Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are considered a leading cause of death worldwide. Allelic variation in the CYP2C19 gene leads to a dysfunctional enzyme, and patients with this loss-of-function allele will have an impaired clopidogrel metabolism, which eventually results in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Ischemic heart disease patients (n = 102) who underwent percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) followed by clopidogrel were enrolled in the present study.
Methods
The genetic variations in the CYP2C19 gene were identified using the TaqMan chemistry-based qPCR technique. Patients were followed up for 1 year to monitor MACE, and the correlations between the allelic variations in CYP2C19 and MACE were recorded.
Results
During the follow-up, we reported 64 patients without MACE (29 with unstable angina (UA), 8 with myocadiac infarction (MI), 1 patient with non-STEMI, and 1 patient with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC)). Genotyping of CYP2C19 in the patients who underwent PCI and were treated with clopidogrel revealed that 50 patients (49%) were normal metabolizers for clopidogrel with genotype CYP2C19*1/*1 and 52 patients (51%) were abnormal metabolizers, with genotypes CYP2C19*1/*2 (n = 15), CYP2C19*1/*3 (n = 1), CYP2C19*1/*17 (n = 35), and CYP2C19*2/*17 (n = 1). Demographic data indicated that age and residency were significantly associated with abnormal clopidogrel metabolism. Moreover, diabetes, hypertension, and cigarette smoking were significantly associated with the abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel. These data shed light on the inter-ethnic variation in metabolizing clopidogrel based on the CYP2C19 allelic distribution.
Conclusion
This study, along with other studies that address genotype variation of clopidogrel-metabolizing enzymes, might pave the way for further understanding of the pharmacogenetic background of CVD-related drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a class of diseases that affect the heart or blood vessels. Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent clinical condition representing various heart diseases [1, 2]. CVDs are the leading cause of death globally, with an estimated 17.9 million people dying from CVDs in 2019, accounting for 32% of all global deaths. It is expected to cause death for nearly 23.6 million in 2030 [3]. Among the spectrum of CVDs, coronary artery disease (CAD) is caused by atherosclerosis. This condition restricts blood flow to the heart, resulting in a heart attack when the blood flow is completely hindered. Atherosclerosis occurs upon a cascade of events, including vascular injury, inflammation, degeneration, and thrombosis [4, 5].
For the management of atherosclerosis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the method of choice. This intervention requires antiplatelet therapy depending on the admission diagnosis and the stent type [6, 7]. Antiplatelet drugs are commonly used to control ischemic events, mainly in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [8, 9]. Despite the ongoing development of new antiplatelet drugs, variability in response has been observed, leading to adverse cardiovascular events [10, 11].
The interindividual pharmacogenetic variation in response to approved antiplatelet drugs has been extensively studied, emphasizing the antiplatelet prodrug clopidogrel. These drugs are for asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), ischemic stroke, and ischemic events caused by ACS. Several factors can affect the platelet activation process, including epinephrine, thrombin, serotonin, and collagen. These factors have been extensively studied as they represent the site of action for antiplatelet drugs [11, 12].
Clopidogrel is a commonly used antiplatelet prodrug, converted in the liver into its active form that functions by targeting platelet P2Y12 receptor and inhibiting ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation [13, 14]. About 85% of the clopidogrel prodrug is hydrolyzed to inactive metabolites by esterase, while only 15% is transformed into active drugs. Two sequential oxidative reactions are necessary for this transformation [15, 16]. Clopidogrel combined with aspirin reduces cardiovascular-related death and ischemic complications in patients with ACS. However, interindividual variations in platelet aggregation are expected, leading to thrombotic events in some patients [17, 18].
