Abstract
Purpose of Review
Consumers increasingly demand for fruit products as a source of health-promoting compounds. However, fruits have a limited shelf life and their processing with thermal technologies significantly reduces their bioactive compounds. Instead, the application of a non-thermal technology like gamma irradiation could overcome this limitation. This review summarizes the latest research on the application of gamma irradiation on fruit processing.
Recent Findings
Evidence shows that gamma irradiation produces positive effects on fruit products: fungal and microbial (spoilage and pathogenic) disinfection and decontamination, deparasitization, and delayed ripening and senescence, leading to a longer shelf life without affecting their quality. Besides, this technology is also being tested as a stress elicitor to induce physiological defense mechanisms in plant fruit tissues.
Summary
The gamma irradiation process represents an opportunity to expand the export of value-added products over long distances, given its high efficiency to extend the shelf life of fruit products. Therefore, this paper provides a review of the currently available applications and effects of gamma irradiation in fruit processing. Considering the high cost associated to the refrigerated storage and transport of fruits, ionization is expected to give birth to a new era in the international trade of foods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gamma irradiation (GI) is a completely safe physical method of food preservation, applied in the form of ionizing radiation. It is also known as “cold sterilization” because of its capacity to inactivate microorganisms that may grow during the storage of food without any heat transfer, which makes it a non-thermal preservation technology [1].
In practice, this technology consists in exposing food products to the energy emitted by a radiation source for a certain period of time, so that the product absorbs a controlled amount of energy per unit of mass. In an industrial irradiation plant, the absorbed dose is controlled by a single parameter, the exposure time. Thus, with only one variable to control, the process has a high reliability and repeatability. One of the main advantages is that this technology does not generate industrial effluents. The products to be treated can be processed in their final packaging and consumed right after treatment without the need of quarantine [2, 3].
GI is used to achieve the following objectives: consumer health protection, phytosanitary control, extension of shelf life, and quality preservation of the final product. In terms of its proven applications, GI produces the following positive effects on fruit products: fungal and microbial (both spoilage and pathogenic) disinfection and decontamination, deparasitization, sprout inhibition, delayed ripening, and senescence, all these leading to a longer shelf life and eventually, the sterilization of foods [4].
GI proved effective to prevent the transmission of pathogenic diseases in humans. In addition, foods irradiated at doses considered as safe did not produce any teratogenic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic modifications, nor any significant nutritional change [5]. GI also represents a promising alternative to fumigation, making it possible to reduce or eliminate the use of chemical agents such as methyl bromide, a substance banned by the Montreal Protocol [6]. On the other hand, GI can be considered as an environmentally sustainable process, able to render healthy fruit products with extended shelf life, and no refrigeration requirement. Moreover, a significant amount of energy can be saved compared to other technologies, since no heat is used during the process.
Given that this technology is able to reduce food losses and waste along the entire supply chain, it is expected to represent an opportunity to increase the exportation of value-added products over long distances, given its high efficiency in extending the shelf life of fruit products. All these positive aspects considered, this paper provides a review of the currently available applications and effects of GI in fruit processing. The novelty of the work is to describe recent laboratory-scale research indicating that GI can be used to preserve functional bioactive compounds beneficial to human health, and as a stress elicitor to induce physiological defense mechanisms in plant fruit tissues.
Basic Principles of GI and Description of Its Effect on Food Components
Gamma irradiation is a food processing technology that involves exposing products to ionizing radiation in the form of gamma rays, emitted by radioactive isotopes such as cobalt-60 or cesium-137. Gamma rays are generated from photons, which are bundles of electromagnetic waves moving at the speed of light, located in the electromagnetic radiation spectrum, in the high-frequency and high-energy region. GI has an undulatory nature, lacking mass and charge, similar to ordinary light but with a shorter wavelength [7].
The technology exerts both direct and indirect physical, chemical, and biological effects on matter (Table 1). Radiation interacts with organic and inorganic compounds, generating excitations and electronic ionizations, the latter being the predominant effect. In this way, radiation can remove electrons from atoms or molecules, which will therefore become charged (ionized). These chemical species are usually unstable, and can rapidly react with their neighboring molecules, exciting and/or recombining them or producing fragmentations [8]. The chemical changes generated can affect the components of food and the cells of the organisms that may be present, with biological consequences at the level of cellular activity and functionality.
