Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to compare the predictive abilities of macrocirculation markers (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure), microcirculation markers (capillary refill time and peripheral perfusion index), as well as fluid balance, lactate level, and lactate clearance on the outcomes of patients with septic shock during initial resuscitation.
Methods
In this prospective, single-center observational study, adult patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Shohada Hospital in Tabriz, Iran, between December 2020 and September 2021, were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the associations between macrocirculation markers (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and fluid balance) and microcirculation markers (capillary refill time, peripheral perfusion index, mottling score, lactate level, and lactate clearance level) with outcomes such as ICU length of stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressor requirements, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality rate. Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 h, and 24 h after fluid resuscitation.
Results
A total of 100 patients with septic shock (55 men and 45 women) were enrolled in the study. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the macrocirculation and microcirculation markers in predicting mortality ranged from 0.517 to 0.770 and 0.695 to 0.993, respectively. Among the macrocirculation markers, central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure at baseline showed the best predictive values for mortality, with AUCs of 0.770 and 0.753, respectively.
Conclusion
In patients with septic shock, microcirculation markers, particularly the peripheral perfusion index (PPI), demonstrated better predictive accuracy for mortality compared to macrocirculation markers. Furthermore, the combination of markers had a higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting outcomes compared to individual markers alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Septic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by an uncontrolled immune response to infection, leading to severe circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities [1]. It is associated with a greater risk of mortality, prolonged hospital stays, high duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), need to use vasopressors, renal replacement therapy (RRT), increased costs for patients, and increased use of healthcare resources [2,3,4].
Fluid balance disruption is a key feature of septic shock, caused by increased capillary permeability and fluid leakage into tissues [5, 6]. Additionally, elevated blood lactate levels are commonly observed in septic shock patients [7, 8]. Previous studies showed that initial lactate level and lactate clearance as markers for response to resuscitation have demonstrated a clear association with clinical outcomes including mortality. Therefore, managing fluid balance and lactate clearance are vital aspects of septic shock management, as they profoundly impact prognostic outcomes [9, 10]. Maintaining fluid balance, equilibrium between fluid intake and output in the body, is critical because inadequate or excessive fluid administration can have detrimental effects on patient outcomes [11, 12]. Inadequate fluid resuscitation can lead to inadequate tissue perfusion and organ dysfunction, while excessive fluid administration can result in fluid overload, worsening organ dysfunction, and increased mortality rates [11,12,13]. Proper monitoring and management of fluid balance are crucial for ensuring adequate perfusion and improving the prognosis of septic shock patients.
While hyperlactatemia is important for identifying tissue hypoxia and initiating resuscitation [14, 15], other factors like sustained hyperadrenergia and impaired hepatic clearance can also raise lactate levels. [16,17,18]. Additionally, lactate measurements may not be universally available, and lactate recovery is slow, making it a suboptimal target for fluid resuscitation [19, 20]. Therefore, relying solely on hyperlactatemia for resuscitation may be inappropriate. Evidence suggests that indicators such as peripheral perfusion index (PPI) [21, 22], capillary refill time (CRT) [23, 24], and mottling score are reliable for reflecting perfusion [25]. The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial and its post hoc analysis indicated that a CRT-guided strategy may limit organ failure and reduce mortality compared to a lactate-targeted approach [23]. CRT, due to its simplicity, bedside applicability, rapid recovery after fluid resuscitation, and suitability for resource-limited settings, could be used as a target for fluid resuscitation in septic shock [26]. Similarly, the mottling score, as a non-invasive marker, is easy to assess and could guide treatments targeting organ perfusion and microcirculation [27]. A study by Dumas et al. [28] supported the high prognostic value of mottling score for 14-day mortality in septic patients.
This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of macrocirculation and microcirculation markers on the outcomes of patients with septic shock. While MAP and lactate serum levels are commonly used markers in resuscitation, broadening the assessment to include microcirculation markers may better reflect tissue perfusion and improve resuscitation. In addition to these markers, the prognostic values of fluid balance, lactate, and lactate clearance on outcomes were separately evaluated. The study also combined the microcirculation and macrocirculation markers at three different time intervals to evaluate their cumulative effect on predicting the consequences of septic shock.
2 Methods
2.1 Study Design and Setting
In this prospective, single-center observational study, adult patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Shohada Hospital in Tabriz, Iran, between December 2020 and September 2021, were included. This study was conducted to compare the predictive ability of the macrocirculation and microcirculation markers on outcomes of patients with septic shock. The protocol study was reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committees of Islamic Azad University-Tabriz Branch (IR.IAU.TABRIZ.REC.1400.044), in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association [29]. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or from their legally accepted representatives. This observational study was conducted and reported in accordance with the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [30].
