Abstract
Purpose
Restoring coronal alignment in spine deformity patients has been shown to play an important role in improving patient reported outcomes (PRO). Recently, the “kickstand rod” (KSR) technique was developed as a novel coronal correction method in complex spine deformity cases. The goal of the present study was to assess outcomes of this technique at two years of follow-up.
Methods
Consecutive, unique adult patients who underwent KSR constructs for coronal spinal malalignment between 2015 and 2019 with a minimum 2 year clinical and radiographic follow-up were identified. A KSR construct includes a more laterally placed iliac screw and additional rod that effectively depresses the ipsilateral ilium/pelvis for coronal correction, while serving as a buttress to prevent future loss of correction. Outcomes included revision for instrumentation-related complications, radiographic alignment, and PROs.
Results
Twenty patients were included with a mean age of 54 years [range: 20–73 years]. Mean follow-up time was 2.5 years [range: 2.0–5.0]. Mean number of levels fused was 17.3 [range: 10–24]. There were significant improvements in coronal alignment (CVA: 5.8 cm ± 2.6 cm vs. 1.7 cm ± 1.5 cm), sagittal alignment (SVA: 5.6 cm ± 5.9 cm vs. 1.6 cm ± 2.5 cm) and major Cobb angle (55º ± 32 vs. 26º ± 21) maintained at 2 years (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an asymptomatic fracture at the shank of the KSR iliac screw. There were significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index and SRS-22 domains (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
The KSR technique is a safe and effective method for correcting coronal malalignment in complex spinal deformity patients with no revisions specific for the KSR or iliac screw and significantly improved PROs at a minimum two-year follow-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Glassman SD et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30(6):682–688
Mac-Thiong JM et al (2009) Can c7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related quality of life in adult scoliosis? Spine 34(15):E519–E527
Daubs MD et al (2013) Does correction of preoperative coronal imbalance make a difference in outcomes of adult patients with deformity? Spine 38(6):476–483
Koller H et al (2016) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25(2):532–548
Lewis SJ et al (2018) Risk factors for postoperative coronal balance in adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J 8(7):690–697
Acaroglu E et al (2015) Multiple regression analysis of factors affecting health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform 3(4):360–366
Bao H et al (2016) Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy. Bone Joint J 98(9):1227–1233
Buell TJ et al (2021) Global coronal decompensation and adult spinal deformity surgery: comparison of upper-thoracic versus lower-thoracic proximal fixation for long fusions. J Neurosurg Spine 35:1–13
Obeid I et al (2019) Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline. Eur Spine J 28(1):94–113
Cheng GHM et al (2021) Correction of degenerative lumbar coronal deformity using asymmetrical interbody cages: Surgical technique and case report. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 12(4):432–436
Heary RF, Karimi RJ (2010) Correction of lumbar coronal plane deformity using unilateral cage placement. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E10
Makhni MC et al (2019) The “kickstand rod” technique for correction of coronal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity: initial case series. J Neurosurg Spine 4:1–8
Buell TJ et al (2020) Kickstand rod technique for correcting coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 19(2):E163-e164
Buell TJ et al (2020) Coronal correction using kickstand rods for adult thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: case series with analysis of early outcomes and complications. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 19(4):403–413
Fiani B, Jarrah RM (2020) The “kickstand rod” technique for coronal imbalance in patients with spinal deformity: a case report with review of literature. Cureus 12(12):e11876
Redaelli A et al (2020) Useful and innovative methods for the treatment of postoperative coronal malalignment in adult scoliosis: the “kickstand rod” and “tie rod” procedures. Eur Spine J 29(4):849–859
Fairbank JC et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483
Gardner A et al (2021) The resting coronal and sagittal stance position of the torso in adolescents with and without spinal deformity. Sci Rep 11(1):2354
Moal B et al (2014) Radiographic outcomes of adult spinal deformity correction: a critical analysis of variability and failures across deformity patterns. Spine Deform 2(3):219–225
Ploumis A et al (2015) Coronal spinal balance in adult spine deformity patients with long spinal fusions: a minimum 2–5 year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(9):341–347
Strom RG et al (2016) Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 25(6):697–705
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VP: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, drafted the work, approved the version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. MR: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, analysis/interpretation of the data, drafted the work, approved the version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. FMH: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data, drafted the work, approved the version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. JML: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, revised the work critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. ZMS: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, revised the work critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. RAL: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, revised the work critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. LGL: Contributed to the concept/design of the work, revised the work critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version to be published, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Lawrence G. Lenke has received grant support from AO Spine, International Spine Summit Group, Scoliosis Research Society, EOS Technology and Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation as a study investigator. Ronald A. Lehman has received grant support from the Department of Defense as a study investigator. Joseph M. Lombardi, Zeeshan M. Sardar, Ronald A. Lehman, and Lawrence G. Lenke have received consulting fees from Medtronic. Joseph M. Lombardi has received consulting fees from Stryker. Lawrence G. Lenke has received consulting fees from Acuity Surgical and Abryx. Lawrence G. Lenke has received reimbursements from Broadwater, AO Spine, and Scoliosis Research Society for attending meetings/travel. Ronald A. Lehman and Lawrence G. Lenke have received royalties and are patent holders from Medtronic. Ronald A. Lehman has received royalties and is a patent holder from Stryker. Varun Puvanesarajah, Fthimnir M. Hassan, and Micheal Raad declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
IRB-AAAR6015.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Puvanesarajah, V., Raad, M., Hassan, F.M. et al. The “kickstand rod” technique for correction of coronal malalignment: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine Deform 11, 153–161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00564-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00564-y