Skip to main content
Log in

Meningiomas in Gynecology and Reproduction: an Updated Overview for Clinical Practice

  • Review
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is various evidence to suggest a relationship between female hormones and meningiomas; as clinicians, we often come to face challenging situations involving female patients diagnosed with meningiomas during the post-pubertal phases of their life. We aimed to review the specific circumstances (pregnancy, postpartum, hormonal contraception and hormone replacement therapy, gender-affirming hormonal treatment) clinicians might come to face during their daily clinical practice, given the absence of available guidelines. We therefore conducted a narrative review on articles found in PubMed and Embase databases using appropriate keywords. Ninety-six relevant articles were included. The available evidence on managing meningiomas in post-pubertal women often implies personal strategies, highlighting the lack of a unified approach. The knowledge of the biological links between female hormones and meningiomas is fundamental to correctly counsel patients in various life phases. Prospective randomized studies are required to improve available guidelines on how to best manage meningiomas in female post-pubertal patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeAngelis LM. Brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(2):114–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200101113440207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Longstreth WT Jr, Dennis LK, McGuire VM, Drangsholt MT, Koepsell TD. Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Cancer. 1993;72(3):639–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mindermann T, Wilson CB. Age-related and gender-related occurrence of pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol. 1994;41(3):359–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02557.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blankenstein MA, Verheijen FM, Jacobs JM, Donker TH, van Duijnhoven MW, Thijssen JH. Occurrence, regulation, and significance of progesterone receptors in human meningioma. Steroids. 2000;65(10-11):795–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00193-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bos D, Poels MM, Adams HH, Akoudad S, Cremers LG, Zonneveld HI, et al. Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Radiology. 2016;281(2):507–15. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, Kaley TJ, McDermott M, Raizer J, et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):4–23. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS131644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee CC, Trifiletti DM, Sahgal A, DeSalles A, Fariselli L, Hayashi M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign (World Health Organization Grade I) cavernous sinus meningiomas-International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(6):1128–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaley T, Barani I, Chamberlain M, McDermott M, Panageas K, Raizer J, et al. Historical benchmarks for medical therapy trials in surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma: a RANO review. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16(6):829–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Klaeboe L, Lonn S, Scheie D, Auvinen A, Christensen HC, Feychting M, et al. Incidence of intracranial meningiomas in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, 1968-1997. Int J Cancer. 2005;117(6):996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2010;99(3):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magdelenat H, Pertuiset BF, Poisson M, Martin PM, Philippon J, Pertuiset B, et al. Progestin and oestrogen receptors in meningiomas. Biochemical characterization, clinical and pathological correlations in 42 cases. Acta Neurochir. 1982;64(3-4):199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donnell MS, Meyer GA, Donegan WL. Estrogen-receptor protein in intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1979;50(4):499–502. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1979.50.4.0499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesch KP, Fahlbusch R. Analysis of estradiol and progesterone receptors in meningioma. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1986;29(4):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1054147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lesch KP, Schott W, Engl HG, Gross S, Thierauf P. Gonadal steroid receptors in meningiomas. J Neurol. 1987;234(5):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poisson M, Pertuiset BF, Hauw JJ, Philippon J, Buge A, Moguilewsky M, et al. Steroid hormone receptors in human meningiomas, gliomas and brain metastases. J Neuro-Oncol. 1983;1(3):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson JJ. Laboratory evidence for the hormonal dependency of meningiomas. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(Suppl 1):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maiuri F, Mariniello G, Guadagno E, Barbato M, Corvino S, Del Basso De Caro M. WHO grade, proliferation index, and progesterone receptor expression are different according to the location of meningioma. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(12):2553–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04084-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishioka T, Kondo A, Aoyama I, Shimotake K, Takahashi J, Kusaka H. Primary interosseous meningioma associated with pregnancy--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1989;29(7):619–23. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.29.619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chakravarthy V, Kaplan B, Gospodarev V, Myers H, De Los RK, Achiriloaie A. Houdini tumor: case report and literature review of pregnancy-associated meningioma. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e1261–e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Casabella AM, Urakov TM, Basil G, Morcos JJ. Management of Foramen magnum meningioma during pregnancy: literature review and case report. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:752 e15–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. King AB. Neurologic conditions occurring as complications of pregnancy. Arch NeurPsych. 1950;63(4):611–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1950.02310220078008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weyland RD, MacCarthy CS, Wilson RB. The effect of pregnancy on intercranial meningiomas occurring about the optic chiasma. Surg Clin N Amer. 1951;31:122.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Priddy BH, Otto BA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Management of skull base tumors in the obstetric population: a case series. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e373–e82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wigertz A, Lonn S, Hall P, Auvinen A, Christensen HC, Johansen C, et al. Reproductive factors and risk of meningioma and glioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(10):2663–70. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laviv Y, Bayoumi A, Mahadevan A, Young B, Boone M, Kasper EM. Meningiomas in pregnancy: timing of surgery and clinical outcomes as observed in 104 cases and establishment of a best management strategy. Acta Neurochir. 2018;160(8):1521–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3146-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harland TA, Freeman JL, Davern M, McCracken DJ, Celano EC, Lillehei K, et al. Progesterone-only contraception is associated with a shorter progression-free survival in premenopausal women with WHO Grade I meningioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2018;136(2):327–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2656-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bickerstaff ER, Small JM, Guest IA. The relapsing course of certain meningiomas in relation to pregnancy and menstruation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1958;21(2):89–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.21.2.89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlehofer B, Blettner M, Wahrendorf J. Association between brain tumors and menopausal status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(17):1346–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.17.1346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wahab M, Al-Azzawi F. Meningioma and hormonal influences. Climacteric. 2003;6(4):285–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hortobagyi T, Bencze J, Murnyak B, Kouhsari MC, Bognar L, Marko-Varga G. Pathophysiology of Meningioma Growth in Pregnancy. Open Med (Wars). 2017;12:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1821–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Verheecke M, Halaska MJ, Lok CA, Ottevanger PB, Fruscio R, Dahl-Steffensen K, et al. Primary brain tumours, meningiomas and brain metastases in pregnancy: report on 27 cases and review of literature. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(8):1462–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Graillon T, Cuny T, Castinetti F, Courbiere B, Cousin M, Albarel F, et al. Surgical indications for pituitary tumors during pregnancy: a literature review. Pituitary. 2020;23(2):189–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-01004-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dietrich J, Rao K, Pastorino S, Kesari S. Corticosteroids in brain cancer patients: benefits and pitfalls. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4(2):233–42. https://doi.org/10.1586/ecp.11.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Schiff D, Lee EQ, Nayak L, Norden AD, Reardon DA, Wen PY. Medical management of brain tumors and the sequelae of treatment. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17(4):488–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Mele L, Johnson F, Dudley DJ, Spong CY, et al. Long-term outcomes after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1190–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morsi A, DeFranco D, Witchel SF. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the fetus. Horm Res Paediatr. 2018;89(5):380–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brosnan PG. The hypothalamic pituitary axis in the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol. 2001;25(6):371–84. https://doi.org/10.1053/sper.2001.29038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bain MD, Copas DK, Landon MJ, Stacey TE. In vivo permeability of the human placenta to inulin and mannitol. J Physiol. 1988;399:313–9. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kazemi P, Villar G, Flexman AM. Anesthetic management of neurosurgical procedures during pregnancy: a case series. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26(3):234–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Veroniki AA, Cogo E, Rios P, Straus SE, Finkelstein Y, Kealey R, et al. Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Christianne Lok MD, PhD. Surgery during pregnancy. In: Oncology TEVoG, editor. Textbook of Cancer in Pregnancy. 2017. p. 25 - 8.

