Abstract
Distributed energy system, a decentralized lowcarbon energy system arranged at the customer side, is characterized by multienergy complementarity, multienergy flow synergy, multiprocess coupling, and multitemporal scales (nM characteristics). This review provides a systematic and comprehensive summary and presents the current research on distributed energy systems in three dimensions: system planning and evaluation, modeling and optimization, and operation and control. Under the regional environmental, resource, and policy constraints, planning distributed energy systems should fully integrate technical, economic, environmental, and social factors and consider device characteristics, system architecture, and sourceload uncertainties. Further, this review presents four modeling perspectives for optimizing and analyzing distributed energy systems, including energy hub, thermodynamics, heat current, and datadriven. The system’s optimal operation and scheduling strategies, disturbance analysis, and related control methods are also discussed from the power system and thermal system, respectively. In all, more research is required for distributed energy systems based on an integrated energy perspective in optimal system structure, hybrid modeling approaches, datadriven system state estimation, crosssystem disturbance spread, and multisubject interaction control.
Introduction
Research background
Energy, water, and the environment are necessary foundations for the sustainable development of human society. Figure 1 presents changes in population, total installed capacity, carbon emission, and human development index (HDI) over four decades in China. As the population grows, total installed capacity increases, contributing to China’s human development index and bringing massive carbon emissions. In particular, the total installed capacity has expanded 33 times, while per capita carbon emissions have increased 4.7 times. As the contradiction between energy demand and environmental crisis is further accentuated, the clean, lowcarbon, safe, efficient, and sustainable energy system has become a national energy development strategy [1]. Therefore, some developing and developed countries have proposed netzero carbon emissions targets [2].
Decarbonization, decentralization, and digitalization will be the leading energy systems driven by technology and the market [3]. Therefore, as an effective complement to centralized energy systems, distributed energy system has been proposed and has become a research topic as a kind of energy system [4,5,6]. However, there is no consistent, precise concept or definition of a distributed energy system. In 2006, Alanne and Saari [7] discussed the concept of distributed energy systems by analogy with information systems and summarized the pros and cons of a distributed energy system from flexibility, reliability, local and global wellbeing of humans, environment, and utilization of local resources and networks. In 2010, Yang [8] published a monograph “Distributed energy system” . Different designations of distributed energy systems are introduced in the monograph, such as distributed generation, decentralized generation, distributed power generation, and distributed energy sources [8]. The distributed energy system is relative to centralized energy supply methods such as large power grids and plants. It is an energy system arranged near the customer to meet its energy demand [8]. In 2018, Mehigan et al. [9] pointed out that there is no internationally accepted definition of distributed generation and considered that distributed generation is an electric power generation source connected to the distributed network. Based on the current development and applications, this review suggests the distributed energy system is a smallscale integrated energy supply system based on renewable energy or clean fossil fuels as energy source, isolated or connected only to the power distribution network, which is scalable as technology advances and evolves [8].
After nearly 20 years of development, distributed energy systems rely on clean fossil fuels or renewable energy sources, such as natural gas, hydrogen, solar energy, and wind energy, and are arranged near the users’ side, which can realize polygeneration of electricity, heating, and cooling [10]. Depending on users’ energy scale requirements, they can be divided into householdlevel, buildinglevel, and communitylevel [5]. It mainly includes energy production unit, transport unit, and storage unit. Meanwhile, distributed energy systemsbased users will transform from passive energy consumers to active, flexible prosumers. For example, Clarke and Searle [11] proposed the active building that integrates renewable energy technologies for electricity, heat, and transport and reduces operational energy consumption and carbon emissions by maximizing locally generated renewable energy utilization. Koirala et al. [12] have identified various approaches that can be used for energy system integration, such as Microgrids (MG), Integrated Energy Systems (IES), Virtual Power Plants (VPP), Energy hubs (EH), and Prosumer Community Groups (PCG). This research proposed the integrated community energy systems that can facilitate reliability and efficiency by integrating smartgrid technologies and demandside management and achieving selfprovision and system services. In all, distributed energy systems have become vital global energy systems. Figure 2 presents the policies related to energy system development in various countries worldwide.
Research status
Distributed energy systems are now becoming a research hotspot. This review searched “distributed energy system” by searching for “title, abstract, and keywords” in Scopus from 2010 to 2021 about 57,841 publications. Figure 3 presents these articles published annually, the percentage of different subjects, and the number of countries in the last decade of distributed energy systems. These publications on distributed energy systems have increased nearly 1.5 times from 2010 to 2021. Significantly, from 2018 to 2020, the number of articles published each year has exceeded 6500. These published articles are in Engineering, Computer science, Energy, Mathematics, Physics and astronomy, Environmental science, Materials science, Social sciences, Decision sciences, and others. Considering these publications by country, China and the United States have published the most articles, exceeding 10,000, followed by India, Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany, Iran, and Canada, with cumulative publications exceeding 2000 articles since 2010. It is clear that distributed energy systems have received great interest from researchers in various fields in many countries.
As early as 2010, Yang [8] published a monograph that systematically illustrated the advantages and disadvantages of distributed energy systems and analyzed the components, development status, problems, and future trends of distributed energy systems from technology, economic, and social aspects. In 2011, Manfren et al. [13] presented some available models for distributed generations planning and design of urban energy systems. In 2012, Basak et al. [14] reviewed the integration of distributed energy resources from microgrid’s control, protection, and stability. In 2013, Chen et al. [15] reviewed the gasfired distributed energy system from political, technical, and economic perspectives in China. In 2017, Nosratabadi et al. [16] presented a comprehensive review of the distributed energy resources scheduling in power system by microgrid and virtual power plant perspectives. In 2018, Mavromatidis et al. [17] reviewed the uncertainty characterization approaches that will result in some suboptimal design decisions for the optimal design of distributed energy systems. In 2019, Fonseca et al. [18] provided a systematic literature review of distributed energy systems, including hydrogen as the energy vector from system design, plan, operation, and evaluation. Ahl et al. [19] holistically explored the potential challenges of blockchainbased P2P distributed energy. In 2020, Guerrero et al. [20] focused on transactive energy systems integrating with distributed energy sources, provided three general categories, and systematically analyzed different integration methods such as home energy management, optimal power flow, and P2P energy trading. In 2021, Khanna et al. [21] studied the householdlevel behavioral change for reducing energy consumption through interventions such as feedback, information, monetary incentives, motivation, social comparison. Moreover, Table 1 lists more review articles on distributed energy systems in the last decade. These review articles all focus on the planning, evaluation, modeling, optimization, control, and dispatch of distributed energy systems from different viewpoints, such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political aspects [35], which are of significance for the integration and development of distributed energy systems.
Research structure
Distributed energy systems have been proposed and developed for nearly two decades. With the introduction of carbon neutral and carbon peaking energy strategies by various countries, further promoting the development of distributed energy systems based on clean fossil fuels or renewable energy sources is imperative to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions [36]. As Berjawi et al. [3] said, a holistic view of the whole energy system considering the interactions of the components, is necessary for the planning, operation, and evaluation of future integrated energy systems [5, 37]. Based on the current research on distributed energy systems, this paper will systematically and holistically sort out the research contents, problems, and future development trends related to distributed energy systems. Figure 4 presents the review framework of distributed energy systems in this paper. Based on the current policy support, research status, and development of distributed energy systems, this review first introduces the generation unit, transport unit, and storage unit in distributed energy systems and then summarizes and discusses the essential characteristics of distributed energy systems. On this basis, this review provides a thorough overview of the current research on distributed energy systems from three aspects: system planning and evaluation, modeling and optimization, and operation and control, respectively.
The review focuses on the presentation and summary of the methods and ideas of the above three aspects. Sector 2 introduces distributed energy systems. Sectors 3 ~ 5 present system planning and evaluation, modeling and optimization, and operation and control methods. Finally, the research conclusions of this paper are presented in Sector 6.
Distributed energy systems
Energy generation unit
Clean and highefficiency energy generation units can provide the primary energy for satisfying various user demands such as electricity, heating, and cooling. Energy generation technology mainly includes two types. One is based on clean fuel, such as natural gas, biomass, solar fuel, mainly internal combustion engine, micro gas turbine, fuel cell, Stirling engine, and other technologies. The other is based on renewable energy, such as wind energy and solar energy, mainly wind power, photovoltaic power, and photovoltaic solar thermal. These energy generation units are mainly characterized by multiple complementary sources, micro equipment, polygeneration of heat, cold and electricity, and low pollution.
Internal combustion and gas turbine engines
The internal combustion engine is the most familiar and widely used energy generation unit, with capacities ranging from kW to MW. They have the advantages of lowcost, highpower generation efficiency, flexible startup, high reliability, excellent load following, and achieving waste heat recovery. Due to the fossil fuelbased operation of internal combustion engines, they produce about 10% of greenhouse gas emissions [38]. Therefore, the internal combustion engines transition from carbonbased to hydrogenbased fuels [39]. The efficiency improvement and reduced dependence on fossil fuels will become existing research directions for internal combustion engines [38]. Like the internal combustion engine, an alternative technology converting the internal energy of fuel combustion into electrical energy, gas turbines are also limited by the efficiency of the Carnot cycle. The combined cooling, heating, and power system composed of gas turbines can achieve an energy utilization efficiency of more than 80% and use clean fossil energy such as natural gas as fuel, which has better environmental performance.
Fuel cells
Fuel cells can directly convert the chemical energy of the fuel into electrical energy by some electrochemical reaction between natural gas, hydrogen, and oxygen [40]. This technology is a promising and attractive way to provide electricity and heat to rural areas and distributed homes, communities, etc., with a combined efficiency exceeding 80% [41]. Numerous fuel cells, such as Alkaline Fuel Cell (AFC), Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC), Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC), Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), and Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) have been proposed and developed for applications in distributed generation, auxiliary power, transportation, and military space [42, 43].
Wind power
Wind energy is a clean and extremely abundant source of renewable energy. Wind power generation converts the wind’s kinetic energy into environmentally friendly electrical energy and is available in gridconnected and offgrid connections [44]. However, wind power generation is always characterized by randomness and uncertainty with variations in wind speed [17, 45]. These intermittent wind power will impact system reserves, reliability, expected carbon emissions, and costs [46]. Therefore, integrating wind power with other distributed generation technologies is necessary and feasible.
Solar energy
Solar energy generation is another clean and sustainable energy generation technology that is considered promising because of its inexhaustible supply, universality, high capacity, and environmental friendliness [47]. Lewis [48] pointed out that solar energy will be converted into electricity, heat, and fuel with much higher efficiencies, lower costs, and improved scalability. Recently, solar energy utilization contains solar electricity, thermal, and solar fuel technologies, such as photovoltaic, photovoltaic thermal, and solar hydrogen, that will be important for developing and applying a distributed energy system located at the user side [49].
Heat pump/air conditioner
To meet customers’ cooling and heating needs, heat pumps and air conditioners can efficiently convert electrical energy into thermal energy, thus realizing the integrated supply of cooling, heating, and electricity for distributed energy systems [50]. Air conditioners are driven by electrical energy to meet the cooling needs of users. Heat pumps can be classified as airsource, groundsource, or watersource heat pumps, driven by electrical energy, to meet users’ thermal energy needs [51,52,53]. Recently, heat pumps and air conditioners are essential highefficiency and environmentally friendly heating/cooling technologies in distributed energy systems.
Energy transport unit
Distributed energy systems also comprise electrical energy transport, thermal energy transport, and working fluid transport, which deliver the generated energy from the generation units to the users. Since the physical properties of the transported quantities, such as electricity, heat, and fluids are different, their transmission devices, networks, and physical description processes are also different [54, 55].
Power distribution network
Different distributed generation units, such as wind power, solar power, fuel cell, gas turbine, and internal combustion engine, connect directly to power distribution networks by various power electronics devices [56] or directly provide the power for the consumers. The placement of distributed generation has a pivotal impact on the operation of the power distribution network. Appropriate distributed generation placement will reduce system loss, network capital, and operating cost and improve power quality, supply reliability, system stability, and loadability [57, 58]. Therefore, the power distribution network is the critical link between the distributed energy system and the electrical grid. On top of meeting the basic electricity demand of users, the power distribution network also undertakes the function of reverse power delivery to the grid [59]. Under this circumstance, the operation mode of the distributed energy system and power distribution network will be reconfigured due to the variations of the quantity and direction of active and reactive power and the distribution of voltage with the changes of users from traditional consumers to prosumers of electricity energy.
Heat network
Thermal energy is another primary energy demand of users, including hot water for bathing and heating in winter. For example, in the case of winter heating, it is usually satisfied by a centralized heat network at the district/community level or realized by an independent household heating network [60]. Such heating networks mainly include supply and return water networks and heat exchange equipment. Various heat networks consist of fluid flow, enthalpy flow, heat transfer rate, and other processes. The mass conservation, energy conservation, heat transfer equations and temperature, pressure, flow rate, and other parameters should be included in the network constraints with typical nonlinear features [61, 62].
Fluid network
In distributed energy systems, such as heating networks, natural gas networks, heat pump systems, and cooling systems, are composed of various fluid networks [63]. The fluid network mainly consists of components such as pipes, pumps, and valves. The usual fluids are natural gas, air, water, and refrigerants. Therefore, the flow characteristics of the fluid in the pipeline, the pump’s power characteristics, and the valve’s adjustment characteristics all need to be considered in the energy transport aspect of the distributed energy system [64, 65].
Energy storage unit
