Introduction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common sexual dysfunctions in men [1, 2]. It is regarded as the inability to initiate and/or maintain an erection adequate for intercourse [3]. ED is thought to be quite common among those with liver disease [4, 5]. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as the accumulation of intrahepatic fat of at least 5% of liver weight in absence of a secondary contributing factor or therapeutic drugs [6, 7]. It is the most common chronic liver disease in developed countries, affecting more than 30% of the global population [5, 8, 10]. NAFLD is regarded as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is associated with central obesity, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia and/or hypertension [11]. Corona et al. (2023) stated that ED associated with MetS was multifactorial with the necessity of treating such risk factors individually to manage ED [12]. Consistently, an observational study demonstrated an association between ED and celiac disease [13]. Also, the same study revealed that early age at diagnosis together with high body mass index were the main determinants for ED in this group of patients [13]. Remarkably, other conditions could cause ED including obstructive sleep apnea that was associated with ED in a study conducted by Cantone et al. (2022) [14]. Vasculogenic ED is the most frequent reason for ED in patients with NAFLD [5]. Nitric oxide (NO) is released from nerves in the corpora cavernosa on sexual stimulation and is one of the important molecules controlling the process of erection [15]. The NO pathway has other vital roles in the human body [16, 17]. Shared factors for reduced NO bioavailability in the human body are sedentary lifestyles, ageing, poor nutrition, oxidative stress, cardiovascular diseases, nephropathies and antidepressant drugs [16, 18,19,20].

Human data demonstrated that patients with NAFLD had marked endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) dysfunction and animal data demonstrated that eNOS deficiency exacerbated the early stages of NAFLD [21, 22]. Adropin was first identified in the liver and brain tissues of rats [21]. Its secretion is mediated by dietary macro-nutrients [23]. Recently, serum adropin was observed to decrease in patients with NAFLD [24]. Although several studies [5, 25, 26] highlighted the association between NAFLD and ED, no study before addressed the relationship between patients with NAFLD induced ED and serum levels of NO and adropin. Furthermore, exploratory studies were needed to unravel the underlying pathophysiology responsible for this potential association [26]. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the serum levels of NO and adropin in males with NAFLD induced ED and NAFLD patients without ED and controls. Moreover, we aimed to study the relationship between serum NO and adropin levels and the degree of ED in males with NAFLD.

Methods

The current observational study selected 165 participants from the hepatology department of Beni-Suef University Hospital from November 2021 to November 2022. Males with NAFLD were allocated into either NAFLD induced ED (group I; n = 41) or NAFLD with preserved erectile function (group II; n = 30). Moreover, 94 controls (group III) were recruited as well. Eligible participants were asked to sign an informed consent prior to enrolment in this study, according to the regulations mandated by the Research Ethical Committee (REC) of Beni-Suef Faculty of Medicine that conform to the Helsinki Declaration (2013) (Approval Number: FMBSUREC/07092021–01112021) [27].

Inclusion Criteria for Patients

All patients should be in a steady sexual relationship during the last six months. Patients were men aged more than 20 years with the following diagnostic criteria of NAFLD: signs of fatty liver by abdominal US through detecting increased echogenicity of the liver versus the kidneys and the spleen [28] plus overweight or obesity (BMI > 25) or two of the following criteria of MetS: increased waist circumference: > 102 cm; blood pressure > 130/ 85; plasma triglyceride > 150; plasma HDL cholesterol < 40 and pre-diabetic status in which fasting blood glucose level was 100 to 125 mg /dl or HbA1c 5.7% to 6.4% or 2 h post-prandial blood glucose levels 140 to 199 [29].

Inclusion Criteria for Controls

Controls were age and BMI-matched healthy volunteers. They were companions of the patients who attended the hepatology department seeking for diagnosis and treatment of their condition.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with liver cirrhosis, diabetes, psychogenic ED or patients receiving drugs associated with ED were excluded. Also, end-stage renal disease, neurological diseases, COPD, coronary artery disease, endocrine disorders, hepatic fat accumulation secondary to excessive alcoholism (intake of more than 30 g/day), long-term use of steatogenic drugs, viral hepatitis and hereditary hemochromatosis were also excluded.