Cytochromes P450 (CYP) are a superfamily of monooxygenases that, in humans, oxidize steroids, fatty acids, and xenobiotics and are essential for detoxification and clearance of a variety of drugs with toxicological importance [17, 18]. The human genome contains 57 genes and 59 pseudogenes that comprise 18 CYP families and 43 subfamilies. Several members in this family, such as CYP1, CYP2, and CYP3 of CYP450, received more attention because of their significant role in pharmacokinetics [19]. In humans, 4 CYP2C members have been identified; CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, and CYP2C19. CYP2C19 is a hepatic cytochrome P450 that metabolizes various clinical drugs, including clopidogrel, with 35 alleles. The CYP2C19*1 allele is the wild-type copy with full enzymatic activity. Other alleles include CYP2C19*2, which encodes for a truncated, nonfunctional protein, and CYP2C19*3, which harbors a premature stop codon. These polymorphisms of CYP2C19 are associated with the abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel [20].
Ethnicity can influence the risk of phenoconversion, a phenomenon that might affect genotype-based drug prescription [21], where ethnicity can determine drug response and metabolism [22].
In the present study, we evaluated the role of CYP2C19 allelic variation in the metabolism of clopidogrel in an Egyptian cohort population with CAD.
2 Patients and methods
2.1 Study population
In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 102 patients attended ELDOA Hospital, the Cardiovascular Department of Beni Suef University Hospital, and Cairo Health Care Center for Cardiac Catheterization for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) from April 2017 to April 2018 were enrolled. Samples were represented as the main Governorates in Egypt. The study was approved by the IRB, Misr University for Science and Technology. Formally informed consent was collected from each participant after explaining the aim and objectives of the study.
In this study, patients with ACS who underwent PCI followed by clopidogrel treatment met the inclusion criteria. Patients on aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast allergy, Bare-Metal Stents (BMS) stents due to a higher risk of thrombosis, tumors or bleeding tendency, hemodynamic instability, and severe renal or liver dysfunction were excluded from this study.
Data were recorded blood sample was collected after obtaining informed consent from the patient. Personal data were verbally collected from all patients (name, age, address, education level, patient history, and family history of heart disease). Current and previous and follow-up clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical record of the patients, which includes ECG reports, echocardiographic reports, and angiographic reports. Similarly, the collected data included the medications and doses administered, including clopidogrel and the reason for clopidogrel intake.
2.2 Clinical and laboratory investigations
Family and medical history were collected from each patient. According to the American Heart Association guidelines, patients with blood pressure higher than 130/80 mm Hg were considered hypertensive patients. Furthermore, fasting and 2 h postprandial blood glucose levels were recorded for each patient. Patients with fasting glucose levels of 126 mg/dL and 2 h postprandial (two h pp) blood glucose levels above or equal to 220 mg/dL were considered people with diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Troponin (for the diagnosis of STEMI and non-STEMI), CK-MB, and CBC were also measured. Moreover, imaging investigations including ECG, Echocardiography, and Coronary angiography were performed for each patient (data not shown).
2.3 PCI and clopidogrel management
The standard of care performed PCI. All patients were administrated 300 mg clopidogrel and 40 mg atorvastatin before operation and operated according to the type of anticoagulant, the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban), and the type of stent. After PCI, patients were treated with 100 mg/day of aspirin and 75 mg/day of clopidogrel for 1 year. The success of PCI was defined as follows: (1) achievement of complete revascularization and residual stenosis of < 20% in target vessels of patients, (2) level 3 TIMI blood flow, (3) partial or complete remission of symptoms of myocardial ischemia, and (4) no severe complications during hospitalization (such as acute myocardial infarction, urgent target lesion revascularization, or death).
2.4 Chemicals and kits
Taq-AT Polymerase, PCR buffer, mineral oil, the polymorphisms under study [CYP2C19:681G>A*2 (P227P)-960MCL, CYP2C19:636 G>A*3 (W212X)-960MCL, CYP2C19:806 C>T *17-960MCL], and DNA extraction kits were purchased from DNA Technology, Russia. The identification of the studied polymorphisms was performed at the laboratory of the Biotechnology Department, GMA Biotechnology, Cairo, Egypt.
2.5 Molecular analysis
Approximately 2.5 mL of venous blood samples on heparin-coated tubes from 102 patients. Total DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (prep-rapid Genetics, DNA Technology, Russia). For the qPCR amplification, the following mix was prepared for each SNP [CYP2C19 681 G>A (*2), CYP2C19 636 G>A (*3), CYP2C19 -806 (*17)] in a total volume of 50 μL: 20 μL from each specific probe, 10 μL master mix, 15 μL mineral oil, and 5 μL DNA (equals to 500 ng).