Due to the randomness and uncertainty of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, energy storage units are essential for distributed energy systems to provide stable, reliable, economical electricity, heating, and cooling for users’ energy needs [66, 67]. Various energy storage technologies have been proposed and applied in distributed energy systems, such as electrochemical supercapacitors, flow batteries, lithiumion batteries, superconducting magnetic energy storage, flywheel energy storage, compressed air storage, and thermal energy storage [68]. For the application scenarios of distributed energy systems, electrical energy storage and thermal energy storage are the more mature energy storage application technologies in distributed energy systems. For example, Sameti and Haghighat [69] considered electrical energy storage (battery bank) and thermal energy storage (hot water bank) in a district energy system which will bring significant economic and environmental benefits. Yuan et al. [70] integrated thermal energy storage into an internal combustion enginebased distributed energy system and presented that a thermal storage system can improve the primary energy efficiency. In different distributed energy storage application scenarios, the capacity, power, and response time of energy storage devices vary greatly.
System characteristic
Based on the development and application of distributed energy systems, this paper proposes and presents a sketch of a distributed energy system, as shown in Fig. 5. This distributed energy system contains electricity, heating, cooling, gas, and transportation. The energy generation unit includes photovoltaic (PV), wind power (WP), and fuel cell (FC) connected to the power distribution grid to satisfy the electric energy demand of customers and interact with the transmission grid through the distribution grid connection. Meanwhile, the fuel cell can convert clean fuels such as natural gas and hydrogen into electrical and thermal energy for cogeneration. A gas boiler (GB) is also introduced to generate heat to satisfy users’ thermal energy requirements. As an efficient energy conversion device, heat pumps (HP) and air conditioners (AC) can turn electricity into heating and cooling. This system introduces a heat storage (HS) device used to break the realtime balance constraint between heat supply and heat demand in the heating supply segment. The electricity supply segment introduces an electricity storage device (battery), which breaks the realtime power balance constraint between the electricity supply and demand. Besides, in the proposed distributed energy system, electrical energy can also be converted into hydrogen through some power to gas devices, which can be turned into fuel for storage by an electrochemical process. At the same time, fuel can be dispatched to meet part of users’ gas demand. In order to coordinate the production, transport, storage, and supply of different energies in the distributed energy system, it is also necessary and significant to develop a power conversion system (PCS) and energy management system (EMS) to regulate the distributed energy system for achieving efficient, clean, safe, and reliable operating of the distributed energy system [64, 71].
Based on the distributed energy system shown in Fig.5, this review concludes the characteristics of distributed energy systems: multienergy interaction, multitemporal scale, and multiobjective regulation (nM characteristics). The multienergy interaction includes multienergy complementarity in the energy production sector, multienergy flow synergy in the energy transport sector, and multimode coupling in the energy storage sector. Different application scenarios like householdlevel, buildinglevel, communitylevel, and citylevel are the characteristics of distributed energy systems with multiple spatial scales [64, 71]. As shown in Fig. 6, householdlevel distributed energy systems are kWscale, while buildinglevel and communitylevel distributed energy systems may be MWscale, and various distributed energy systems at the citylevel may form the GWscale. Meanwhile, distributed energy systems contain multiple links of conversion, storage, and transmission between different forms of heat, electricity, and gas, covering a variety of physical processes such as heat transfer, mass transfer, fluid flow, and electrochemistry, involving different time scales from milliseconds, seconds, minutes to hours shown in Fig. 6, as well as multiple connection methods such as series, parallel and multiloop layouts between components [54, 63, 64, 71]. In terms of users, different loads such as electricity, heat, and gas are also characterized by uncertainty and multiple time scales, such as second, minute, and hourly scales. In addition, due to the random and uncertain characteristics of wind power and photovoltaic power generation, sufficient system flexibility is necessary to ensure the complete and adequate accommodation of renewable energy. However, for energy conversion equipment such as fuel cells, heat pumps, and air conditioners, it is necessary to improve energy conversion efficiency and utilization as much as possible. Therefore, for different application scenarios and user needs, the system also has multiobjective regulation characteristics, including technical, economic, and social indicators, such as synergistic flexibility and efficiency indicators, synergistic technical and economic indicators, synergistic technical and social acceptability indicators.
System planning and evaluation
System planning framework
Mixedinteger programming
The planning of distributed energy systems is sophisticated and multidimensional due to sourceload uncertainties, coupling characteristics of devices, nonlinearity, and joint optimization objectives [72, 73]. In 2010, Ren and Gao [74] developed mixedinteger linear programming (MILP) model for the integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems by minimizing overall energy costs under the given site energy loads, local climate data, utility tariff structure, and some technical and financial information of alternative equipment. Based on the MILP model, Mehleri et al. [75] developed the optimal planning and evaluation of distributed energy systems by integrating PV, CHP units, heating networks, thermal storage tanks, and electricity transmission lines and then determined the optimal combination, allocation, and operation strategies of distributed energy resources technologies. On this basis, Bracco et al. [76] presented a distributed energy system optimal design tool based on the MILP model to optimize a distributed energy system that provides heating, cooling, and electricity to an urban neighborhood. Huang et al. [77] presented a twostage MILP approach that considers a districtlevel multienergy system planning as a directed acyclic graph with multiple layers based on an energy hub model considering distributed renewable energy integration. This model can optimize the equipment option and multienergy system configuration by sensitivity analysis of load profiles, energy prices, and equipment parameters. Similarly, Liu et al. [78] developed a distributed hydrogenbased multienergy system and proposed an optimization planning model under the optimization objective of minimum annual capital and operation expenditure for ensuring the optimal component capacity and combination.
Besides, the MILPbased planning of distributed generation in the distributed energy system is also developed from the power system perspective. For example, Wouters et al. [79] proposed a MILP model to integrate microgrids and distributed energy systems in the current grid infrastructure that lacks locally appropriate economic and efficient energy design. The model integrated the operational characteristics and constraints of different distributed generation technologies to minimize the total annual cost of the residential energy system. Yang et al. [80] considered the annual cost of investing, maintaining, and operating of the distributed energy resource systems as the optimization objective and provided the optimal energy generation site, equipment type, capacity, and number based on the MILP model. Meanwhile, the energy storage system planning has caused more attention in recent distributed energy system planning. For example, Bai et al. [81] considered the new power electronic devices in the distributed energy storage planning by proposing an optimal planning model of distributed energy storage systems in active distribution networks based on the soft open points by the mixedinteger secondordercone programming. Bozorgavari et al. [82] proposed a robust planning model for distributed battery energy storage systems from the perspective of distribution system operators based on an equivalent linear programming model. Mao et al. [83] proposed the mathematical formulation of the energy storage system into the generation expansion framework by integrating the dynamic charge/discharge efficiency, maximum cycle power, and cycle degradation of the lithiumion battery system. Pirouzi et al. [84] proposed an effective hybrid planning of distributed generation and distribution automation in distribution networks for improving the reliability and operating indices under the minimum of the sum of the expected daily investment, operation, energy loss, and reliability costs by introducing a stochastic programming approach for the uncertainty parameters analysis.
Therefore, the mixedinteger linear programming method is an effective and feasible mathematical modeling approach for solving complex optimization tasks and identifying potential tradeoffs between conflicting objectives. As a mathematical framework for distributed energy system planning optimization, it is particularly important for addressing the ability to discretize in time and space and for system planning the transition to a nondispatchable energydominated system. Figure 7 presents the planning methodology flowchart as follows. 1) Collect problemrelated input data and identify decision variables. 2) Model the system and determine the objective function of the system requirements. 3) Determine the constraints in the system such as equipment, economic, environmental, operational constraints, and other factors. 4) Simulate the model by substituting the input data under different conditions into the MILP model and solving it appropriately.5) Select the optimal solution and evaluate the planning results practically in various aspects to verify system feasibility.
Objectiveoriented planning
Another part of planning studies on distributed energy systems focuses on different optimization, operation, and management levels considering different planning objectives such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political. Therefore, this review article summarizes this type of research as objectiveoriented planning based on planning optimization objectives. Falke et al. [85] provided an overview mode of the optimization problem of distributed energy system planning. This model includes input parameters, preprocessing, optimization model, and results. A multiobjective optimization model for the investment planning and operation management of distributed energy systems is proposed by considering energy efficiency and supply options. Meanwhile, Wu et al. [86] introduced the economic and environmental objectives for obtaining the optimal distributed energy generation components, the site and size of the solution technology, optimal operational schedule and layout of heating pipelines by combining the MILP model. The results show that user preference, load fluctuation, and fuel prices considerably impact the distributed energy network performance. On this basis, Wang et al. [87] proposed a multiobjective including technological, economic, environmental, and social criteria, such as the related primary energy saving ratio, payback period, carbon emission, and social acceptability, for the natural gasbased regional distributed energy system planning. Meanwhile, Jing et al. [88] explained the relationship between multiobjective optimization and multicriteria evaluation and presented a novel twostage framework for the optimal planning of distributed energy systems. The optimization stage considers the system design and dispatch by multipleobjectives εconstraint method, and the evaluation stage consists of the analytic hierarchy process and gray relation analysis method for evaluating and ranking optimal solutions.
Meanwhile, the consideration of system operation performance and sourceload uncertainties is also necessary and significant for the objectiveoriented planning of distributed energy systems by the multilayer planning method [89]. For example, Ahmadi et al. [90] proposed a multiobjective multiverse optimization method by introducing two basic objectives, voltage profile improvement and cost minimization of the planning for the optimal allocation and sizing of renewable distributed generation and operation of energy storage systems. Wang et al. [91] proposed a multiobjectives optimization method for the optimal design of distributed energy systems considering uncertainties combining Monte Carlo simulation and deterministic programming model. Fonseca et al. [92] also carried out the total annualized cost, CO_{2} emissions, and grid dependence as objection functions to present a multicriteria optimization strategy for the optimal design and operation of the distributed energy system by considering the timevarying operation of energy conversion units and seasonal behavior of the storage system. Based on the duallayer planning solution, Mu et al. [93] developed a dynamic energy hub model considering the timevaryingbased efficiency correction model and built a doublelayer planning model to determine the optimal planning and operation schemes for the integrated community energy system. Wang et al. [94] considered equipment exergy efficiency in the upperlevel planning model and economy and exergy efficiency in the lowerlevel planning model for the regional integrated energy system planning. Therefore, multilayer planning can introduce different optimization objectives and is an effective method for objectiveoriented planning of distributed energy systems.
Objective and evaluation
Combined with the above planning summary of distributed energy systems, objective selection and system evaluation are extremely important for the planning and optimization of distributed energy systems. As early as the 1970s, Balderston [95] considered that the perspective placing environmental and social impacts on the heart of energy predicament would become essential to compare impacts generated by alternative energy options systematically, comprehensively, and objectively. Distributed energy systems are arranged directly on the customer side and contain different energy conversion, transport, and storage components, enabling direct interaction between energy generation and consumption. Therefore, when planning and evaluating the performance of distributed energy systems, it is necessary to consider the comprehensive performance and environmental impact of the system and the stability, safety, and reliability of the energy supply used by customers [96]. These optimization objectives and evaluation indicators include technical, economic, environmental, social, and political aspects. In addition, some scholars have also adopted a comprehensive evaluation that considers several aspects simultaneously to measure the performance of distributed energy systems [97].
Figure 8 concluded the main optimization objectives and evaluation indicators of distributed energy systems from technical, economic, environmental, social, and political aspects [3, 12, 30, 64, 71, 98,99,100]. In the technical aspect, energy efficiency [101], primary energy saving ratio [102], and exergy efficiency [102] have been proposed and applied in the optimization and planning evaluation for the distributed energy systems. Energy efficiency is defined as the ratio of the total energy output of a system to its energy input. The primary energy saving ratio is defined as the ratio of primary energy reduction of the proposed system compared to the separated production system to the primary energy consumption of the separated production system. Similar indicators include primary energy savings [103] and primary energy saving [104]. Besides, exergy analysis is also a reasonable and efficient method to identify the types, magnitudes, and locations of irreversibility in a thermodynamic system [105]. In terms of environmental, emissions such as carbon dioxide are generally calculated using multiplying the emission equipment output with the intensity factor of the relevant emissions. The common environmental evaluation indicators according to this calculation method are CO_{2} emission reduction ratio [106], the PM2.5 emission reduction ratio [107], and greenhouse gasses reduction [103]. Besides, the planning and optimization of distributed energy systems also focus on the economy, such as the annual total cost saving ratio [106], operating cost savings [108], net present value [109], and payback period [110]. The operating consumption can be calculated by multiplying the power output of different energy sources by the corresponding energy consumption coefficients. The net present value relates all incomes and outcomes existing through the lifespan of the plant to the initial investment. The ratio of the additional capital cost to the saving of the distributed energy system’s operating cost compared with the centralized energy system.
