Abstract
Cancer provokes systemic diseases through three possible mechanisms: 1) Distal metastasis in multiple tissues and organs, which directly causes functional damage and impairment of involved organs; 2) Paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS) that affects multiple organ systems, including the endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematologic, neurologic, dermatologic, and ophthalmologic systems; and 3) Cancer cachexia (CCA) or self-wasting syndrome characterized by anorexia, progressive bodyweight loss, adipose atrophy, and muscle atrophy. While cancer metastasis has received considerable attention for comprehensive research, PNS and CCA remain relatively overlooked. At the time of this writing, effective treatments of PNS and CCA in human cancer patients are lacking. This review focuses on discussing mechanistic insights into PNA and CCA and current advances in development of new possible therapeutic interventions.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Approximately 50% of patients with all types of cancer manifest paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS) and/or cancer cachexia (CCA), which are responsible for at least 25% of cancer-related death [1,2,3,4]. This life-threatening and devastating cancer-associated systemic disease (CASD) is particularly commonly seen in patients with gastrointestinal, lung, breast, gynecological, hematological, and kidney cancers and affects a vast majority of cancer patients with advanced disease [3, 5]. Although metastatic disease frequently occurs at the advanced stage of malignancy, PNS and CCA are not directly associated with metastases. PNS affects multiple organs and tissues, including neurologic, endocrine, hematologic and dermatologic systems. In some cases, PNS occurs even before cancer diagnosis [5,6,7].
CCA is featured by progressive bodyweight loss, muscle atrophy, adipose atrophy, and systemic inflammation, which are often associated with anorexia and elevated energy expenditure [8]. CCA alone is responsible for approximate 22% of cancer-related death. Diagnostic criteria of CCA in the clinic are defined by ≥ 5% bodyweight loss within 12 months although some other criteria have been proposed and tailored [9]. Notably, conventional cancer therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy significantly contribute to CCA development in cancer patients [10]. Thus, intensive treatments of CCA patients with these conventional therapeutics may accelerate CCA progression, which affects the quality of life (QOL), survival outcomes, and therapeutic efficacy.
Systemic inflammation has received tremendous attentions as a potential mediator for causing CCA and PNS and inflammation is believed to be the key driving force for altering global metabolism in cancer patients [10, 11]. Cancer cells together with other stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) release a myriad of inflammatory cytokines that transcriptionally activate catabolism in the targeted cells, including adipocytes, skeletal myocytes, hepatocytes, and hematopoietic cells [12]. Other tumor-derived non-inflammatory factors such as lipase maturation factor (LMF) and proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) also participate in CCA development by alteration of lipid metabolism and protein catabolism [2]. Tumor-released cytokines and factors often act as systemic hormones to induce high levels of cytokine production in other cell types located in distal tissues and organs, including adipocytes, hepatocytes, gastrointestinal epithelial cells, skeletal myocytes, and cardiomyocytes [6, 11,12,13,14]. Collectively, high levels of circulating and tissue-interstitial cytokines and factors contribute to development and progression of CCA and PNS (Table 1). As CCA and PNS have been extensively reviewed elsewhere, this review focuses on discussing new mechanistic insights into CCA and PNS for the purpose to design future effective therapies.
1.1 Tumor-derived CCA and PNS factors
In prompting CCA and PNS, a solid tumor acts as a pathological endocrine organ by producing a myriad of cytokines, growth factors, metabolites, and other signaling molecules, which target remote healthy tissues and organs (Table 1) (Fig. 1). Although tumor cells directly synthesize and release these factors and cytokines, other non-cancerous stromal cells in TME, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), vascular endothelial cells (VECs), perivascular cells, lymphocytes, and cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) significantly contribute to high production of CCA- and PNS-associated factors [18]. In addition to remotely targeting the CCA- and PNS-affected tissues and organs and reprograming catabolic metabolism and functions, tumor-derived factors act as signaling amplifiers that upregulate expression levels of other cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in various cells [32]. Collectively, tumor- and healthy tissue-derived cytokines and factors induce systemic inflammation and reprogram global metabolism through endocrine and paracrine mechanisms. This review provides in-depth discussion of CCA- and PNS-associated cytokines and growth factors using interleukin-6 (IL-6) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) examples.
