguyen, V. L. (2015). Linking rapid erosion of the Mekong River delta to human activities. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14745
Mouyen, M., Longuevergne, L., Steer, P., Crave, A., Lemoine, J., Save, H., & Robin, C. (2018). Assessing modern river sediment discharge to the ocean using satellite gravimetry. Nature Communication, 9(1), 3384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05921-y
Zhang, S. R., Torres, A., Chen, R. S., & Ye, C. (2022). Trends, challenges, and mitigation strategies for the use of sand and gravel resources in China. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 223(03), 137–147. (in Chinese).
Database of General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China. National data search. Retrieved January 27, 2022, from http://www.customs.gov.cn/
Mohammad, I., Chan, K.Y. & Bala, M. (2016). Life-span prediction of abandoned reinforced concrete residential buildings. Construction and Building Materials, 112,1059-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.012.
Xia, B., Ding, T. & Xiao, J.Z. (2020). Life cycle assessment of concrete structures with reuse and recycling strategies: A novel framework and case study. Waste Management, 105, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.015.
Zubizarreta, M., Cuadrado, J., Orbe, A., & García, H. (2019). Modeling the environmental sustainability of timber structures: a case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 78(March), 106286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106286
Zhou, R. (2020). Analysis of the development trend of modern wood structure buildings in my country. Sichuan Building Materials, 46(02), 56–57. (in Chinese).
Hong, C. K., Li, H. T., Xiong, Z. H., Lorenzo R., Corbi I., Corbi O., Wei D. d., Yuan C. G., Yang D., & Zhang H. Z. (2020). Review of connections for engineered bamboo structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101324
Xiao, J. Z., Ma, Z.M., Sui, T. B., Akbarnezhad, A., & Duan, Z. H. (2018). Mechanical properties of concrete mixed with recycled powder produced from construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.277
Zhang, H. (2020). Utilize solid waste in accordance with the law to build ecological civilization. Concrete World, 05, 8–11. (in Chinese).
Xiao, J. Z. (2018). Recycled aggregate concrete structures. Springer-Verlag.
Wang, C. H., Xiao, J. Z., Zhang, C. Z., & Xiao X. W. (2020). Structural health monitoring and performance analysis of a 12-story recycled aggregate concrete structure. Engineering Structures,205, 110102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110102
Xiao, J. Z., Li, J. B., & Zhang, C. (2005). Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(6), 1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.020
Assefa, G., & Ambler, C. (2017). To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.011
Magnusson, S., Lundberg, K., Svedberg, B., & Knutsson, S. (2015). Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas – a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.010
Xu M., Ai X. M., Huang L. Y., Fan L.L., Yang J. H., Pei Z. S., Feng D. C., & Yi J. Y. (2022). Utilization of RCAs arising from excavated soil in CTBM: Laboratory characterization and environmental impact assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 134221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134221
Xiao, J. Z., Qiang, C. B., Nanni, A., & Zhang, K. J. (2017). Use of sea-sand and seawater in concrete construction: Current status and future opportunities. Construction and Building Materials, 155, 1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.130
Bendixen, M., Overeem, I., Rosing, M. T., Bjørk, A. A., Kjær, K. H., Kroon, A., Zeitz, G., & Iversen, L. L. (2019). Promises and perils of sand exploitation in Greenland. Nature Sustainability, 2(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0218-6
Liu, A.X., Liu, Z.J., Wang, C.Y., Niu, Z ., Yan, D.M. (2003). Monitoring of desertification in central Asia and western China using long term NOAA-AVHRR NDVI time-series data. 23rd International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2003), Jul 21-25, 2003, Toulouse, France
Luo, F. J., He, L., Pan, Z., Duan, W. H., Zhao, X. L., & Collins, F. (2013). Effect of very fine particles on workability and strength of concrete made with dune sand. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.005
Bagnold, R. A. (1941). The Physics of Blown Sands and Desert Dunes. Nature, 148, 480.
