Abstract
FeSe is one of the most enigmatic superconductors. Among the family of iron-based compounds, it has the simplest chemical makeup and structure, and yet it displays superconducting transition temperature (\(T_{\text{c}}\)) spanning 0 to 15 K for thin films, while it is typically 8 K for single crystals. This large variation of \(T_{\text{c}}\) within one family underscores a key challenge associated with understanding superconductivity in iron chalcogenides. Here, using a dual-beam pulsed laser deposition (PLD) approach, we have fabricated a unique lattice-constant gradient thin film of FeSe which has revealed a clear relationship between the atomic structure and the superconducting transition temperature for the first time. The dual-beam PLD that generates laser fluence gradient inside the plasma plume has resulted in a continuous variation in distribution of edge dislocations within a single film, and a precise correlation between the lattice constant and \(T_{\text{c}}\) has been observed here, namely, \(T_{\text{c}} \propto \sqrt{c- c_{0}}\), where c is the c-axis lattice constant (and \(c_{0}\) is a constant). This explicit relation in conjunction with a theoretical investigation indicates that it is the shifting of the \(d_{\text{xy}}\) orbital of Fe which plays a governing role in the interplay between nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The properties of iron-based superconductors are delicately controlled by subtle variation of their lattice parameters [1–4], and delineating the correlation between structure and the superconducting properties is an important path towards understanding the mechanism of superconductivity. Among the iron-based superconductor family, iron selenide (FeSe) has the simplest lattice structure and yet exhibits widely varying superconducting properties closely associated with minute changes in its lattice parameters [5–7]. A bulk FeSe single crystal becomes superconducting at a critical temperature \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \approx 8\text{ K}\) [8], which can be boosted by modifying the lattice parameters: under high pressure, its \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) can be pushed up to \({\approx} 37\text{ K}\) with reduction in both the in-plane (a) and out-of-plane (c) lattice parameters and a decrease in the \(c/a\) ratio [9–11]. By an alkali metal or organic molecule interlayer intercalation [12, 13], the c-axis lattice constant of a crystal can be increased, and concomitantly \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) is enhanced to 40–50 K. In our previous study, we have applied ionic gating on an FeSe film and raised its \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) from 10 to 45 K [14]. More strikingly, for a monolayer FeSe grown on a SrTiO3 substrate, the in-plane lattice expands by \({\approx} 3\%\) and the superconducting energy gap closes at \((\approx) 65\text{ K}\) [15], revealing an unusually large intrinsic tunability of superconductivity in FeSe.
Compared to the bulk and the monolayer limit, thin films of FeSe in the intermediate regime (with thicknesses ranging from several to hundreds of nanometers) provide an indispensable platform for performing fundamental studies and pursuing practical applications [16]. Pulsed laser deposition (PLD) has been a powerful and versatile technique for fabricating FeSe thin films [17]. Nevertheless, ubiquitous micron-scale particulates generated during the laser ablation process can induce complex variation in the local atomic structure of the films, which in turn can influence their physical properties [18]. For example, FeSe thin films grown by PLD on different substrates can result in different strain states displaying a range of transport properties spanning insulating to superconducting with \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) up to 15 K [19–24] which is nearly twice that of bulk FeSe, underscoring the importance of delicate microstructural variation influencing their superconducting properties. To date, however, a definitive description connecting superconductivity and the lattice parameters in FeSe has been lacking, hindering the understanding of superconductivity in iron chalcogenides.
A primary reason for the dilemma is the large run-to-run variation in properties of FeSe fabricated by PLD associated with the inherent dynamics and hyper-thermal process in the plasma plume of PLD involving multiple ion species and particulates. Previously, a crossed-beam PLD technique utilizing interacting plumes generated by two laser beams on two targets has been developed to tune the spatial profile of the particulates in the film [25–27]. In this work, we report a new method for achieving a continuous tuning of the lattice structure on a single film, achieved by a home-designed dual-beam PLD system. This technique has allowed us to synthesize FeSe films which display a continuous stretch (compression) in the out-of-plane (in-plane) lattice constant across a 3 cm width of a film on a CaF2 substrate. The advantage of this method is evident in the rapid delineation of a precise correlation between \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) and the lattice constant as we present below. This is in sharp contrast to a “random” distribution of the lattice constant data from a large number of individual FeSe films deposited under similar conditions with a conventional single-beam PLD process.