Water Radiolysis
GI can cause a wide range of chemical changes on the irradiated matter through direct and indirect effects. In terms of direct effects, radiation can act directly on food nutrients, ionizing them and breaking down molecules, giving rise, as in the case of water, to radicals that can combine each other differently from their original form. The main compounds that can undergo significant changes are proteins (including enzymes), carbohydrates, lipids, and vitamins.
Regarding the indirect effects, water plays a relevant role, since, in addition to its capacity to generate ions and free radicals — reactive oxygen species (ROS) — through ionization and radiolysis processes, it constitutes on average 80% of cellular matter (in fruit products it can attain almost 90% of its composition). In this way, radiation generates unstable radicals and reactive molecules with very short half-life (nanoseconds) [9]. However, this time frame is sufficient to combine with other components through oxidation, addition, and reduction reactions, initiating a series of competitive reactions as well as giving rise to new compounds by recombination of radicals.
Another factor influencing the effect of radiation is the potential presence of oxygen during irradiation, since the reducing agents formed in the radiolysis of water can react with this compound, leading to the formation of hydrogen peroxide. Therefore, the formation of this highly reactive compound in irradiated systems depends on the oxygen concentration. In this aspect, packaging in modified atmospheres can be useful to limit this process [1, 10].
Effect of GI on Microorganisms
GI affects microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts, and molds) by causing damage to the genetic material of the cells and interfering with the biological processes necessary for their development [11, 12]. GI must be applied to foods in an intensity range able to inactivate microorganisms without affecting the quality, safety, and functionality of the food components.
Radiation interacts with genetic material and other cellular elements such as proteins and membranes, which are essential for the survival of organisms. Hydrogen bridges of the inter-catenary bonds of deoxyribonucleic (DNA) and ribonucleic acids (RNA) are particularly sensitive to this treatment, so that the damage can prevent cell reproduction or even cause the death of microorganisms [13].
On the other hand, radiation interacts with other atoms and molecules in the cell, including water, giving rise to complex reactions, some of them generating ROS, which can damage nucleic acids. This effect is important in vegetative microorganisms, whose cytoplasm contains about 80% water [14]. Although irradiation can also damage other structures such as cell membranes and inactivate enzymes, leading to metabolic alteration, the main target of this type of treatment is DNA [15].
Effect of GI on Proteins
GI can modify the secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure of proteins, leading to changes in chain spatial arrangement and 3D configuration. Weak physical bonds such as hydrogen bridges or electrostatic bonds can be broken, bringing about protein aggregation and denaturation and, consequently, loss of protein functionality in aspects such as water holding capacity, rheological behavior, solubility, electrophoretic behavior, enzymatic activity, and immunological reactivity [10].
Enzymes are considerably more resistant to inactivation than microorganisms. In general, complete inactivation of enzymes requires a dose 5 to 10 times higher than that required for the destruction of microorganisms [16]. Despite this resistance, it is possible to reduce at low doses the enzyme activity to inhibit spoilage processes such as enzymatic browning, therefore extending the shelf life of fruit products. Besides, enzymes in solution can be also affected by the indirect effects of free radicals formed in the solvent.
Effect of GI on Carbohydrates
Because of their crystalline character, carbohydrates are sensitive to radiation, whose effect will depend on the dose applied: at low doses (up to 1.0 kGy), no breakdown of monomers such as glucose, fructose, and galactose will be provoked [17], while at medium and high doses, products such as H2, CO2, aldehydes, ketones, acids, and other carbohydrates can be generated [18].
In the presence of water, the direct and indirect action of radiation can cause oxidative degradation. The indirect action can provoke the attack of carbohydrates mainly by -OH radicals. These radicals would predominantly react with the hydrogen of the C-H bonds, forming H2O, while in the presence of oxygen, secondary reactions can be also evidenced.
In the case of oligosaccharides, different monosaccharides and products similar to those obtained by irradiation of simple sugars can be formed. High molecular weight polysaccharides will also degrade due to the cleavage of the glycosidic linkage, forming smaller carbohydrates such as glucose or maltose [10]. Irradiation of fruit products may result in softening and loss of texture because of the breakdown of cell wall materials such as pectins and celluloses [18]. However, this softening can be beneficial, for example, by increasing juice extraction yield, and/or decreasing drying and cooking times in dehydrated products.
