Abstract
In this paper, the main purpose is to study existence of the global attractor for the weakly damped wave equation with gradient type nonlinearity. To this end, we first verify the existence and uniqueness of global weak solution by the Galerkin method and compulsively variational method. Furthermore, we obtained the global strong solution under some mild assumptions on f. Secondly, we utilize the \(\omega\)-limit compactness to show the semigroup generated by the equation has a compact, connected and invariant attractor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In this paper we are concerned with the following weakly damped wave equation with gradient type nonlinearity on a bounded domain \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) with smooth boundary \({\partial \Omega}\)
where \(\alpha>0, p>1,\) and \(1<p<\frac{n}{n-2}, n\ge 3; 1<p<\infty , n=1,2,\) respectively. The source \(f\in C^1\) and satisfies the following growth condition
where \(g\in L^2(\Omega \times (0,T)), q\le \frac{p+1}{2}, s\le 1\) for some constant \(C_1,C_2>0\).
Similar initial-boundary problem was investigated by Meng and Zhu in [18, 28] for the equation
where \(\alpha >0, \varphi\) is the nonlinear term, and f is a given external forcing term, \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^3\) is a bounded domain with smooth boundary \(\partial \Omega\). Nonlinear wave equation of the type (1.3) arises as an evolutionary mathematical model in many branched of physics, for example, (i) modeling a continuous Josephson junction with \(\varphi (u)=\beta \sin u\); (ii) modeling a relativistic quantum mechanics with \(\varphi (u)=|u|^\gamma u\). A relevant problem is to investigate the asymptotic dynamical behavior of these mathematical models. The understanding of the asymptotic behavior of dynamical systems is one of the most important problems of modern mathematical physics(see,e.g. [14, 21] and references therein). One way to treat this problem is to analyse the existence of its global attractor. Meng obtained the existence of a global attractor for (1.3) in strong topological space \(H^2(\Omega )\cap H_0^1(\Omega )\times H_0^1(\Omega )\) where the nonlinear term \(\varphi\) with some polynomial growth and the external forcing term f is independent of time. Zhu invested the case which \(\varphi (u)=0\) with nonlinear boundary conditions. The boundary was divided into two parts: one part is Dirichlet boundary and the other part is with boundary damping which the framework was arising in control theory in [12, 13]. And also, the other way to treat this problem is to concern the decay of solutions (see,e.g. [4, 19, 23] and references therein).
Attractor is an important concept describing asymptotic properties of dynamical systems, a great deal of work has been devoted to the existence of global attractors of dynamical systems (see, e.g. [1, 3, 5, 6, 8,9,10, 22, 26, 27] and references therein). The existence of a global attractor Eq. (1.1) which the source term only containing f was proved by Hale [8] for f satisfying for \(n\ge 3\) the growth condition \(f(u)\le C_{0}(|u|^{\gamma }+ 1)\), with \(1\le \gamma <\frac{n}{n-2}\). For the case \(n=2\), Hale and Raugel [7] proved the existence of the attractor under an exponential growth condition of the type \(|f(u)|\le \exp \theta (u)\) (such a condition previously appearing in the work of Gallou\(\ddot{e}\)t [16]). The existence of the attractor in the critical case \(\gamma =\frac{n}{n-2}\) was first proved by Babin and Vishik [2], and then more generally by Arrieta, Carvalho and Hale [5]. For other treatments see Chepyzhov and Vishik [5], Ladyzhenskaya [11], Raugel [24] and Temam [26]. When \(\Omega\) is bounded and u is subjected to suitable boundary conditions, the general result is that the dynamical system associated with the problem possesses a global attractor in natural energy space \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega )\) if nonlinear term f has subcritical or critical exponent, because there exists typical parabolic-like flows with an inherent smoothing mechanism. However, the nonlinear source f with gradient in Eq. (1.1) which is different from [3, 6, 27, 28]. So we make the nonlinear source f those under some growth conditions controlled by the variational structure. By the traditional method [25] (for examples), in order to obtain the existence of global attractors for semilinear wave equations, one needs to verify the uniform compactness of the semigroup by getting the boundedness in a more regular function space. However, in some cases it is difficult to obtain the uniform compactness of the semigroup. Fortunately, a new method for obtaining the global attractors has been developed in [17]. With this method, one only needs to verify a necessary compactness condition(\(\omega\)-limit compactness) with the same type of energy estimates as those for establishing the absorbing sets. In this paper, we use this method to obtain the existence of global attractors for the Eq. (1.1) with the complicated condition where the source term \(f(u,\nabla u,x,t)\) is without variational structure.