2.2 Participants
All consecutive adult patients with septic shock admitted at ICU subjected were considered as eligible for this study. Septic shock was diagnosed at ICU admission according to the Sepsis-3 Consensus Conference [14]. It was defined as suspected or confirmed infection by a serum lactate > 2 mmol/liter and requirements of norepinephrine (NE) to maintain a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg after an intravenous fluid load of at least 20 ml/kg over 60 min [14]. Patients in whom CRT could not be evaluated (Raynaud syndrome, severe hypothermia), pregnant patients, patients with active bleeding, patients with liver cirrhosis, patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patients who required a peremptory surgical procedure during the first 6 h after potential inclusion, or had a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order, were excluded from the study.
2.3 Management of Patients
All participants with septic shock were treated according to the standard protocol recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines for the first 3 h includes obtaining blood culture before antibiotics, obtaining lactate level, administering broad-spectrum antibiotics, administering 30 mL/kg of crystalloid fluid in 2 h for hypotension (defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65) or lactate (> 4), and standardized assessment of the circulation including serum lactate levels before and after this initial FR [17]. After an initial fluid bolus, a fluid challenge technique was implemented as long as hemodynamic improvement was witnessed. Norepinephrine up to a maximum dose of 1.5 μg/Kg/min was started as the first choice of vasopressor to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg. If a second vasopressor drug was needed, vasopressin at a dose of 0.03 IU/min was added to the regimen.
2.4 Data Collection
Patient data collected at baseline (0 h) included demographic data (age and gender), comorbidities such as congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebral vascular accident (CVA), diabetes mellitus (DM]), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), hypertension (HTN), and ischemic heart disease (IHD), as well as severity of illness assessed by the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE IV) [31], and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores [32]. Macrocirculation and organ perfusion were assessed at time zero (0 h) and at 6 and 24 h (6 h and 24 h) after ICU admission. Macrocirculation was evaluated using heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and central venous pressure (CVP), while microcirculatory dysfunction and organ perfusion were assessed through capillary refill time (CRT), peripheral perfusion index (PPI), and mottling score. Fluid balance, serum lactate levels, and lactate clearance levels were also assessed at 6 h and 24 h as independent factors for all participants. The study spanned 24 h, with markers recorded at 0 h, 6 h, and 24 h for all patients. After this, attending intensivists continued treating patients according to standard protocol care, and patients were followed until ICU discharge.
2.5 Micro/Macro Circulation Markers
Heart rate was monitored by electrocardiography and mean arterial pressure was measured through non-invasive blood pressure technique. HR, MAP, and CVP were recorded at baseline (0 h), 6 h, and 24 h. Normal range was defined for MAP greater than 65 (mmHg), CVP between 8 and 12 (mmHg), and HR for adults from 60 to 100 beats per minute (bpm).
CVP monitoring is prescribed every 3 h by the medical staff. After checking the absence of spontaneous breathing of the patient on the screen of the ventilator, CVP was carefully measured by the physician or by a trained nurse. Measurements in patients in whom a cardiac arrhythmia occurred were not performed or excluded. The zero reference was carefully checked and calibrated as required. The pressure line was connected to the monitoring system. The research staff (physician or research nurse) froze the screen allowing the measurement of pressure at end expiratory time at the base of the “c” wave.
Capillary refill time (CRT) was measured by applying firm pressure to the distal phalanx of the index finger for 10 s. The pressure applied was just enough to remove the blood at the tip of the physician’s nail, illustrated by the appearance of a thin white distal crescent (blanching) under the nail. The time for the return of the normal skin color will be registered with a chronometer, and > 3 s is defined as abnormal. During the prospective observational study, CRT was measured three times (0 h, 6 h, and 24 h), and the mean value ± standard division was recorded.
PPI was derived from the photoelectric plethysmographic signal of pulse oximetry which reflects changes in peripheral perfusion that can be measured continuously and noninvasively. A PPI value < 1.4% indicates the presence of poor peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients.
Mottling score was defined as patchy skin discoloration, is a common sign of cutaneous hypoperfusion Blood flow reduction may be due to local vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction [25, 33]. The mottling score provided a semi-quantitative evaluation of mottling based on skin area extension on knee: Score 0 no mottling, score 1 small mottling area (coin size) localized to the center of the knee, score 2 mottling area that does not exceed the superior edge of the knee cap, score 3 mottling area that does not exceed the middle thigh, score 4 mottling area that does not exceed the fold of the groin, and score 5 severe mottling that extends beyond the groin.