1.2 Interleukin-6
IL-6 is a pleotropic cytokine that is frequently expressed at high levels in various tumor tissues and non-malignant tissues in response to tissue damage and infections [33]. IL-6 binds to a IL-6 receptor (IL-6R)-gp130 complex that transduces intracellular signals through the JAK-STAT3 pathway [34]. In addition to the membrane-bound form of IL-6R, IL-6 binds to a proteolytically cleaved soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R). The IL-6-sIL-6R complex binds to the ubiquitously expressed gp130 receptor subunit thought its homodimer to trigger intracellular signaling via the Janus kinase/ signal transducer of activation (JAK/STAT) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. Through this mechanism, IL-6 targets a broad-spectrum of cell types that lack IL-6R expression, a paradigm named the IL-6 trans-signaling [35]. Owing to the IL-6 trans-signaling, IL-6 may serve as the key cytokine to cause sepsis and cytokine storms by systemically targeting multiple tissues and organs.
IL-6 is involved in senescence-associated phenotypes and augmenting skeletal muscle catabolism in the elderly population [36, 37]. Genetic IL-6-overexpressing mouse models show muscle atrophy and similarly IL-6 administration to humans reduces protein synthesis in skeletal muscles [38,39,40]. However, the IL-6-assocaited muscle atrophy was not observed in experimental rats [41]. Counterintuitively, transient upregulation of IL-6 after physical exercise may mitigate inflammation and increase insulin sensitivity [42]. These findings demonstrate that the role of IL-6 in regulation of muscular catabolism is far more complex, perhaps in the pathophysiological context-dependent manner.
Although IL-6 is synthesized and released by many cell types in various organs, it has been estimated that white adipose tissue (WAT) alone contributes to approximate 35% of total IL-6 molecules in human blood. In obese individuals, circulating IL-6 levels are elevated largely due to significant release from visceral WAT [43, 44]. It seems that both inflammatory macrophages and adipocytes are the main cellular sources for IL-6 production [44]. High levels of IL-6 exist in patients with various types of cancer and is often reversely correlated with poor survival [45]. Adipocyte specific deletion of the Il-6 gene in mice reduced circulating IL-6 protein levels by approximate 40%, demonstrating adipocytes as the key cellular source of IL-6 [44, 46]. Additionally, genetic deletion of IL-6 in mice also mitigates inflammation in obese adipose tissues [44, 46].
IL-6 promotes tumor growth and metastasis through several mechanisms, including inflammation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and metabolic reprograming [47]. IL-6 induces polarization of M2-macrophages, which in turn promotes cancer metastasis [48, 49]. IL-6-induced tumor neovascularization and vascular remodeling not only facilitate cancer metastasis [47], but also significantly modulate the endocrine function of IL-6 by regulating vascular transport. Circulating IL-6 levels have been correlated with anorexia [50], a common caloric deficiency associated with CCA. One of the mechanisms that underlie the IL-6-triggered excessive energy expenditure, adipose atrophy, and bodyweight loss in cancer hosts is that IL-6 promotes non-shivering thermogenesis (NST) by activation of thermogenic adipose tissues (TATs), including brown adipose tissue (BAT) and browning WAT [44, 51, 52]. TAT activation has been linked to CCA development in preclinical models [53]. IL-6 also induces liver dysfunction, a transitional stage of CCA development, by augmenting ER stress and cellular apoptosis [54, 55].
