Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Live Births Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements in Single Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Reproductive Biology: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated whether singleton pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) are associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton pregnancies conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We collected data on singleton live births after PGT-SR (n = 107) and ICSI (n = 585) in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2020. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for maternal age, body mass index, gravidity and parity, paternal age, ovulatory disorder, and recurrent spontaneous abortion. The unadjusted results showed a significantly higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–5.54; P = 0.029) associated with PGT-SR singleton pregnancies than with ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, there were no longer any significant differences in the risk of HDP (adjusted OR = 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92–5.48; P = 0.077) between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. There were no significant differences between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies in terms of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, gestational age (weeks), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), very preterm delivery (≥ 28 weeks and < 32 weeks), birth weight (g), low birth weight (< 2500 g), very low birth weight (< 1500 g), birth height (cm), birth defects, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores. In conclusion, for single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, due to the limited sample size, these conclusions need to be confirmed by further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Munné S, Scott R, Sable D, Cohen J. First pregnancies after preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1209–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goossens V, Traeger-Synodinos J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Moutou C, Pehlivan T, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XI: cycles from January to December 2008 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2009. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1887–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebaers I, Desmyttere S, Verpoest W, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Sermon K, et al. Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schendelaar P, Middelburg KJ, Bos AF, Heineman MJ, Kok JH, La Bastide-Van GS, et al. The effect of preimplantation genetic screening on neurological, cognitive and behavioural development in 4-year-old children: follow-up of a RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1508–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Makhijani R, Bartels CB, Godiwala P, Bartolucci A, DiLuigi A, Nulsen J, et al. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):340–8.

  8. Hasson J, Limoni D, Malcov M, Frumkin T, Amir H, Shavit T, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: cohort study and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:208–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Natsuaki MN, Dimler LM. Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review. World J Pediatr. 2018;14:555–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmyttere S, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Liebaers I, De Schrijver F, Verpoest W, et al. Neonatal follow-up of 995 consecutively born children after embryo biopsy for PGD. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:288–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eldar-Geva T, Srebnik N, Altarescu G, Varshaver I, Brooks B, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1016–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter C, Van Acker F, Bonduelle M, Desmyttere S, Nekkebroeck J. Psychosocial development of full term singletons, born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) at preschool age and family functioning: a prospective case-controlled study and multi-informant approach. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1122–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bay B, Ingerslev HJ, Lemmen JG, Degn B, Rasmussen IA, Kesmodel US. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1363-9.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He H, Jing S, Lu CF, Tan YQ, Luo KL, Zhang SP, et al. Neonatal outcomes of live births after blastocyst biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing cycles: a follow-up of 1,721 children. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:82–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heijligers M, Peeters A, van Montfoort A, Nijsten J, Janssen E, Gunnewiek FK, et al. Growth, health, and motor development of 5-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:1151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper AR, Jungheim ES. Preimplantation genetic testing: indications and controversies. Clin Lab Med. 2010;30:519–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Kramer MS. Why might infertile couples have problem pregnancies? Lancet. 1999;353:1724–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schendelaar P, Van den Heuvel ER, Heineman MJ, La Bastide-Van GS, Middelburg KJ, Seggers J, et al. Increased time to pregnancy is associated with less optimal neurological condition in 4-year-old singletons, in vitro fertilization itself is not. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2773–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, Diop H, Stern JE. Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nouri K, Ott J, Stoegbauer L, Pietrowski D, Frantal S, Walch K. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center–a pilot study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kokkali G, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Stavrou D, Jones GM, Cram DS, et al. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1443–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT Jr. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:608–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. da Silva SG, da Silveira MF, Bertoldi AD, Domingues MR, Dos Santos IDS. Maternal and child-health outcomes in pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harton GL, Magli MC, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, Harper JC. ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group–best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod. 2011;26:41–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berger VK, Baker VL. Preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:107–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Wang XL, Zhang X, Shen CY, Zhang Z. Live births resulting from 0PN-derived embryos in conventional IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:373–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lou H, Li N, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Hao D, Cui S. Association between morphologic grading and implantation rate of Euploid blastocyst. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14:18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2013. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e237–60.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, et al. Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(Suppl 4):131–55 (discussion 56-9).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod. 2002;17:671–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttila V, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:87–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Seggers J, Pontesilli M, Ravelli ACJ, Painter RC, Hadders-Algra M, Heineman MJ, et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:590-8.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gulersen M, Peyser A, Ferraro A, Goldman R, Mullin C, Li X, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(7):835–42.

  37. Awadalla MS, Park KE, Latack KR, McGinnis LK, Ahmady A, Paulson RJ. Influence of trophectoderm biopsy prior to frozen blastocyst transfer on obstetrical outcomes. Reprod Sci. 2021;25.

  38. Feldman B, Orvieto R, Weisel M, Aizer A, Meyer R, Haas J, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic diseases. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:782–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang WY, von Versen-Höynck F, Kapphahn KI, Fleischmann RR, Zhao Q, Baker VL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:283-90.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao Q, Chen L, Liang Y, Sui L, Guo L, Zhou J, et al. Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters placental function, which is associated with placental oxidative stress and inflammation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu D, Huang J, Gu X, Li L, Han J. Downregulation of aromatase plays a dual role in preeclampsia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2021;27(4):gaab013.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks should go to all the nurses for follow-up and questionnaire registration.

Funding

This study was funded by grants received from Henan Science and Technology Development Plan (No. 202102310061) and State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University (SKLRM-K201902 and SKLRM-K201903).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.Z., M.M., R.Y., and Y.G. contributed to the conception and design of this study. C.Y., S.Y., and J.L. contributed to the data acquisition. B.R. and R.Z. performed data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by W.Z., B.R., and Y.L. Besides, X.L., S.R., H.W., and Y.G. contributed to the manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yichun Guan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (ethics approval number: 2021–029-01).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 68 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, W., Ren, B., Mu, M. et al. Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Live Births Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements in Single Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Reprod. Sci. 29, 3039–3046 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00732-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00732-x

Keywords

Navigation