However, a single evaluation method often yields results that are not comprehensive enough, so in the study of actual objects, researchers often use multiple evaluation methods to achieve the advantages and overcome the flaws of the evaluation methods. After determining the common evaluation indicators of distributed energy systems and the analysis of individual indicators, the comprehensive performance of the research object can be evaluated by considering all types of indicators together. Hou et al. [111] introduced the annual costs, main energy rates, and annual carbon emissions to comprehensively evaluate distributed energy systems. Berjawi et al. [3] provided a whole energy system approach for system evaluation from multidimensional, multivectoral, systemic, futuristic, and applicability characteristics. Table 2 also presents some literatures on comprehensive evaluation methods for distributed energy systems. These evaluation methods are mainly subjective, objective, and other methods. Subjective methods include the Delphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and fuzzy assignment. Objective methods include the Entropy Information method and Grey Relation Analysis (GRA). However, Fattahi et al. [120] considered that the traditional consumer would become the prosumer that plays an essential and active role in the distributed energy system. Therefore, the modeling of the distributed energy system should also consider technological and social factors. Although quantifying the social parameters is usually difficult, the behavior of the prosumer should be considered in the distributed energy system planning and modeling. Koirala et al. [12] also showed the assessment criteria from locality, modularity, flexibility, intelligence, synergy, customer engagement, and efficiency, which will become more critical for designing and analyzing distributed energy systems. Therefore, For the planning of distributed energy systems, comprehensive, quantitative, and operational optimization objectives and evaluation indicators should be further established, taking into full consideration different aspects such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political aspects.
In summary, with the development and application of energy storage and renewable energy technologies and the active participation of endusers, the future planning of distributed energy systems will be directly oriented to users. The planning should clarify different users and revenue generators, determine acceptable planning targets for multiple parties, and fully consider the complementarity and uncertainty of multienergy production and multiple types of user loads, including geographical differences, climate, user behavior forecasts, and market price fluctuations. The planning should also consider the multiscenario operation characteristics of the system and realize the optimal dynamic planning of the distributed energy system by synergizing the system flexibility and the efficiency of each device under different time scales. Meanwhile, in the face of future distributed energy systems clustered on the power distribution network side, there is necessary to develop artificial intelligence computing techniques that combine efficiency and accuracy to accommodate more complex optimal planning and evaluation of distributed energy systems.
Modeling and optimization method
Distributed energy systems are typical heterogeneous energy flow systems. The simple coupling of different forms of energy flow makes the mathematical models describing the physical processes highly heterogeneous, resulting in system equations with strong nonlinearities and low computational efficiency [5, 64, 71]. Koirala et al. [12] reviewed the primary problems and trends of the integrated community energy system. Some technologies, actors, institutions, and market mechanisms complicate the implementation of local energy systems that need a more bottomup solution for capturing all the benefits of distributed energy sources and increasing the global welfare. Fattahi et al. [120] reviewed 19 integrated energy system models and provided seven current and future lowcarbon energy system modeling challenges that are increasing flexibility need, further electrification, the emergence of new technologies, technological learning and efficiency improvements, decentralization, macroeconomic interactions, and social behavior role. For example, social behavior is usually difficult to quantify and neglected in the quantitative energy models. However, this is important in decentralized energy systems such as distributed energy systems [121]. In fact, various integration and modeling options such as Microgrid, Virtual power plant, Energy hub, and Prosumer community groups have been proposed for the planning, modeling, optimization, and operation [5, 122]. In these modeling methods, microgrid modeling focuses on electricity generation and demand optimization, including power reliability, security, and sustainability [123]. In addition, the virtual power plants can aggregate various distributed energy generation and consumption to form flexibility capacity equivalent to a power plant [12, 122]. The energy hub favors the multicarrier optimization of electricity, gas, heating, and cooling within a district by optimal dispatch [12]. Prosumer community group is defined as “a network of prosumers having relatively similar energy sharing behavior and interests, which purser a mutual goal and jointly compete in the energy market [124]”, and puts more effort into energy exchange among prosumers having similar goals [12].
The integration and coupling of various energy carriers increase the complexity and interconnectedness of components in distributed energy systems [3, 37, 125]. According to the essential characteristics of distributed energy systems, a unified modeling perspective covering the conversion, transmission, and storage processes of different forms of energy, such as electricity, heat, and mass, is significant and essential [64, 71, 126]. Different modeling methods have their own characteristics and are suitable for different application scenarios. From the perspective of the power system, distributed energy system makes the sourceload interaction on the user side. It focuses more on system characteristics such as power balance, stability, flexibility, and controllability. From the perspective of the thermal system, distributed energy system has electrical energy, chemical energy, and thermal energy conversion between each other, more focused on the concern of energy conversion efficiency, irreversible losses, and the exergy efficiency of the system. Meanwhile, various devices are often connected through transmission processes such as electrical energy, thermal energy, and kinetic energy transmission in distributed energy systems. The modeling of distributed energy systems should also be analyzed from the perspective of energy transmission. Therefore, in the modeling and optimization method sector, based on these perspectives of electrical energy transmission, energy conversion, thermal energy transmission, etc., this review will provide some current critical research perspectives such as the energy hub method, thermodynamic analysis method, heat current method, and datadriven method, respectively.
Energy hub method
Energy hub was proposed by Prof. G. Anderson in 2006 [127, 128], i.e., “transformation, conversion, and storage of various forms of energy in centralized units,” which is a powerful approach for nextgeneration energy systems and is feasible for the distributed energy system modeling and optimization. Figure 9 presents an energy hub example sketch that contains a transformer, natural gasbased microturbine, heat exchanger, furnace, absorption chiller, battery storage, and hot water storage. This model can be considered a blackbox component with multiple energy flow inputs and outputs [129]. Recently, Mohammadi et al. [130, 131] have developed a review of the Energy hub, provided the utilization of the dominant structure for energy hub models, identified and discussed weaknesses, strengths, and challenges.
The energy hub model has been used for the planning, modeling and optimization of distributed energy systems [132]. Mohammadi et al. [131] present some important research in the field of the energy hub, such as planning, optimal operation, demand response, and energy management at various levels. For example, Ma et al. [133] introduced a microenergy grid integrating the power, heating, and cooling sector based on the energy hub and developed a genetic modeling method for the energy flow of the micro energy grid. Finally, a dayahead dynamic optimal operation model combined with demand response is formulated to minimize the daily operation cost. Mostafavi et al. [134] stated that numerous publications had discussed energy hub elements optimization in a singleobjective state by assuming some constant coupling matrix parameters. Therefore, a new energy management strategy for a sustainable coastal urban energy supply system was obtained by modeling and optimizing the energy hub network under a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis. Li et al. [135] proposed an optimal userlevel integrated energy system planning framework based on the extended energy hub by considering synergistic effects under multiple uncertainties. Qi et al. [136] established a smart energy hub model consisting of combined heat and power, an HVAC system, heat storage, and electricity storage units. This model proposed an energy cost minimization strategy by dynamic control of the heatpower ratio of combined heat and power, flexible load management, and energy storage system control.
Meanwhile, the energy hub concept can also be used to model and optimize the integration of multiple distributed energy systems. For example, Moghaddam et al. [137] provided an innovative energy flowbased method for energy hub modeling containing electricity, heating, and cooling loads. This energy hub modeling incorporates the potential technical interconnections between different distributed energy system components: CHP generation system, electric heat pump, absorption chiller, electrical energy storage, and thermal energy storage. Sobhani et al. [138] stated that an individual energy hub’s optimal operation and schedule could affect other energy hubs in a large network. Therefore, a congestion game is used in this research to model the interaction between energy hubs and propose a distributed algorithm that can achieve Nash equilibrium. In the game process, each energy hub player participating in the dynamic energy price market can maximize the related payoff under the constraints of energy demand. Rastegar et al. [139] designed a renewable energybased energy hub framework on the residential level to present the interaction of energy carriers, including combined heat and power plugin hybrid electric vehicles, solar panels, and electrical storage systems. On this basis, an optimization program was proposed to obtain the energy hub’s optimal operational modes under minimizing customer payment costs. Meanwhile, Yang et al. [140] proposed a distributed planning framework that is different from centralized planning, based on the alternating direction method of multipliers. Each energy hub is considered the decoupling node of the electricity and gas networks in this framework. Wang et al. [141] proposed a standardized matrix modeling method for building the multiple energy coupling matrix based on the energy hub concept and reduced the nonlinearity of the energy hubbased optimization model.
Besides, in considering system uncertainty and microgrid, Nikmehr [142] introduced the energy hub concept into the networked microgrids structure to reveal the potential capabilities of microgrids in satisfying various energy demands. Chen et al. [143] proposed a twostage robust planningoperation cooptimization method for the energy hub that considers uncertainties of renewable energy and multiload demands, the selection problem, and the exact economic model of the energy storage system. Meanwhile, Shams et al. [144] proposed an energy hubbased microgrid model for the optimal scheduling of electrical and thermal resources, which considers such stochastic variables as renewable generations, electricity, and thermal loads by probability distribution functions. Lu et al. [145] established an energy hubbased environmentallyaware load dispatch model that considers the electrical and thermal demand response programs and analyzed the proposed robust optimization approach to analyze the uncertainty of electricity prices. Hu et al. [146] introduced scenariobased stochastic programming into the energy hub models presenting the intrinsic coupling relationship among different energy carriers for considering the uncertainty of renewable energy sources.
In conclusion, the energy hub method provides a practical and alternative solution that identifies four main functionalities: input, conversion, storage, and output [131]. This approach is a holistic view that establishes the relationship between different energy storage, conversion, and transfer by describing the external properties of the components such as the allocation matrix and the coefficient matrix. However, for the sourceload uncertainty and the deep involvement of users in distributed energy systems, accurate analysis of the dynamic characteristics of different components and construction of their operation models are the basis for improving the efficiency and flexibility of distributed energy systems. Therefore, Future research should focus on accurately characterizing the complex properties of conversion, transport, and storage among multiple energies, the multitime scale dynamics, and nonlinear interactions in modeling distributed energy systems.
Thermodynamic analysis method
The direct conversion process of electrical, thermal, and chemical energy is an elementary part of the distributed energy system. Renewable energybased devices such as wind power and photovoltaic are characterized by randomness and uncertainty, focusing on considering the system’s flexible regulation capability. In contrast, clean fossil fuelbased fuel cells, micro gas turbines, and electrothermal conversion devices such as heat pumps focus more on energy conversion efficiency. Therefore, coordinating system flexibility and efficiency at the level of distributed energy systems are extremely critical for efficient and reliable system operation. Exergy is derived from the second law of thermodynamics and measures energy quality such as heat, electricity, and fossil fuels. Since different energy demands are characterized by different energy quality levels, such as building heating or cooling, hot water, electric appliances, and lighting, the exergy analysis can be used to promote the matching of energy quality levels between energy supply and demand [147, 148]. Distributed energy systems can match the quality levels of energy supply and demand and have a unique opportunity to obtain the exergy analysis benefits [147]. Therefore, exergy analysisbased thermodynamic modeling and analysis of distributed energy systems have been developed and focused on in many literatures by energy conversion, exergy, and exergyeconomic concepts [149,150,151,152]. Park et al. [153] reviewed both energy and exergy analyses of typical energy systems based on solar energy utilization.
On the one hand, for the energy cascade utilization in distributed energy systems, in 2015, Di et al. [147] considered that the application of exergy principles in building energy supply energy systems could achieve rational energy resource utilization by introducing the different quality levels of energy resources and demands. That is, the energy cascade utilization based on different energy quality levels can effectively improve the overall exergy efficiency of distributed energy systems. For example, lowtemperature energy sources should be used to meet the lowquality thermal energy demands. Meanwhile, the multiobjective considering the economic and exergetic objectives is formulated to choose an optimal operation strategy. Yan et al. [154] applied the exergy principles in the operational optimization of distributed energy systems by considering the whole energy supply chain from energy resources to energy demands. The energy networks with the exergy loss model are established at the energy conversion step and capture complicated interactions. The minimization of total energy cost and exergy loss results demonstrated that reducing highquality energy resource utilization could reduce the exergy loss and lead to sustainability of energy supply systems. Wang et al. [155] pointed out that matching waste heat recovery technologies and various heat sources at different temperatures based on the energy quality is essential and can improve the whole distributed energy system efficiency.
On the other hand, renewable energybased fuels are becoming significant for distributed energy systems. For example, Liu et al. [49] proposed a solarhybrid fuelfired distributed energy system. The overall efficiency, exergy efficiency, and net solarenergytoelectricity efficiency are used to analyze the system performance and state the efficient utilization solution of solar and clean fuel in distributed energy systems. Moreover, Zhang et al. [156] proposed a solarassisted combined cooling, heating, and power system for improving the energy conversion and utilization efficiency of renewable energy in the distributed energy systems and analyzed the system performance by introducing the solartoelectricity efficiency and exergy efficiency concepts. Zheng et al. [157] proposed a new distributed energy system that considers solar thermochemical hydrogen production by upgrading the energy level from thermal to chemical energy. On this basis, the solarbased produced hydrogen is converted into power by cascaded utilization of solid oxide fuel cells and micro gas turbines. The proposed system combining power, cooling, and heating is analyzed from thermodynamic, energy, and exergy perspectives. Yuan et al. [158] proposed two combined cooling and power systems for satisfying the diversified power and cooling demands of distributed energy systems. Based on the established mathematical models, detailed exergy and thermoeconomic analysis were performed for the optimal system performance. Wang et al. [159] proposed a solarassisted gas turbinebased combined cooling, heating, and power distributed energy system. It analyzed the system performance by combining energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental. Yang and Zhao [160] put forward the solid oxide fuel cellsteaminjected gas turbinebased distributed energy system fueled by liquefied natural gas with CO_{2} recovery. They calculated the system’s exergy, thermal, and power efficiencies and then analyzed the influences of some critical parameters on the system thermodynamic performance. Guo et al. [161] considered that the thermodynamic performance and optimization design of novel distributed energy systems combining with solar utilization and hybrid energy storage are still insufficient. On this basis, this research proposed a distributed energy system with hybrid energy storage, analyzed system thermodynamic performance by parameter analysis method considering exergy efficiency and primary energy ratio, and optimized the configuration by a cooperative optimization method considering system configuration and operation.
