Abstract
Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) is a siloxane substance mainly used in cosmetics and personal care products. While octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) were once commonly used in personal care products, their usage has been restricted due to the classification as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT)/very persistent and very bio-accumulative (vPvB) substances. While D6 has emerged as a substitute for D4 and D5, the risk assessment for D6 remains limited compared to the evaluations for D4 and D5. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive risk assessment of D6. In this study, we reviewed the toxicity information on D6 and calculated the exposure level to D6, considering the content of D6 in cosmetic products. No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1500 mg/kg bw/day was established in a repeated dose toxicity study after oral administration to rats. Negative results were found in tests on the ocular and skin irritation, skin sensitization, and genotoxicity of D6. According to the product content of up to 48% of D6 reported in 2012, the Systemic Exposure Dose (SED) was 5.4E-06 to 7.04 mg/kg bw/day for a 60 kg adult using the exposure factors from Korean cosmetic usage. The Margin of Safety was estimated to be between 35.5 and 4.63E+07, posing a potential health risk of D6 according to the maximum concentration and the product type. Further consideration of the potential of D6 as PBT or vPvB is also required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson W Jr, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks JG Jr, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Andersen FA (2011) Safety assessment of cyclomethicone, cyclotetrasiloxane, cyclopentasiloxane, cyclohexasiloxane, and cycloheptasiloxane. Int J Toxicol 30:149S-227S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581811428184
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (2019) Annex XV restriction report proposal for a restriction, vol 1
Krestine G, Nielsen E, Ladefoged O (2014) Siloxanes (D3, D4, D5, D6, HMDS). Environmental Project No. 1531 edn. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, The Danish Environmental Protection Agency
Kumari K, Singh A, Marathe D (2023) Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (D4, D5, and D6) as the emerging pollutants in environment: environmental distribution, fate, and toxicological assessments. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25568-7
Agency California Environmental Protection (2021) Chemicals in hair straightening products background document. Safer Consumer Products Program. Department of Toxic Substances Control, SAFER consumer Products
Rijcken P (1999) Assessment of acute oral toxicity with dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxan in the rat (acute toxic class method). NOTOX project 262575
Pels Rijcken (1999) Assessment of acute dermal toxicity with dodecamethylcyclohexasilosan in the rat. NOTOX Project 262586
Crofoot SD Stanton E, Siddiqui W, Zimmer MA (1990) A 28-day subchronic oral gavage feasibility study of various low molecular weight silicone oligomers in rats. Report No.1990-I0000-35105. Dow Corning
Environment Canada Health Canada (2008) Screening assessment for the challenge. Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6). Environment Canada, Health Canada
Brooke D N Crookes M J, Gray D and Robertson, S (2009) Environmental risk assessment report_dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane. Environment Agency
Siddiqui WH (2005) Combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test for dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in Sprague-Dawley rats. HES study number 10054-012. Health and Environmental sciences, Dow Corning
Pels Rijcken (1999) Acute eye irritation/corrosion study with dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxan in the rabbit. NOTOX project 262597
Pels Rijcken (1999) Primary skin irritation/corrosion study with dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxanj in the rabbit (4-hour semiocclusive application). NOTOX project 262608
Pels Rijcken (1999) Assessment of contact hypersensitivity to dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxan in the albino guinea pig (maximisation-test). NOTOX project 262619
Verspeek-Rip CM (1999) Evaluation of the mutagenic activity of dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxan in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with independent repeat. NOTOX project 262621
US-EPA (2004) Pharmacokinetics of 14C-D6 in the rt following single oral exposure. DCN 84030000026
US-EPA (2003) Absorption of D6 using the flow-through diffusion cell system for in vitro absorption in human skin. DCN 84030000026
The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) (2017) Guideline for risk assessment of cosmetic
Tran TM, Tu MB, Vu ND (2018) Cyclic siloxanes in indoor environments from hair salons in Hanoi, Vietnam: emission sources, spatial distribution, and implications for human exposure. Chemosphere 212:330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.101
Capela D, Alves A, Homem V, Santos L (2016) From the shop to the drain—Volatile methylsiloxanes in cosmetics and personal care products. Environ Int 92–93:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.016
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2021) The SCCS notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation 11th revision
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2010) Opinion on cyclomethicone octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (cyclotetrasiloxane, D4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (cyclopentasiloxane, D5). SCCS/1241/10 edn. https://doi.org/10.2772/24205
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2016) Opinion on decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (cyclopentasiloxane, D5) in cosmetic products. SCCS/1549/15 edn. https://doi.org/10.2875/841314
Krenczkowska D, Mojsiewicz-Pienkowska K, Wielgomas B, Bazar D, Jankowski Z (2020) Ex vivo human skin is not a barrier for cyclic siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): evidence of diffusion, bioaccumulation, and risk of dermal absorption using a new validated GC-FID procedure. Pharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060586
Government of Canada (2023) Siloxane D6 (cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl-) - information sheet
Acknowledgements
This study was cosmetic safety evaluation project conducted by the Korea Cosmetic Industry Institute (KCII) and funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare
Funding
This study was cosmetic safety evaluation project conducted by the Korea Cosmetic Industry Institute (KCII) and funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yeonju Ko: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. Hyunjoon Choi, Seongwon Choi, Donghyun Lim, Shinai Choi, Jiyeon Hong, Young A Yoon, Hyun Chung: Data curation, Investigation. Kyung-Min Lim: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Kyu-Bong Kim, Joo Young Lee, Seung Jun Kwack: Writing—review & editing. Ok-Nam Bae: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate and publication
Acquired from all authors.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ko, Y., Lim, D., Choi, H. et al. Risk assessment of cyclohexasiloxane D6 in cosmetic products. Toxicol Res. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-024-00235-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-024-00235-2