Effect of GI on Vitamins
The stability of vitamins to radiation is important when analyzing the nutritional aspects. Some vitamins are considered susceptible to ionizing radiation [19]. Although in complex media such as food matrices, the effect of radiation can be reduced. The typical doses and irradiation conditions used in food can largely alter vitamin stability [20].
The wide variety of chemical structures of vitamins determines that the effect of radiation also presents a great variability, depending on each vitamin. Among the water-soluble vitamins, vitamin B1 (thiamine) is the most susceptible to radiation, while vitamin C or ascorbic acid is also unstable to radiation, producing, among other products, dehydroascorbic acid [21]. However, these vitamins in fruit products are quite stable to irradiation at low doses [22]. Other water-soluble vitamins prone to radiation are vitamins B2 (riboflavin) and B12 (cyanocobalamin) and biotin. Among the fat-soluble vitamins, vitamin E is the most radiosensitive, while vitamin D is the most resistant. Vitamin A is also relatively susceptible because the induced cis–trans isomerization can decrease its activity.
Application of GI on Fruit Processing
Among the various potential uses of irradiation in food technology, the most promising applications are the decontamination, disinfestation, and quality preservation of food products to extend their shelf life [7] (Fig. 1). These applications are detailed below (Table 2).
Disinfection and Preservation
GI is effective in disinfecting fruits by reducing their pathogenic load, extending their shelf life. For instance, in table grapes, irradiation proved effective to reduce the levels of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli by over 90%, significantly enhancing the microbiological safety of the produce [24]. In strawberries, irradiation was able to eliminate pathogenic bacteria like Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes, enhancing the safety of the produce [23]. This is crucial to minimize the risk of foodborne diseases. Other studies reported that an optimized radiation dose of 0.5 kGy inhibits in Ponkan fruit the growth of Penicillium digitatum, slowing down the rate of fruit decay [25•].
Insect and Pest Control
GI is a valuable tool for controlling insects and pests in fruit products. In fruits like oranges, irradiation can effectively eliminate larvae and eggs of fruit flies such as Ceratitis capitata, without causing damage to the tissues [27]. This preserves fruit quality and prevents pest proliferation. In papayas, the technology has been employed to prevent the proliferation of fruit flies such as Bactrocera dorsalis, preventing damage with suitable fruit quality [26].
Delay of Ripening
GI is applied to delay the ripening process in fruits like bananas. The irradiation of green bananas successfully inhibited ethylene production and the consequent formation of volatile compounds, delaying the ripening process. This allows for a longer storage and transportation period [29]. By irradiating mangoes, the production of ethylene and enzymes responsible for softening was reduced, extending the shelf life and maintaining fruit quality [28].
Reduction of Postharvest Losses
GI contributes to reducing postharvest losses in fruits by extending their shelf life [32]. In mangoes, irradiation can decrease the rate of weight loss and maintain the firmness, the color, and the sugar content of the product during storage [31]. This is essential for maintaining product quality and marketability. In table grapes, irradiation prevented the softening and shriveling of the fruit during storage, minimizing economic losses [30].
Pathogen Elimination
GI is an effective technique to eliminate pathogens in fruit products. In stone fruit such as peaches and plums, irradiation can inactivate bacteria like Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp., reducing the risk of foodborne diseases [34]. Another study reported the use of GI as an intervention treatment to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in freshly extracted apple juice [35••]. In blueberries, irradiation was used to reduce the levels of Salmonella spp., ensuring the safety of the fruit for consumption [33].
Improved Quality in Minimally Processed Fruit Products
In the case of minimally processed fruit products, irradiation can also serve the purpose of preservation [43]. The primary merit of employing this non-thermal technology relies on its proven effectiveness to maintain the quality and safety of the produce, preserving several compounds associated to quality attributes such as pigments, nutrients, bioactive compounds, and typical flavor [37, 44•]. When applied at optimized doses, GI proved effective to enhance the textural attributes of minimally processed fruit products [36], increase of their antioxidant capacity [38], and prevent physiological disorders by inhibiting the activity of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD). These enzymes’ activities are closely associated to deteriorative processes that lead to browning [7, 45].