Fluid balance was calculated as follows: total fluid input minus total fluid output within the first 72 h of ICU stay. As fluid accumulation during 72 h is an independent marker for mortality in septic patients we measured fluid balance at 72 h after initiation of initial resuscitation. Lactate and lactate clearance levels outcomes: Serum was sampled at baseline and after 6 h and 24 h of resuscitation from arterial. A normal serum lactate value is defined as less than 2 mmol/l. Lactate will be assessed with the techniques, including arterial serum levels point-of-care or artery blood gas analysis at the central laboratory. Moreover, we calculated lactate clearance using the serum lactate level at 6 h and 24 h after admission using the following formula: lactate clearance = (lactate baseline − lactate at 6 h or 24 h)/lactate baseline [34].
2.6 Outcomes
Various outcomes were recorded for all participants, including ICU length of stay (LOS), the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), the need for and number of vasopressors, the duration of mechanical ventilator (MV) use, and the mortality rate. Additionally, we established a binary outcome based on the median of quantitative variables and, for qualitative variables, based on a yes or no classification. This binary outcome encompassed ICU LOS (≥ 13 days vs. < 13 days), MV duration (≥ 10 days vs. < 10 days), the need for renal replacement therapy (yes vs. no), the number of vasopressors administered (1 vs. > 1), and ICU mortality (yes vs. no).
2.7 Statistical Analysis
All quantitative variables were tested for normal distribution with Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Patient characteristics are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (IQR) for non-normal distributions, and percentages as appropriate. Changes of macrocirculation and microcirculation markers in participants according to time trends (baseline, 6 h and 24 h) were assessed based on two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures (RMANOVA), adjusted and non-adjusted models. Adjusted RMANOVA model was done according to the baseline characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities, and APACHE IV and SOFA scores. The results of the mottling score were reported as median (IQR), and P value was calculated based on the Friedman test. The effect of patients’ characteristics, macrocirculation and microcirculation markers on outcomes (ICU length of stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), need and number of vasopressors, duration of MV, and mortality rate) were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and the results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated, and area under the curve (AUC) figures were calculated alongside sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), for each macrocirculation and microcirculation markers at baseline, 6 h, and 24 h. In addition, we combined the microcirculation and macrocirculation markers separately in three different time intervals to create new markers to predict outcomes using binary logistic regression to get the probability and then run a ROC curve using the probability as the test markers, and AUCs were compared using the DeLong test. According to the general guidelines for the discriminative power of a test based on ROC, AUC between (0.9–1.0), (0.8–0.9), (0.7–0.8), and (0.6–0.7) was considered as excellent, good, fair, and poor, respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software (ver.21) (SPSS Inc. IL, Chicago, USA) and MedCalc (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php). In all analyses, P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
3 Results
3.1 Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Participants
Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patients are shown in Table 1. One hundred patients with septic shock, including 55 men and 45 women, were enrolled in this study. The median (IQR) age, APACHE IV and SOFA scores of the patients were 66 (59–70), 27 (24–30) and 14 (12–15), respectively. All participants used vasopressors and underwent MV. The most common comorbidities in the patients were HTN (26.5%) and DM (25%). In terms of outcomes, the mean ± SD of ICU LOS and MV duration of the patients were 13.5 ± 2.3 and 10.8 ± 2.5 days, respectively. Seventy percent of the patients need only one vasopressor and 27% of the patients’ needs RRT. The incidence of mortality was 34%. In terms of multivariate analysis, the male gender was associated with an increased use of more than one vasopressor (OR: 2.858, 95% CI: 1.075–7.599, P = 0.035) (Supplementary File, Table S1).
3.2 Time Trend Changes of Markers
The time trend of macrocirculation, microcirculation and independent markers are presented in Table 2. According to the results, the trend changes of all markers based on the time effect were significant (P < 0.05). Parameters including hemodynamic (HR, MAP, and CVP), PPI, fluid balance and clearance lactate significantly increased after 6 h and 24 h of resuscitation. However, serum lactate concentration and CRT significantly decreased after 6 h and 24 h of resuscitation (P < 0.001).