Therapeutic targeting the IL-6 signaling for treatment of CCA has been evaluated in both preclinical models and clinical trials [56]. In a mouse CCA model, blocking IL-6R by tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6R neutralizing antibody, alleviates CCA [57]. Similarly, clazakizumab, a humanized rabbit monoclonal antibody against IL-6, produces encouraging results in a Phase II clinical trial by preventing muscle wasting and improving hematopoiesis [58]. In another Phase II trial, simultaneous targeting IL-6 and TNF-α by a broad-spectrum agent also improves bodyweight gain in patients with advanced cancer disease [59].
1.3 VEGF
VEGF is one of the key angiogenic factors utilized by various tumors to stimulate neovascularization [60, 61]. Although several other structurally and functionally related members, including VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and placental growth factor (PlGF) exist within the VEGF family [62], VEGF, also named VEGF-A, as the prototype member displays broad biological functions [11, 63]. Biological functions of VEGF include, but limited to, angiogenesis, vascular permeability, vascular remodeling, endothelial survival, neurotrophic functions, inflammation, endocrine regulation, hematopoiesis, metabolism, and embryogenesis [11]. Most of these VEGF-stimulated functions are mediated by VEGF receptor2 (VEGFR2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, although VEGFR1, often acting as a decoyed receptor, also participates in mediating some of these functions [62].
Compared with their adjacent heathy tissues where tumors originate, tumor tissues almost always express higher levels of VEGF [64]. There are several possible mechanisms that underlie high VEGF production in tumors, including: 1) Genetic mutations in cancer cells as drivers for elevating VEGF expression. For example, genetic mutations of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lead to exceptionally high expression of VEGF through stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α that transcriptionally controls VEGF mRNA expression [65]. Another example is Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutations, commonly existing in epithelial carcinomas, which markedly upregulate VEGF expression [66]; 2) Stromal cellular components in TME such as inflammatory cells and fibroblasts significantly contribute to VEGF production [67, 68]; 3) Hypoxia. Despite enrichment of blood supply, most solid tumors experience various degrees of hypoxic insults, often owing to the structural malformation and dysfunctional blood vessels [69]. Hypoxia upregulates VEGF expression via the HIF-1α-triggered transcription activation of the VEGF gene promoter [70, 71]; and 4) Accumulation of metabolites. TME often exhibits acidosis owing to accumulation of acidic metabolites from highly proliferating tumor cells and stromal cells [72]. These acidic metabolites augment VEGF production.
VEGF is synthesized in various cells and exists in various isoforms due to alternative splicing of its mRNA [73]. While high molecular forms of VEGF molecules are often sequestered in the local tissue where they are produced by interacting with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in the extracellular matrix and on the cell surface, smaller VEGF isoforms can diffuse into the circulation and act as endocrine hormones [74]. In preclinical cancer models, high expression of VEGF in tumor cells induces a PNS-like systemic disease, manifesting multiorgan dysfunctions [6]. Circulating VEGF molecules preferentially target sinusoidal vasculatures in bone marrow (BM), liver and spleen, and fenestrated vasculatures in endocrine organs such as those located in the pancreatic islet, adrenal gland, and thyroid [6]. For example, subcutaneous implantation of an VEGF-overexpressing tumor in mice induces hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, BM-associated anemia, and endocrine dysfunctions by altering vascular architectures and structures [6, 18]. These preclinical findings are highly relevant to human patients with certain types of cancer. As discussed above, RCC patients carrying VHL mutations often have high circulating levels of VEGF and manifest PNS [6, 7, 64, 65]. In an early study, autopsy analysis of cancer patients demonstrated that about 20% of RCC patients had hepatomegaly owing to vascular dilation [75]. Although VEGF was not discovered at that time, this study speculated that RCC tumors produce X factor(s) that ultimately targets remote tissues and organs for causing PNS.