Table 3 lists more literature about distributed energy systems by energy and exergy analysis methods. Di et al. [173] concluded that the economic assessmentsbased design and optimization of distributed energy systems for shortrun benefits is insufficient. Applying exergy principles can improve energy utilization efficiency for the longrun sustainability of the energy supply. Moreover, Li et al. [174] stated that the energy storage operation status has a significant influence on the hourly energy generation in the distributed energy system, energysaving and energy efficiency performance are not enough for the hourly optimization of energy cascade utilization. On this basis, this research proposed the exergy loss rate as the hourly operation optimization objection of the distributed energy system for obtaining the hourly offdesign output of various components.
Consequently, distributed energy systems contain thermodynamic systems based on clean fossil fuels and nonthermal systems based on renewable energy sources. The complementarity of multiple energy sources in terms of quantity and quality is the key to the distributed energy system to achieving energy cascading. The comprehensive analysis of different energy conversion, storage, and transmission processes and the dynamic characteristics of distributed energy systems from a thermodynamic perspective is a crucial foundation for the future application of thermodynamic methods for modeling, analysis, and evaluation. On the one hand, the high efficiency of distributed energy systems should be pursued. The energy conversion process of nonfossil fuels should also be analyzed and evaluated from the thermodynamics perspective to promote the efficient utilization of multiple forms of energy such as electricity, heat, and gas. In addition to the pursuit of efficiency, distributed energy systems should also consider the flexible regulation capability of the system under different time scales. Considering the dynamic operating characteristics of distributed energy systems from the thermodynamics perspective is significant in achieving efficient and rapid regulation of distributed energy systems.
Heat current method
Distributed energy systems also contain conversion, storage, and transmission of thermal energy, such as various heat exchangers, heat exchanger networks, pumps, heat pumps, air conditioners, radiators, etc. The unit models of these devices are a vital part of the system analysis and overall modeling. For example, in a typical heat exchanger, the heat transfer process is a multistream coupling process containing fluid flow, enthalpy flow, and power flow. Many parameters such as temperature, pressure, mass flow rate, and heat transfer rate are coupled with strong nonlinear characteristics [175]. Meanwhile, fluid flow, heat conversion, heat storage, and transfer processes have different characteristic time scales in dynamic analysis, which further increases the difficulties of dynamic modeling and analysis of distributed energy systems. Therefore, the modeling and optimization of distributed energy systems from the perspective of heat transfer is also a very worthwhile research effort.
An accurate and complete description of the performance of heat exchange equipment in distributed energy systems is necessary for system modeling and scheduling optimization. Recently, based on the entransy dissipation theory [176, 177], Chen et al. [178] have proposed the heat current/power flow method for describing and analyzing heat exchangers [179, 180], heat transfer systems [181], thermal systems [182, 183], and distributed energy systems by combining with thermoelectrical analogy method. The heat current method was firstly proposed and also termed as power flow method in Ref. [178], which is based on the power flow perspective rather than the work mass flow perspective and takes into account the dual characteristics of heat energy conservation and irreversibility in the heat transfer process of the heat exchanger. In the heat current model, the general thermal resistance is redefined as the ratio of linear temperature difference, such as inlet temperature, to the heat transfer rate [175, 184]. The general thermal resistance provides a linear form between the temperature difference and heat transfer rate, convenient for system modeling. Considering the basic structure of thermal subsystem in distributed energy system, Chen et al. [178] proposed three kinds of basic heat transfer networks, i.e., series layout, parallellayout, and multiloop layout and building the related heat current models, respectively. On this basis, Chen et al. [185] established the heat current model of a heat recoverybased power generation system and derived the heat transfer and conversion constraints combining with circuit principle. Moreover, Chen et al. [186] developed a realtime optimization platform for thermal system and applied the heat current method to model the cogeneration system, meanwhile proposed a highefficiency simulation procedure by the hierarchical and categorized algorithm.
Besides, Hao et al. [187, 188] introduced an electricheat conversion and heat transfer/heat storage units into the power system. They considered that the transmission natures of heat and electricity result in a complex and challenging power system analysis. The heat current method and Kirchhoff’s law have been used to deduce the heat transport matrix and construct a uniform power flow model of the power system with the electricheat conversion and heat transfer/storage units. The wind power accommodation case analysis concluded that considering the heat transfer constraints in the entire system will improve the system’s scheduling accuracy. On this basis, Chen and Zhao [189] introduced a heat recovery and thermal energy storage subsystem into the battery system to achieve the combined heat and power generation and utilization. The system modeling used the new power flow method (heat current method) by combining with the traditional power system power analysis method to establish the overall power flow model of the integrated electric and thermal energy system. Inspired by the common nature of irreversibility of electric transmission and heat transfer phenomena, He et al. [190] applied a redefined thermal resistance of heat exchange facilities used in the distributed energy system and proposed a heat current model of thermal system, which was consistent with the power flow model of power systems in physics and provided an accurate and holistic modeling method for the distributed energy system. Meanwhile, the proposed multienergy flow model of the integrated power and thermal systems can be solved by some existing power system simulators based on a multitime scale hybrid simulation algorithm proposed in Ref. [190]. Zhao et al. [191] considered efficient modeling and simulation impressive for thermal system analysis, optimization, and integration into the distributed energy system. Figure 10 presented a standardized heat current modeling strategy that consists of three steps, 1) construct a preliminary system hear current model based on the traditional mass flow topologies of components; 2) construct a final system heat current model based on the preliminary model; (3) obtain global system constraints by applying Kirchhoff’s laws [191].
Table 4 shows more applications of the heat current method in various types of thermal systems and distributed energy systems. These studies focused more on the steadystate modeling and variable operating conditions optimization of the system. Based on the research status, the heat current method realizes crosslevel modeling from heat transfer components, heat transfer systems, and thermal systems to distributed energy systems from the heat transfer perspective, which is a kind of electrification, standardization, and systematic modeling idea. The heat current method can electrify the thermal system model in the distributed energy system, reduce the repetition of component operating parameters in the system modeling, and greatly simplify the complex and nonlinear model of the thermal system by separating linear and nonlinear equations. The “physical analogy and mathematical consistency” solution can realize the electric and thermal system homogenization analysis and modeling. However, in the face of distributed energy systems with complex application scenarios, more research in the future should focus on integrating the heat flow method with modeling methods of power networks and fluid networks. Combining with big data technology, we study the dynamic modeling methods driven by physics and data under different time scales, separate the coupling relationship between nonlinearity and linearity, and propose the solution method with high accuracy and fast solution speed. Based on the quantification of user behavior, the overall coordination strategy of multiuser, multinetwork, and multienergy flow should be studied from the perspective of power flow.
Datadriven method
Energyhub, thermodynamic analysis, and heat current methods are three different approaches focusing on different research perspectives and have provided feasible and efficient applications for various distributed energy systems. However, Capturing some epistemic and aleatory uncertainties of intermittent renewable resources, consumer behavior variabilityrelated energy demand, and market costs of generation construction and storage infrastructure is also necessary and significant for analyzing sociotechnical complexities but limited by deterministic modeling methods [201, 202]. Zhang et al. [203] also proposed that accurate and effective modeling of distributed energy resource uncertainties must be holistically improved. Aliramezani et al. [204] considered that modeling and subsequent control of internal combustion engines are critical and significant for improving performance efficiency and reducing harmful emissions. However, the high nonlinearity and the complex phenomena impose considerable obstacles to performance prediction, optimization, and control. For example, Mirnaghi et al. [205] considered that knowledgebased and modelbased systems are for the fault detection and diagnosis of building energy supply system.
Datadriven design, modeling, and optimization method have been proposed and used in various distributed energy systems [203, 206]. Li and Wen [207] considered that agentbased modeling is a new modeling strategy that has made “remarkable progress” in controlling and optimizing distributed energy systems. Alvarado et al. [208] proposed a technology selection and operation model that is a datadriven framework for the optimal selection and operation of distributed energy systems by utilizing the holistic energy demands, prices, and the portfolio of available technologies. Chen et al. [209] reviewed the datadriven methods for operational optimization of integrated energy systems and provided that these component/equipmentlevel modeling and network/systemlevel modeling have been developed by artificial neural network model [210], genetic algorithms [211], and particle swarm [212]. Meanwhile, deep neural networks [213] and deep reinforcement learning [214] have also been proposed to model and optimize distributed energy systems. Besides, Wang et al. [215] considered that the contradiction between accuracy and efficiency limits the modeldriven method application and could be integrated with the datadriven method in the complex power system, and proposed serial, parallel, and embedded integration approaches between modeldriven and datadriven.
Compared with the physicsdriven modeling approach, the datadriven approach does not have sufficient physical laws of the system and lacks interpretability. Meanwhile, these methods require a large amount of training data for modeling and are limited to high data quality. Besides, due to the increased complexity and uncertainty of distributed energy systems with various power electronics and flexible loads, more online continuous learning or metalearning is essential to deal with continuously generated unmolded dynamics [214]. Therefore, studying online measurement and data collection techniques for distributed energy systems is the basis for datadriven modeling, such as measuring and collecting the operating parameters of individual devices in different subsystems such as power distribution networks, thermal systems, and natural gas systems. In addition, the physicsdriven and datadriven modeling and optimization methods are more meaningful for distributed energy systems. The datadriven modeling of distributed energy systems should be investigated with stacked data processing methods such as data cleaning, feature parameter screening, and overall modeling. Further study of the data and physical dualdriven modeling approach should be developed to increase the interpretability of the data model based on the complete analysis of the uncertainty of system output and load.
Operation and control method
Distributed energy system includes diverse types of energy conversion, storage, and transmission devices such as fuel cells, micro gas turbines, wind power, photovoltaic, electric heat pumps, and energy storage, which will supply power and heat directly to users through power electronics connected to the electrical network and heat exchangers connected to the thermal network, respectively [81]. The directly customerfacing system realizes the interactivity of supply and demand of different forms of energy such as electricity, heat, and gas in a limited region, thus forming an efficient energy supply system with multienergy integration and complementary utilization. Different types of distributed power sources such as wind power, photovoltaic, and fuel cell can operate by connecting with the grid, forming a local interaction of sourcegridload coexistence. The coupling linkage at the consumer side is different from the sourcegridload spatial scale in traditional energy power production and consumption. Different types of distributed generation and load demand on the user side have different degrees of volatility and uncertainty, and their corresponding dynamic response characteristics vary greatly. This dual stochastic of multiple types of distributed generations and loads will break through the dynamic response boundary conditions for optimal integration and operation control of distributed energy systems, reshape the dynamic response characteristics and stability of distributed energy systems, and bring new challenges for the coordinated control, safe and stable operation of distributed energy systems [216]. Therefore, the operation and control of distributed energy systems are becoming more important. Based on the above planning, modeling, and optimization, this research will review the operation and control for distributed energy systems from the optimal operation and scheduling strategy, the disturbance analysis and the control method.
Optimal operation and scheduling strategy
According to different application scenarios of distributed energy systems, researchers have proposed appropriate and effective control strategies to ensure a highly efficient distributed energy system [70, 217, 218]. The operation and control types of distributed energy systems include island control and interactive control with the power system. Interactive control can be divided into centralized, decentralized, and distributed control types [219]. Rahman et al. [220] introduced and reviewed the operation and control strategies of distributed energy sources from the microgrid perspective and concluded the main features of some typical control strategies including the gridconnected mode or standalone mode. And then, they considered that different distributed energy systems with energy storage units will produce some challenges due to their operation and control methods. Moreover, Zhang et al. [55] provided a comprehensive review of the modeling and solutions for the optimal operation of integrated electricity and heat systems. The review presented that the operational characteristics and dispatch mechanism depend on system modeling and are greatly influenced by dynamic characteristics, various flexible devices, and uncertainty of supply and demands.
In the conventional power system, dayahead schedule and shortterm/realtime dispatchers based on the different time scales have been differentiated in the economic dispatch and unit commitment [219]. Tian et al. [221] proposed a static model of the multienergy microgrid coupling system based on unified energy flow and an analog energy storage model representing dynamic energy transfer and established a MILPbased optimal scheduling model using segmented linear approximation and convex relaxation methods. The feasibility of the system model and the optimal scheduling method are verified practically in a multienergy microgrid. Liu et al. [222] proposed the twolevel interactive mechanism for the dayahead scheduling optimization of distributed networks with multimicrogrids. The lowerlevel economic dispatch of each microgrid considered the renewable energy generation and load uncertainties. The upperlevel interactive model ensures the operational quality by the distribution network operator.