This paper is organized as follows:
-in Sect. 2 we obtained the existence and uniqueness of weak solution by using Galerkin method and compulsively variational method;
-in Sect. 3 we obtained the existence of global attractor for the Eq. (1.1) by using the new method (\(\omega\)-compactness condition).
2 Existence and Uniqueness of the Global Weak Solution
Definition 2.1
(Weak Solution) [20] A \(u=u(x,t)\) is called a weak solution of the Eq. (1.1), if \(u\in W_{loc}^{1,\infty }(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega ))\cap L_{loc}^{\infty }(0,T;H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\) and satisfies the Eq. (1.1) in the distribution sense, i.e.
for any \(v\in H_{0}^{1}(\Omega ), t\in (0,T)\), where \((\varphi ,\psi )\in (H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\times L^{2}(\Omega ),\) \(<\cdot ,\cdot >_2\) means the inner product \(<\cdot ,\cdot >_{L^{2}(\Omega )}\) and \(G(u)=\triangle u-|u|^{p-1}u+f(u,\nabla u,x,t).\)
Theorem 2.1
(Existence) Under condition (1.2), for any \((\varphi , \psi )\in (H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\times L ^{2}(\Omega )\), then the Eq. (1.1) has a global weak solution
Proof
Fix spaces as follows:
\(X_{\frac{1}{2}}\) is a fractional space which generated by \(\Delta ^{\frac{1}{2}}, X_{\frac{1}{2}}=H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ).\)
Set \(\{e_{k}|k=1,2,\ldots \}\subset X\) is the common orthogonal basis of H and \(H_2\), that is
Note \(u_n=\sum _{k=1}^{n}u_k(t)e_k\). Multiply (1.1) by \(e_k\) and integrate it over \(\Omega\) to get
from (2.2),we get
it is easily to know
for any \(v\in H_n\) is hold, and also for any \(v\in {\widetilde{H}}_n\) ,we have
we can set \(v=\frac{du_n}{dt}\) and put it into (2.5), it yields
i.e.
there exists a \(C^1\) functional \(F: X_2\rightarrow R^1\), such that
where
and satisfied
by computing (2.10),we get
i.e.
Now, we deal with the nonlinear and invariational source under the growth condition (1.2) to get
where \(C,C_1,C_2\in R^+\) and \(C_1>2C, q\le \frac{p+1}{2},s\le 1,\) put (2.12) into (2.11), we can conclude that
where
combine the Gronwall Inequality and (2.13), we get
Set \(\varphi \in H_2\), since the \(\triangle\) operator is linear, \({e_n}\) is also the orthogonal basis of \(H_1\),since the weak convergence, we have
obviously, \(H_2\hookrightarrow X_2\), then
From (2.9), (2.14) and (2.15), we can conclude that for any \(0<T<\infty\),
Set \(u_n\rightarrow *u_0~~in ~~W^{1,\infty }(0,T; H_{1})\cap L^{\infty }(0,T; X_{2})\), we have
and
Hence, from (2.4) we conclude that \(u_0\) is a global weak solution of the Eq. (1.1).
The proof is completed.
Remark 2.1
In Theorem 2.1, the gradient source f satisfies the growth condition (1.2)in order to ensure
we can give a further weak growth condition from (2.11) as follows
where \(g\in L_{loc}^1(0,\infty ), 0<a<1,b>0.\)
Now, we discuss the uniqueness of global weak solution for the Eq. (1.1) as follows:
Firstly, we can get the expression of the solution \(u,u_t\) for the Eq. (1.1) from semigroup theory
where \({\mathcal {L}}=\triangle +\alpha ^2 I:X_1\rightarrow X\) is a sectorial operator.
We have the uniqueness theorem as follows
Theorem 2.2
(Uniqueness) If \(u\in W^{1,\infty }(0,T; L^{2}(\Omega )) \cap L^{\infty }_{loc}(0,T;H^{1}_{0}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\) is a global weak solution of Eq. (1.1), and \(g:H^{1}_{0}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\rightarrow L^{2}(\Omega )\) is \(C^1\), then the solution u is unique.
where \(g(u)=-|u|^{p-1}u+f(u,\nabla u,x,t).\)
Proof
Set \(u_1,u_2\in W^{1,\infty }(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega )) \cap L^{\infty }_{loc}(0,T; H^{1}_{0}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega ))\) are the solutions of the Eq. (1.1), then we get \(u_i\in C^{0}((0,T),H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\cap L^{p+1}(\Omega )), i=1,2,\) and
by applying the poinc\(\acute{a}\)re inequality, we can conclude that
it implied that
from Gronwall inequality.