VEGF plays a crucial role in regulation adipose metabolism [76,77,78,79,80,81]. Activation of thermogenesis in TATs by cold exposure or β3-adrenoceptor agonists is dependent on the VEGF-induced adipose angiogenesis [78,79,80,81,82,83]. Loss-of-function experiments by a pharmacological anti-VEGF approach inhibits TAT activation and NST metabolism [79, 84]. Likewise, genetic specific deletion of the Vegfr2 gene in endothelial cells completely abrogates the cold exposure-induced adipose angiogenesis and browning of TATs [84]. Interestingly, inhibition of VEGFR1 alone markedly induces a browning phenotype of WAT and thermogenic activation of TATs [77], indicating the negative role of VEGFR1 in regulation of adipose NST metabolism. In contrast, delivery of VEGF to WAT augments a local browning phenotype [84]. Noticeably, VEGFRs are primarily expressed in vascular endothelial cells, but not in adipocytes. These findings indicate that the adipose vasculature plays a pivotal role in controlling adipocyte metabolism. Along the CCA trajectory, tumor-derived circulating VEGF molecules likely to contribute to adipose atrophy and bodyweight loss by stimulating energy expenditure.
Anti-VEGF-based antiangiogenic drugs are broadly used in the clinic for treatment of various cancers in human patients [63]. Although there has been lacking sufficient clinical data to convincingly correlate improvement of PNS and CCA by these drugs with clinical outcomes, I reasonably speculate that improvement of the systemic cancer disease by anti-VEGF drugs likely contributes to prolonged survivals of cancer patients in either monotherapy and combination therapy settings. This view is supported by the fact that survival improvement by anti-VEGF drugs may not be necessarily correlated with reduction of the tumor size [7], a clinical parameter commonly used to determine anticancer effects. A preclinical study shows survival improvement by an anti-VEGF drug is not correlated with decreasing of the tumor mass, but rather through the mechanism of improving systemic cancer disease [6]. This important issue warrants future clinical validation.
1.4 Conclusions and perspectives
Malignancy is not a local disease that only affects the tissue where tumors originate, but rather a systemic disease that in principle affects multiple organs. Although metastasis significantly attributes to the most of cancer-related death, CCA and PNS are responsible for high mortality of cancer patients. This mini-review discusses IL-6 and VEGF as two examples of tumor-derived cytokines and growth factors in causing PNS and CCA. Obviously, multiple cytokines and growth factors are involved causing the systemic cancer disease (Table 1). In addition to their own receptor-mediated signaling pathways, cytokines and growth factors often interact each other to amplify their biological signals or synergistically act on their targeted cells. Thus, disruption of the interaction loop by a specific drug that targets one cytokine/growth factor may produce profound impacts on other signaling pathways. Taken IL-6 and VEGF as examples, inhibition of IL-6 or its receptors may downregulate VEGF production from cancer cells and inflammatory cells because IL-6 is known to instigate VEGF production. Thus, blocking IL-6 by drugs may indirectly affect VEGF-triggered PNS and CCA. Like other therapeutic regimens, effective treatments of PNS and CCA may embroil complex approaches by combining drugs with different principles and molecular targets of cancer cells and other host cells (Table 2). Unlike drugs targeting cancer cells, future drugs for treating PNS and CCA may aim to normalize functions of the cancer-affected tissues and organs (Table 2). Thus, systemic rather than local treatments should be considered for drug development. As patients with systemic cancer disease often occur at the advanced stage of malignancy, they are often intolerable to toxic drugs with severe adverse effects. In particular, if combinations of drugs are considered for clinical use, the combined drug toxicities should be minimized and tolerable for cancer patients with advanced cancer disease. Despite the well-accepted