All participants were subjected to the following:

Past and medical histories were obtained from all participants. Evaluation of erectile function was done using the validated Arabic version of the international index of erectile function (ArIIEF-5) [30]. Evaluation of anxiety manifestations was done using the validated Arabic form of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire [31, 32].Evaluation of depression manifestations was done using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [32, 33]. General and genital examinations were done. Fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, serum lipid profile and hepatic function panel were all obtained via a blood sample that was withdrawn from the participants. A fasting sample before 11 AM was taken for assessment of total testosterone serum levels (ng/dl). NO levels were measured in venous blood samples using a colorimetric assay kit from Elabscience Biotechnology Co. (Wuhan, China). The concentration of NO was determined based on the optical density value at 550 nm.The assay kit had low coefficients of variation for both intra-assay and inter-assay measurements, with values of 2.4% and 3.7%, respectively. The NO assay range was 0.16–100 μmol/l with a sensitivity of 0.16 μmol/l. Additionally, serum adropin levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from the same manufacturer. The coefficients of variation for the adropin assay were less than 10%. The detection range for adropin was 12.50–800 pg/mL and the assay exhibited a sensitivity of 7.50 pg/mL. Venous blood samples were collected after a 12-h overnight fasting period. The patients were either suffering from NAFLD with normal liver functions or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with abnormal liver functions (NASH). Liver biopsies were not used to differentiate between both types of NAFLD [34, 35]. Differentiation between both types depended on clinical signs of hepatitis and liver functions [34, 35].

Sample Size Determination

The prevalence of NAFLD is generally 25%, in line with the findings of a prior study conducted by Young and colleagues (2020) [36]. Supposing a 95% confidence interval (CI) with an error bound of 0.05, at least a sample size of 100 participants should be recruited based on the Epi Info 7 main menu. The number of participants was maximized to 165 to intensify the findings of this study.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was completed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 26.0, IBM, Chicago). Qualitative and quantitative data were expressed using frequency (%) and mean + S.D., respectively. Variables were compared using the t test, one-way ANOVA, and X2 test. The Pearson coefficient (r) was utilized to evaluate correlations.

Results

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Nineteen cases suffered from moderate ED (46.3%), whereas the rest of the cases were equally split into mild ED (26.8%) and severe ED (26.8%). Furthermore, 17 cases suffered from minimal depression (41.5%) and 17 cases suffered from mild depression (41.5%). whereas 4 cases and 3 cases suffered from severe depression (9.8%) and moderate depression (7.3%), respectively. Additionally, 19 cases and 14 cases were mildly anxious (46.3%) and moderately anxious (34.1%), respectively. A pair-wise comparison between NAFLD induced ED and NAFLD without ED and controls was shown in Table 2. Noteworthy, there were significant positive correlations between the ArIIEF-5 score, NO, adropin and total testosterone (Table 3).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
Table 2 Pairwise comparisons between different groups
Table 3 Correlations between Ar IIEF-5 and other parameters in NAFLD patients

Meanwhile, there were significant negative correlations between the ArIIEF-5 score, creatinine, duration of the disease and scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 (Table 3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting ED in NAFLD patients using scores of GAD-7 revealed cutoff value and sensitivity and specificity were 6.5, 90.2%, and 83.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, ROC curve for predicting ED in NAFLD patients using scores of PHQ-9 revealed cutoff value and sensitivity and specificity were 5.5, 56.1%, and 70%, respectively (Fig. 1). Thus, GAD-7 score was a strong predictor of ED. Furthermore, ROC curve revealed that cutoff value and sensitivity and specificity for predicting ED in NAFLD patients using the duration of the disease were 4.5, 68.3%, and 63.3%, respectively (Fig. 2). Meanwhile, ROC curve demonstrated that cutoff value and sensitivity and specificity of creatinine for predicting ED in NAFLD patients were 0.925, 75.6%, and 66.7%, respectively (Fig. 2). Finally, ROC curve demonstrated that cutoff values and sensitivity and specificity of adropin and NO for predicting ED in NAFLD patients were 17.95 ng/ml, 70.7% and 60%; 12.55, 51.2% and 60%, respectively (Fig. 3). Finally, a linear regression analysis revealed that GAD-7, creatinine and adropin were the only strong independent predictors of the ArIIEF-5 score as the 95% confidence interval (CI) in the form of upper and lower bounds were -0.349, -0.843, p < 0.001, -6.507, -18.402, p < 0.001, 0.476, 0.117, and p 0.002, respectively (Table 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curve for detection of erectile dysfunction in fatty liver patients using GAD7 and PHQ9

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve for detection of erectile dysfunction in fatty liver patients using significant parameters

Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve for detection of erectile dysfunction in fatty liver patients using Adropin and NO

Table 4 Multivariate linear regression analysis for detection of erectile dysfunction using ArIIEF-5 score after adjustment of different parameters

Discussion

The current observational study demonstrated that there were significant positive correlations between the ArIIEF-5 score, NO, adropin and total testosterone. Meanwhile, there were significant negative correlations between the ArIIEF-5 score, creatinine, duration of the disease, and scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9.