Obviously,
so
Now, we focus on the existence of strong solution for the Eq. (1.1).
Note \(Gu=\triangle u-|u|^{p-1}u+f(u,\nabla u,x,t)\) and satisfies that
where \(F(u)=\int _{\Omega }[\frac{1}{2}|\nabla u|^{2}+\frac{1}{p+1}|u|^{p+1}]dx,~H_1=L^2(\Omega ).\)
Theorem 2.3
(Strong Solution) Under condition (2.22), for any \((\varphi , \psi )\in H^2(\Omega )\times H_0^{1}(\Omega )\), then the Eq.(1.1) has a global strong solution
Proof
For any \(v\in {\widetilde{H}}_n\), we can set \(v=\frac{d^2u_n}{dt^2}\) and put it into (2.5),
from (2.22), we get
combine (2.14), it implies that
i.e.,for any \(0<T<\infty\),
since
is compact mapping, so
The proof is completed.
3 Existence of Global Attractor
Next, we introduce the concepts and definitions of invariant sets, global attractors, and \(\omega\)-limit compactness sets for the semigroup S(t).
Definition 3.1
Let S(t) be a semigroup defined on X. One set \(\Sigma \subset X\) is called an invariant set of S(t) if \(S(t)\Sigma = \Sigma , \forall t\ge 0\). An invariant set \(\Sigma\) is an attractor of S(t) if \(\Sigma\) is compact, and there exists a neighborhood \(U\subset X\) of \(\Sigma\) such that for any \(u_{0}\in U\),
In this case, we say that \(\Sigma\) attracts U. Especially, if \(\Sigma\) attracts any bounded set of X, \(\Sigma\) is called a global attractor of S(t) in X.
Definition 3.2
Let X be an infinite dimensional Banach space and A be a bounded subset of X. The measure of noncompactness \(\gamma (A)\) of A is defined by
Lemma 3.1
[16] If \({A_{n}}\subset X\) is a sequence bounded and closed sets, \(A_{n}\ne \emptyset , A_{n+1}\subset A_{n}\), and \(\gamma (A_{n})\rightarrow 0, (n\rightarrow \infty )\), then the set \(A=\cap _{n=1}^{\infty } A_{n}\) is a nonempty compact set.
Definition 3.3
[17] A semigroup \(S(t): X\rightarrow X (t\ge 0)\) in X is called \(\omega\)- limit compact, if for any bounded set \(B\subset X\) and \(\forall \varepsilon >0\), there exists \(t_{0}\) such that
where \(\gamma\) is noncompact measure in X.
For a set \(D\subset X\), we define the \(\omega\)-limit set of D as follows:
where the closure is taken in the X-norm.
Lemma 3.2
[15] Let S(t) be a semigroup in X, then S(t) has a global attractor \({\mathcal {A}}\) in X if and only if
(1) S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compactness, and
(2) there is a bounded absorbing set \(B\subset X\).
In addition, the \(\omega\)-limit set of B is the attractor \({\mathcal {A}}=\omega (B)\).
Remark 3.1
Although the lemma has been proved partly in [15], we still give a proof here. Our proof is different from that in [27] but is similar to that in [17]. We adopt and present the proof also because we will use the same method to obtain the existence of the global attractor.
Proof
Step1. To prove the sufficiency of Lemma 3.2:
(a). Since S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compactness, i.e., for any bounded set \(B\subset X\) and \(\forall \varepsilon >0,\) there exists a \(t_{0}\), such that:
So, we know \(\omega (B)=\bigcap _{t_0= 0}^{\infty }\overline{\bigcup _{t\ge t_{0}}S(t)B}\) is a compact set from the Lemma [2.3].
(b). the nonempty of \(\omega (B)\);
For \(B\ne \emptyset\), so \(\overline{\bigcup _{t\ge s}S(t)B}\ne \emptyset , \forall s\ge 0,\)
and
we can obtain
(c). the invariant of \(\omega (B)\);
For \(x\in \omega (B) \Leftrightarrow\) there exists \(\{x_{n}\}\in B\) and \(t_{n}\rightarrow \infty\), such that \(S(t_{n})x_{n}\rightarrow x.\)
If \(y\in S(t)\omega (B)\), then for some \(x\in \omega (B), y=S(t)x\).