reduction of the tumor mass as a surrogate marker for assessing anticancer effects, survival improvement is the ultimate criterion for determining clinical outcome and for receiving the FDA approval of anticancer drugs. Again, clinical benefits of anti-PNS and anti-CCA drugs should be especially determined by survival improvement (Table 2). Although improvement of QOL by drugs should also be taken into consideration, the criteria for QOL improvement by drugs are far more byzantine, which vary considerably between individual cancer patients. Together, effective drugs for treatment of PNS and CCA are not clinically available at the time of this writing and they are urgently needed for improving survival and QOL of cancer patients.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ACVR:
-
Activin receptor type-2A
- AdipoR:
-
Adiponectin receptor
- BAT:
-
Brown adipose tissue
- BM:
-
Bone marrow
- BMP:
-
Bone morphogenetic protein
- CAA:
-
Cancer-associated adipocyte
- CAF:
-
Cancer-associated fibroblast
- CASD:
-
Cancer-associated systemic disease
- CCA:
-
Cancer cachexia
- CCR2:
-
C-C motif chemokine receptor 2
- EMT:
-
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- GDF-15:
-
Growth/differentiation factor-15
- GFRAL:
-
Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha like
- ghrelinR:
-
Ghrelin receptor
- HIF:
-
Hypoxia-inducible factor
- HSPG:
-
Heparan sulfate proteoglycan
- IFN-γ:
-
Interferon-γ
- IFNAR:
-
Interferon-α/β receptor
- IGF:
-
Insulin-like growth factor
- IGFR:
-
Insulin-like growth factor receptor
- IL-1:
-
Interleukin-1
- IL1R1:
-
Interleukin-1receptor 1
- IL-6:
-
Interleukin-6
- IL-6R:
-
IL-6 receptor
- IL-8:
-
Interleukin-8
- IL8RA:
-
Interleukin 8 receptor alpha
- IL-10:
-
Interleukin-10
- IL-10R:
-
Interleukin-10 receptor
- JAK:
-
Janus kinase
- KRAS:
-
Kirsten rat sarcoma virus
- LABA:
-
Long-acting β2 agonist
- LEP-R:
-
Leptin receptor
- LMF:
-
Lipase maturation factor
- MAPK:
-
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MC4R:
-
Melanocortin 4 receptor
- MCP1:
-
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- mRNA:
-
Messenger ribonucleotide acid
- NST:
-
Non-shivering thermogenesis
- PIF:
-
Proteolysis-inducing factor
- PlGF:
-
Placental growth factor
- PNS:
-
Paraneoplastic syndrome
- QOL:
-
Quality of life
- RCC:
-
Renal cell carcinoma
- SARM:
-
Selective androgen receptor modulator
- sIL-6R:
-
Soluble IL-6R
- STAT:
-
Signal transducer of activation
- TAT:
-
Thermogenic adipose tissue
- TAM:
-
Tumor-associated macrophage
- TGF-β:
-
Transforming growth factor-beta
- TGF-βR:
-
Transforming growth factor-beta receptor
- TME:
-
Tumor microenvironment
- TNF-α:
-
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- TNFR:
-
Tumor necrosis factor receptor
- VEC:
-
Vascular endothelial cell
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- VEGFR:
-
VEGF receptor
- VHL:
-
Von Hippel-Lindau
- WAT:
-
White adipose tissue
References
Albert ML, Darnell RB. Paraneoplastic neurological degenerations: keys to tumour immunity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:36–44.
Aoyagi T, Terracina KP, Raza A, Matsubara H, Takabe K. Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7:17–29.
Argiles JM, Busquets S, Stemmler B, Lopez-Soriano FJ. Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:754–62.
Dalmau JO, Posner JB. Paraneoplastic syndromes. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:405–8.
Pelosof LC, Gerber DE. Paraneoplastic syndromes: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:838–54.
Xue Y, et al. Anti-VEGF agents confer survival advantages to tumor-bearing mice by improving cancer-associated systemic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:18513–8.
Cao Y. Off-tumor target–beneficial site for antiangiogenic cancer therapy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:604–8.
Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:17105.
Argiles JM, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Stemmler B, Busquets S. Cancer-associated cachexia - understanding the tumour macroenvironment and microenvironment to improve management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:250–64.