GI as a Stress Elicitor Treatment
Low doses of gamma irradiation (0.5 kGy) were employed on papaya fruit as a way to induce ripening, rapidly attaining the fruit’s commercial firmness [39]. Nevertheless, when samples are exposed to higher radiation doses (> 1.0 kGy), the elevated levels of ROS generated caused damage to the functionality of cellular materials. From a commercial perspective, the application of low doses (0.1 and 0.3 kGy) on minimally processed peaches significantly increased the softening rate, an effect that could be appreciated by a consumers panel [40••]. This is particularly relevant since stone fruits are typically harvested while still unripe and firm, for a proper postharvest handling. Therefore, GI can help reach faster the optimal firmness values for consumption, rendering a homogeneous product at the precise time that it is required.
Induction of the Physiological Mechanism of Defense in Fruit Products
Considering that GI can be classified as an abiotic stress, it would be reasonable to anticipate a physiological response to this condition [46]. The cellular response to stress involves, among others, the induced synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSP), which serve as a protective mechanism against thermal and oxidative stresses. This protection helps prevent cell death and enhances stress tolerance [47]. This phenomenon, well-documented in the context of tumor therapy, can apparently play a role in protecting tumor cells from stress-induced lethal damage [48], and has also been observed in bacteria [49, 50], although it has been relatively unexplored in plant tissues.
Typically, HSP are synthesized in cells of tissues exposed at low levels of stress, and the increase in their relative concentration is a fundamental aspect of the natural response of any living tissue to thermal stress [51]. In fact, the overexpression of these proteins has been recognized as an early marker of the response to the exposure of different types of stress [52] and has been associated with the enhanced resilience of heat-treated products against chilling injury [53].
The overexpression of HSP was detected in minimally processed peaches exposed to low irradiation doses of 0.1 and 0.3 kGy, a relevant finding not previously documented in fruits [40••]. Therefore, HSP could be used in plant tissues as a biomarker of the stress brought about by exposure to irradiation, capable of preventing physiological damage. This physiological tolerance appears to be a part of the evolutionary adaptation of plant tissues to different external disturbances [54, 55]. A better understanding of these phenomena can contribute to optimize GI applications and enhance the production of high-quality fruit products with extended shelf life.
Compliance with Phytosanitary Regulations
GI has been used to comply with phytosanitary regulations in the international trade of fruits. In mangoes, irradiation can be employed to control pests like fruit flies and meet export requirements of certain countries [42]. In lychees, irradiation has been applied to control the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, ensuring fulfillment of export requirements [41].
Food irradiation has been approved by health and safety authorities in more than 57 countries, based on Codex Alimentarius standards. GI has a promising potential in developing countries, where food is often altered during the postharvest stage due to infrastructure deficiencies. In particular, Argentina has been a pioneer both in research studies and in keeping its legislation up to date. This technology is becoming increasingly relevant, given the modification of the Argentine Food Code [56] that promotes its application in different types of products, including fresh fruits. In this case, the maximum allowed doses are regulated according to the purpose of the irradiation: 1.0 kGy for delaying ripening, disinfecting insects, and quarantine control, and 2.5 kGy for controlling spoilage microorganisms. In June 2023, the Argentine regulatory agency (Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria — SENASA) approved, under Resolution 495/2023, minimum conditions for the application of ionizing energy treatments in regulated items for phytosanitary purposes: plant, plant product, storage place, packaging, means of transport, container, soil, and any other organism, object, or material capable of harboring or dispersing pests, which are considered commodities subjected to phytosanitary measures, especially in international transport [57].
It should be highlighted that the application of GI in food has been for long considered as a safe and effective treatment, not representing a health hazard, although the safety of their application for (reasonable) technological purposes must be demonstrated prior to their commercial use. The technology cannot be used as a substitute for good manufacturing practices (GMP) or good agricultural practices (GAP), or to reduce unacceptably high levels of microbial contamination [58].
Limitations and Prospective on the Use of GI
It is well known that the successful commercial implementation of any technology primarily depends on the availability of an adequate infrastructure. In this sense, one of the limitations of irradiation is the requirement of high capital costs, a minimum critical capacity, and a certain volume of product for the operation to be economically feasible. In contrast, it has the advantage of its low operating cost and minimal energy requirements [59]. In the case of fruit processing, it represents a treatment whose efficacy will depend on several factors, resulting in a high variability, which makes difficult its standardization. Thus, the successful implementation requires the establishment of cultivar aptitude; optimization of variables such as irradiation dose, degree of maturity, physiological state of the fruit, temperature, and atmosphere during and after treatment; and requirement of pre- and postharvest treatments, as well as the susceptibility and the potential microbial load in the product.