3.3 Logistic Regression Analysis
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of microcirculation markers and independent factors (fluid balance, lactate and clearance lactate) on outcomes are presented in Tables 3 and 4. In multivariate analysis, the OR of mortality significantly increased with CRT at 6 h (OR: 17.482, 95% CI: 1.278–23.185, P = 0.032), and serum lactate level at baseline (OR: 3.392, 95% CI: 1.145–10.052, P = 0.032). However, PPI at baseline (OR: 0.027, 95% CI: 0.003–0.233, P = 0.001) and at 6 h (OR: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001–0.186, P = 0.003) were decreased the risk of mortality. Mottling score was associated with an increased risk of RRT (OR: 3.709, 95% CI: 1.182–11.634, P = 0.025). CRT at baseline and at 24 h were associated with an increased risk of using more than one vasopressor (OR: 6.506, 95% CI: 2.226–9.117, P = 0.010) and (OR: 1.075, 95% CI: 0.007–2.844, P = 0.036), respectively. PPI at 6 h (OR: 0.005, 95% CI: 0.001–0.187, P = 0.004) was decreased the risk of prolonged MV duration (> 10 days). The results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of macrocirculation markers on outcomes are presented in Supplementary file, Table S2.
3.4 Predicting Outcomes by Markers
The AUCs for the macrocirculation and microcirculation markers for predicting mortality ranged from 0.517 to 0.770 and 0.695 to 0.993, respectively. Best performing predictive value for mortality in the macrocirculation markers was related to the CVP at baseline with (AUC: 0.770, 95% CI: 0.676–0.849, P < 0.001), and the best cut-off value (> 13) had a value sensitivity 61.76%, specificity 90.91%, (LR+) 6.79, (LR−) 0.42, PPV 77.8%, NPV 82.2%, and 65% of accuracy. All microcirculation markers had significantly excellent predictive value for mortality (AUC between 0.837 and 0.993), except CRT at baseline with (AUC: 0.695, 95% CI: 0.594–0.783, P < 0.001). Best performing predictive value for mortality in the microcirculation markers was related to the PPI at 24 h with (AUC: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.983–1.000, P < 0.001), and the best cut-off value (< 1.55) had a value sensitivity 94.1%, specificity 93.9%, (LR+) 15.53, (LR−) 0.06, PPV 88.89%, NPV 96.88%, and 65% of accuracy. The microcirculation markers had a better predictive accuracy value for mortality in patients with septic shock than macrocirculation markers. Nevertheless, most markers in both of macrocirculation and microcirculation had poor predictive value for the other outcomes with an AUC between 0.408 and 0.705. In macrocirculation markers, MAP (at baseline) for ICU length of stay, and HR (at 24 h), MAP (at 6 h) for MV duration had AUC values significantly greater than 0.6. Results for macrocirculation and microcirculation markers with significant AUC values for other outcomes (RRT, vasopressors, ICU length of stay, and MV duration) are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 7 shows the predictive performance of fluid balance, lactate and clearance lactate for septic shock outcomes. The AUCs for these markers for predicting mortality ranged from 0.714 to 0.984, respectively. Best performing predictive value for mortality in these markers was related to the lactate at 24 h with (AUC: 0.984, 95% CI: 0.966–1.000, P < 0.001), and the best cut-off value (> 3.35) had a value sensitivity 91.2%, specificity 96.9%, (LR+) 30.09, (LR−) 0.09, PPV 93.94%, NPV 93.94%, and 95% of accuracy. However, lower predictive value for mortality in these markers was related to the fluid balance at 24 h with (AUC: 0.714, 95% CI: 0.615–0.800, P < 0.001), and the best cut-off value (≤ 3600) had a value sensitivity 88.24%, specificity 66.67%, (LR+) 2.65, (LR−) 0.18, PPV 57.7%, NPV 91.7%, and 72% of accuracy (The ROC curves related to this factors for predictive mortality are presented in the Supplementary file, Figure S1).
