Abstract
This special issue of Reproductive Sciences is focusing on ethnic health disparity and its impact on (fe)male reproduction. Indeed, studies regarding underlying mechanisms, interventions and prognosis in reproduction are underexposed for the non-White male and female. Here, we call for documentation of race and ethnicity in the analysis and management of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
To the Editor:
This special issue of Reproductive Sciences is focusing on ethnic health disparity and its impact on (fe)male reproduction. Indeed, studies regarding underlying mechanisms, interventions and prognosis in reproduction are underexposed for the non-White male and female. Here, we call for documentation of race and ethnicity in the analysis and management of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).
Recurrent pregnancy loss is defined as the loss of two or more conceptions before the 24th week of gestation. It is a poorly understood condition that comes with many uncertainties. A better understanding of contributing factors is necessary to provide answers to the couples and to improve their pregnancy outcomes. Currently, there is hardly any focus on race, or ethnicity, and its contribution to the development of RPL. For some reproductive disorders, it is clear that there is differential prevalence in one ethnic or racial group versus the other [1]. Also for RPL, it was shown recently that Black ethnicity is associated with a higher risk of miscarriage compared to White ethnicity [2]. Whether the miscarriage risk differs across nations and other ethnic groups is currently however under-documented.
For couples with RPL, the question regarding chance of a future successful pregnancy is utmost important. Even when aetiological mechanisms are not fully elucidated, well-developed and validated prediction models may provide adequate estimates of future pregnancy outcomes [3].
In today’s clinical practice, two prediction models for couples with unexplained RPL [4, 5] are used and recommended by international clinical guidelines. As a result of changing definition and diagnostic investigations for RPL, this could affect the predictive performance in other population [6]. Moreover, these models are based on only two predictors: the number of previous pregnancy losses and maternal age. We suggested recently that the prediction of a subsequent ongoing pregnancy in couples with RPL could improve when taking additional candidate predictors into account [7].
Female and male of racial and ethnic minority groups may be genetically predisposed to worse outcomes, independent of other clinical risk factors. In addition, race and ethnicity may serve as a surrogate for known risk factors of RPL, such as age, obesity, uterine abnormalities, smoking or other environmental risk factors (8). This implies that race or ethnicity, of both female as male, could represent a suitable predictor candidate to improve predictive ability of the prediction model. More research is necessary to verify this statement. However, to investigate these variables we must start with the documentation of race and ethnicity in our analysis and management in couples with RPL. Hopefully, this will add to the knowledge on RPL and add to Reproductive Science’ aim of health equity.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Humphries LA, Chang O, Humm K, Sakkas D, Hacker MR. Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):212.e1-e17.
Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, Podesek M, Stephenson MD, Fisher J, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1658–67.
van Diepen M, Ramspek CL, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Prediction versus aetiology: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(suppl_2):ii1–5.
Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 1999;14(11):2868–71.
Lund M, Kamper-Jørgensen M, Nielsen HS, Lidegaard Ø, Andersen AM, Christiansen OB. Prognosis for live birth in women with recurrent miscarriage: what is the best measure of success? Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):37–43.
Youssef A, Hoorn van der MLP, Dongen M, Visser J, Bloemenkamp K, van Lith JMM, van Geloven N, Lashley EELO. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction. Accepted for publication 2021.
du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, de Koning R, Mulders A, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, et al. Toward more accurate prediction of future pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: taking both partners into account. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(1):144–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.037.
Lintsen AM, Pasker-de Jong PC, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, Jansen CA, Braat DD, et al. Effects of subfertility cause, smoking and body weight on the success rate of IVF. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 2005;20(7):1867–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest Statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
van der Hoorn, ML., Lashley, L. Value of Ethnicity or Race in More Accurate Prediction of Future Outcome in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages. Reprod. Sci. 29, 2079–2080 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00942-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00942-x