On the other hand, consumer attitudes towards irradiation are undergoing a positive change, mainly due to the development of pathogen resistance to various fungicides, the banner of some additives from the market, and the growing consumer demand for residue-free fresh produce. Therefore, this technology is considered as a promising alternative to improve the quality of fresh and fresh-cut produce. However, its acceptance still faces opposition from some consumers. This phenomenon could be due to economic and logistical factors, but also to psychological concerns of irradiation, due to the lack of public knowledge about the safety and wholesomeness of irradiated foods [4, 60].
Consequently, it would be necessary a more effective diffusion on the safety and the proven benefits of the application of irradiation in food. This could increase public understanding and lead to better consumer acceptance of irradiated products [61, 62]. In this sense, different initiatives have been proposed, such as the development of educational programs, which are expected to contribute to a better knowledge and attitude of consumers, and to positively influence the purchase decision of irradiated products [63].
Among the main factors that would contribute to a widespread application and economic feasibility of this technology, it can be mentioned the need of research funding from the government and industry, the development of new applications, a harmonized legislation, a better consumer attitude, and the practical solution of different economic and logistical issues associated to its use. Similarly to the use of genetic engineering technologies for food production, it is essential that the education of consumers and the compromise of professionals to solve the technological challenges be an integral part of future developments, together with the feasibility of industrial application of this technology.
A technology that was relatively obscure just two decades ago, is now firmly established itself as a key phytosanitary control, together with chemical and non-chemical methods, ensuring the biosafety of fresh fruit and vegetable products in international trade. The global trade of irradiated produce has increased to substantial levels. Irradiated fresh produce not only shows an appealing appearance and taste but also stands out for its absence of post-harvest treatment residues and affordability. This recognition has been widespread among growers, traders, retailers, and consumers in numerous countries.
However, the question remains: will phytosanitary irradiation continue to expand at its current rate? The primary hurdle for its further growth seems to be non-science-based regulations. On the flip side, the simplicity of the irradiation process, its effectiveness, and its low environmental impact are compelling advantages for the future. To fully harness these benefits, it is imperative to maintain and broaden international cooperation in this field.
In addition, it will be essential to invest in production capacities, as well as to satisfy the demanding requirements of the international trade for compliance with food safety regulations, quality standards and innovative technologies related to the Industry 4.0 model.
Conclusions
The application of gamma irradiation to preserve food products represents an emerging and promising research area. Several studies reported the effects of this technology combined with other technologies such as modified atmosphere to remove microbial growth, maintain the quality parameters, and extend the shelf life of fruit and minimally processed fruit products. Further research is necessary to better understand the underlying physiological and molecular mechanisms induced by gamma irradiation against stress, which will help establish optimum processing conditions able to preserve pigments, vitamins, and bioactive compounds, as well as maximize the induction of certain proteins associated to the defense mechanism in plant tissues. In this direction, official regulations should be harmonized, and the process standardized, to increase the international trade of fruits reaching more distant markets, while protecting the health of consumers and reducing losses and waste.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Barkai-Golan R, Follett PA: Postirradiation changes in fruits and vegetables. In: Osborn P (ed). Irradiation for quality improvement, microbial safety and phytosanitation of fresh produce. Elsevier, Academic Press; 2017.
Bonilla M. Irradiación de alimentos: qué es, cuándo y dónde se utiliza. El Español. 2015. Available from: https://www.elespanol.com/cocinillas/actualidad-gastronomica/20150331/irradiacion-alimentos-utiliza/22247783_0.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2023.
Prakash A, Ornelas-Paz JJ: Irradiation of fruits and vegetables. In: Elhadi MY (ed). Postharvest technology of perishable horticultural commodities. Duxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2019.
Mostafavi HA, Mirmajlessi SM, Fathollahi H: The potential of food irradiation: benefits and limitations. In: Eissa AA (ed). Trends in vital food and control engineering. InTech; 2012.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). La irradiación de los alimentos: una técnica para conservar y preservar la inocuidad de los alimentos. Organización Mundial de la Salud; 1989. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/36940. Accessed 10 Nov 2023.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Methyl bromide. 2015; Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ods-phaseout/methyl-bromide. Accessed 8 Sep 2023.