It has been recognized that \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) of individual FeSe films grown by PLD has a subtle dependence on the laser fluence [5]. Namely, the larger fluence seems to lead to higher \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) (Supplementary Fig. S1 in Additional file 1). In order to highlight the advantage of the plume control of the dual-beam PLD, we look at a collection of data taken from over 200 individual FeSe films made by the conventional PLD and compare them against the data from two lattice gradient films made by the dual-beam PLD, as summarized in Fig. 1. For both conventional (Fig. 1(a)) and dual-beam PLD (Fig. 1(e)), we are fabricating (00l)-oriented FeSe films with high crystalline quality (Supplementary Fig. S3) on CaF2 substrates using the same FeSe target. The key characteristic of individual FeSe films made by conventional PLD is that over up to 10 mm × 10 mm area, structural and superconducting properties are uniform, as can be gleaned from x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns zoomed in around the FeSe (002) reflection (Fig. 1(b)) and the temperature dependence of resistance [\(R(T)\)] (Fig. 1(c)) measured across the sample for a typical film. In Fig. 1(d), we plot the c-axis lattice constant versus \(T_{\mathrm{c0}}\) (zero resistance transition temperature) from 200 such individual FeSe film samples randomly selected from about 1500 experimental runs using conventional single-beam PLD performed over a three-year period. Apart from a general positive correlation between \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) and c-axis lattice constant (the correlation coefficient is ≈0.70 and a linear fit gives the coefficient of determination \(R^{2} \approx 0.49\)), no further details in the functional dependence can be extracted due to the scatter in the data. This is not surprising since the superconducting properties of FeSe films are sensitive to many factors such as strain effects, point and line defects [28–30], and the subtle day-to-day variation in fabrication conditions can influence physical properties of the resulting films in a multitude of ways.
In contrast to a conventional PLD process involving a single laser shot on a target (Fig. 1(a)), our dual-beam deposition process employs two sliding laser beams to create a variation of beam density on a single FeSe target (Fig. 1(e)), resulting in modulation of the local properties of the deposited film across the substrate. The separation between the two laser beams is about half of the beam size (Supplementary Fig. S5). A small variation of the laser beam separation (overlap between 1/2 and 1/3 of the beam size) has no significant impact on our experimental results. As can be seen in Fig. 1(f), we are able to track the evolution of the crystal structure of the FeSe film across the 30 mm width of the substrate with an in-house x-ray diffractometer with a beam width of \({\approx} 0.4\text{ mm}\). From one side of the substrate to the other side, the FeSe (002) Bragg peak first moves to a lower angle as the substrate center position is reached, and then it shifts back away from the center (Fig. 1(f)); in contrast, the (220) peak shifts in the opposite direction [Full diffraction patterns can be found in Supplementary Fig. S3, and the evolution of the in-plane FeSe (220) peak is shown in Supplementary Fig. S4]. The evolution trend follows the profile of the dual-beam density, which is roughly symmetric about the center of the substrate (Supplementary Fig. S5). From the center to the edge, the c-axis parameter gradually shrinks from 5.57 to 5.51 Å, whereas the a-axis parameter expands from 3.73 to 3.78 Å, corresponding to the lattice constant change of \({\approx} 1.1\%\) and \({\approx} 1.3\%\), respectively.