2.6 Interpretation of CYP2C19 alleles
Each of the two variant alleles is caused by a substitution of one nucleotide leading to different effects in the enzymatic activity where CYP2C19*1 is the wild type, CYP2C19*2 characterized by c.681G>A (rs4244285), which leads to cryptic splice acceptor activation, and CYP2C19*3 characterized by c.636G>A (rs4986893) which leads to gained stop codon. The predicted metabolism phenotypes for CYP2C19 were: extensive metabolizer (CYP2C9-1*/1*), intermediate metabolizer (CYP2C9-1*/2*, CYP2C9-1*/3*, and poor metabolizer (CYP2C9-2*/2*, CYP2C9-2*/3*, and CYP2C9-3*/3*).
2.7 Statistical analysis
Data were entered in a spreadsheet using (SPSS v.22, Chicago, Illinois, USA) program. Discrete values were presented in numbers, and the chi-square test made percentages and inferences of significance and the Fisher exact test. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were presented in means ± , standard deviation, the Student t test for normally distributed data, and the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normal distribution data. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. All data analysis was done by the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS v.22, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
3 Results
3.1 Demographic data
In the present study, 102 patients were enrolled, and their demographic data are represented in Table 1.
For the risk factors in the study group, 49 (48.04%) were found to have diabetes mellites type 2, 56 (54.9%) were having hypertension, and 40 (39.22%) were smokers. Figure 1 represents the study group’s major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during 1 year of follow-up.
The CYP2C19 allelic distribution was variably distributed in the study group, with the most common genotype *1/*1, which represented 49 (48.04%) of the total number of patients followed by *1/*17 which represented 35 (34.31%) of the total number of patients.
According to the variation in genotypes, phenotype distributions were also recorded. Table 2 represents the distribution of the real-life experience of the patients enrolled in this study in terms of the capability of metabolizing clopidogrel. Data showed that 50 patients (49.25%) were normal metabolizers of clopidogrel, while 52 patients representing 50.98% of the study group were abnormal metabolizers. Table 3 represents the allelic and genotype frequency of the study population.
We linked the normal and abnormal metabolizers with their demographic data to gain a deeper insight. The obtained data (Fig. 2) indicated that there are significant variations for age (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2A) and residency (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2B), while sex did not yield significant differences (p = 0.797) (Fig. 2C). Age was a determinant factor in terms of the capability to metabolize clopidogrel.
Patients over 60 years old at the time of testing (n = 45) were 9 (18%) normal metabolizers and 36 (69.2%) abnormal metabolizers. While patients below 60 years old (n = 57) were 41 (82%) normal metabolizers and 16 (30.8%) abnormal metabolizers. Meanwhile, the residency also played a role in determining the patient’s capability to metabolize clopidogrel. Data indicated that out of 50 patients who normally metabolize the drug, 32 patients (61%) lived in a rural area, while 18 patients (36%) lived in an urban area. On the other hand, out of the 52 patients who abnormally metabolize clopidogrel, 14 (26.9%) were from rural areas, and the rest 38 patients (73.1%) were from urban areas.
Furthermore, based on the genotyping data, patients were categorized according to their risk factors. Diabetes mellites type 2 significantly affected the patient’s capability to normally metabolize clopidogrel, where out of the 102 patients enrolled in this study, 16 patients (32%) were normal metabolizers, while 33 patients (63.5%) were abnormal metabolizers (p = 0.001) (Fig. 3A). Meanwhile, hypertension was also found to affect the metabolizing activity of clopidogrel in patients, where 18 patients (36%) of the study group (n = 102) were normal metabolizers, while 38 (73.1%) were abnormal metabolizers (p = 0.001) (Fig. 3B). Smoking also affected the metabolism of clopidogrel in the patients enrolled in this study, where 8 patients (16%) were normally metabolizing clopidogrel, while 32 patients (61.5%) were abnormally metabolizing the drug (p = 0.001) (Fig. 3C).