Fan X. Irradiation of fresh and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: quality and shelf life. y Sommers X, editor. Blackwell Publishing and the Institute of FoodTechnologists; 2013.
Chiossi CE. Una mirada a la física atómica. Instituto de Energía y Desarrollo Sustentable: Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica; 2019.
Asociación Latinoamericana de Tecnologías de la Irradiación (ALATI). Ionización de alimentos. Dissertation. Available from: https://www.alati.la/conferencias-02.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.
Shafiur Rahman M (ed). Handbook of food preservation. Food science and technology, 167. NY, USA: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press; 2007.
Cap M, Lires C, Cingolani C, Mozgovoj M, Soteras T, Gentiluomo J, et al. Identification of the gamma irradiation dose applied to ground beef that reduces Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli but has no impact on consumer acceptance. Meat Sci. 2021;174(108414):108414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108414.
Murano EA: Microbiology of irradiated foods. In: Murano EA (ed). Food Irradiation: A Sourcebook. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press; 1995.
Diehl JF (ed.). Safety of irradiated foods. NY, USA: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press; 1995.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Food & Environmental Protection Newsletter 2022;25(1). Available from: https://www.iaea.org/publications/15074/food-and-environmental-protection-newsletter-vol-25-no-1-january-2022. Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
Loaharanu P, Hallman GJ. Irradiation for quality improvement, microbial safety and phytosanitation of fresh produce. HortScience. 2017;52(10):1459. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci5210bkrev-17.
Kim KH, Kim MS, Kim HG, Yook HS. Inactivation of contaminated fungi and antioxidant effects of peach (Prunus persica L. Batch cv Dangeumdo) by 0.5–2 kGy gamma irradiation. Radiaion Phys Chem. 2010;79:495–501.
Djaeni M, Rahardjo S, Rohman A. Effects of gamma irradiation on carbohydrates: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2018;55(3):839–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-3005-7.
Cova MC. Efecto de la radiación ionizante sobre los alimentos. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Available from: https://es.slideshare.net/slideshows/curso-irradiacion-alimentos-2021-clase-3-pdf/265436564. Accessed 25 Nov 2023.
Xue Y, Ahmedna M, Goktepe I. Effects of gamma irradiation on vitamins and nutrient components in food products: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutri. 2019;59(8):1203–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1329526.
Dionísio AP, Gomes RT, Oetterer M. Ionizing radiation effects on food vitamins: a review. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2009;52(5):1267–78.
Simic MG: Radiation chemistry of water-soluble food components. In: Josephson ES, Peterson MS (eds). Preservation of food by ionizing radiation. NY, USA: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press; 2018.
Narvaiz P, Ladomery LG. Estimation of the effect of food irradiation on total dietary vitamin availability as compared with dietary allowances: study for Argentina. J Sci Food Agric. 1998;76(2):250–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199802)76:2%3c250::aid-jsfa941%3e3.0.co;2-r.
Mazzotta AS, Beuchat LR. Effectiveness of gamma radiation for inactivating Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in fresh-cut fruits. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;253:1–8.
Jeong SM, Woo SG, Lee SK, Byun MW. Inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms in fresh fruits by gamma irradiation. Food Control. 2019;95:226–30.
• Zhao B, Hu S, Wang D, Chen H, Huang M. Inhibitory effect of gamma irradiation on Penicillium digitatum and its application in the preservation of Ponkan fruit. Sci Hortic. 2020;272(109598):109598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109598. This paper presents the inhibitory effect on the growth of Penicillium digitatum at different doses of gamma irradiation and the optimization of the process to slow Ponkan fruit decay, nutrient loss, and reduction of malondialdehyde (MDA) content, which resulted in an improvement of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities.
Akami M, Clarke AR, Armstrong KF. Effects of irradiation on Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults: mortality, sterility, wing malformation, oviposition, longevity, and mating competitiveness. J Econ Entomol. 2016;109(3):1272–80.
Damos P, Sotiraki S, Vasarmidis T, Papanastasiou S. Sterilizing Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) males with X-rays for use in sterile insect technique programs: flight ability, survival, and field cage tests. J Econ Entomol. 2018;111(6):2705–10.
Wu F, Zhou X, Tao N, Wu J. Effect of gamma irradiation on quality and postharvest physiology of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Keitt). Food Chem. 2018;239:1180–8.