From one such dual-beam FeSe film, \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) is mapped from a series of \(R(T)\) curves obtained by patterning the sample into an array of micro-bridges. Specifically, a long conducting channel (width \({\approx} 200~\mu \text{m}\)) is configured along the gradient direction of the substrate (length \({\approx} 30\text{ mm}\)), with electrodes arranged alongside the channel in a Hall-bar configuration, and micro-bridges are defined by neighboring electrodes with a separation of 500 μm. Along the x-direction defined in Fig. 1(e), \(T_{\mathrm{c0}}\) first increases, reaching the maximum of approximately 12 K at the center, where the onset superconducting transition temperature is about 14 K, and then decreases toward the other end, revealing a positive (negative) correlation between \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) and the c-axis (a-axis) lattice constant. From two such films, a clear lattice-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) relationship of FeSe has emerged (Fig. 1(h)) which can be well captured by the expression \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \propto \sqrt{c- c_{0}}\), where c represents the c-axis lattice constant and \(c_{0} = 5.51\) Å is a constant.
Having unmasked the fundamental relation between the c-axis lattice constant and \(T_{c}\), we now look for its microscopic origin by performing scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) on a number of representative FeSe thin films with different \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\)’s fabricated by standard PLD according to the lattice-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) relationship. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show high angle annular dark field (HAADF) images of low-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) (SC03) and high-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) (SC09) films, respectively, along the [100] projection. Here, we use the notation SCXX to indicate a uniform film sample with \(T_{\mathrm{c}} = \text{XX K}\). The HAADF image of SC09 shows a standard FeSe lattice (Fig. 2(a)), while for SC03 (Fig. 2(b)) clearly distorted regions are observed (inside region enclosed by the white dashed line). The average size of these distorted regions is approximately 5 nm. The bottom panel of Fig. 2(c) shows a magnified image of the distorted area in Fig. 2(b). On the left side, the originally overlapping Se atoms projections have split into two sets. The splitting gradually increases from left to right and eventually becomes half of the original distance between two nearest Se atoms, resulting in the observed distorted regions. The splitting of the Se atoms projections suggests the observed pattern is an overlap between two sets of lattices, i.e. the overlap between a distorted plane and a standard plane (as illustrated in Fig. 2(c)).
Such distortions in SC03 seemingly originate from partial edge dislocations, i.e. an extra half-unit-cell plane is inserted between two nearby (020) planes, a picture supported by the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) image with (020) spots (see Supplementary Fig. S7 for details). The in-plane lattice of the distorted plane is stretched compared to that of the standard plane. Such in-plane expansion can bring about stress to the entire sample, which increases the in-plane lattice constant and decreases the out-of-plane lattice constant. We have looked at a number of STEM samples and found that the number of the distorted regions for low-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) samples (such as SC03) is much more than that from high-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) samples. As a rough estimate, the distorted regions occupy \({\approx} 10\%\) of the total volume of SC03 (Supplementary Fig. S8), while the high-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) sample (SC09) is almost distortion-free.
As for the origin of these local lattice distortions, strain effects [21, 31, 32] from the substrate can be ruled out since the dual-beam FeSe film with gradient \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) is deposited on the same substrate in a single experiment, and therefore the stress is uniform across the substrate. Moreover, strain from the substrate is expected to be largely relaxed for the 200 nm thick film. One might surmise that the distribution of laser energy on the target can result in an uneven deposition rate across the substrate, which in turn can lead to density variation of lattice distortions at different locations. However, the thickness of the film is nearly constant across the 30 mm substrate, with a variation of less than 1% from the center to the edge (Supplementary Fig. S9). Thus, we also exclude the variation of deposition rate as the reason for the distortion.
Since films made by single-beam PLD do not exhibit location-dependent properties across the substrate, the reason for the distribution of the lattice parameters in the dual-beam PLD configuration must lie in the laser-material interactions. To gain insight into this phenomenon, we have applied a kinetic-fluid joint model for quantitative simulations of laser-plume dynamics created by the laser pulses. In the first step, we used the mesoscopic two-temperature molecular dynamics simulation method [33] to study the influence of the acting laser on the cluster distribution, spallation, and particle motion. This process occurs within the laser-material interaction zone, which lies close to the surface of the target, i.e. \(z < 0.2~\mu\text{m}\) (z denotes the vertical distance from the target surface). The formation of particle clusters and voids, as well as the particle distribution are monitored and taken as the initial conditions for the plasma plume expansion in the second step, where we have adopted a plasma fluid model [34] to describe the expansion process. Details of the simulation can be found in Supplementary Note 3.