3.5 Cumulative Effect of Markers
To have a cumulative effect of markers, we conducted a logistic regression and then used the probability for creating new variables from combined the microcirculation and macrocirculation markers separately at three different time intervals to predict the consequences of septic shock. The cumulative effect of markers on outcomes is presented in Table 8. In combined macrocirculation markers at baseline to predict mortality, the AUC was 0.837 (95% CI: 0.749–0.903, P < 0.001) and the used cutoff value had a value of sensitivity 61.7%, specificity 89.4%, PPV 75%, NPV 81.9%, (LR+) 5.82, (LR−) 0.43 and 0.511 of Yuden index. In combined macrocirculation markers at 6 h and 24 h to predict mortality, the AUC was 0.726 (95% CI: 0.628–0.810, P < 0.001) and 0.652 (95% CI: 0.551–0.745, P = 0.004). Best performing predictive value for mortality in the combined microcirculation markers was related to the combined marker at baseline with (AUC: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.904–0.990, P < 0.001), and the used cutoff value had a value of sensitivity 91.18%, specificity 90.91%, PPV 83.8%, NPV 95.2%, (LR+) 10.03, (LR−) 0.097 and 0.820 of Yuden index. In combined microcirculation markers at 6 h to predict mortality, the AUCs were 0.947 (95%CI: 0.883–0.982, P < 0.001) and 0.871 (95%CI: 0.789–0.930, P < 0.001), with 97.06% and 100% of sensitivity and 90.91% and 74.245 of specificity, respectively.
3.6 Compares of AUCs
Comparison of AUCs was performed between individual macro and microcirculation markers and combined markers to predict mortality using the DeLong test (Fig. 1). The combined macrocirculation markers at baseline were found to be comparable as predictors of mortality with all single macrocirculation markers at baseline, including HR (0.837 vs. 0.517, P < 0.0001), MAP (0.837 vs. 0.742, P = 0.0193) and CVP (0.837 vs. 0.770, P = 0.0449) (Fig. 1A). The cumulative effect of macrocirculation marker at 6 h was also comparable as a predictor of mortality with HR (AUC: 0.726 vs. 0.615, P = 0.0433) (Fig. 1B). However, there was no significant difference between the AUCs of the combined marker and the macrocirculation markers at 24 h for predicting mortality (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1C).
Comparison of ROC curves of single markers with combine marker to predict mortality A–C macrocirculation markers vs. combined marker (at baseline, 6 h and 24 h, respectively), D–F macrocirculation markers vs. combined marker (at baseline, 6 h and 24 h, respectively), and G and H between fluid balance, lactate and clearance lactate at 6 and 24 h, respectively
The combined microcirculation markers at baseline were found to be comparable as predictors of mortality with both single microcirculation markers, including CRT (0.962 vs. 0.695, P < 0.001) and PPI (0.962 vs.0.837, P = 0.008) (Fig. 1D). There was no significant difference between the AUCs of the combined marker and the microcirculation markers at 6 h for predicting mortality (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1E). However, the AUC of the combined microcirculation marker was significantly lower at 24 h than that of the CRT (0.871 vs. 0.990, P < 0.0001) and PPI (0.871 vs. 0.993, P < 0.0001) markers for predicting mortality (Fig. 1F).
Among the fluid balance, lactate and clearance lactate at 6 h, the AUC of lactate was comparable as predictor of mortality compared to fluid balance (0.897 vs. 0.738, P = 0.0028) and clearance lactate (0.897 vs. 0.799, P = 0.0119) (Fig. 1G). However, when comparing these factors at 24 h, the AUC of fluid balance was significantly lower than lactate (0.714 vs. 0.984, P < 0.0001) and clearance lactate (0.714 vs. 0.961, P < 0.0001) markers for predicting mortality (Fig. 1H). The rest of the results, including ROC curves and pairwise comparisons between markers for other outcomes, are presented in the Supplementary file, Figure S2 to S31.
4 Discussion
This prospective observational study aimed to compare the predictive abilities of of macrocirculatory markers (HR, MAP and CVP), microcirculatory markers (CRT, PPI and molting score) and fluid balance, lactate and clearance lactate on the outcomes (mortality, RRT, vasopressors, ICU LOS and MV duration) of patients with septic shock during initial resuscitation. Additionally, to assess the cumulative effect of the markers, we combined the microcirculation and macrocirculation markers separately at three different time intervals to predict the consequences of septic shock. Our findings revealed that the accuracy of the microcirculation markers in predicting outcomes was comparable and higher than that of the macrocirculation markers. The three most important predictors of mortality identified in our study were PPI with an AUC of 0.993, CRT with an AUC of 0.990, and lactate with an AUC of 0.984 at 24 h.