Hence, there exists \(\{x_{n}\}\subset B, t_{n}\rightarrow \infty\), such that
In conclusion, \(y\in \omega (B), S(t)\omega (B)\in \omega (B), \forall t\ge 0.\)
If \(x\in \omega (B)\), fix \(\{x_{n}\}\subset B\) and \({t_{n}}\), such that
Since S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compact, i.e., there exists a \(y\in H\), such that
so \(y\in \omega (B)\).
For
and
it implies that
In conclusion, combine (a–c) and condition (1.2), step 1 has been proved.
Step 2. To prove the necessary of Lemma 3.2.
If \({{\mathcal {A}}}\) is a global attractor, then the \(\varepsilon\)-neighborhood \(U_{\varepsilon }({{\mathcal {A}}})\subset X\) is a absorbing set. So we need only to prove S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compactness.
Since \(U_{\varepsilon }({{\mathcal {A}}})\) is a absorbing set, for any bounded set \(B\subset X\) and \(\varepsilon > 0,\) there exists a time \(t_{\varepsilon }(B)> 0\) such that
On the other hand, \({\mathcal {A}}\) is a compact set, there exists finite element \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \cdots , x_{n} \in X\) such that
Then,
it implies that
Hence, the Lemma 3.2. has been proved.
Fix the spaces as follows
Assume that
Theorem 3.1
For any \((\varphi , \psi )\in (H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega ))\), the gradient source f satisfies the growth restriction (1.2), the domain \(\Omega\) satisfies the condition \(|\Omega |^{\frac{1}{2q}-\frac{1}{2p}}\)and the exponents of p satisfies \(1<p<\frac{n}{n-2}, n\ge 3\) or \(1<p<\infty , n=1,2\), then the problem (1.1) has a global attractor \({\mathcal {A}}\) in \((H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega ))\).
Remark 3.2
Comparing the Remark 3.1., we divide the operator G(u) of Definition (2.1)into two parts: L and T, where L is a linear operator while T is a nonlinear operator. We obtain the global attractor of the problem (1.1) by using the Lemma 2.4.
Proof
According to Lemma 3.5., we prove Theorem 3.1 in the following three steps.
Step 1. The problem (1.1) has a globally unique weak solution;
Step 2. To prove S(t) has a bounded absorbing set in \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega );\)
Step 3. S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compactness.
From the Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we get the problem (1.1) has a global unique weak solution \((u, u_{t})\in C^{0}(0,\infty X_2\times H_1)\). Equation (1.1) generates a semigroup:
Firstly, we demonstrate S(t) has a bounded absorbing set in \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega ):\)
The Eq. (1.1) is equivalent to the parabolic equations as follows
Multiply (3.1) by \((-\triangle u, v)\) and take the inner product in \(H_1\), we have
moreover,
integrate (3.4) over [0,t], we can conclude that
from the growth condition (1.2), we have
and
since
so we have
i.e.
combine (3.7), (3.8)and (3.9), we make (3.6) be as follows
so
where \(C>0\). We can conclude that as follows from Gronwall inequality
it implies that S(t) has a bounded absorbing set in \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega ).\)
At last, we prove S(t) is \(\omega\)-limit compactness.
From the formula in Lemma 2.2, the solution of problem (1.1) can be expressed as follows:
Since the linear operator
is symmetrical sector operator, it has eigenvalue sequence:
Then
For any \(v=\sum _{j=1}^{\infty }v_{j}e_{j}\in L^{2}(\Omega )\) and \(-\lambda _{j}>0, (j\ge 1),\) operator
is uniformly bounded, i.e.
Furthermore, \((u, u_{t})\) contains two parts:
degenerative term
integral term
From the uniformly bounded condition (3.16), we get
and for any \((\varphi , \psi )\in B,\)
where \(B\subset H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega )\) is a bounded set.
