Skip to main content
Log in

Does Information Bias Teachers’ Perceptions of Intervention Effectiveness?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Education and Treatment of Children Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2011, the United States Congress amended and passed laws requiring states to monitor and decrease psychotropic medication use in child welfare systems. In addition to prescribers, Luna et al. Behavior and Social Issues, 27, AA16-AA20, (2018) identified case managers, caregivers, and teachers as potential contributors to the prescribing process. For example, due to the lower response effort, teachers may recommend caregivers seek a medical evaluation, which may give rise to pharmacological interventions for behavioral problems as opposed to behavioral interventions. To date, no study has evaluated the extent to which teachers display positive or negative bias for either behavioral or pharmacological intervention as treatment for behavior problems displayed by students. As a step toward addressing this issue, the current study randomly assigned 119 certified teachers to one of four groups: Medication information (Med info), Behavioral information (Beh info), No change (control), and Reverse video (also no change control). Teachers watched two 5-min videos of a child engaging in low to moderate levels of problem behavior. After watching each video, teachers rated seven questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Although teachers in the Med info and Beh info groups observed worsening of behavior in the second video, only the Beh info group provided more negative ratings than the control group regarding the child’s ability to follow directions. In addition, Pre-K/elementary school teachers rated the child’s behavior as “more normal” than did other teachers. Overall, findings suggest that teachers displayed (1) a slight negative bias toward the behavioral intervention; and (2) neither positive nor negative bias toward psychotropic medication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the conclusions from this study are available upon request from JTR.

Notes

  1. The second author of the current study serves as the director of the APMRT.

  2. The first author obtained permission to use copies of videos from Almanza (personal communication, August 15, 2021).

  3. The Almanza et al. (2020) study was made up of 114 participants.

  4. Participants in the Almanza et al. study watched videos and completed questionnaires in a lab setting in the presence of researchers, but the video and survey questions were identical to those provided via Qualtrics for teachers.

  5. To reduce the probability of producing false positives, researchers only evaluated questions that were statistically different across groups on the omnibus test.

References

Download references

Funding

Alabama Department of Human Resources, Family Services Division

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Rapp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 217 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Massey, S.L., Rapp, J.T., Bush, H. et al. Does Information Bias Teachers’ Perceptions of Intervention Effectiveness?. Educ. Treat. Child. 47, 35–49 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-023-00111-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-023-00111-y

Keywords

Navigation