Among the microcirculation markers we evaluated, PPI emerged as the most valuable prognostic indicator for mortality in adult patients with septic shock. PPI serves as a reflection of inadequate perfusion in critically ill patients [21] and, in comparison to blood lactate testing, offers real-time and non-invasive monitoring [35]. The plotted ROC curves of PPI and CRT at baseline for predicting mortality demonstrated the AUCs of 0.837 and 0.695, respectively. These findings indicate that PPI can predict mortality earlier with improved sensitivity and specificity. During the early stages of hypoperfusion, peripheral blood vessels constrict to maintain sufficient blood flow to the heart [36, 37]. At this point, macro vital signs such as HR and blood pressure (BP) appear normal. As a result of vasoconstriction reducing blood flow in a specific area, PPI, an indicator of regional perfusion, decreases. This highlights the superiority of PPI over other micro parameters, such as lactate, in alerting physicians to hypoperfusion. However, the use of PPI is limited by its susceptibility to external factors such as low temperature, vascular diseases, and patient positioning [38, 39].
The study found that both CRT and lactate concentration were equally accurate in predicting mortality, with excellent predictive value. These findings are consistent with a randomized controlled trial by Castro et al. [40], which showed that CRT-targeted fluid resuscitation was comparable to lactate-targeted fluid resuscitation in terms of fluid administration and balances. Another study by Kataria et al. [41], found that elevated CRT at 3 h and 6 h can be a valuable additional aid for prognostication of septic shock patients, while lactate levels at 6 h had a better predictive value in predicting 28-day mortality than other parameters. A pilot study [42] indicated a potential link between CRT and microcirculatory dysfunction, a key factor in septic shock mortality, by showing that abnormal CRT values during early septic shock resuscitation are associated with impaired skin blood flow and abnormal skin microvascular reactivity. These findings suggest that both CRT and lactate have high accuracy in providing prognostic information in septic shock as a predictor of mortality. However, CRT measurement could be a better predictor than blood lactate concentration due to its simplicity, non-invasive alternative, and suitability for resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to confirm and generalize these results.
CRT assessment is susceptible to various factors that can significantly influence results, such as ambient temperature, skin temperature, core temperature, age, ambient light conditions, time of pressure, level, and site of pressure application [43]. Some of these conditions can be controlled, and measurements can be standardized to reduce ambient-related and technical variability [44]. Van Genderen et al. [35] investigated the reliability of observers in CRT assessments among different healthcare workers and demonstrated good overall consensus. Another study revealed a strong correlation with objective variables of peripheral perfusion [43]. Ait-Oufella et al. [24] showed that CRTs were highly reproducible in a prospective cohort of patients with septic shock and exhibited excellent interrater concordance. However, to optimize CRT reproducibility, effective measures include education, standardization, and minimizing the impact of environmental factors.
Our observational study shows that fluid balance had a fair predictive value for mortality at 6 h and 24 h (AUC: 0.738 and 0.714, respectively). These results align with previous studies, which demonstrated that higher positive fluid balance in the first two days of resuscitation was linked to increased mortality risk in septic shock patients [12, 45]. Additionally, our study revealed good predictive accuracy for serum lactate and lactate clearance for mortality and number of vasopressors and also a poor significant predictive value for RRT. Similarly, a retrospective study by Ryoo et al. [46] indicated that lactate and lactate clearance levels at 6 h were effective prognostic tools for septic shock patients treated with protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy. Mahmoodpoor et al. [47], showed that serial measurements of serum lactate, with emphasis on its concentration at 24 h after admission, were the most predictive of short-term mortality in the ICU. Furthermore, Marty et al. [48] reported that lactate clearance was the best parameter associated with the 28-day mortality rate in septic patients during the first 24 h in the ICU. Another study demonstrated that combining lactate levels and its clearance is a reliable predictor of mortality in sepsis [49]. Using lactate as a potential resuscitation marker is controversial as it is a non-specific sign of hypoperfusion that also shows slow recovery kinetics. In fact, drop in levels of lactate even after appropriate resuscitation may show a biphasic curve. First, a rapid initial drop in parallel to other flow-sensitive parameters. Second, a later slower decrease, probably representing residual stress-related hyperlactatemia and metabolic clearance problems. Therefore, aiming at lactate optimization can lead to over-resuscitation and fluid overload, which has been associated with higher mortality [18, 19].
Our study found that the mottling score was associated with an increased risk of mortality and RRT in septic patients, consistent with previous studies [27, 28]. However, the clinical evaluation of mottling can be influenced by factors such as vasopressor dosage [25]. Combining macrocirculation and microcirculation markers resulted in a greater AUC and higher accuracy, SN, SP, LR+, PPV, and NPV, and lower LR− values compared to using each marker alone. This suggests that the combination of markers is the most reliable predictor of septic shock outcome, with microcirculatory variables at 24 h being the most important. Using the cutoffs identified by ROC analyses in a multivariable analysis, adjusted for appropriate confounders, can help identify prognostic value.