To deeply investigate the effect of normal versus abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel in patients, further analysis of follow-up for MACE revealed variations between normal and abnormal metabolizers regarding cardiac events. Data showed a relationship between clopidogrel metabolism and major cardiovascular events. During the follow-up period, one patient with non-ST segmental elevation myocardial infarction was a normal metabolizer to clopidogrel, while no patients with non-STEMI were recorded as abnormal metabolizers, with no significant differences (p = 0.984). In addition, one patient with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) was recorded in the normal metabolizer group, while no patients with IDC were recorded as abnormal metabolizers with no significant differences (p = 0.984). Furthermore, one patient had MI during the follow-up period from the normal metabolizer group, while seven patients with the same condition were from the abnormal metabolizer group (p = 0.047).
Unstable angina was observed in 8 patients from the normal metabolizer group, while 20 patients with the same condition were from the abnormal metabolizer group (p = 0.020). No cardiac events were observed in 39 patients belonging to the normal metabolizer group and 25 patients in the abnormal metabolizer group (p = 0.004) (Fig. 4).
3.2 Logistic regression
The logistic regression of factors affecting normal metabolizers and abnormal metabolizers was observed. These factors were age, residence, hypertension, and smoking. Other parameters such as the level of blood glucose had no statistically significant effects on the metabolism of clopidogrel. Table 4 and Fig. 5 represent the logistic regression of all parameters affecting the metabolism of clopidogrel.
Finally, for the sake of elucidating the differences in the allelic distribution between the study group and different groups, Table 5 highlights these data.
4 Discussion
Cytochromes are a redox-active family of proteins involved in several metabolic activities, including electron transport chain and redox catalysis [23, 24]. CYP2C19, a member of this family, plays a crucial role in the metabolism of nearly 18% of the prescribed drugs. Clopidogrel is one of the drugs whose clinical outcome mainly depends on the polymorphism of CYP2C19 [25, 26]. As commonly prescribed for antiplatelet medication, clopidogrel is associated with MACE risk in patients with loss-of-function CYP2C19 allele. Till the moment, there are no large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of CYP2C19 genotyping in patients taking clopidogrel after PCI. However, small-scale clinical studies in different populations might contribute to the growing evidence to support the utility of this test [27].
In the present study, 102 CVD patients were enrolled who had undergone PCI. Patients were males (62.75%) and females (37.255) aged above 60 yr (44.12%) and less than 60 yr (55.88%), and they were living in rural areas (45.1%) or urban areas (45.9%). Those patients were monitored for 1 year. The data obtained showed that 62.75% of the patients underwent no major cardiac events, while 27.45%, 7.87%, 0.98%, and 0.98% underwent unstable angina and myocadiac infarction none-STEMI, and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, respectively. After PCI, the 102 Egyptian patients taking clopidogrel were categorized upon genotyping into abnormal metabolizer (50.98%) and normal metabolizer (49.02%). These two categories were subdivided into *1/*2 (15.3%), *1/*3 (1.2%), *1/*17 (35.7%), and *2/*17 (1.2%). These allelic variations in the CYP2C19 gene were associated with resistance to the clopidogrel antiplatelet activity [28]. But the CYP2C19*17/*17 genotype has been found to increase the clinical response to clopidogrel treatment, and that this genotype is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Thus, either a loss-of-function allele or a gain-of-function allele might affect the clinical outcomes of patients taking clopidogrel [29], where this is common in different populations due to inter-ethnic variation [21]. For example, in a Lithuanian population (n = 54), 33.33% of the patients were NMs (*1/*1), 25.93% were IMs (*1/*2; *2/*17), 27.78% were RMs (*1/*17), 7.4% were UMs (*17/*17), and 5.56% were PMs (*2/*2) [30]. Normal metabolizers account for 33.33%, while abnormal metabolizers account for 66.77%. In another population (Kinh, Vietnam), 100 patients were enrolled in a study to characterize the genotypic variation in the CYP2C19 gene. Data showed that the allelic distributions were 1%, 2.5%, 20.5%, and 76% for *17, *3, *2, and *1, respectively [31]. This indicates that most of the studied group were normal metabolizers (76%) while 24% were abnormal metabolizers. Although almost equal population size, our study showed fewer normal metabolizers than the Vietnamese population, indicating inter-ethnic variations [30, 32].
