Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vesico-Vaginal Fistula in Females in 2010–2020: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In the Western world today, urogenital fistula, including vesicovaginal fistula (VVF), is rare. However, while it remains significant in developing parts of the world due to prolonged and obstructed labor, in this study, we systematically reviewed the existing literature, discussing VVF occurrence, its etiology, and outcomes.

Material and Methods

We used electronic databases to search relevant articles from 2010–2020. The screening was performed with the help of Covidence. Relevant data from included studies were extracted in excel sheets, and final analysis was done using CMA-3 using proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Fifteen studies reported the VVF among the fistula series. The pooled result showed 76.57% cases of VVF (CI, 65.42–84.96), out of which 27.54% were trigonal, 55.70% supra-trigonal, and the rest with a varied description like circumferential, juxta-cervical, juxta-urethral. Obstetric etiology was commonly reported with 19.29% (CI, 13.26–27.21) with cesarean section and 31.14% (CI, 18.23–47.86) with obstructed labor. Hysterectomy was the commonly reported etiology among gynecological etiology (46.52%, CI; 36.17–57.19). Among different surgical treatments employed for fistula closure, 49.50% were by abdominal approach (CI, 37.23–61.82), and 42.31% by vaginal approach (CI, 31.82–53.54). Successful closure of fistula was reported in 87.09% of the surgeries (CI, 84.39–89.38).

Conclusion

The vesicovaginal fistula is the most common type of genitourinary fistula. Major causes of fistula are gynecological surgery, obstructed labor, and cesarean section. The vaginal approach and abdominal are common modalities of repair of fistula with favorable outcomes in the majority of the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AH:

Abdominal hysterectomy

CS:

Cesarean section

LH:

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

LSCS:

Lower segment cesarean section

RVF:

Recto vaginal fistula

TAH:

Total abdominal hysterectomy

UGF:

Urogenital fistula

VH:

Vaginal hysterectomy

VVF:

Vesico-vaginal fistula

References

  1. Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet Lancet. 2006:1201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69476-2.

  2. de Bernis L. Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development, a new WHO guideline. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.032.

  3. Hillary CJ, Osman NI, Hilton P, Chapple CR. The aetiology, treatment, and outcome of urogenital fistulae managed in well- and low-resourced countries: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2016;70:478–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler AJ, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, Filippi V. Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:246. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Härkki-Sirén P. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00146-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahliqa Maqsud B. Obstetric fistula prevention in South Asia an overview. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olusegun AK, Akinfolarin AC, Olabisi LM. A review of clinical pattern and outcome of vesicovaginal fistula. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:593–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30946-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. (No Title). [cited 2 Feb 2021]. Available: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=215772

  9. How can I cite Covidence? [cited 26 Jan 2021]. Available: https://support.covidence.org/help/how-can-i-cite-covidence

  10. Akpak YK, Yenidede I, Kilicci C. Evaluation of etiology, characteristics, and treatment of patients with vesicovaginal fistula observed in rural Africa. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101879

  11. Barageine JK, Tumwesigye NM, Byamugisha JK, Almroth L, Faxelid E. Risk factors for obstetric fistula in western uganda: a case control study. PLoS One. 2014;9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112299

  12. Chandna A, Mavuduru RS, Bora GS, Sharma AP, Parmar KM, Devana SK, et al. Robot-assisted repair of complex vesicovaginal fistulae: feasibility and outcomes. Urology. 2020;144:92–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang OH, Pope RJ, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Ganesh P, Wilkinson JP. Predictors of urinary retention after vesicovaginal fistula surgery: a retrospective case-control study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26:726–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cromwell D, Hilton P. Retrospective cohort study on patterns of care and outcomes of surgical treatment for lower urinary-genital tract fistula among English National Health Service hospitals between 2000 and 2009. BJU Int. 2013;111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11483.x

  15. Delamou A, Diallo M, Beavogui AH, Delvaux T, Millimono S, Kourouma M, et al. Good clinical outcomes from a 7-year holistic programme of fistula repair in Guinea. Tropical Med Int Health. 2015;20:813–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farahat YA, Elbendary MA, El-Gamal OM, Tawfik AM, Bastawisy MG, Radwan MH, et al. Application of small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of complicated vesicovaginal fistula: a pilot study. J Urol. 2012;188:861–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta NP, Mishra S, Hemal AK, Mishra A, Seth A, Dogra PN. Comparative analysis of outcome between open and robotic surgical repair of recurrent supra-trigonal vesico-vaginal fistula. J Endourol. 2010;24:1779–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hilton P. Urogenital fistula in the UK: a personal case series managed over 25 years. BJU Int. 2012;110:102–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10630.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kayondo M, Wasswa S, Kabakyenga J, Mukiibi N, Senkungu J, Stenson A, et al. Predictors and outcome of surgical repair of obstetric fistula at a regional referral hospital, Mbarara, western Uganda. BMC Urol. 2011;11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-11-23

  20. Kumar M, Pandey S, Goel A, Sharma D, Garg G, Aggarwal A. Spectrum of urologic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: 13 years’ experience from a tertiary referral center. Turkish J Urol. 2019;45:212–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.92072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurniawati E, Sudiartien Y, Paraton H, Biosci GH-J, 2020 undefined. Characteristics of vesicovaginal fistula with operative measures at tertiary referral hospital. ejobios.org. [cited 2 Feb 2021]. Available: http://www.ejobios.org/download/characteristics-of-vesicovaginal-fistula-with-operative-measures-at-tertiary-referral-hospital-7690.pdf