From the multigeneration perspective, Ma et al. [26, 27] integrated the cogeneration, photovoltaic, and ground source heat pump to propose a new distributed energy system and introduced a multiobjective optimization consisting of annual energysaving, costsaving, and emission reduction ratios for developing the seasonal operation strategy by combining differential evolution and particle swarm optimization hybrid algorithm. Li et al. [223] focused on a distributed renewable energy system with heterogeneous residential, commercial, and industrial endusers. They proposed a hierarchical framework for the energy demandside management by integrating smart contracts and blockchain technologies. Wen et al. [107] applied the genetic algorithm to design optimization and performance analysis under seven operation strategies. Liu et al. [78, 132, 224] proposed a twophase collaborative optimization method for optimal operation strategy by prioritizing renewable energy utilization in the distributed energy system with a multienergy storage system including cold, heat, and electricity during a typical day. Meanwhile, Liu et al. [225] proposed a dayahead optimal operation strategy by an interconnected multienergy system framework considering the renewable energy generation fluctuations and demand variations by a reformulated chanceconstrained programming technique. Hao et al. [187] also proposed a dayahead scheduling strategy for the integrated electrical and thermal energy systems to obtain optimal wind power accommodation. Besides, Zhu et al. [226] proposed an optimal design solution and presented an hourly operation strategy for the renewable energycombined cooling, heating, and power coupled system by considering the comprehensive economic and environmental evaluation. Chen et al. [227] proposed a hierarchical control framework combining the modelbased method for upperlevel scheduler that solving the optimal power flow problem and the modelfree method for lowerlevel distributed energy resources controllers that absorb realtime disturbances and uncertainties.
In conclusion, a distributed energy system connects directly with users and the grid, which should respond to the regulation and control commands of the grid and have the ability of selfcoordination and control. The optimal control and scheduling strategy of distributed energy system should prioritize meeting the needs of users, maximizing the operational efficiency of the system, and meeting the flexibility needs of the grid based on giving full play to the demand response of users and energy stepping utilization. It is also necessary to further integrate users, distributed energy systems, and distribution grids, break through their respective dynamic response boundaries, and develop optimal operation strategies for systems with different timescale dynamic responses. In the future, the cluster of distributed energy systems will become an effective supplement to centralized energy production, which requires the development of intelligent, autonomous, coordinated and reliable distributed regulation and control technologies to achieve global stability and optimal regional operation of the cluster of distributed energy systems.
Disturbance analysis and control methods
The distributed energy system’s safe and stable operation is the foundation of optimal control [64, 71]. Recently, more literature has developed disturbance analysis and stability control methods from the power system perspective. For example, Hasan et al. [228] used the sensitivity analysis method to assess the influence of parameters on the stability of the power system under small perturbations. Based on the calculation results, it was possible to derive several parameters that had the greatest degree of influence on the system after a disturbance, thus focusing on adjusting and optimizing parameters in this category. Wang et al. [229] used the energy hub concept to model the energy coupling component divided into three submodules according to the supply, conversion, and demand of energy and performed multienergy flow calculations for three representative disturbances in the energy hub, such as emergency gas supply stoppage on the supply side, boiler failure and sudden increase in demand, and derived the corresponding changes of each energy flow of the system under three disturbance cases. Wang et al. [230] proposed an individualbased model (IBM) capable of disassembling largescale heterogeneous complex systems and applied it to the multitime scale dynamic analysis of integrated energy systems. Using the IBM model, the literature presented a phased dynamic analysis of the propagation mechanism of four typical disturbances: stable operation phase, disturbance generation phase, power side response phase, pipe network response phase, and multienergy flow balance and the next stable operation phase. This modeling method reduced the computation time and improved the efficiency of interaction analysis compared with the traditional stepbystep analysis method. Wang et al. [231] proposed a systemlevel stability assessment model based on critical energy functions to explore the small disturbance stability region in order to maintain a stable and healthy energy network. The small disturbance stability region was estimated based on the energy function theory, and the modeling process was optimized with a big data approximation analysis algorithm, which reduced the computational complexity with higher accuracy.
Meanwhile, from the thermal disturbance perspective in a thermal system, Yao et al. [232] introduced a potential circuit analysis technique that is an analysis tool to improve the safety and reliability of circuit control systems and analyzed the prospect and implementation of the potential analysis method applied to thermal systems. After improving the traditional potential analysis method applied to mass flow, Yao et al. [233] proposed a network tree topology model based on power flow to describe the heat transfer process in thermal systems by introducing the concept of power flow/heat current. According to the design function of the thermal system, all possible heat transfer paths of the thermal system were obtained by defining the heat source and cold source of the system as the starting point and the ending point of the path search, respectively. The application of this method could target the possible perturbations and other situations that make the system unstable in the multienergy flow system. O’Dwyer et al. [234] proposed an identification method incorporating artificial intelligence for unmeasured perturbations in buildinglevel distributed energy systems. The quantized particle swarm optimization algorithm was first used for finding and identifying the disturbances. Finally, the identification results of the particle swarm algorithm were refined by using principal component analysis to derive the main disturbances. Sun et al. [235] proposed a robust coordinated optimization method for distributed energy systems by considering thermal inertia uncertainty, which provided a feasible method for coordinated multienergy regulation of distributed energy systems containing perturbations. Moon [236] investigated the adaptability of a residentialbased distributed system to changes in environmental parameters through a thermal control logic based on artificial neural networks (ANN). The adaptability and stability of the approach was demonstrated by incorporating the predictive function of the neural network into the conventional control logic and testing the system for disturbances in relevant parameters, such as changes in internal loads and changes in climatic conditions. The proposed ANNbased predictive and adaptive thermal control method had shown its potential to be used for the regulation of small distributed multienergy systems.
Besides, The coupling between different energy sources in a distributed energy system will lead to the propagation of disturbances or faults from the nonpower subsystem to the power system through the multienergy coupling devices [64, 71]. Therefore, from the coupling perspective of electricity and heat, Jiang et al. [237] proposed the concept, method, and implementation of an integrated energy network security region to assess the reliability and security of the system by considering the multienergy flow coupling effects. The method considered the operational constraints of multienergy networks, including heat, voltage, pressure, temperature, and transmission capacity limitations in distributed energy. A hyperplanebased segmental approximation method was proposed to approximate the safety region boundary, and a general energy flow optimization model was developed. The proposed general optimization method based on the track solution and the hyperplanebased segmental approximation method could construct heterogeneous types of multidimensional safe regions in distributed energy with high computational accuracy and efficiency. Thilker et al. [238] developed a perturbed shortterm prediction model based on advanced physical description and statistical methods to predict changes in cloud cover, solar radiation, net radiation, and ambient air temperature, respectively. The stochastic differential equations and shortterm perturbation prediction methods were also integrated into the model predictive control (MPC) scheme, which enabled MPC to optimize better the control of distributed energy systems incorporating renewable energy sources. Jin et al. [239] established a distributed energy system model containing a microcombustion engine, photovoltaic, lithium battery, and ground source heat pump. Then this paper analyzed the dynamic characteristics of electric and thermal energy flow in it. After that, the traditional MPC control strategy was improved, and a centralized MPC control strategy with a dualinput and dualoutput control system is proposed, which could cope with the electric and thermal load fluctuations and renewable energy side disturbances and regulate the electric and thermal energy flows separately, and then became a systemlevel disturbance coping control scheme. Based on the operation mechanism and scheduling mode of distributed energy system, Huang et al. [240] developed a discrete system model for optimal control of the system under the disturbance input. According to this model, an accurate and fast optimal control algorithm was designed to plan and allocate the optimal operating power of distributed energy devices. Different disturbance inputs were used and compared with the classical optimization algorithm Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization in an example analysis. The results showed that the optimal control model could effectively suppress the disturbance effects and obtain fast and satisfactory control results.
In conclusion, the proposed stability analysis methods and control strategies rely on a single energy flow perspective for the stability analysis and overall control of distributed energy systems under multiple scenarios and variable operating conditions. The distributed energy system is a complex dynamical system with high dimensionality, multiscale, strong stochasticity, and strong nonlinearity. The disturbance concept, occurrence, and propagation forms in electric, thermal, and gas subsystems are also different in each subsystem. For example, disturbances in the power distribution network refer to power fluctuations, voltage variations, and impulse disturbances. Disturbances in the thermal network refer to hydraulic and thermal conditions, such as fluctuations in the work mass flow and temperature. Disturbances are affected by the propagation medium in each energy system, and the propagation speed varies. Such as, the disturbance time scale in power systems is usually in the millisecond, microsecond level. In thermal systems, the disturbance occurs with the work mass propagation, and the speed is slow. The time scale is usually in the minutes, hourly, or daily. Moreover, the causes of perturbations are diverse, such as input perturbations, external change perturbations, internal system change perturbations, modeling inaccuracies, and small perturbations, which make the mechanism of system perturbation propagation evolution more complex. In addition, the electric and thermal networks do not operate separately in distributed energy systems. They can be coupled by electric and thermal conversion devices, resulting in the crosssystem propagation of perturbations in the thermal and electric distribution networks that can follow the transformation of energy forms. Therefore, future research should fully consider the dynamic characteristics of multienergy conversion and transmission of electricity, heat, and gas based on a unified physical model, study the crosspropagation mechanism of disturbances in different energy conversion and transmission components in the system, propose stability analysis methods and coordinated control strategies for distributed energy systems, and guarantee the safe, reliable and efficient operation of the system under multiple operating conditions.
Conclusions
The vigorous development of distributed energy systems based on renewable energy and clean fossil fuels is one of the significant ways to achieve the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality [241]. This review first introduces the essential components and characteristics of distributed energy systems. According to different definitions, distributed energy systems are generally arranged on the consumer side and mainly consist of units for energy generation, energy transfer, and energy storage, which are capable of offgrid or gridconnected operation through energy management systems. The composition and application of distributed energy systems are characterized by multienergy complementarity, multienergy flow synergy, multicomponent coupling, multiscenario coexistence, and multiple time scales (nM characteristics). The review provides a systematic and macroscopic understanding of current research on distributed energy systems from three levels: system planning and evaluation, modeling and optimization, and operation and control. Figure 11 presents the research focus on different approaches in distributed energy systems. Among them, the planning of distributed energy systems requires integrated technical, economic, environmental, and social factors for comprehensive and optimal planning under regional environmental, resource, and policy constraints, considering the system’s equipment performance, process architecture, capacity configuration, and sourceload uncertainty. In terms of modeling and optimization, energy hub, thermodynamics analysis, heat current, and datadriven methods are introduced to model distributed energy systems. Finally, regarding system operation and control, the optimal system operation and scheduling strategies, disturbance analysis, and related control methods are discussed from the perspective of power and thermal systems.
In view of the aforementioned research and needs at different levels, distributed energy systems have become the frontier of interdisciplinary research in engineering thermophysics, electrical engineering, control science and engineering, economic and social sciences [126]. Improvement of comprehensive utilization efficiency is always charming and desirable for the development and applications of distributed energy systems. From the view of system composition, clarifying the dynamic characteristics and common laws of different energy conversion, storage, and transmission components from the physical level depends on a homogeneous modeling method for reconstructing the mathematical models of each component in different time scales and proposing efficient solution strategies. Meanwhile, in terms of the application level, the dynamic interaction characteristics of sourcenetworkload are significant for proposing stability analysis methods and coordinated control strategies for distributed energy systems to ensure safe, stable, efficient, and flexible operation.
Energy conversion is imperative for utilizing renewable energy sources and clean fossil fuels in distributed energy systems. The integration of thermal and nonthermal systems can realize the multienergy complementary utilization of the system. Further consideration of the dynamic process of thermal system energy conversion from a thermodynamic perspective at multiple time scales and the energy conversion characteristics and flexible requirements of nonthermal systems are necessary. Entropy and exergy can be used to analyze some advanced thermal cycles in future distributed energy systems, but with some challenges due to the integration of renewable energy. Besides, electricity, heating, cooling, and gas are the main energy demands for consumers. The integration and interaction of power distribution, heat, and fluid networks increase the difficulties of capturing complex system operations and network constraints due to the multiparameters, strong coupling, multiscale, and nonlinear characteristics. Therefore, unifying mass transport with the transport processes of different energy grades (electricity, heating with different temperatures) and constructing unified intrinsic equations are the basis for the synergy of multiple energy flows in distributed energy systems. Besides, quantifying user behavior is another important research direction for system modeling due to the impact of user behavior, participation, and acceptability on system modeling and operation. Incorporating user behavior into the system model provides an alternative energybalanced relationship different from the realtime rigid energy demand balance characteristics. Meanwhile, considering the intrinsic characteristics and differences of different forms of energy transmission and storage ways is necessary for deeply exploiting the regulating ability of the system to realize efficient conversion and energy accommodation utilization from the interaction perspective of efficiency and flexibility. For the multiscenario applications of distributed energy systems, their related and appropriate resolution is also necessary to meet the modeling and computational demands, such as technical detail, temporal and spatial resolutions, and stakeholder’s behavior presence [120]. The decentralized control architecture is also significant for the coordination control and flexile operation of distributed energy systems by developing and using the new blockchain technology [19, 63, 64, 71]. Meanwhile, With the increase in system complexity, model granularity, and data resolution, state estimation and online processing and analysis of operational data of distributed energy systems need to be further developed and studied for optimal energy management and scheduling.
Consequently, distributed energy systems are complex in composition and involve many physical processes, and it is difficult for a single theory and method to fully realize the comprehensive analysis of the system. More research is still needed to propose new research paradigms for planning, modeling, optimization and control from a multidisciplinary, multiperspective and multidisciplinary deep intersection perspective, which is crucial and significant for the development and application of distributed energy systems.
Availability of data and materials
The data and material analyzed in this current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
 AC:

Air conditioner
 AFC:

Alkaline fuel cell
 AHP:

Analytic hierarchy process
 ANN:

Artificial neural networks
 CHP:

Combined heat and power
 DMFC:

Direct methanol fuel cell
 EH:

Energy hubs
 EMS:

Energy management system
 FC:

Fuel cell
 GB:

Gas boiler
 GRA:

Grey relation analysis
 HDI:

Human development index
 HP:

Heat pump
 HS:

Heat storage
 HVAC:

Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
 IES:

Integrated energy systems
 MCFC:

Molten carbonate fuel cell
 MG:

Microgrid
 MILP:

Mixedinteger linear programming
 MPC:

Model predictive control
 PAFC:

Phosphoric acid fuel cell
 PCG:

Prosumer community group
 PCS:

Power conversion system
 PEMFC:

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell
 PM2.5:

Fine particulate matter
 PV:

Photovoltaic
 SOFC:

Solid oxide fuel cell
 VPP:

Virtual power plant
 WP:

Wind power
References
Chilvers J, Bellamy R, Pallett H, Hargreaves T (2021) A systemic approach to mapping participation with lowcarbon energy transitions. Nat Energy 6(3):250–259
Mercure JF, Salas P, Vercoulen P, Semieniuk G, Lam A, Pollitt H, Holden P, Vakilifard N, Chewpreecha U, Edwards N (2021) Reframing incentives for climate policy action. Nat Energy 6(12):1133–1143
Berjawi A, Walker S, Patsios C, Hosseini S (2021) An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: a whole energy systems approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 145:111163
Han J, Ouyang L, Xu Y, Zeng R, Kang S, Zhang G (2016) Current status of distributed energy system in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:288–297
Mancarella P (2014) MES (multienergy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy 65:1–17
Perera A, Nik VM, Chen D, Scartezzini JL, Hong T (2020) Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat Energy 5(2):150–159
Alanne K, Saari A (2006) Distributed energy generation and sustainable development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 10(6):539–558
Yang Y (2010) Distributed energy system. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing
Mehigan L, Deane J, Gallachóir BÓ, Bertsch V (2018) A review of the role of distributed generation (DG) in future electricity systems. Energy 163:822–836
Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan Z, Wang M, Wang F, Li S, Yin Z, Huang L, Fu Y, Li L (2021a) Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. The Innovation 2(4):100180
Clarke J, Searle J (2021) Active building demonstrators for a lowcarbon future. Nat Energy 6(12):1087–1089
Koirala BP, Koliou E, Friege J, Hakvoort RA, Herder PM (2016) Energetic communities for community energy: a review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:722–744
Manfren M, Caputo P, Costa G (2011) Paradigm shift in urban energy systems through distributed generation: methods and models. Appl Energy 88(4):1032–1048
Basak P, Chowdhury S, nee Dey SH, Chowdhury S (2012) A literature review on integration of distributed energy resources in the perspective of control, protection and stability of microgrid. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(8):5545–5556
Chen Q, Wang W, Lu J, Ding J (2013) An overview of the political, technical and economical aspects of gasfired distributed energy system in China. Appl Therm Eng 52(2):531–537
Nosratabadi SM, Hooshmand RA, Gholipour E (2017) A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:341–363
Mavromatidis G, Orehounig K, Carmeliet J (2018a) A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 88:258–277
Fonseca JD, Camargo M, Commenge JM, Falk L, Gil ID (2019) Trends in design of distributed energy systems using hydrogen as energy vector: a systematic literature review. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(19):9486–9504
Ahl A, Yarime M, Tanaka K, Sagawa D (2019) Review of blockchainbased distributed energy: implications for institutional development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 107:200–211
Guerrero J, Gebbran D, Mhanna S, Chapman AC, Verbič G (2020) Towards a transactive energy system for integration of distributed energy resources: home energy management, distributed optimal power flow, and peertopeer energy trading. Renew Sust Energ Rev 132:110000
Khanna TM, Baiocchi G, Callaghan M, Creutzig F, Guias H, Haddaway NR, Hirth L, Javaid A, Koch N, Laukemper S (2021) A multicountry metaanalysis on the role of behavioural change in reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions in residential buildings. Nat Energy 6(9):925–932
Borges CLT (2012) An overview of reliability models and methods for distribution systems with renewable energy distributed generation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(6):4008–4015
Martinot E, Kristov L, Erickson JD (2015) Distribution system planning and innovation for distributed energy futures. Curr Sustain Renew Energy Rep 2(2):47–54
Christakou K (2016) A unified control strategy for active distribution networks via demand response and distributed energy storage systems. Sustain Energy Grids Networks 6:1–6
Ho WS, Macchietto S, Lim JS, Hashim H, Muis ZA, Liu WH (2016) Optimal scheduling of energy storage for renewable energy distributed energy generation system. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:1100–1107
Ma W, Fang S, Liu G (2017b) Hybrid optimization method and seasonal operation strategy for distributed energy system integrating CCHP, photovoltaic and ground source heat pump. Energy 141:1439–1455
Ma W, Fang S, Liu G, Zhou R (2017c) Modeling of district load forecasting for distributed energy system. Appl Energy 204:181–205
Su P, Tian X, Wang Y, Deng S, Zhao J, An Q, Wang Y (2017) Recent trends in load forecasting technology for the operation optimization of distributed energy system. Energies 10(9):1303
Twaha S, Ramli MAM (2018) A review of optimization approaches for hybrid distributed energy generation systems: offgrid and gridconnected systems. Sustain Cities Soc 41:320–331
von Wirth T, Gislason L, Seidl R (2018) Distributed energy systems on a neighborhood scale: reviewing drivers of and barriers to social acceptance. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:2618–2628
Khan MW, Wang J, Ma M, Xiong L, Li P, Wu F (2019) Optimal energy management and control aspects of distributed microgrid using multiagent systems. Sustain Cities Soc 44:855–870
Wolsink M (2020) Distributed energy systems as common goods: sociopolitical acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids. Renew Sust Energ Rev 127:109841
Alzahrani AM, Zohdy M, Yan B (2021) An overview of optimization approaches for operation of hybrid distributed energy systems with photovoltaic and diesel turbine generator. Electr Power Syst Res 191:106877
McIlwaine N, Foley AM, Morrow DJ, Al Kez D, Zhang C, Lu X, Best RJ (2021) A stateoftheart technoeconomic review of distributed and embedded energy storage for energy systems. Energy 229:120461
Burke MJ, Stephens JC (2018) Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review. Energy Res Soc Sci 35:78–93
Jin H, Sui J (2016) Transformational technology innovation—distributed energy system. Distributed Energy Resources 1(1):1–5
Pfenninger S, Hawkes A, Keirstead J (2014) Energy systems modeling for twentyfirst century energy challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:74–86
Reitz R, Ogawa H, Payri R, Fansler T, Kokjohn S, Moriyoshi Y, Agarwal A, Arcoumanis D, Assanis D, Bae C (2020) IJER editorial: the future of the internal combustion engine. SAGE Publications Sage UK, London, pp 3–10
Fiore M, Magi V, Viggiano A (2020) Internal combustion engines powered by syngas: a review. Appl Energy 276:115415
Wang J, Wang H, Fan Y (2018c) Technoeconomic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering 4(3):352–360
Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Safari A (2012) Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(1):981–989
Arsalis A (2019) A comprehensive review of fuel cellbased microcombinedheatandpower systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 105:391–414
Kirubakaran A, Jain S, Nema R (2009) A review on fuel cell technologies and power electronic interface. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(9):2430–2440
Dai J, Yang X, Wen L (2018a) Development of wind power industry in China: a comprehensive assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 97:156–164
Hong YY, Rioflorido CLPP (2019) A hybrid deep learningbased neural network for 24h ahead wind power forecasting. Appl Energy 250:530–539
Ren G, Liu J, Wan J, Guo Y, Yu D (2017) Overview of wind power intermittency: impacts, measurements, and mitigation solutions. Appl Energy 204:47–65
Gong J, Li C, Wasielewski MR (2019) Advances in solar energy conversion. Chem Soc Rev 48(7):1862–1864
Lewis NS (2016) Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science 351(6271):aad1920
Liu T, Liu Q, Lei J, Sui J, Jin H (2018a) Solarclean fuel distributed energy system with solar thermochemistry and chemical recuperation. Appl Energy 225:380–391
Tušek J, Engelbrecht K, Eriksen D, Dall’Olio S, Tušek J, Pryds N (2016) A regenerative elastocaloric heat pump. Nat Energy 1(10):1–6
Huang S, Zuo W, Lu H, Liang C, Zhang X (2019a) Performance comparison of a heating tower heat pump and an airsource heat pump: a comprehensive modeling and simulation study. Energy Convers Manag 180:1039–1054
Luo J, Rohn J, Xiang W, Bertermann D, Blum P (2016) A review of ground investigations for ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems. Energy Buildings 117:160–175
Zhang Q, Zhang L, Nie J, Li Y (2017) Technoeconomic analysis of air source heat pump applied for space heating in northern China. Appl Energy 207:533–542
Qin X, Sun H, Shen X, Guo Y, Guo Q, Xia T (2019) A generalized quasidynamic model for electricheat coupling integrated energy system with distributed energy resources. Appl Energy 251:113270
Zhang M, Wu Q, Wen J, Lin Z, Fang F, Chen Q (2021a) Optimal operation of integrated electricity and heat system: a review of modeling and solution methods. Renew Sust Energ Rev 135:110098
Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND (2013) Optimal distributed generation placement in power distribution networks: models, methods, and future research. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(3):3420–3428
Mulenga E, Bollen MH, Etherden N (2020) A review of hosting capacity quantification methods for photovoltaics in lowvoltage distribution grids. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 115:105445
Prakash P, Khatod DK (2016) Optimal sizing and siting techniques for distributed generation in distribution systems: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:111–130
Ehsan A, Yang Q (2018) Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: a review of analytical techniques. Appl Energy 210:44–59
Ahmed A, Mancarella P (2014) Strategic technoeconomic assessment of heat network options for distributed energy systems in the UK. Energy 75:182–193
Dai Y, Chen L, Min Y, Chen Q, Hao J, Hu K, Xu F (2018b) Dispatch model for CHP with pipeline and building thermal energy storage considering heat transfer process. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 10(1):192–203
Liu B, Meng K, Dong ZY, Wei W (2019a) Optimal dispatch of coupled electricity and heat system with independent thermal energy storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(4):3250–3263
Huang W, Zhang N, Cheng Y, Yang J, Wang Y, Kang C (2020) Multienergy networks analytics: standardized modeling, optimization, and low carbon analysis. Proc IEEE 108(9):1411–1436
Wang D, Zhang X, Qu K, Yu T, Pan Z, Liu Q (2018b) Pareto tribe evolution with equilibriumbased decision for multiobjective optimization of multiple home energy management systems. Energy Buildings 159:11–23
Zhou Y, Gu C, Wu H, Song Y (2017) An equivalent model of gas networks for dynamic analysis of gaselectricity systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(6):4255–4264
Hall PJ, Bain EJ (2008) Energystorage technologies and electricity generation. Energy Policy 36(12):4352–4355
Liu Z, Fan G, Sun D, Wu D, Guo J, Zhang S, Yang X, Lin X, Ai L (2022) A novel distributed energy system combining hybrid energy storage and a multiobjective optimization method for nearly zeroenergy communities and buildings. Energy 239:122577
Kousksou T, Bruel P, Jamil A, El Rhafiki T, Zeraouli Y (2014) Energy storage: applications and challenges. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 120:59–80
Sameti M, Haghighat F (2018) Integration of distributed energy storage into netzero energy district systems: optimum design and operation. Energy 153:575–591
Yuan J, Cui C, Xiao Z, Zhang C, Gang W (2020b) Performance analysis of thermal energy storage in distributed energy system under different load profiles. Energy Convers Manag 208:112596
Wang D, Liu L, Jia H, Wang W, Zhi Y, Meng Z, Zhou B (2018a) Review of key problems related to integrated energy distribution systems. CSEE J Power Energy Systems 4(2):130–145
Li H, Zhang C, Sun B (2022a) Deep integration planning of sustainable energies in district energy system and distributed energy station. Renew Sust Energ Rev 154:111892
Zhou Z, Zhang J, Liu P, Li Z, Georgiadis MC, Pistikopoulos EN (2013) A twostage stochastic programming model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems. Appl Energy 103:135–144
Ren H, Gao W (2010) A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems. Appl Energy 87(3):1001–1014
Mehleri ED, Sarimveis H, Markatos NC, Papageorgiou LG (2013) Optimal design and operation of distributed energy systems: application to Greek residential sector. Renew Energy 51:331–342
Bracco S, Dentici G, Siri S (2016) DESOD: a mathematical programming tool to optimally design a distributed energy system. Energy 100:298–309
Huang W, Zhang N, Yang J, Wang Y, Kang C (2019b) Optimal configuration planning of multienergy systems considering distributed renewable energy. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(2):1452–1464
Liu J, Xu Z, Wu J, Liu K, Guan X (2021a) Optimal planning of distributed hydrogenbased multienergy systems. Appl Energy 281:116107
Wouters C, Fraga ES, James AM (2015) An energy integrated, multimicrogrid, MILP (mixedinteger linear programming) approach for residential distributed energy system planning – a south Australian casestudy. Energy 85:30–44
Yang Y, Zhang S, Xiao Y (2015) An MILP (mixed integer linear programming) model for optimal design of districtscale distributed energy resource systems. Energy 90:1901–1915
Bai L, Jiang T, Li F, Chen H, Li X (2018) Distributed energy storage planning in soft open point based active distribution networks incorporating network reconfiguration and DG reactive power capability. Appl Energy 210:1082–1091
Bozorgavari SA, Aghaei J, Pirouzi S, Nikoobakht A, Farahmand H, Korpås M (2020) Robust planning of distributed battery energy storage systems in flexible smart distribution networks: a comprehensive study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 123:109739
Mao J, Jafari M, Botterud A (2022) Planning lowcarbon distributed power systems: evaluating the role of energy storage. Energy 238:121668