The most common allelic variation in CYP2C19 is *2 and *3 alleles, and it is considered a loss-of-function allele. Patients carrying these alleles are more resistant to clopidogrel, and they are considered abnormal metabolizers for the drug [16, 33, 34]. In our study group, *2 and *3 alleles were 15.3% and 1.2%, respectively (n = 102). This might explain the number of patients undergoing MACE during the follow-up period.
In the Egyptian population under study, the CYP2C19*3 allele was represented with a low percentage (1.2%), indicating its insignificant role in regulating the metabolism of clopidogrel, and this allele was not associated with MACE in the Chinese population [35]. However, in a recent study, 190 patients taking clopidogrel were followed up for MACE and genotyped for CYP2C19 allelic variations, and the results showed that the carriers of loss-of-function CYP2C19 allele were at increased risk to undergo MACE compared to non-carriers [36].
In the present study, the frequency of CYP2C19*2 was 15.3%, and this was higher than the frequency reported in the Iraqi population (15.2%) [37], Saudi Arabian population (15%) [38], Jordanian population (16%) [39], Lebanese population (13.4%) [40], Tunisian population (11.5%) [41], Belgian population (9.1%) [42], Ethiopian population (14%) [43]. Meanwhile, our reported frequency of CYP2C19*2 was lower than reported in the Japanese population (27.4%) [44], and Korean population (20.9%) [45].
Furthermore, the allelic frequency of CYP2C19*17 reported in our study was 30.39%). The allelic frequency of CYP2C19*17 reported in this study was higher than reported in Saudi Arabian (25.7%) [38] and Iraqi populations (19.4%) [37].
The present study showed a significant relationship between age and abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel (p = 0.001), while no significant relationship was reported between sex and abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel (p = 0.797). Other studies indicated the same profile of clopidogrel metabolism in the elderly [46,47,48].
Furthermore, in the present study, a significant relationship was reported between residence and abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel (p = 0.001), and between diabetes and abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel (p = 0.001). These results were consistent with several reports that indicated the significant relationship between diabetes and abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel [49,50,51,52].
Smoking is associated with abnormal clopidogrel metabolism [53, 54]. In our study, we reported a significant relationship between cigarette smoking and the abnormal metabolism of clopidogrel. Moreover, we reported that hypertension was associated with the abnormality of clopidogrel metabolism, and this was inconsistent with previously published reports [55,56,57].
Our data sustain the inter-ethnic variation in clopidogrel metabolism status regarding the phenotype/genotype variation in the CYP2C19 gene.
5 Conclusion
As a prodrug, clopidogrel is converted in the liver to its active form with the aid of hepatic cytochromes. Allelic variation in one of the cytochrome members; CYP2C19 may cause variabilities in the metabolism of clopidogrel. The present study sheds some light on the inter-ethnic variation in response to the antiplatelet drugs, and this—along with other studies in the same field—might help pave the way to new personalized medicine-based antiplatelets for patients with CVDs.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated in this work are mentioned in the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ACS:
-
Acute coronary syndromes
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CBC:
-
Complete blood count
- CK-MB:
-
Creatine kinase-MB
- CVDs:
-
Cardiovascular diseases
- CYP2C19:
-
Cytochrome P450 2C19
- CYP450:
-
Cytochromes P450
- ECG:
-
Electrocardiogram
- HF:
-
Heart failure
- IDC:
-
Ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
- IMs:
-
Intermediate metabolizers
- IRB:
-
Institutional review board
- MACE:
-
Major adverse cardiovascular events
- MI:
-
Myocardial infarction
- NMs:
-
Normal metabolizers
- non-STEMI:
-
Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- PAD:
-
Peripheral arterial disease
- PCI:
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMs:
-
Poor metabolizers
- RMs:
-
Rapid metabolizers
- SNP:
-
Single-nucleotide polymorphism
- STEMI:
-
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- TIMI:
-
Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
- UA:
-
Unstable angina
- UMs:
-
Ultra-rapid metabolizers
References
Bielecka-Dabrowa A, et al. Cachexia, muscle wasting, and frailty in cardiovascular disease. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(12):2314–26.