We summarize the simulation results in Fig. 3. In the plasma plume expansion stage, the appearance of plasma plume is similar to a mushroom cloud (Fig. 3(a)), formed by vortex-like convection of the heat flow colliding with the cold flow at the top. The integration of the plasma density at the top of the mushroom cloud has a uniform mass density distribution (Fig. 3(b)), namely the total amount of molecules shows little variation in the lateral direction, which explains the constant thickness observed across the substrate. The inset images of Fig. 3(c) show the mesoscopic atomic cluster distribution of the plume close to the target during the ablation process. The results are obtained by a series of molecular dynamic simulations according to the spatial profile of the laser intensity. The dimensions of these images are roughly 0.05 μm in the x-direction and 0.2 μm in the z-direction, and the laser intensity for obtaining each individual image is indicated by the red arrows in Fig. 3(c). In the center where the laser fluence is the highest, molecular clusters of the plume are smaller, and the size distribution is more even. In contrast, a complex structure of plume with larger clusters and voids appears away from the center with lower laser fluence. These observations are highly consistent with previous studies where particulate density is significantly reduced in the intersection area of two ablation plumes from twinned simultaneously irradiated targets [25, 35]. This non-uniform distribution of the cluster size is inherited in the plume expansion and brings about uneven formation of edge dislocations and associated lattice distortions in the deposited film, as larger clusters induce more stress during the film growth.
We now turn to the impact of the lattice distortion on the superconducting properties. Figure 4 shows the summary of the structural and transport properties of individual films with different \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\)’s, which can be mapped in a manner consistent with the lattice constant-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) relation revealed here (inset of Fig. 4(b)). The samples exhibit high crystalline quality as manifested in the small FWHM value (≈0.6∘) of the rocking curves (Fig. 4(a)) and sharp superconducting transitions (Fig. 4(b) and Supplementary Fig. S11), e.g. \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.3\text{ K}\) for SC12. The highest \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) here is \({\approx} 14\text{ K}\), which is almost twice that of typical FeSe single crystals (\(T_{\mathrm{c}} \approx 8\text{ K}\)) [7].
The Hall resistivity \(\rho _{\mathrm{xy}}\) is proportional to the magnetic field (B) from 200 to 20 K (Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) & Supplementary Fig. S12), namely the Hall coefficient \(R_{\mathrm{H}}(B)\) (\(=\rho _{\mathrm{xy}}/B\)) is field independent. \(R_{\mathrm{H}}(T)\) shows a sign change from negative to positive at a crossover temperature \(T^{*} \approx 120 \pm 10\text{ K}\) for all samples (Fig. 4(e)). Remarkably, the \(R_{\mathrm{H}}(T)\) curves of all samples overlap at \(T > T^{*}\). Our first-principles calculations indicate that 0.5% deviation in stoichiometry in FeSe would lead to doping effects, leading to significant change in the Hall coefficient. This is contrary to the present observation of \(R_{\mathrm{H}}(T)\) curves collapsing to the same temperature dependence. Thus, we conclude that there is no significant off-stoichiometric effect in our study (see Supplementary Note 5 for more details). In addition, neither energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy nor the inductively coupled plasma techniques showed discernible stoichiometric change among the films, within the error bar of 2%. Note that the characteristic temperature \(T^{*}\), slightly higher than the structural transition temperature (\(T_{\mathrm{s}} \approx 90\text{ K}\)), is consistent with the previously reported temperature for the band splitting associated with the nematic phase [36, 37], which may explain the divergence of \(R_{\mathrm{H}}(T)\) curves below \(T^{*}\).