Argiles JM, Stemmler B, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Busquets S. Inter-tissue communication in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;15:9–20.
Cao Y. VEGF-targeted cancer therapeutics-paradoxical effects in endocrine organs. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:530–9.
Cao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:3006–17.
Kusmartsev S, Gabrilovich DI. Effect of tumor-derived cytokines and growth factors on differentiation and immune suppressive features of myeloid cells in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:323–31.
McAllister SS, Weinberg RA. The tumour-induced systemic environment as a critical regulator of cancer progression and metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:717–27.
Patel HJ, Patel BM. TNF-alpha and cancer cachexia: Molecular insights and clinical implications. Life Sci. 2017;170:56–63.
Laird BJ, et al. The Emerging Role of Interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) in Cancer Cachexia. Inflammation. 2021;44:1223–8.
Narsale AA, Carson JA. Role of interleukin-6 in cachexia: therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014;8:321–7.
Yang Y, Cao Y. The impact of VEGF on cancer metastasis and systemic disease. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86:251–61.
Waning DL, et al. Excess TGF-beta mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice. Nat Med. 2015;21:1262–71.
Sartori R, et al. Perturbed BMP signaling and denervation promote muscle wasting in cancer cachexia. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eaay9592.
Matthys P, et al. Severe cachexia in mice inoculated with interferon-gamma-producing tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 1991;49:77–82.
Hou YC, et al. Elevated Serum Interleukin-8 Level correlates with cancer-related cachexia and sarcopenia: an indicator for pancreatic cancer outcomes. J Clin Med. 2018;7:502.
Deans DA, et al. Cancer cachexia is associated with the IL10 -1082 gene promoter polymorphism in patients with gastroesophageal malignancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1164–72.
Lokireddy S, et al. Myostatin is a novel tumoral factor that induces cancer cachexia. Biochem J. 2012;446:23–36.
Loumaye A, et al. Role of Activin A and myostatin in human cancer cachexia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:2030–8.
Engineer DR, Garcia JM. Leptin in anorexia and cachexia syndrome. Int J Pept. 2012;2012:287457.
Wolf I, et al. Adiponectin, ghrelin, and leptin in cancer cachexia in breast and colon cancer patients. Cancer. 2006;106:966–73.
Ling T, Zhang J, Ding F, Ma L. Role of growth differentiation factor 15 in cancer cachexia (Review). Oncol Lett. 2023;26:462.
Costelli P, et al. IGF-1 is downregulated in experimental cancer cachexia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291:R674-683.
Talbert EE, et al. Circulating monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is associated with cachexia in treatment-naive pancreatic cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9:358–68.
DeBoer MD, et al. Ghrelin treatment causes increased food intake and retention of lean body mass in a rat model of cancer cachexia. Endocrinology. 2007;148:3004–12.
Xue Y, et al. PDGF-BB modulates hematopoiesis and tumor angiogenesis by inducing erythropoietin production in stromal cells. Nat Med. 2011;18:100–10.
Tanaka T, Kishimoto T. The biology and medical implications of interleukin-6. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:288–94.
Kishimoto T. Signal transduction through homo- or heterodimers of gp130. Stem Cells. 1994;12 Suppl 1:37–44. Discussion 44-35.
Rose-John S, Neurath MF. IL-6 trans-signaling: the heat is on. Immunity. 2004;20:2–4.
Ortiz-Montero P, Londono-Vallejo A, Vernot JP. Senescence-associated IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines induce a self- and cross-reinforced senescence/inflammatory milieu strengthening tumorigenic capabilities in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:17.
Huang W, Hickson LJ, Eirin A, Kirkland JL, Lerman LO. Cellular senescence: the good, the bad and the unknown. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18:611–27.
Tsujinaka T, et al. Interleukin 6 receptor antibody inhibits muscle atrophy and modulates proteolytic systems in interleukin 6 transgenic mice. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:244–9.