Nielsen RE, Banner J, Jensen SE. Cardiovascular disease in patients with severe mental illness. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(2):136–45.
Lavie CJ. Cardiovascular statistics 2021. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;67:114–5.
Modarressi T. Assessing stable coronary artery disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020;87(12):713.
Katta N, et al. Obesity and coronary heart disease: epidemiology, pathology, and coronary artery imaging. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(3): 100655.
Stone GW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(20):2289–301.
Zheng X, Wu L. The value of cytochrome P4502C19 gene assay for antiplatelet therapy after PCI in stable angina patients with left main coronary artery lesions. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020;40(2):274–8.
Mayer K, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel for platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndrome patients: the ISAR-REACT 5 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(21):2569–71.
Silvain J, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10264):1737–44.
Nooney VB, et al. Does high on-treatment platelet aggregability reflect poor individual response to clopidogrel? Thromb Res. 2020;196:510–5.
McDonough CW. Pharmacogenomics in cardiovascular diseases. Curr Protoc. 2021;1(7): e189.
Galli M, et al. Genetic testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale, evidence and practical recommendations. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(8):963–78.
Chetty M, Ravenstijn P, Manchandani P. Clopidogrel dosing: current successes and emerging factors for further consideration. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109(5):1203–11.
Claassens DMF, et al. Clopidogrel in noncarriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles versus ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: a pre-specified sub analysis from the POPular genetics and POPular age trials CYP2C19 alleles in elderly patients. Int J Cardiol. 2021;334:10–7.
Kisor DF, Petry NJ, Bright DR. Pharmacogenomics in the United States community pharmacy setting: the clopidogrel-CYP2C19 example. Pharmgenom Pers Med. 2021;14:569–77.
Pereira NL, et al. Clopidogrel pharmacogenetics. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(4): e007811.
Hiatt WR, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin in peripheral artery disease lower extremity revascularization: impact of concomitant clopidogrel on efficacy and safety. Circulation. 2020;142(23):2219–30.
Zhu T, et al. Xuesaitong injection (lyophilized) combined with aspirin and clopidogrel protect against focal cerebral ischemic/reperfusion injury in rats by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation and regulating the NOX2/IL-6/STAT3 pathway. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(2):1650–67.
Nebert DW, Wikvall K, Miller WL. Human cytochromes P450 in health and disease. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2013;368(1612):20120431.
Goldstein JA. Clinical relevance of genetic polymorphisms in the human CYP2C subfamily. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(4):349–55.
Shah RR, Gaedigk A. Precision medicine: does ethnicity information complement genotype-based prescribing decisions? Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018;9(1):45–62.
Lin YS, et al. Sources of interindividual variability. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2342:481–550.
Eidenschenk C, Cheruzel L. Ru(II)-diimine complexes and cytochrome P450 working hand-in-hand. J Inorg Biochem. 2020;213: 111254.
Sarparast M, et al. Cytochrome P450 metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids and neurodegeneration. Nutrients. 2020;12:11.
Rosemary J, Adithan C. The pharmacogenetics of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19: ethnic variation and clinical significance. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2007;2(1):93–109.
Sienkiewicz-Oleszkiewicz B, Wiela-Hojeńska A. CYP2C19 polymorphism in relation to the pharmacotherapy optimization of commonly used drugs. Pharmazie. 2018;73(11):619–24.
Klein MD, et al. Clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy in patients with an acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(4):647–52.
Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. CYP2C19*2 polymorphism and clopidogrel resistance. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2020;90(4):544.
Ellithi M, Baye J, Wilke RA. CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy: promises and pitfalls. Pharmacogenomics. 2020;21(12):889–97.