Bhatnagar P, Gururani P, Bisht B, Kumar V, Kumar N, Joshi R, Vlaskin MS. Impact of irradiation on physico-chemical and nutritional properties of fruits and vegetables: A mini review. Heliyon, 2022;8(10):e10918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10918.
Jaiswal P, Moon KD. Effect of gamma irradiation on quality of table grape (cv. Superior Seedless) during storage. J Radia Res Appl Sci. 2020;13(2):596–603.
Kan Y, Wu Y, Wang Z. Effects of gamma irradiation on postharvest quality of mango fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2019;147:135–41.
Haider ST-A, Azam M, Naz S, Hussain S, Ali S, Liaquat M, et al. Postharvest application of gamma irradiation affects fruit quality and antioxidant enzymes activities of ‘kinnow’ mandarin fruits during cold storage. Food Sci Technol. 2023;43. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.113122
Sanyal D, Marchello M, Schaffner DW. Microbiological quality of irradiated fresh blueberries. J Food Sci. 2016;81(8):M2037–44.
Alam MJ, Anjum FM, Altaf I. Gamma irradiation: a tool for microbial decontamination of fruits and vegetables. Microb Pathog. 2018;121:1–5.
•• Fernandes D, Prakash A. Use of gamma irradiation as an intervention treatment to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in freshly extracted apple juice. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl. 2020;168:108531. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X19305961. This paper presents the application of gamma irradiation on apples and apple juice to inhibit the pathogenic bacteria E. coli O157:H7, testing different process doses to achieve the highest log reduction without negative effects on sensory quality for 3 weeks at 4 °C.
Wang C, Meng X. Effect of 60 Co γ-irradiation on storage quality and cell wall ultra-structure of blueberry fruit during cold storage. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;38:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.010.
Pieroni V, Ottaviano FG, Sosa M, Gabilondo J, Budde C, Colletti AC, et al. Effects of gamma irradiation on the sensory and metabolic profiles of two peach cultivars. J Sci Food Agric. 2023;103(13):6362–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12712.
Lires CML, Docters A, Horak CI. Evaluation of the quality and shelf life of gamma irradiated blueberries by quarantine purposes. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993. 2018;143:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.07.025.
D’innocenzo M, Lajolo FM. Effect of gamma irradiation on softening changes and enzyme activities during ripening of papaya fruit. J Food Biochem. 2001;25(5):425–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2001.tb00750.x.
•• Colletti AC, Denoya GI, Budde CO, Gabilondo J, Pachado JA, Vaudagna SR, et al. Induction of stress defense response and quality retention in minimally processed peaches through the application of gamma irradiation treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2022;194(112084):112084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112084. This paper evaluated the application of different doses of gamma irradiation in minimally processed peaches with modified atmosphere packaging. Irradiation treatments up to 1.0 kGy in combination with low oxygen permeability packaging improved phytochemical quality parameters and produced a physiological response in plant tissues that resulted in an induction of stress proteins, which can be used as biochemical markers.
Chinajariyawong A, Tiwonge EK, Hallman GJ, Clarke AR. Efficacy of gamma radiation for quarantine control of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in lychee. J Econ Entomol. 2018;111(2):887–93.
Manoukis NC, Geib SM, Wang XG, Mckenzie CL, Vargas RI. Achieving market access for Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) in mangoes by using a systems approach and x-ray irradiation treatment. J Econ Entomol. 2021;114(1):38–47.
McDonald H, McCulloch M, Caporaso F, Winborne I, Oubichon M, Rakovski C, Prakash A. Commercial scale irradiation for insect disinfestation preserves peach quality. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl. 2012;81(6):697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.018.
• Eustice RF. Novel processing technologies. In: Genetically modified and irradiated food. Elsevier; 2020;269–86. This chapter presents studies of consumer acceptance of irradiated food and their introduction into supermarkets in several countries.
Xuetong F. Irradiation of fresh and fresh‐cut fruits and vegetables: quality and shelf life. Food Irradia Res Technol. Wiley; 2012. p. 271–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118422557.ch15.
Jacobo-Velázquez DA, Santana-Gálvez J, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Designing next-generation functional food and beverages: combining nonthermal processing technologies and postharvest abiotic stresses. Food Eng Rev. 2021;13(3):592–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09244-x.