Based on our experimental observations, we consider an explanation for the continuous tuning of \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) resulting from the electronic structure modulation due to lattice constant change. In FeSe superconductors, the hole Fermi pockets around Γ are known to be dominated by the \(d_{\mathrm{xz}}/d_{\mathrm{yz}}\) orbital bands (the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) band is below the Fermi level) [38–40], while the electron Fermi pockets around M are attributed to all three \(t_{\mathrm{2g}}\) orbitals [36, 41]. With a decrease (increase) in \(a(c)\)-axis, the Se height increases. Phenomenologically, since the diagonal hopping between \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) orbitals is sensitive to the Se height (i.e. the vertical distance from the Se atoms to the Fe plane) while \(d_{\mathrm{xz}}/d_{\mathrm{yz}}\) is not, a small variation in the Se height will mainly affect the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) bands. To substantiate this hypothesis, we have performed first-principles band structure calculations of FeSe in the tetragonal phase, directly incorporating three sets of lattice parameters from three positions on our dual-beam PLD film (details of the calculation can be found in Supplementary Fig. S13 and Note 5). With decreasing (increasing) a-axis (c-axis) lattice parameter, the most noticeable change in the electronic structures takes place in the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) band: the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) band shifts up in energy around Γ and shifts down around M, while \(d_{\mathrm{xz}}/d_{\mathrm{yz}}\) bands exhibit little change. It has been reported that the increased weight of the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) pocket at the Fermi level from the downshift of the \(d_{\mathrm{xy}}\) band around M, together with the reduced d–p coupling derived from the lattice modulation which affects the spin fluctuations [42], will weaken the nematicity [43]. A number of experimental observations have previously pointed to the presence of competition between nematicity and superconductivity [16, 44, 45]. Thus, the suppression of nematicity can naturally lead to the enhancement of superconductivity.
Another consequence of the decrease in the in-plane lattice constant in FeSe is phonon hardening and the enhanced the electron-phonon interaction. It has been argued that phonons are likely playing a critical role in FeSe thin films, especially in the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) enhancement of single layer FeSe films on SrTiO3, where the electron-phonon coupling originating from either FeSe itself or across the interface has attracted significant attention [41, 46, 47]. In this regard, the enhancement of the electron-phonon interaction could lead to the boosting of superconductivity. It is also interesting to note that the isotope effect [48] in conventional superconductors has the form \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \propto (1/M)^{1/2}\) (M: atomic mass) [49], which bears a resemblance to the quantitative relation between c-axis and \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) observed here, namely, \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \propto ( c- c_{0} )^{1/2}\). Since the lattice vibrations are modulated by the atomic mass and lattice parameters, whether there exists a more fundamental link between the two relationships is perhaps an intriguing question for further investigation.
In summary, a unique dual-beam PLD approach has given us a panoramic view of the \(T_{c}\) – lattice parameter relationship in FeSe thin films. The atomic-level microstructural investigation coupled with a theoretical analysis paints the picture of local lattice distortion resulting in electronic structure modulation, which in turn dictates the delicate balance between nematicity and superconductivity. The quantitative relation observed here can place explicit constraints on theoretical models describing the mechanism of superconductivity in FeSe.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the paper. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Mizuguchi Y, Hara Y, Deguchi K, Tsuda S, Yamaguchi T, Takeda K, Kotegawa H, Tou H, Takano Y (2010) Anion height dependence of \(\mathrm{T}_{c}\) for the Fe-based superconductor. Supercond Sci Technol 23:054013