  44. Ancel PY, Goffinet F, Group E-W, Kuhn P, Langer B, Matis J, et al. Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):230–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Manuck TA, Rice MM, Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, et al. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):103 e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Su TM, Lan CM, Yang LC, Lee TC, Wang KW, Hung KS. Brain tumor presenting with fatal herniation following delivery under epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(2):508–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200202000-00041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rodrigues AJ, Waldrop AR, Suharwardy S, Druzin ML, Iv M, Ansari JR, et al. Management of brain tumors presenting in pregnancy: a case series and systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(1):100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yust-Katz S, de Groot JF, Liu D, Wu J, Yuan Y, Anderson MD, et al. Pregnancy and glial brain tumors. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16(9):1289–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mallari RJ, Thakur JD, Griffiths C, Krauss H, Eisenberg A, Barkhoudarian G, et al. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas in pregnancy: 3 cases treated in the second trimester and literature review. World Neurosurg. 2020;143:268–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. International Commission on Radiological P. Pregnancy and medical radiation. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(1):iii-viii, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6453(00)00037-3.

  51. Philip Poortmans M, PhD, Orit Kaidar-Person, MD, Helene Masset, PhD, MSc, Elzbieta Lampka, MD. Radiotherapy during Pregnancy. In: Oncology TEVoG, editor. Textbook of Cancer in Pregnancy. INCIP; International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy; 2017. p. 17 - 24.

  52. Committee on Obstetric P. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(4):e210-e2e6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355.

  53. Mervak BM, Altun E, McGinty KA, Hyslop WB, Semelka RC, Burke LM. MRI in pregnancy: indications and practical considerations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(3):621–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Anic GM, Madden MH, Nabors LB, Olson JJ, LaRocca RV, Thompson ZJ, et al. Reproductive factors and risk of primary brain tumors in women. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;118(2):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1427-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Johnson N, Sermer M, Lausman A, Maxwell C. Obstetric outcomes of women with intracranial neoplasms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(1):56–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Owens MA, Craig BM, Egan KM, Reed DR. Birth desires and intentions of women diagnosed with a meningioma. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(5):1151–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS14522.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Custer B, Longstreth WT Jr, Phillips LE, Koepsell TD, Van Belle G. Hormonal exposures and the risk of intracranial meningioma in women: a population-based case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019. NCHS Data Brief. 2020(388):1–8.