Tsujinaka T, et al. Muscle undergoes atrophy in association with increase of lysosomal cathepsin activity in interleukin-6 transgenic mouse. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;207:168–74.
Stojanovic D, et al. Soluble inflammatory markers and risk of incident fractures in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33:221–8.
Garcia-Martinez C, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Argiles JM. Interleukin-6 does not activate protein breakdown in rat skeletal muscle. Cancer Lett. 1994;76:1–4.
Kamimura D, Ishihara K, Hirano T. IL-6 signal transduction and its physiological roles: the signal orchestration model. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;149:1–38.
Mohamed-Ali V, et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue releases interleukin-6, but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:4196–200.
Wueest S, Konrad D. The controversial role of IL-6 in adipose tissue on obesity-induced dysregulation of glucose metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;319:E607–13.
White JP. IL-6, cancer and cachexia: metabolic dysfunction creates the perfect storm. Transl Cancer Res. 2017;6:S280–5.
Han MS, et al. Regulation of adipose tissue inflammation by interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:2751–60.
Raskova M, et al. The Role of IL-6 in Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Metastasis-Overview and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cells. 2022;11:3698.
Yin Z, et al. IL-6/STAT3 pathway intermediates M1/M2 macrophage polarization during the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:9419–32.
Chen L, et al. IL-6 influences the polarization of macrophages and the formation and growth of colorectal tumor. Oncotarget. 2018;9:17443–54.
Bossola M, Luciani G, Giungi S, Tazza L. Anorexia, fatigue, and plasma interleukin-6 levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2010;32:1049–54.
Knudsen JG, et al. Role of IL-6 in exercise training- and cold-induced UCP1 expression in subcutaneous white adipose tissue. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84910.
Path G, et al. Human breast adipocytes express interleukin-6 (IL-6) and its receptor system: increased IL-6 production by beta-adrenergic activation and effects of IL-6 on adipocyte function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:2281–8.
Kir S, Spiegelman BM. Cachexia & Brown Fat: A Burning Issue in Cancer. Trends Cancer. 2016;2:461–3.
Narsale AA, et al. Liver inflammation and metabolic signaling in ApcMin/+ mice: the role of cachexia progression. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119888.
Flint TR, et al. Tumor-Induced IL-6 Reprograms Host Metabolism to Suppress Anti-tumor Immunity. Cell Metab. 2016;24:672–84.
Lacina L, Brabek J, Kral V, Kodet O, Smetana K Jr. Interleukin-6: a molecule with complex biological impact in cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2019;34:125–36.
Ando K, et al. Tocilizumab, a proposed therapy for the cachexia of Interleukin6-expressing lung cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102436.
Doberer K, et al. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Anti-IL-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:708–22.
Clamon G, Byrne MM, Talbert EE. Inflammation as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer Cachexia. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:5262.
Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell. 2019;176:1248–64.
Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:581–611.
Cao Y. Positive and negative modulation of angiogenesis by VEGFR1 ligands. Sci Signal. 2009;2:re1.
Cao Y, Langer R, Ferrara N. Targeting angiogenesis in oncology, ophthalmology and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22:476–95.
Jubb AM, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, and carbonic anhydrase IX in human tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:504–12.
Na X, et al. Overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor related to von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene mutations and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression in renal cell carcinomas. J Urol. 2003;170:588–92.
Figueras A, et al. The impact of KRAS mutations on VEGF-A production and tumour vascular network. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:125.
Ono M. Molecular links between tumor angiogenesis and inflammation: inflammatory stimuli of macrophages and cancer cells as targets for therapeutic strategy. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1501–6.
Wang FT, Sun W, Zhang JT, Fan YZ. Cancer-associated fibroblast regulation of tumor neo-angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:3055–65.
Cao Y. Tumor angiogenesis and molecular targets for therapy. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009;14:3962–73.
Zimna A, Kurpisz M. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 in Physiological and Pathophysiological Angiogenesis: Applications and Therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:549412.