Naujokaitis D, Asmoniene V, Kadusevicius E. Cytochrome P450 2C19 enzyme, cytochrome P450 2C9 enzyme, and cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme allelic variants and its possible effect on drug metabolism: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(11): e24545.
Vu NP, et al. CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism in the Vietnamese population. Ann Hum Biol. 2019;46(6):491–7.
Koopmans AB, et al. Meta-analysis of probability estimates of worldwide variation of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):141.
AlMukdad S, Elewa H, Al-Badriyeh D. Economic evaluations of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy compared to the universal use of antiplatelets in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(3):201–11.
Yu L, et al. Association between cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated Uygur population with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):391.
Zhang YY, et al. Association between CYP2C19*2/*3 polymorphisms and coronary heart disease. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(1):44–51.
Khalil BM, et al. Genetic and nongenetic factors affecting clopidogrel response in the Egyptian population. Clin Transl Sci. 2016;9(1):23–8.
Sahib BI. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 in a sample of IRAQI population. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2015;5:4.
Al-Jenoobi FI, et al. CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism in Saudi Arabians. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;112(1):50–4.
Zalloum I, Hakooz N, Arafat T. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 in a Jordanian population: influence of allele frequencies of CYP2C19*1 and CYP2C19*2 on the pharmacokinetic profile of lansoprazole. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(4):4195–200.
Jureidini I, et al. Prevalence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms in the Lebanese population. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(8):5449–52.
Abid L, Laroussi L, Bahloul A, Siala A, Abdelhédi R, Kharrat N, Hentati M, Kammoun S. Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19*2 polymorphism on the clinical cardiovascular events after stent implantation in patients receiving clopidogrel of a southern Tunisian region. World J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;2013:3.
Allabi AC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 in the Beninese and Belgian populations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):653–7.
Persson I, et al. S-mephenytoin hydroxylation phenotype and CYP2C19 genotype among Ethiopians. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6(6):521–6.
Kohyama K, et al. Polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene in Japanese patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(5):1117–20.
Jin SK, et al. CYP2C19 haplotypes in Koreans as a marker of enzyme activity evaluated with omeprazole. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34(4):437–46.
Gimbel M, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1374–81.
Szummer K, et al. Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the SWEDEHEART registry. Circulation. 2020;142(18):1700–8.
You SC, et al. Association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with net adverse clinical events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2020;324(16):1640–50.
Maeng M, et al. Dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy post-PCI in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(23):2346–55.
Zheng Z, et al. Clopidogrel reduces fibronectin accumulation and improves diabetes-induced renal fibrosis. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(1):239–52.
Mohareb MW, et al. Diabetes and CYP2C19 polymorphism synergistically impair the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated acute coronary syndrome patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020;76(4):478–88.
Parker WAE, et al. Aspirin, clopidogrel and prasugrel monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects on thrombotic markers and microRNA levels. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):3.
Swiger KJ, et al. Cigarette smoking and clopidogrel interaction. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15(5):361.
Kirkpatrick AC, et al. Clopidogrel use and smoking cessation result in lower coated-platelet levels after stroke. Platelets. 2020;31(2):236–41.
Gkaliagkousi E, Gavriilaki E, Douma S. Antiplatelet treatment in essential hypertension: where do we stand? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(4):536.
Greving JP, et al. Antiplatelet therapy after noncardioembolic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(7):1812–8.
Bobescu E, et al. Low response to clopidogrel in coronary artery disease. Am J Ther. 2020;27(2):e133–41.
Acknowledgements
This work received no funds from any funding bodies.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS: conducted the experiments, HS: analyzed data and wrote the manuscript, KB and ME: conceived the idea and revised the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work has been approved by the IRB committee at MUST.
Consent for publication
This manuscript has been revised and approved by all authors.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shawky, A., Sabit, H., Nazih, M. et al. CYP2C19 Polymorphism in Ischemic Heart Disease Patients Taking Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Egypt. J Epidemiol Glob Health 13, 374–383 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00113-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00113-4