Chen X, Dai P, Feng D, Xiang T, Zhang F-C (2014) Iron-based high transition temperature superconductors. Nat Sci Rev 1:371
Alloul H, Bobroff J, Gabay M, Hirschfeld PJ (2009) Defects in correlated metals and superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 81:45
Dagotto E (2005) Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems. Science 309:257
Haindl S et al. (2014) Thin film growth of Fe-based superconductors: from fundamental properties to functional devices. A comparative review. Rep Prog Phys 77:046502
Si Q, Yu R, Abrahams E (2016) High-temperature superconductivity in iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater 1:4
Böhmer AE, Kreisel A (2017) Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe. J Phys Condens Matter 30:023001
Hsu F-C et al. (2008) Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14262
Medvedev S et al. (2009) Electronic and magnetic phase diagram of β-Fe1.01Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure. Nat Mater 8:8
Sun JP et al. (2016) Dome-shaped magnetic order competing with high-temperature superconductivity at high pressures in FeSe. Nat Commun 7:12146
Gati E, Böhmer AE, Bud’ko SL, Canfield PC (2019) Bulk superconductivity and role of fluctuations in the iron-based superconductor FeSe at high pressures. Phys Rev Lett 123:167002
Guo J, Jin S, Wang G, Wang S, Zhu K, Zhou T, He M, Chen X (2010) Superconductivity in the iron selenide KxFe2Se2. Phys Rev B 82:180520
Burrard-Lucas M et al. (2013) Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer. Nat Mater 12:15
Jiang X et al. (2023) Interplay between superconductivity and the strange-metal state in FeSe. Nat Phys 19:3
Wang Q-Y et al. (2012) Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Phys Lett 29:037402
Lin Z et al. (2021) Enhancement of the lower critical field in FeSe-coated Nb structures for superconducting radio-frequency applications. Supercond Sci Technol 34:015001
Dijkkamp D, Venkatesan T, Wu XD, Shaheen SA, Jisrawi N, Min-Lee YH, McLean WL, Croft M (1987) Preparation of Y-Ba-Cu oxide superconductor thin films using pulsed laser evaporation from high \(\mathrm{T}_{c}\) bulk material. Appl Phys Lett 51:619
Willmott PR, Huber JR (2000) Pulsed laser vaporization and deposition. Rev Mod Phys 72:315
Wu MK et al. (2009) The development of the superconducting PbO-type β-FeSe and related compounds. Physica C, Supercond 469:340
Chen T-K et al. (2010) Low-temperature fabrication of superconducting FeSe thin films by pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 519:1540
Nie YF, Brahimi E, Budnick JI, Hines WA, Jain M, Wells BO (2009) Suppression of superconductivity in FeSe films under tensile strain. Appl Phys Lett 94:242505
Nabeshima F, Imai Y, Hanawa M, Tsukada I, Maeda A (2013) Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature in FeSe epitaxial thin films by anisotropic compression. Appl Phys Lett 103:172602
Feng Z et al. (2018) Tunable critical temperature for superconductivity in FeSe thin films by pulsed laser deposition. Sci Rep 8:1
Sakoda M, Iida K, Naito M (2018) Recent progress in thin-film growth of Fe-based superconductors: superior superconductivity achieved by thin films. Supercond Sci Technol 31:093001
Gorbunov AA et al. (1996) Ultrathin film deposition by pulsed laser ablation using crossed beams. Appl Surf Sci 96:649
Ong CK, Xu SY, Zhou WZ (1998) A novel approach for doping impurity in thin film in situ by dual-beam pulsed-laser deposition. Rev Sci Instrum 69:3659
Christen HM, Eres G (2008) Recent advances in pulsed-laser deposition of complex oxides. J Phys Condens Matter 20:264005
McQueen TM et al. (2009) Extreme sensitivity of superconductivity to stoichiometry in \(\mathrm{Fe}_{1+\delta }\mathrm{Se}\). Phys Rev B 79:014522
Haindl S et al. (2014) Thin film growth of Fe-based superconductors: from fundamental properties to functional devices. A comparative review. Rep Prog Phys 77:046502
Dagotto E (2013) Colloquium: the unexpected properties of alkali metal iron selenide superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 85:849
Liu D et al. (2012) Electronic origin of high-temperature superconductivity in single-layer FeSe superconductor. Nat Commun 3:1
He S et al. (2013) Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconductivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films. Nat Mater 12:7