Pirouzi S, Zaghian M, Aghaei J, Chabok H, Abbasi M, Norouzi M, Shafiekhah M, Catalão JPS (2022) Hybrid planning of distributed generation and distribution automation to improve reliability and operation indices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 135:107540
Falke T, Krengel S, Meinerzhagen AK, Schnettler A (2016) Multiobjective optimization and simulation model for the design of distributed energy systems. Appl Energy 184:1508–1516
Wu Q, Ren H, Gao W, Ren J (2016b) Multiobjective optimization of a distributed energy network integrated with heating interchange. Energy 109:353–364
Wang J, Yang Y, Sui J, Jin H (2016) Multiobjective energy planning for regional natural gas distributed energy: a case study. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 28:418–433
Jing R, Zhu X, Zhu Z, Wang W, Meng C, Shah N, Li N, Zhao Y (2018) A multiobjective optimization and multicriteria evaluation integrated framework for distributed energy system optimal planning. Energy Convers Manag 166:445–462
Davoudi M, Jooshaki M, MoeiniAghtaie M, Barmayoon MH, Aien M (2022) Developing a multiobjective multilayer model for optimal design of residential complex energy systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 138:107889
Ahmadi B, Ceylan O, Ozdemir A (2021) A multiobjective optimization evaluation framework for integration of distributed energy resources. J Energy Storage 41:103005
Wang M, Yu H, Lin X, Jing R, He F, Li C (2020a) Comparing stochastic programming with posteriori approach for multiobjective optimization of distributed energy systems under uncertainty. Energy 210:118571
Fonseca JD, Commenge JM, Camargo M, Falk L, Gil ID (2021a) Multicriteria optimization for the design and operation of distributed energy systems considering sustainability dimensions. Energy 214:118989
Mu Y, Chen W, Yu X, Jia H, Hou K, Wang C, Meng X (2020) A doublelayer planning method for integrated community energy systems with varying energy conversion efficiencies. Appl Energy 279:115700
Wang Y, Huang F, Tao S, Ma Y, Ma Y, Liu L, Dong F (2022) Multiobjective planning of regional integrated energy system aiming at exergy efficiency and economy. Appl Energy 306:118120
Balderston F (1977) Distributed Energy Systems in California's Future: A Preliminary Report Volume 2
Mukhopadhyay B, Das D (2020) Multiobjective dynamic and static reconfiguration with optimized allocation of PVDG and battery energy storage system. Renew Sust Energ Rev 124:109777
Wen Q, Liu G, Rao Z, Liao S (2020a) Applications, evaluations and supportive strategies of distributed energy systems: a review. Energy Buildings 225:110314
Fonseca JD, Commenge JM, Camargo M, Falk L, Gil ID (2021b) Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: a multiobjective optimization approach. Appl Energy 290:116746
Liu L, Wang D, Hou K, Jia Hj, Li Sy (2020) Region model and application of regional integrated energy system security analysis. Appl Energy 260:114268
Sarabia Escriva EJ, Hart M, Acha S, Soto Francés V, Shah N, Markides CN (2022) Technoeconomic evaluation of integrated energy systems for heat recovery applications in food retail buildings. Appl Energy 305:117799
Wang X, Jin M, Feng W, Shu G, Tian H, Liang Y (2018d) Cascade energy optimization for waste heat recovery in distributed energy systems. Appl Energy 230:679–695
Wang X, Yang C, Huang M, Ma X (2018e) Multiobjective optimization of a gas turbinebased CCHP combined with solar and compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag 164:93–101
Gazda W, Stanek W (2016) Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system. Appl Energy 169:138–149
Wu Q, Ren H, Gao W, Ren J (2016a) Multicriteria assessment of building combined heat and power systems located in different climate zones: Japan–China comparison. Energy 103:502–512
Kumar R (2017) A critical review on energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and economic (4E) analysis of thermal power plants. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(1):283–292
Zhang X, Li H, Liu L, Bai C, Wang S, Song Q, Zeng J, Liu X, Zhang G (2018b) Optimization analysis of a novel combined heating and power system based on biomass partial gasification and ground source heat pump. Energy Convers Manag 163:355–370
Wen Q, Liu G, Wu W, Liao S (2020b) Genetic algorithmbased operation strategy optimization and multicriteria evaluation of distributed energy system for commercial buildings. Energy Convers Manag 226:113529
Knizley AA, Mago PJ, Smith AD (2014) Evaluation of the performance of combined cooling, heating, and power systems with dual power generation units. Energy Policy 66:654–665
GonzálezPino I, PérezIribarren E, CamposCelador A, LasHerasCasas J, Sala JM (2015) Influence of the regulation framework on the feasibility of a Stirling enginebased residential microCHP installation. Energy 84:575–588
Kang J, Wang S, Yan C (2019) A new distributed energy system configuration for cooling dominated districts and the performance assessment based on real site measurements. Renew Energy 131:390–403
Hou J, Wang J, Zhou Y, Lu X (2021) Distributed energy systems: multiobjective optimization and evaluation under different operational strategies. J Clean Prod 280:124050
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhang XT, Shi GH (2008) Integrated evaluation of distributed triplegeneration systems using improved grey incidence approach. Energy 33(9):1427–1437
Sadeghi A, Larimian T (2018) Sustainable electricity generation mix for Iran: a fuzzy analytic network process approach. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 28:30–42
Yang K, Ding Y, Zhu N, Yang F, Wang Q (2018) Multicriteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: a case study in Tianjin. Appl Energy 229:352–363
Dai H, Wang J, Li G, Chen W, Qiu B, Yan J (2019) A multicriteria comprehensive evaluation method for distributed energy system. Energy Procedia 158:3748–3753
Wang WY, Li HC, Hou XL, Zhang Q, Tian SF (2021b) Multicriteria evaluation of distributed energy system based on order relationantientropy weight method. Energies 14(1):16
Lu Z, Gao Y, Xu C (2021) Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type2 hesitant fuzzy environment. Energy 222:119860
Qin G, Zhang M, Yan Q, Xu C, Kammen DM (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: a case in China. Energy 228:120569
Zhao H, Li B, Lu H, Wang X, Li H, Guo S, Xue W, Wang Y (2022) Economyenvironmentenergy performance evaluation of CCHP microgrid system: a hybrid multicriteria decisionmaking method. Energy 240:122830
Fattahi A, Sijm J, Faaij A (2020) A systemic approach to analyze integrated energy system modeling tools: a review of national models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 133:110195
Adil AM, Ko Y (2016) Sociotechnical evolution of decentralized energy systems: a critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1025–1037
Pudjianto D, Ramsay C, Strbac G (2007) Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources. IET Renewable Power Generation 1(1):10–16
Soshinskaya M, CrijnsGraus WH, Guerrero JM, Vasquez JC (2014) Microgrids: experiences, barriers and success factors. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:659–672
Rathnayaka AD, Potdar VM, Dillon T, Kuruppu S (2015) Framework to manage multiple goals in communitybased energy sharing network in smart grid. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73:615–624
Li P, Li S, Yu H, Yan J, Ji H, Wu J, Wang C (2022b) Quantized eventdriven simulation for integrated energy systems with hybrid continuousdiscrete dynamics. Appl Energy 307:118268
Mancarella P, Andersson G, PeçasLopes J, Bell KR (2016) Modelling of integrated multienergy systems: drivers, requirements, and opportunities. In: 2016 power systems computation conference (PSCC). IEEE, pp 1–22
Geidl M, Andersson G (2007) Optimal power flow of multiple energy carriers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):145–155
Geidl M, Koeppel G, FavrePerrod P, Klockl B, Andersson G, Frohlich K (2006) Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power Energy Magazine 5(1):24–30
Li R, Wei W, Mei S, Hu Q, Wu Q (2019a) Participation of an energy hub in electricity and heat distribution markets: An MPEC approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(4):3641–3653
Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadiivatloo B, Hosseinzadeh M, Yousefi H, Khorasani ST (2018) Optimal management of energy hubs and smart energy hubs–a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 89:33–50
Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, MohammadiIvatloo B, Yousefi H (2017) Energy hub: from a model to a concept–a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:1512–1527
Liu Z, Guo J, Wu D, Fan G, Zhang S, Yang X, Ge H (2021b) Twophase collaborative optimization and operation strategy for a new distributed energy system that combines multienergy storage for a nearly zero energy community. Energy Convers Manag 230:113800
Ma T, Wu J, Hao L (2017a) Energy flow modeling and optimal operation analysis of the micro energy grid based on energy hub. Energy Convers Manag 133:292–306
Mostafavi Sani M, Mostafavi Sani H, Fowler M, Elkamel A, Noorpoor A, Ghasemi A (2022) Optimal energy hub development to supply heating, cooling, electricity and freshwater for a coastal urban area taking into account economic and environmental factors. Energy 238:121743
Li C, Wang N, Wang Z, Dou X, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Maréchal F, Wang L, Yang Y (2021a) Energy hubbased optimal planning framework for userlevel integrated energy systems: considering synergistic effects under multiple uncertainties. Appl Energy 307:118099
Qi H, Yue H, Zhang J, Lo KL (2021) Optimisation of a smart energy hub with integration of combined heat and power, demand side response and energy storage. Energy 234:121268
Moghaddam IG, Saniei M, Mashhour E (2016) A comprehensive model for selfscheduling an energy hub to supply cooling, heating and electrical demands of a building. Energy 94:157–170
Sobhani SO, Sheykhha S, Madlener R (2020) An integrated twolevel demandside management game applied to smart energy hubs with storage. Energy 206:118017
Rastegar M, FotuhiFiruzabad M (2015) Load management in a residential energy hub with renewable distributed energy resources. Energy Buildings 107:234–242
Yang H, You P, Shang C (2021) Distributed planning of electricity and natural gas networks and energy hubs. Appl Energy 282:116090
Wang Y, Zhang N, Kang C, Kirschen DS, Yang J, Xia Q (2017c) Standardized matrix modeling of multiple energy systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(1):257–270
Nikmehr N (2020) Distributed robust operational optimization of networked microgrids embedded interconnected energy hubs. Energy 199:117440
Chen C, Sun H, Shen X, Guo Y, Guo Q, Xia T (2019a) Twostage robust planningoperation cooptimization of energy hub considering precise energy storage economic model. Appl Energy 252:113372
Shams MH, Shahabi M, Kia M, Heidari A, Lotfi M, Shafiekhah M, Catalão JPS (2019) Optimal operation of electrical and thermal resources in microgrids with energy hubs considering uncertainties. Energy 187:115949
Lu X, Liu Z, Ma L, Wang L, Zhou K, Feng N (2020) A robust optimization approach for optimal load dispatch of community energy hub. Appl Energy 259:114195
Hu J, Liu X, Shahidehpour M, Xia S (2021) Optimal operation of energy hubs with largescale distributed energy resources for distribution network congestion management. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 12(3):1755–1765
Di Somma M, Yan B, Bianco N, Graditi G, Luh PB, Mongibello L, Naso V (2015) Operation optimization of a distributed energy system considering energy costs and exergy efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 103:739–751
Torio H, Angelotti A, Schmidt D (2009) Exergy analysis of renewable energybased climatisation systems for buildings: a critical view. Energy Buildings 41(3):248–271
Bai Z, Liu Q, Gong L, Lei J (2019a) Application of a mid−/lowtemperature solar thermochemical technology in the distributed energy system with cooling, heating and power production. Appl Energy 253:113491
Fang J, Liu Q, Liu T, Lei J, Jin H (2018) Thermodynamic evaluation of a distributed energy system integrating a solar thermochemical process with a doubleaxis tracking parabolic trough collector. Appl Therm Eng 145:541–551
TerésZubiaga J, Jansen S, Luscuere P, Sala J (2013) Dynamic exergy analysis of energy systems for a social dwelling and exergy based system improvement. Energy Buildings 64:359–371
Wang LX, Zheng JH, Li MS, Lin X, Jing ZX, Wu PZ, Wu QH, Zhou XX (2019a) Multitime scale dynamic analysis of integrated energy systems: An individualbased model. Appl Energy 237:848–861
Park S, Pandey A, Tyagi V, Tyagi S (2014) Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30:105–123
Yan B, Di Somma M, Bianco N, Luh PB, Graditi G, Mongibello L, Naso V (2016) Exergybased operation optimization of a distributed energy system through the energysupply chain. Appl Therm Eng 101:741–751
Wang X, Tian H, Yan F, Feng W, Wang R, Pan J (2020b) Optimization of a distributed energy system with multiple waste heat sources and heat storage of different temperatures based on the energy quality. Appl Therm Eng 181:115975
Zhang N, Wang Z, Lior N, Han W (2018a) Advancement of distributed energy methods by a novel high efficiency solarassisted combined cooling, heating and power system. Appl Energy 219:179–186
Zheng Z, Liu T, Liu Q, Lei J, Fang J (2021) A distributed energy system integrating SOFCMGT with midandlow temperature solar thermochemical hydrogen fuel production. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(38):19846–19860
Yuan J, Wu C, Xu X, Liu C (2021) Multimode analysis and comparison of four different carbon dioxidebased combined cooling and power cycles for the distributed energy system. Energy Convers Manag 244:114476
Wang Q, Li F, Tang Y, Xu Y (2019b) Integrating modeldriven and datadriven methods for power system frequency stability assessment and control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(6):4557–4568
Yang X, Zhao H (2019) Thermodynamic performance study of the SOFCSTIG distributed energy system fueled by LNG with CO2 recovery. Energy 186:115860
Guo J, Liu Z, Li Y, Wu D, Liu X, Zhang S, Yang X, Ge H, Zhang P (2022) Thermodynamic performance analyses and optimization design method of a novel distributed energy system coupled with hybridenergy storage. Renew Energy 182:1182–1200
Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2013) Thermodynamic modeling and multiobjective evolutionarybased optimization of a new multigeneration energy system. Energy Convers Manag 76:282–300
Li M, Mu H, Li N, Li H, Gui S, Chen X (2014) Optimal option of naturalgas district distributed energy systems for various buildings. Energy Buildings 75:70–83
Gao P, Dai Y, Tong Y, Dong P (2015) Energy matching and optimization analysis of waste to energy CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) system with exergy and energy level. Energy 79:522–535
Rezaie B, Reddy BV, Rosen MA (2015) Exergy analysis of thermal energy storage in a district energy application. Renew Energy 74:848–854