Makino Y, et al. Inhibitory PAS domain protein is a negative regulator of hypoxia-inducible gene expression. Nature. 2001;414:550–4.
Annan DA, et al. Carbonic anhydrase 2 (CAII) supports tumor blood endothelial cell survival under lactic acidosis in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17:169.
Grunstein J, Masbad JJ, Hickey R, Giordano F, Johnson RS. Isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor act in a coordinate fashion To recruit and expand tumor vasculature. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:7282–91.
Peach CJ, et al. Molecular Pharmacology of VEGF-A Isoforms: Binding and Signalling at VEGFR2. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1264.
Aoyagi T, Mori I, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N. Sinusoidal dilatation of the liver as a paraneoplastic manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 1989;20:1193–7.
Jing X, et al. COVID-19 instigates adipose browning and atrophy through VEGF in small mammals. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1674–83.
Seki T, et al. Ablation of endothelial VEGFR1 improves metabolic dysfunction by inducing adipose tissue browning. J Exp Med. 2018;215:611–26.
Cao Y. Angiogenesis and vascular functions in modulation of obesity, adipose metabolism, and insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 2013;18:478–89.
Xue Y, et al. Hypoxia-independent angiogenesis in adipose tissues during cold acclimation. Cell Metab. 2009;9:99–109.
Cao Y. Angiogenesis modulates adipogenesis and obesity. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2362–8.
Cao Y. Adipose tissue angiogenesis as a therapeutic target for obesity and metabolic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:107–15.
Sui W, et al. Bladder drug mirabegron exacerbates atherosclerosis through activation of brown fat-mediated lipolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:10937–42.
Yang X, et al. Switching harmful visceral fat to beneficial energy combustion improves metabolic dysfunctions. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e89044.
Seki T, et al. Endothelial PDGF-CC regulates angiogenesis-dependent thermogenesis in beige fat. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12152.
Wiedenmann B, et al. A multicenter, phase II study of infliximab plus gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cachexia. J Support Oncol. 2008;6:18–25.
Mehrzad V, Afshar R, Akbari M. Pentoxifylline treatment in patients with cancer cachexia: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:60.
Greig CA, et al. Phase I/II trial of formoterol fumarate combined with megestrol acetate in cachectic patients with advanced malignancy. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:1269–75.
Gordon JN, et al. Thalidomide in the treatment of cancer cachexia: a randomised placebo controlled trial. Gut. 2005;54:540–5.
Acknowledgements
YC’s laboratory is supported through research grants from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Strategic Research Areas (SFO)–Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Foundation, the Karolinska Institute Foundation, the NOVO Nordisk Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (Project No. 2016-02215, Project No. 2019-01502, Project No. 2021-06122), the Swedish Research Council-the National Natural Science Foundation of China joint grants, the Hong Kong Centre for Cerebro-Cardiovascular Health Engineering; and the Horizon Europe grant-PERSEUS (Action Number: 101099423).
Funding
YC’s laboratory is supported through research grants from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Strategic Research Areas (SFO)–Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Foundation, the Karolinska Institute Foundation, the NOVO Nordisk Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (Project No. 2016–02215, Project No. 2019–01502, Project No. 2021–06122), the Swedish Research Council-the National Natural Science Foundation of China joint grants, the Hong Kong Centre for Cerebro-Cardiovascular Health Engineering; and the Horizon Europe grant-PERSEUS (Action Number: 101099423).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yihai Cao is the only author for this article and he has done all work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Yes. I agree with the publication policy.
Competing interests
Author Yihai Cao is a member of the Editorial Board for Holistic Integrative Oncology. The paper was handled by the other Editor and has undergone rigorous peer review process. Author Yihai Cao was not involved in the journal's peer review of or decisions related to, this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y. Cancer-triggered systemic disease and therapeutic targets. Holist Integ Oncol 3, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-024-00077-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-024-00077-w