From the growth condition (1.2) and \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\hookrightarrow L^{2p}(\Omega ), (p<\frac{n}{n-2})\), we get
where \(Tu=-|u|^{p-1}u+f(u,\nabla u,x,t).\)
Hence, combine (3.20) and (3.21), for the noncompact measure \(\gamma\) we get
it implies that
At last, combine the step 2 and step 3, applying the Lemma [2.4], the problem (1.1) has a global attractor \({\mathcal {A}}\) in \(H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\times L^{2}(\Omega ).\)
References
Babin, A.V., Vishik, M.I.: Attractors of Evolution Equations (English transl North-Holland 1992). Nauka, Moscow (1989)
Babin, A.V., Vishik, M.I.: Attractors of Evolution Equations (English translation North-Holland 1989). Nauka, Moscow (1992)
Ball, J.M.: Global attractors for damped semilinear wave equations. Disc. Control Dyn. Syst. 10, 31–52 (2004)
Cárdenas, A.S., Niche, C.J.: Decay character and estimates for the damped wave equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 506, 125548 (2022)
Chepyzhov, V.V., Vishik, M.I.: Attractors for equations of mathematical physics, mathematical physics, volume 49 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002)
Ghidaglia, J.M., Temam, R.: Attractors for damping nonlinear hyperbolic equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. 66, 273–319 (1987)
Hale, J.K., Raugel, G.: Attractors for dissipative evolutionary equations. In C. Perell\(\acute{o}\), C. Sim\(\acute{o}\), and J. Sol\(\grave{a}\)-Morales, editors, Proceedings of the conference EQUADIFF 91 held at the Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, August 26–31, 1991, volume 1, pages 3–22. World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., 1993
Hale, J.K.: Asymptotic behaviour and dynamics in infinite dimensions. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. 132, 1–42 (1984)
Haraux, A.: Two remarks on dissipative hyperbolic problems. In J.-L. Lions, editor, S\(\acute{e}\)minaires de Coll\(\grave{e}\)ge de France (1984)
Haraux, A.: Systems Dynamiques Dissipatifs et applications (RMA 17). Mas, Pairs (1991)
Ladyzhenskaya, O.: Attractors for Semigroups and Evolution Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Lasiecka, I.: Stabilization of wave and plate-like equations with nonlinear dissipation on the boundary. J. Differ. Equ. 79, 340–381 (1989)
Lasiecka, I., Triggiani, R.: Uniform Stabilization of the wave equation with Dirichlet or Neumann feedback control without geometrical conditions. Appl. Math. Optim. 25, 189–224 (1992)
Li, L., Fan, Y.L., Han, D.Z., Wang, Q.: Dynamical transition and bifurcation of hydromagnetic convection in a rotating fluid layer. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 112, 106231 (2022)
Ma, T.: Theories and Methods in Partial Differential Equations. Science Press, Beijing (2011)
Ma, T., Wang, S.H.: Stability and Bifurcation of Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Science Press, Beijing (2007)
Ma, Q., Wang, S., Zhong, C.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of global attractors for semigroups and applications. Indiana Math. J 5(6), 1542–1558 (2002)
Meng, F.J., Liu, C.C.: Exponential attractors for weakly damped wave equation with sub-quintic nonlinearity. Comput. Math. Appl. 78, 1026–1036 (2019)
Palmieri, A.: Decay estimates for the linear damped wave equation on the Heisenberg group. J. Funct. Anal. 279, 108721 (2020)
Pan, Z.G., Pu, Z.L., Ma, T.: Global solutions to a class of nonlinear damped wave operator equations. Bound. Value Prob. 42, 1–9 (2012)
Pan, J.J., Xing, C., Luo, H.: Uniform regularity of the weak solution to higher-order Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 486, 123925 (2020)
Pan, Z.G., Jia, L., Mao, Y.Q., Wang, Q.: Transitions and bifurcations in couple stress fluid saturated porous media using a thermal non-equilibrium model. Appl. Math. Comput. 415, 126727 (2022)
Park, S.-H.: Global nonexistence for logarithmic wave equations with nonlinear damping and distributed delay terms. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 68, 103691 (2022)
Raugel, G.: Global attractors in partial differential equations. In Handbook of dynamical systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam 2, 885–982 (2002)
Robinson, C.: Infinite-dimensional Dynamical Systems: An Introduction to Dissipative Parabolic PDEs and the Theory of Global Attractors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Temam, R.: Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Zhang, Y.H., Zhong, C.K.: Existence of global attractors for a nonlinear wave equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 18, 77–84 (2005)
Zhu, C.S.: Global attractor of the weakly damped wave equation with nonlinear boundary conditions. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 27, 97–106 (2012)
Funding
This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Number. 2682022ZTPY063), Sichuan Federation of Social Sciences special Project (Grant Number. SC21TJ017)and Chengdu College of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Guoteng Venture Capital Fund (Grant Numbers. GTKY-07, GTKY-08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZP: studies conceptualization and writing (review and editing) the manuscript, YW: formal analysis and writing (original draft), KS: check the whole proofs of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Consent for Publication
Authors declare the consent for manuscript publication.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, Z., Wang, Y. & Shuai, K. Global Attractors for a Class of Weakly Damped Wave Equations with Gradient Type Nonlinearity. J Nonlinear Math Phys 30, 269–286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44198-022-00079-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44198-022-00079-0