  22. Lee D, Dillon BE, Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Long-term functional outcomes following nonradiated vesicovaginal repair. J Urol. 2014;191:120–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mancini M, Righetto M, Modonutti D, Morlacco A, Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. Successful treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas via an abdominal transvesical approach: a single-center 50-yr experience. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 [cited 2 Feb 2021]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.017

  24. Aggarwal G, Raikwar R, Shrivastava V, Mathur P, Raikwar P, Joshi R, et al. Urogenital fistulae: a prospective study of 50 cases at a tertiary care hospital. Urol Ann. 2010;2:67. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.65114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCurdie FK, Moffatt J, Jones K. Vesicovaginal fistula in Uganda. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2018;38:822–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1407301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nawaz H, Khan M, … FT-PJPM, 2010 undefined. Patients and methods. mail.jpma.org.pk. Available: https://mail.jpma.org.pk/PdfDownload/1896

  27. Ojewola RW, Tijani KH, Jeje EA, Ogunjimi MA, Animashaun EA, Akanmu ON. Transabdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistulae: a 10-year tertiary care hospital experience in Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018;25:213–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_154_18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Osman SA, Al-Badr AH, Malabarey OT, Dawood AM, AlMosaieed BN, Rizk DEE. Causes and management of urogenital fistulas: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2018;39:373–8. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.4.21515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pradhan HK, Dangal G, Karki A, Shrestha R, Bhattachan K, Upadhyay AM, et al. Clinical profile of urogenital fistula in Kathmandu Model Hospital. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;18:210–3. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v18i2.2376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Raassen TJIP, Ngongo CJ, Mahendeka MM. Iatrogenic genitourinary fistula: an 18-year retrospective review of 805 injuries. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1699–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2445-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reddy SVK, Shaik AB. Vesico-vaginal fistula: a clinical study. Urogynaecologia. 2019;31:29–33. https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2019.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Richter LA, Lee H, Nishimwe A, Niteka LC, Kielb SJ. Characteristics of genitourinary fistula in Kigali, Rwanda; 5-year trends. Urology. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.077.

  33. Rupley DM, Dongarwar D, Salihu HM, Janda AM, Pope R. Healthcare access as a risk-marker for obstetric vesicovaginal fistula in Malawi. Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9:4–13. https://doi.org/10.21106/ijma.292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaker H, Saafan A, Yassin M, Idrissa A, Mourad MS. Obstetric vesico-vaginal fistula repair: should we trim the fistula edges? A randomized prospective study Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:302–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh O, Gupta SS, Mathur RK. Urogenital fistulas in women: 5-year experience at a single center. Urol J. 2010;7:35–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Mehrotra S, Sankhwar SN, Bhatt S. Repair of vesicovaginal fistula by the transabdominal route: outcome at a north Indian tertiary hospital. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:411–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1544-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sunday-Adeoye I, Okonta P, Ulu OL. Prevalence, profile and obstetric experience of fistula patients in Abakaliki. Southeast Nigeria Urogynaecologia. 2011;25:6. https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2011.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tatar B, Oksay T, Cebe FS, Soyupek S, Erdemoğlu E. Jinekolojik cerrahi sonrası oluşan vezikovajinal fistüllerin yönetimi. Turk Jinekoloji ve Obstet Dern Derg. 2017;14:45–51. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.46656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wahab F, Nasir A, Manan F. Outcome of VVF repair without omental interposition. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:590–2.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou L, Yang TX, Luo DY, Chen SL, Liao BH, Li H, et al. Factors influencing repair outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula: a retrospective review of 139 procedures. Urol Int. 2017;99:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Frequently Asked Questions | CMA. [cited 28 Jan 2021]. Available: https://www.meta-analysis.com/pages/faq.php

  42. (PDF) Obstetric fistula in the developing countries. [cited 1 Feb 2021]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344754771_Obstetric_Fistula_in_the_Developing_Countries

  43. Rajaian S, Pragatheeswarane M, Panda A. Vesicovaginal fistula: review and recent trends. Indian J Urol. 2019;35:250. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_147_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajamaheswari N, Bharti A, Seethalakshmi K. Vaginal repair of supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulae - a 10-year review. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2012. pp. 1675–1678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1665-7

  45. El-Azab AS, Abolella HA, Farouk M. Update on vesicovaginal fistula: a systematic review. Arab Journal of Urology. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2019. pp. 61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1590033

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available within manuscripts or supplementary files.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DBS, PB, and GD contributed to the concept and design, analysis, and interpretation of data. DBS, PB, PK, PJ, GM, MS, and PG contributed to the literature search, data extraction, review, and initial manuscript drafting. GD and GB interpretation of data, revising the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approval of the final manuscript.

All authors were involved in drafting and revising the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhan Bahadur Shrestha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 13 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 35 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 550 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrestha, D.B., Budhathoki, P., Karki, P. et al. Vesico-Vaginal Fistula in Females in 2010–2020: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Reprod. Sci. 29, 3346–3364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00832-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00832-8

Keywords

Navigation