Park SH, Lee SJ, Chung HY, Kim TH, Cho CK, Yoo SY, et al. Inducible heat-shock protein 70 is involved in the radioadaptive response. Radiat Res. 2000;153(3):318–26. https://doi.org/10.1667/00337587(2000)153[0318:ihspii]2.0.co;2.
Schmid TE, Multhoff G. Radiation-induced stress proteins - the role of heat shock proteins (HSP) in anti- tumor responses. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(12):1765–70.
Caillet S, Millette M, Dussault D, Shareck F, Lacroix M. Effect of gamma radiation on heat shock protein expression of four foodborne pathogens. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105(5):1384–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03891.x.
Trudeau K, Vu KD, Déziel É, Shareck F, Lacroix M. Effect of γ-irradiation on gene expression of heat shock proteins in the foodborne pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90(3):268–73. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2014.859766.
Polenta GA, Guidi SM, Ambrosi V, Denoya GI. Comparison of different analytical methods to evaluate the heat shock protein (HSP) response in fruits. Application to tomatoes subjected to stress treatments. Curr Res Food Sci. 2020;3:329–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.09.002.
Basile A, Sorbo S, Conte B, Cardi M, Esposito S. Ultrastructural changes and Heat Shock Proteins 70 induced by atmospheric pollution are similar to the effects observed under in vitro heavy metals stress in Conocephalum conicum (Marchantiales – Bryophyta). Environ Pollut. 2013;182:209–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.014.
Ré MD, Gonzalez C, Escobar MR, Sossi ML, Valle EM, Boggio SB. Small heat shock proteins and the postharvest chilling tolerance of tomato fruit. Physiol Plant. 2017;159(2):148–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12491.
Sun JH, Chen JY, Kuang JF, Chen WX, Lu WJ. Expression of sHSP genes as affected by heat shock and cold acclimation in relation to chilling tolerance in plum fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2010;55(2):91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.09.001.
Sung YY, Liew HJ, Ambok Bolong AM, Abdul Wahid ME, MacRae TH. The induction of Hsp70 synthesis by non-lethal heat shock confers thermotolerance and resistance to lethal ammonia stress in the common carp, Cyprinus carpio(Linn). Aquac Res. 2014;45(10):1706–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12116.
Código Alimentario Argentino (CAA). Resolución Conjunta SPReI y SAV N° 13-E/2017. Artículo 174. Gob.ar. 2017. Available from: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/capitulo_iii_prod_alimenticiosactualiz_2017-10.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2023.
Boletin Oficial República Argentina – Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA). Resolución 495/2023. Gob.ar. Available from: https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/287734/20230605. Accessed 10 Jul 2023.
Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA). Irradiación de alimentos. Argentina.gob.ar. 2019. Available from: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/cnea/Tecnologia-nuclear/irradiacion-gamma/irradiacion-de-alimentos. Accessed 11 Jan 2023.
Asociación Latinoamericana de Tecnologías de la Irradiación (ALATI). Balance y objetivos cumplidos del año 2022. Dissertation, Asociación Latinoamericana de Tecnologías de la Irradiación. Available from: https://www.alati.la/conferencia-2022-11-14.html. Accessed 16 Jun 2023.
Sommers CH, Delincée H, Smith JS, Marchioni E. Toxicological safety of irradiated food. In: Fan X, Sommers CH, editors. Food Irradiation Research and Technol. Wiley-Blackwell Press; 2013.
Byron DH. International symposium on food irradiation - role of irradiation in food safety and security. Food Environ Protect Newsletter. 2011;14:7–9.
Cia P, Benato EA, Pascholati SF. Use of irradiation in postharvest disease management: problems and solutions. Stewart Postharvest Review. 2010;4:3. https://doi.org/10.2212/spr.2010.4.3.
Pohlman AJ, Wood OB, Mason AC. Influence of audiovisuals and food samples on consumer acceptance of food irradiation. Food Technol. 1994;48.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support from Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación, Argentina (PICT 2016 – 0178) and Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, INTA (INTA 2023-PE-L04-I088).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.C.: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; writing — original draft. G.D.: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; supervision; writing — review and editing. S.V.: formal analysis; supervision; writing — review and editing. G.P.: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; project administration; supervision; writing — review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Colletti, A.C., Denoya, G.I., Vaudagna, S.R. et al. Novel Applications of Gamma Irradiation on Fruit Processing. Curr Food Sci Tech Rep 2, 55–64 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43555-024-00016-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43555-024-00016-w