Yan, W. L., Wu, G., & Dong, Z. Q.(2019). Optimization of the mix proportion for desert sand concrete based on a statistical model. Construction and Building Materials, 226, 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.287
Yu, X. N., Qian, C. X., & Jiang, J. G. (2019). Desert sand cemented by bio-magnesium ammonium phosphate cement and its microscopic properties. Construction and Building Materials, 200, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.046
Kaufmann, J. (2020). Evaluation of the combination of desert sand and calcium sulfoaluminate cement for the production of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 243, 118281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118281
Du, H. J., & Tan, K. H. (2014). Concrete with recycled glass as fine aggregates. ACI Material Journal, 111(1), 47–58.
Dixit, A., Du, H., & Pang, S. D. (2020). Marine clay in ultra-high performance concrete for filler substitution. Construction and Building Materials, 263, 120250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120250
Lu, J. X., Duan, Z. H., & Poon, C. S. (2017). Combined use of waste glass powder and cullet in architectural mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 82, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.011
Alqahtani, F. K., Ghataora, G., Khan, M. I., & Dirar, S. (2017). Novel lightweight concrete containing manufactured plastic aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 148, 386–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.011
Toutanji, H., Goff, C., Pierce, K., & Fares, H. (2015). Using aggregate flowability testing to predict lightweight self-consolidating concrete plastic properties. Cement and Concrete Composites, 62, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.05.003
Gondo, T., Mathada, H., & Amponsah-Dacosta, F. (2019). Regulatory and policy implications of sand mining along shallow waters of Njelele River in South Africa. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies,11(3), a727. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i3.727
Yuill, T. B., Gaweesh, A., Allison, M. A., & Meselhe, E. A. (2015). Morphodynamic evolution of a lower Mississippi River channel bar after sand mining. Earth surface processes and landforms, 41(4), 526–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3846
Li, P. (1998). Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on River Management. Shaanxi Water Resources, 05, 2–7.
Ye, X. Q. (2020). Multiple legal mechanisms for co-governance of illegal sand mining in the protection of the Yangtze River. Environmental protection, 48(Z1), 81–84.
Yao, K.Y. (2019). Study on the Harnessment of Ships without Names, Identify Numbers and Certificates in Inland River from the Perspective of Cooperative Harnessment. Guangxi University. (in chinese).
“Sandmining is destroying Asia’s rivers” (May 16, 2017), Retrieved January 22, 2022, from https://chinadialogue.net/en/nature/9788-sandmining-is-destroying-asia-s-rivers/
Xue, J. W., & Zhao, S. (2018). Construction of the Joint Prevention and Control Legal System for Illegal Sand Mining in the Yangtze River Basin. Yangtze River Forum, 01, 67–73.
“H.R.1937-National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2015”, Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1937
Xiao, S. J., Dong, H. J., Geng, Y., Tian, X., Liu, C., & Li, H. F. (2020). Policy impacts on Municipal Solid Waste management in Shanghai: A system dynamics model analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121366
Acknowledgements
We appreciated all the investigators mentioned in the references.
Funding
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 51325802) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3803400).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, funding acquisition and supervision: Jianzhuang Xiao; Methodology, investigation, resources, data curation and writing—original draft: Hanghua Zhang and Xiaolong Hu; Validation: Tao Ding; Formal analysis and visualization: Hanghua Zhang; Writing—review and editing: Jianzhuang Xiao, Tao Ding and Xuwen Xiao; Project administration: Jianzhuang Xiao and Xuwen Xiao. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from individual or guardian participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Jiangzhuang Xiao is the Executive Editor-in-Chief for Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. Xuwen Xiao is the Editor-in-Chief for Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no other competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, J., Zhang, H., Hu, X. et al. Impact assessment of river sand resource shortage under different policy scenarios in China. Low-carbon Mater. Green Constr. 1, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-023-00015-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-023-00015-5