Our study has several limitations. It is a single-center study, and results need to be confirmed in a larger population. Our participants were critically ill patients with various pre-existing comorbidities which acute dysfunction precludes a correct interpretation of results. We excluded patients with advanced liver dysfunction and ARDS but cannot rule out some degree of subclinical dysfunction. CRT assessment might be subjected to inter-observer variability, but we used a standardized technique that decreases the likelihood of bias. Nevertheless, while the size of this preliminary study was not very large, it was sufficient to highlight significant results.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, microcirculation markers to predict mortality was superior to macrocirculation markers. The three most important predictors of mortality identified in our study were PPI, CRT and serum lactate at 24 h. An important observation of the present study is the combined models for both macrocirculation and microcirculation markers at baseline which had a greater AUCs with higher sensitivity and specificity than the marker alone to predict morbidity and mortality in patients with septic shock.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, Reinhart K, Turnbull IR, Vincent JL. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16045. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.45.
Ryoo SM, Kang GH, Shin TG, Hwang SY, Kim K, Jo YH, et al. Clinical outcome comparison of patients with septic shock defined by the new sepsis-3 criteria and by previous criteria. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(2):845–53. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.96.
Gyawali B, Ramakrishna K, Dhamoon AS. Sepsis: the evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119835043. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119835043.
Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.
Malbrain M, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, De Tavernier B, Van Gaal PJ, Joannes-Boyau O, et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x.
Zhang L, Xu F, Li S, Zheng X, Zheng S, Liu H, et al. Influence of fluid balance on the prognosis of patients with sepsis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):269. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01489-1.
Vincent JL, Quintairos ESA, Couto L Jr, Taccone FS. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1403-5.
Chertoff J, Chisum M, Garcia B, Lascano J. Lactate kinetics in sepsis and septic shock: a review of the literature and rationale for further research. J Intensive Care. 2015;3:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0105-4.
Basodan N, Al Mehmadi AE, Al Mehmadi AE, Aldawood SM, Hawsawi A, Fatini F, et al. Septic shock: management and outcomes. Cureus. 2022;14(12): e32158. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32158.
Sugimoto M, Takayama W, Murata K, Otomo Y. The impact of lactate clearance on outcomes according to infection sites in patients with sepsis: a retrospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01856-5.
Kharadi N, Mehreen T, Habib M, Rasheed G, Ilyas A, Akhtar A, et al. Evaluating the impact of positive fluid balance on mortality and length of stay in septic shock patients. Cureus. 2022;14(5): e24809. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24809.
Sirvent JM, Ferri C, Baró A, Murcia C, Lorencio C. Fluid balance in sepsis and septic shock as a determining factor of mortality. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(2):186–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.016.
de Oliveira FS, Freitas FG, Ferreira EM, de Castro I, Bafi AT, de Azevedo LC, et al. Positive fluid balance as a prognostic factor for mortality and acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.002.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.
Hernandez G, Bruhn A, Castro R, Regueira T. The holistic view on perfusion monitoring in septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18(3):280–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283532c08.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.
Hernandez G, Luengo C, Bruhn A, Kattan E, Friedman G, Ospina-Tascon GA, et al. When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0030-z.
Hernandez G, Bellomo R, Bakker J. The ten pitfalls of lactate clearance in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(1):82–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5213-x.
Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, Bruhn A, Romero C, Rovegno M, et al. Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A Clin Physiol Study J Crit Care. 2012;27(3):283–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.024.
Sivaprasath P, Mookka Gounder R, Mythili B. Prediction of shock by peripheral perfusion index. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86(10):903–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-019-02993-6.
Shi X, Xu M, Yu X, Lu Y. Peripheral perfusion index predicting prolonged ICU stay earlier and better than lactate in surgical patients: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01072-0.
Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, Estenssoro E, Dubin A, Hurtado J, et al. Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(7):654–64. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0071.
Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R, et al. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(7):958–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3326-4.
Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Baudel JL, Lemant J, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):801–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2163-y.
Yasufumi O, Morimura N, Shirasawa A, Honzawa H, Oyama Y, Niida S, et al. Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study. J Intensive Care. 2019;7:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4.
Kazune S, Caica A, Volceka K, Suba O, Rubins U, Grabovskis A. Relationship of mottling score, skin microcirculatory perfusion indices and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with septic shock: an observational study. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2589-0.