Yao E, Wang H, Wang L, Xi G, Maréchal F (2016) Thermoeconomic optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on smallscale compressed air energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 118:377–386
Han BC, Cheng WL, Li YY, Nian YL (2017) Thermodynamic analysis of heat driven combined cooling heating and power system (CCHP) with energy storage for long distance transmission. Energy Convers Manag 154:102–117
Bai Z, Liu Q, Gong L, Lei J (2019b) Performances evaluation of a mid−/lowtemperature solar thermochemical system with cooling, heating and power production. Energy Procedia 158:2278–2283
Coppitters D, Contino F, ElBaz A, Breuhaus P, De Paepe W (2020) Technoeconomic feasibility study of a solarpowered distributed cogeneration system producing power and distillate water: sensitivity and exergy analysis. Renew Energy 150:1089–1097
Zhang T, Zhao H, Du H, Wang H (2021b) Thermodynamic performance study of a novel cogeneration system combining solid oxide fuel cell, gas turbine, organic Rankine cycle with compressed air energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 249:114837
Cao Y, Dhahad HA, Togun H, ElShafay A, Alamri S, Rajhi AA, Anqi AE, Ibrahim BF (2022) Development and transient performance analysis of a decentralized gridconnected smart energy system based on hybrid solargeothermal resources; Technoeconomic evaluation. Sustain Cities Soc 76:103425
Lin L, Zhang L, Luo Y, Luo J, Chen C, Jiang L (2022) Highlyintegrated and costefficient Ammoniafueled fuel cell system for efficient power generation: a comprehensive system optimization and technoeconomic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 251:114917
Di Somma M, Yan B, Bianco N, Graditi G, Luh P, Mongibello L, Naso V (2017) Multiobjective design optimization of distributed energy systems through cost and exergy assessments. Appl Energy 204:1299–1316
Li H, Sun B, Zhang C (2021b) Capacity design of a distributed energy system based on integrated optimization and operation strategy of exergy loss reduction. Energy Convers Manag 231:113648
Hao J, Chen Q, Li X, Zhao T (2021) A correction factorbased general thermal resistance formula for heat exchanger design and performance analysis. J Therm Sci 30(3):892–901
Guo Z, Liu X, Tao W, Shah R (2010) Effectiveness–thermal resistance method for heat exchanger design and analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53(13):2877–2884
Guo Z, Zhu H, Liang X (2007) Entransy—a physical quantity describing heat transfer ability. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50(13):2545–2556
Chen Q, Hao J, Zhao T (2017) An alternative energy flow model for analysis and optimization of heat transfer systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 108:712–720
Hao J, Chen Q, Li X, Zhang M, Yuan F (2019a) A new modeling and analysis method of the indirect evaporative heat exchanger based on the heat current perspective. Appl Therm Eng 163:114331
Hao J, Ge Z, Chen Q, Li X, Du X (2019b) The coupled processcomponent modeling and optimization for heat exchanger of supercritical CO2 with property variation based on heat current method. Appl Therm Eng 168:114833
Li X, Chen Q, Hao JH, Chen X, He KL (2019b) Heat current method for analysis and optimization of a refrigeration system for aircraft environmental control system. Int J Refrig 106:163–180
Hao J, Ge W, Chen Q, He K, Luo H, Zhou G (2018a) Power flow methodbased integrated modeling and optimization for building heat transport and gas refrigeration system. J Energy Eng 144(5):04018060
He K, Chen Q, Liu Y, Hao J, Wang Y, Yuan Y (2019) A transient heat current model for dynamic performance analysis and optimal control of heat transfer system. Int J Heat Mass Transf 145:118767
Chen Q, Fu R, Xu Y (2015) Electrical circuit analogy for heat transfer analysis and optimization in heat exchanger networks. Appl Energy 139:81–92
Chen X, Chen Q, Chen H, Xu YG, Zhao T, Hu K, He KL (2019b) Heat current method for analysis and optimization of heat recoverybased power generation systems. Energy 189:116209
Chen X, Zhao T, Chen Q (2021b) An online parameter identification and realtime optimization platform for thermal systems and its application. Appl Energy 307:118199
Hao J, Chen Q, He K, Chen L, Dai Y, Xu F, Min Y (2020) A heat current model for heat transfer/storage systems and its application in integrated analysis and optimization with power systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 11(1):175–184
Hao J, Gou X, Wang S, Chen Q, Gao K (2022) Dynamic modeling and flexibility analysis of an integrated electrical and thermal energy system with the heat pumpthermal storage. Front Energy Res 10:817503
Chen Q, Zhao T (2017) Heat recovery and storage installation in largescale battery systems for effective integration of renewable energy sources into power systems. Appl Therm Eng 122:194–203
He KL, Chen Q, Ma H, Zhao T, Hao JH (2020a) An isomorphic multienergy flow modeling for integrated power and thermal system considering nonlinear heat transfer constraint. Energy 211:119003
Zhao T, Chen X, He KL, Chen Q (2021) A standardized modeling strategy for heat current methodbased analysis and simulation of thermal systems. Energy 217:119403
Hao L, Xu F, Chen Q, Wei M, Chen L, Min Y (2018b) A thermalelectrical analogy transient model of district heating pipelines for integrated analysis of thermal and power systems. Appl Therm Eng 139:213–221
Shen G, Yuan F, Li Y, Liu W (2019) The energy flow method for modeling and optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems. Energy Convers Manag 199:111958
Vidović D, Sutlović E, Majstrović M (2019) Steady state analysis and modeling of the gas compressor station using the electrical analogy. Energy 166:307–317
Li X, Chen Q, Chen X, He KL, Hao JH (2020) Graph theorybased heat current analysis method for supercritical CO2 power generation system. Energy 194:116911
Yuan F, Dong W, Shen G, Li Y, Liu W (2020a) Energy flowbased method for analysis and optimization of evaporative cooling and ventilation systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 146:118865
Shao W, Chen X, Zhao T, Chen Q (2020) Heat current model of solid granule cooling processes in moving packed beds and its applications. Chem Eng Res Des 156:384–390
Gou X, Chen Q, Sun Y, Ma H, Li BJ (2021) Holistic analysis and optimization of distributed energy system considering different transport characteristics of multienergy and component efficiency variation. Energy 228:120586
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Hao J, Pan H, Ni Y, Di J, Ge Z, Chen Q, Guo M (2021c) Modeling and operation optimization of an integrated ground source heat pump and solar PVT system based on heat current method. Sol Energy 218:492–502
Ma H, Chen Q, Hu B, Sun Q, Li T, Wang S (2021) A compact model to coordinate flexibility and efficiency for decomposed scheduling of integrated energy system. Appl Energy 285:116474
Jain RK, Qin J, Rajagopal R (2017) Datadriven planning of distributed energy resources amidst sociotechnical complexities. Nat Energy 2(8):1–11
Mavromatidis G, Orehounig K, Carmeliet J (2018b) Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis for the optimal design of distributed energy systems. Appl Energy 214:219–238
Zhang Y, Wang J, Li Z (2019) Uncertainty modeling of distributed energy resources: techniques and challenges. Curr Sustain Renewable Energy Rep 6(2):42–51
Aliramezani M, Koch CR, Shahbakhti M (2022) Modeling, diagnostics, optimization, and control of internal combustion engines via modern machine learning techniques: a review and future directions. Prog Energy Combust Sci 88:100967
Mirnaghi MS, Haghighat F (2020) Fault detection and diagnosis of largescale HVAC systems in buildings using datadriven methods: a comprehensive review. Energy Buildings 229:110492
Odonkor P, Lewis K (2019) Datadriven Design of Control Strategies for distributed energy systems. J Mech Des 141(11):111404
Li X, Wen J (2014) Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:517–537
Alvarado DC, Acha S, Shah N, Markides CN (2016) A technology selection and operation (TSO) optimisation model for distributed energy systems: mathematical formulation and case study. Appl Energy 180:491–503
Chen L, Han Z, Zhao J, Wang W (2021a) Review of research of datadriven methods on operational optimization of integrated energy systems. Control Decision 36(2):283–294
Nikpey H, Assadi M, Breuhaus P (2013) Development of an optimized artificial neural network model for combined heat and power micro gas turbines. Appl Energy 108:137–148
Reynolds J, Ahmad MW, Rezgui Y, Hippolyte JL (2019) Operational supply and demand optimisation of a multivector district energy system using artificial neural networks and a genetic algorithm. Appl Energy 235:699–713
Xu X, Li K, Jia H, Yu X, Deng J, Mu Y (2016) Datadriven dynamic modeling of coupled thermal and electric outputs of microturbines. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(2):1387–1396
Du Y, Li F (2019) Intelligent multimicrogrid energy management based on deep neural network and modelfree reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(2):1066–1076
Cao D, Hu W, Zhao J, Zhang G, Zhang B, Liu Z, Chen Z, Blaabjerg F (2020) Reinforcement learning and its applications in modern power and energy systems: a review. J Modern Power Syst Clean Energy 8(6):1029–1042
Wang J, Lu Z, Li M, Lior N, Li W (2019d) Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental (4E) analysis of a distributed generation solarassisted CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) gas turbine system. Energy 175:1246–1258
Guo S, Liu Q, Sun J, Jin H (2018) A review on the utilization of hybrid renewable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:1121–1147
Gao J, Kang J, Zhang C, Gang W (2018) Energy performance and operation characteristics of distributed energy systems with district cooling systems in subtropical areas under different control strategies. Energy 153:849–860
Morstyn T, Hredzak B, Agelidis VG (2016) Control strategies for microgrids with distributed energy storage systems: An overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(4):3652–3666
Meng L, Sanseverino ER, Luna A, Dragicevic T, Vasquez JC, Guerrero JM (2016) Microgrid supervisory controllers and energy management systems: a literature review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1263–1273
Rahman HA, Majid MS, Jordehi AR, Kim GC, Hassan MY, Fadhl SO (2015) Operation and control strategies of integrated distributed energy resources: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:1412–1420
Tian L, Cheng L, Guo J, Wu K (2020) System modeling and optimal dispatching of multienergy microgrid with energy storage. J Modern Power Systems Clean Energy 8(5):809–819
Liu Y, Guo L, Wang C (2018b) A robust operationbased scheduling optimization for smart distribution networks with multimicrogrids. Appl Energy 228:130–140
Li Y, Yang W, He P, Chen C, Wang X (2019c) Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain. Appl Energy 248:390–405
Liu Z, Zeng M, Zhou H, Gao J (2021c) A planning method of regional integrated energy system based on the energy hub zoning model. IEEE Access 9:32161–32170
Liu W, Zhan J, Chung CY, Li Y (2019b) Dayahead optimal operation for multienergy residential systems with renewables. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 10(4):1927–1938
Zhu X, Zhan X, Liang H, Zheng X, Qiu Y, Lin J, Chen J, Meng C, Zhao Y (2020) The optimal design and operation strategy of renewable energyCCHP coupled system applied in five building objects. Renew Energy 146:2700–2715
Chen Y, Lin Y (2021) Combining modelbased and modelfree methods for stochastic control of distributed energy resources. Appl Energy 283:116204
Hasan KN, Preece R, Milanovic JV (2017) Priority ranking of critical uncertainties affecting smalldisturbance stability using sensitivity analysis techniques. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(4):2629–2639
Wang W, Wang D, Jia H, Chen Z, Tang J (2017b) A decomposed solution of multienergy flow in regional integrated energy systems considering operational constraints. Energy Procedia 105:2335–2341
Wang J, Chen Y, Lior N (2019c) Exergoeconomic analysis method and optimization of a novel photovoltaic/thermal solarassisted hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system. Energy Convers Manag 199:111945
Wang K, Li H, Feng Y, Tian G (2017a) Big data analytics for system stability evaluation strategy in the energy internet. IEEE Trans Industrial Inform 13(4):1969–1978
Yao SG, Wang GL (2012) Safety analysis for complex thermal system based on sneak path technique. Adv Mater Res 516517:187–194
Yao SG, Chen C, Xiao M, Jin MM (2019) Sneak analysis and its applications in thermal systems. Appl Therm Eng 149:213–219
O’Dwyer E, De Tommasi L, Kouramas K, Cychowski M, Lightbody G (2016) Modelling and disturbance estimation for model predictive control in building heating systems. Energy Buildings 130:532–545
Sun P, Teng Y, Chen Z (2021) Robust coordinated optimization for multienergy systems based on multiple thermal inertia numerical simulation and uncertainty analysis. Appl Energy 296:116982
Moon JW (2012) Performance of ANNbased predictive and adaptive thermalcontrol methods for disturbances in and around residential buildings. Build Environ 48:15–26
Jiang T, Zhang R, Li X, Chen H, Li G (2021) Integrated energy system security region: concepts, methods, and implementations. Appl Energy 283:116124
Thilker CA, Madsen H, Jørgensen JB (2021) Advanced forecasting and disturbance modelling for model predictive control of smart energy systems. Appl Energy 292:116889
Jin Y, Zhang J, Wu X, Shen J, Lee KY (2020b) Coordinated control for combined heat and power load of an integrated energy system. IFACPapersOnLine 53(2):13184–13189
Huang D, Zhou D, Hao J, Jia X, Huang D, Zhang C, Li T, Yan S, Wang C (2021) A discrete optimal control model for the distributed energy system considering multiple disturbance inputs. IET Generation Transmission Distribution 15(17):2513–2526
Jin H, Xuan Y, He Y, Guo L, Zhao T (2020a) Engineering thermophysics and sustainable energy development. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica 50(10):1245–1251
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52090062, 52176068) and the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51821004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JH organized the framework of the manuscript, drafted, and revised the manuscript. YY conceptualized the manuscript. CX participated in the revision of the manuscript. XD participated in the conceptualization of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Prof. Yongping Yang and Prof. Chao Xu are the editorial board members for Carbon Neutrality and were not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hao, J., Yang, Y., Xu, C. et al. A comprehensive review of planning, modeling, optimization, and control of distributed energy systems. Carb Neutrality 1, 28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979022000291
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979022000291
Keywords
 Distributed energy systems
 Planning
 Evaluation
 Modeling
 Optimization
 Operation
 Control