Stadler J, Mikulla R, Trebin H-R (1997) IMD: a software package for molecular dynamics studies on parallel computers. Int J Mod Phys C 08:1131
Yan Z, Mei X, Wang W, Pan A, Lin Q, Huang C (2019) Numerical simulation on nanosecond laser ablation of titanium considering plasma shield and evaporation-affected surface thermocapillary convection. Opt Commun 453:124384
Witanachchi S, Ahmed K, Sakthivel P, Mukherjee P (1995) Dual-laser ablation for particulate-free film growth. Appl Phys Lett 66:1469
Nakayama K, Miyata Y, Phan GN, Sato T, Tanabe Y, Urata T, Tanigaki K, Takahashi T (2014) Reconstruction of band structure induced by electronic nematicity in an FeSe superconductor. Phys Rev Lett 113:237001
Zhang P et al. (2015) Observation of two distinct dxz/dyz band splittings in FeSe. Phys Rev B 91:214503
Watson MD, Haghighirad AA, Rhodes LC, Hoesch M, Kim TK (2017) Electronic anisotropies revealed by detwinned angle-resolved photo-emission spectroscopy measurements of FeSe. New J Phys 19:103021
Liu D et al. (2018) Orbital origin of extremely anisotropic superconducting gap in nematic phase of FeSe superconductor. Phys Rev X 8:031033
Rhodes LC, Watson MD, Haghighirad AA, Evtushinsky DV, Eschrig M, Kim TK (2018) Scaling of the superconducting gap with orbital character in FeSe. Phys Rev B 98:180503
Song C-L, Zhang H-M, Zhong Y, Hu X-P, Ji S-H, Wang L, He K, Ma X-C, Xue Q-K (2016) Observation of double-dome superconductivity in potassium-doped FeSe thin films. Phys Rev Lett 116:157001
Chen T et al. (2019) Anisotropic spin fluctuations in detwinned FeSe. Nat Mater 18:7
Rhodes LC, Böker J, Müller MA, Eschrig M, Eremin IM (2021) Non-local \(d_{xy}\) nematicity and the missing electron pocket in FeSe. npj Quantum Mater 6:1
Chen X, Maiti S, Fernandes RM, Hirschfeld PJ (2020) Nematicity and superconductivity: competition versus cooperation. Phys Rev B 102:184512
Phan GN et al. (2017) Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 95:224507
Coh S, Cohen ML, Louie SG (2015) Large electron–phonon interactions from FeSe phonons in a monolayer. New J Phys 17:073027
Xiang Y-Y, Wang F, Wang D, Wang Q-H, Lee D-H (2012) High-temperature superconductivity at the FeSe/SrTiO3 interface. Phys Rev B 86:134508
Maxwell E (1950) Isotope effect in the superconductivity of Mercury. Phys Rev 78:477
Reynolds CA, Serin B, Nesbitt LB (1951) The isotope effect in superconductivity. I. Mercury. Phys Rev 84:691
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Kai Liu, Gang Xu, Hongyi Xie, Yifeng Yang, Jinguang Cheng, Xiaoli Dong, Erjia Guo, Minqing He, and Tao Xiang for fruitful discussions, and Lihong Yang for technical support.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12225412, 12204333, 12374141, 11834016, 11927808), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2021YFA0718700, 2022YFA1403900, 2022YFA1403000), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB25000000, XDB33000000), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z190008), the Beijing Nova Program of Science and Technology (20220484014), CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (2022YSBR-048). The Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020B0101340002). The work at the University of Maryland was funded by AFOSR FA9550-14-10332 and NIST 60NANB19D027.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KJ and ZXZ conceived the project. ZPF, YJ and ZYZ synthesized the films and performed the x-ray diffraction characterization. QHZ, LG and HXY performed the transmission electron microscopy. HZ performed the simulations, with help and comments from SMW. XYJ, XXW, QHX, VS and SM contributed to the theoretical discussions. QHC, IT and KJ analyzed the data and discussed the results with all authors. QHC, IT and KJ wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
KJ is an editorial board member for Quantum Frontiers and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish, this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, Z., Zhang, H., Yuan, J. et al. The origin of the large \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) variation in FeSe thin films probed by dual-beam pulsed laser deposition. Quantum Front 3, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-024-00058-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-024-00058-0