Also, a linear regression analysis revealed that GAD-7, creatinine, and adropin were the only strong independent predictors of ArIIEF-5. Endothelium-produced NO plays an important role in maintaining good erectile function [37]. Thus, decreased NO availability led to ED, which could be seen as similar to our finding [37]. Furthermore, decreased NO bioactivity has been depicted as the most important pathological mechanism in ED [38]. An animal study revealed that adropin contributed to NO bioavailability as well as impacting inducible NOS synthesis [39]. Consistently, Kutlu et al. (2019) showed decreased adropin in cases with NAFLD [24]. Additionally, Topuz et al. (2013) postulated that adropin level could be used as a marker to quantify endothelial dysfunction [40]. Thus, it was concluded that adropin had a detrimental effect on erectile function which was also in line with our finding. Testosterone has a direct regulatory effect on insulin secretion in men [41]. Thus, hyperinsulinemia is associated with low testosterone and an increased body mass index [41]. Hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased hepatic lipogenesis, adipose tissue lipolysis and efflux of free fatty acids to the liver with subsequent development of steatosis and progression to NAFLD [42]. Consistently, the chronic low-grade inflammatory state resulting from increased secretion of hepatic inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 might directly suppress luteinizing hormone secretion from the pituitary gland which decreased testosterone secretion from Leydig cells [43]. Similarly, our study demonstrated that NAFLD was associated with low total testosterone that led to ED as a result of this deficiency which could be seen in line with a study conducted by Crocetto et al. (2022) [44]. It is well agreed that decreased testosterone is associated with impaired erectile function which can be diagnosed by the CATCH checklist [45].

In the same context, Ragab et al. (2023) revealed an association between testosterone deficiency and ED [46]. Remarkably, there are similar traditional risk factors for chronic kidney disease and NAFLD, including hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance [47]. Thus, it is difficult to determine a causal relationship with NAFLD adjusting for “hepato-renal” and “cardio-renal” features [47]. Hypothetically, increased caloric intake and fatty tissue induce an inflammatory cascade through the energy sensor 5´-AMP activated protein kinase, fetuin-A and adiponectin between fat cells in the liver and the kidney, leading to end-organ damage [48]. The renin-angiotensin system had been postulated as a player in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [46]. Henceforth, NAFLD was associated with renal dysfunction [50]. ED could be used as an early predictor of CKD, as there was a strong relationship between endothelial dysfunction and ED and the evolution of systemic diseases [51, 52]. Consistently, a recent Egyptian study revealed a significant association between IIEF-5 and creatinine [46]. Hasanain et al. (2017) found significant associations between ageing, obesity and hypertension and patients with NAFLD induced ED [53].This could be seen in line with our finding, as a significant association between duration of the disease and patients with NAFLD induced ED was demonstrated in the current study. Recently, Ragab et al. (2023) showed a significant correlation between the GAD-7 score and ED [46]. Similarly, an Indian randomized clinical trial showed that a multidisciplinary care for 12 months compared to the usual care resulted in statistically significant improvements in depressive symptoms and cardio-metabolic indices at 24 months [54]. Interestingly, the current study has shown that adropin, creatinine, and GAD-7 are the only significant predictors of ED in NAFLD patients.

These findings could be expected from the pivotal role of adropin in NO synthesis as well as the strong association between NAFLD and CKD that was extensively discussed in the current study. To wrap up the findings of the current study, adropin can be used as a marker to predict ED in NAFLD patients taking into consideration the relatively low cost of the kits for measuring NO and adropin in patients suffering from NAFLD. Additionally, it is critical to prioritize psychiatric care and closely monitor kidney function in patients with NAFLD. Admittedly, the small number of patients as well as being recruited from a single center could be seen as a major limitation. Also, the nature of the study being an observational one could be added as another limitation. However, to the best of our knowledge this study is one of the first to show a link between NAFLD induced ED and NO and adropin. Thus, we didn’t have enough previous studies to properly calculate the sample size. Also, after statistical revision to calculate the power analysis of the study regarding the primary outcome, it was around 99% which pushed us to refrain from adding it owing to the significant relationships revealed between NAFLD induced ED and NO and adropin in our small sample size. Finally, the degree of NAFLD was not mentioned in the current study, despite the fact that it could be graded by abdominal ultrasound into three grades or scores according to the degree of liver echogenicity [28]. However, we did not mention the grades of NAFLD by ultrasound in our research as there is no rationale to classify the patients according to the grades of NAFLD by ultrasonography as we had a small sample size, not allowing more sub-grouping of patients according to the grades of NAFLD. Thus, we thought it would be better to analyze and interpret the data of the total patients without sub-grouping according to their grades.

Conclusion

Impaired NO and adropin levels play a potential role in the development of ED in patients with NAFLD. Consequently, patients suffering from NAFLD should be screened for NO and adropin to predict the occurrence of ED and manage accordingly. Also, it is critical to prioritize psychiatric care and closely monitor kidney function in patients with NAFLD. Future longitudinal cohort studies are recommended to assert these findings.