Dumas G, Lavillegrand J-R, Joffre J, Bigé N, de-Moura EB, Baudel J-L, et al. Mottling score is a strong predictor of 14-day mortality in septic patients whatever vasopressor doses and other tissue perfusion parameters. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2496-4.
Helsink. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsink: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.
Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonça A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(7):686–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050931.
Ferraris A, Bouisse C, Mottard N, Thiollière F, Anselin S, Piriou V, et al. Mottling score and skin temperature in septic shock: relation and impact on prognosis in ICU. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0202329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202329.
Odom SR, Howell MD, Silva GS, Nielsen VM, Gupta A, Shapiro NI, et al. Lactate clearance as a predictor of mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(4):999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182858a3e.
van Genderen ME, van Bommel J, Lima A. Monitoring peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients at the bedside. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18(3):273–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283533924.
Vincent J-L, Ince C, Bakker J. Clinical review: circulatory shock—an update: a tribute to Professor Max Harry Weil. Crit Care. 2012;16(6):239. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11510.
Vincent J-L, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1726–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208943.
Tapar H, Karaman S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Sahin A, Tapar GG, et al. The effect of patient positions on perfusion index. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0571-z.
Pinto Lima A, Beelen P, Bakker J. Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse oximetry signal as a noninvasive indicator of perfusion. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(6):1210–3.
Castro R, Kattan E, Ferri G, Pairumani R, Valenzuela ED, Alegría L, et al. Effects of capillary refill time-vs. lactate-targeted fluid resuscitation on regional, microcirculatory and hypoxia-related perfusion parameters in septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00767-4.
Kataria S, Singh O, Juneja D, Goel A, Bhide M, Yadav D. Hypoperfusion context as a predictor of 28-d all-cause mortality in septic shock patients: a comparative observational study. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(16):3765–79. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i16.3765.
Contreras R, Hernández G, Valenzuela ED, González C, Ulloa R, Soto D, et al. Exploring the relationship between capillary refill time, skin blood flow and microcirculatory reactivity during early resuscitation of patients with septic shock: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023;37(3):839–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00946-7.
Espinoza ED, Welsh S, Dubin A. Lack of agreement between different observers and methods in the measurement of capillary refill time in healthy volunteers: an observational study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014;26(3):269–76. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507x.20140038.
Alsma J, van Saase J, Nanayakkara PWB, Schouten W, Baten A, Bauer MP, et al. The power of flash mob research: conducting a nationwide observational clinical study on capillary refill time in a single day. Chest. 2017;151(5):1106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.035.
Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada T-A, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality*. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):259–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
Ryoo SM, Lee J, Lee YS, Lee JH, Lim KS, Huh JW, et al. Lactate level versus lactate clearance for predicting mortality in patients with septic shock defined by sepsis-3. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):e489–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003030.
Mahmoodpoor A, Shadvar K, Saghaleini SH, Koleini E, Hamishehkar H, Ostadi Z, et al. Which one is a better predictor of ICU mortality in septic patients? Comparison between serial serum lactate concentrations and its removal rate. J Crit Care. 2018;44:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.019.
Marty P, Roquilly A, Vallée F, Luzi A, Ferré F, Fourcade O, et al. Lactate clearance for death prediction in severe sepsis or septic shock patients during the first 24 hours in intensive care unit: an observational study. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-3.
Mahmoodpoor A, Shadvar K, Sanaie S, Golzari SEJ, Parthvi R, Hamishehkar H, et al. Arterial vs venous lactate: correlation and predictive value of mortality of patients with sepsis during early resuscitation phase. J Crit Care. 2020;58:118–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.019.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology of Islamic Azad University-Tabriz Branch. Moreover, thanks to guidance and advice from the "Clinical Research Development Unit of Baqiyatallah Hospital".
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to this study; study concept and design, FR-B, AM, and AV-A; analysis and interpretation of data, KSH, TS, and KSH.; Study concept and design, FR-B, S-HS, and AV-A; Acquisition of data and drafting of the manuscript, AS and AGH; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, FR-B, KSH, and S-HS; Statistical analysis, FR-B and AM.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Islamic Azad University-Tabriz Branch (IR.IAU.TABRIZ.REC.1400.044) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or from their legally accepted representatives. This observational study was conducted and reported in accordance with the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shahsavarinia, K., Sabzevari, T., Shadvar, K. et al. Comparison of Predictive Ability of Macrocirculation and Microcirculation Markers on Outcomes of Patients with Septic Shock During Initial Fluid Resuscitation: A Prospective Observational Study. Intensive Care Res 4, 38–54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-024-00059-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-024-00059-6