  59. Michaud DS, Gallo V, Schlehofer B, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, et al. Reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use in relation to risk of glioma and meningioma in a large European cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19(10):2562–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Jhawar BS, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ. Sex steroid hormone exposures and risk for meningioma. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(5):848–53. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Benson VS, Pirie K, Green J, Bull D, Casabonne D, Reeves GK, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and incidence of central nervous system tumours in the Million Women Study. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(7):1692–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cea-Soriano L, Wallander MA, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Epidemiology of meningioma in the United Kingdom. Neuroepidemiology. 2012;39(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lee E, Grutsch J, Persky V, Glick R, Mendes J, Davis F. Association of meningioma with reproductive factors. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(5):1152–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Korhonen K, Raitanen J, Isola J, Haapasalo H, Salminen T, Auvinen A. Exogenous sex hormone use and risk of meningioma: a population-based case-control study in Finland. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(12):2149–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9634-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Alderman CP. Probable drug-related meningioma detected during the course of medication review services. Consult Pharm. 2016;31(9):500–4. https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2016.500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Champagne PO, Passeri T, Froelich S. Combined hormonal influence of cyproterone acetate and nomegestrol acetate on meningioma: a case report. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(3):589–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-03782-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gil M, Oliva B, Timoner J, Macia MA, Bryant V, de Abajo FJ. Risk of meningioma among users of high doses of cyproterone acetate as compared with the general population: evidence from a population-based cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72(6):965–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04031.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. O'Shea T, Crowley RK, Farrell M, MacNally S, Govender P, Feeney J, et al. Growth of a progesterone receptor-positive meningioma in a female patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2016;2016. https://doi.org/10.1530/EDM-16-0054.

  69. Peyre M, Gaillard S, de Marcellus C, Giry M, Bielle F, Villa C, et al. Progestin-associated shift of meningioma mutational landscape. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(3):681–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bernat AL, Oyama K, Hamdi S, Mandonnet E, Vexiau D, Pocard M, et al. Growth stabilization and regression of meningiomas after discontinuation of cyproterone acetate: a case series of 12 patients. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157(10):1741–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2532-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Botella C, Coll G, Lemaire JJ, Irthum B. Intra cranial meningiomas and long term use of cyproterone acetate with a conventional dose in women. A report of two cases of tumor decrease after treatment withdrawal. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(5):339–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2015.05.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cebula H, Pham TQ, Boyer P, Froelich S. Regression of meningiomas after discontinuation of cyproterone acetate in a transsexual patient. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152(11):1955–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0787-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kalamarides M, Peyre M. Dramatic shrinkage with reduced vascularization of large meningiomas after cessation of progestin treatment. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:814 e7–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weill ANP, Yoldjian I, Fontanel S, Froelich S, Coste J. Exposition prolongée à de fortes doses d’acétate de cyprotérone et risque de méningiome chez la femme : une recherche-action de santé publique en France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020;68(March 2020):S3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2020.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Passeri T, Champagne PO, Bernat AL, Hanakita S, Salle H, Mandonnet E, et al. Spontaneous regression of meningiomas after interruption of nomegestrol acetate: a series of three patients. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(4):761–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03848-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Mahajan DK, London SN. Mifepristone (RU486): a review. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(6):967–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00189-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Grunberg SM, Weiss MH, Spitz IM, Ahmadi J, Sadun A, Russell CA, et al. Treatment of unresectable meningiomas with the antiprogesterone agent mifepristone. J Neurosurg. 1991;74(6):861–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.6.0861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Piper JG, Follett KA, Fantin A. Sphenoid wing meningioma progression after placement of a subcutaneous progesterone agonist contraceptive implant. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(4):723–5; discussion 5. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199404000-00022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Zairi F, Aboukais R, LER E, Marinho P, Maurage CA, Lejeune JP. Close follow-up after discontinuation of cyproterone acetate: a possible option to defer surgery in patients with voluminous intracranial meningioma. J Neurosurg Sci. 2017;61(1):98–101. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03243-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ossewaarde ME, Bots ML, Verbeek AL, Peeters PH, van der Graaf Y, Grobbee DE, et al. Age at menopause, cause-specific mortality and total life expectancy. Epidemiology. 2005;16(4):556–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000165392.35273.d4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hing E, Brett KM. Changes in U.S. prescribing patterns of menopausal hormone therapy, 2001-2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000220502.77153.5a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Qi ZY, Shao C, Huang YL, Hui GZ, Zhou YX, Wang Z. Reproductive and exogenous hormone factors in relation to risk of meningioma in women: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Huang K, Whelan EA, Ruder AM, Ward EM, Deddens JA, Davis-King KE, et al. Reproductive factors and risk of glioma in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13(10):1583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hatch EE, Linet MS, Zhang J, Fine HA, Shapiro WR, Selker RG, et al. Reproductive and hormonal factors and risk of brain tumors in adult females. Int J Cancer. 2005;114(5):797–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Benson VS, Pirie K, Green J, Casabonne D, Beral V. Million Women Study C. Lifestyle factors and primary glioma and meningioma tumours in the Million Women Study cohort. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(1):185–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Claus EB, Black PM, Bondy ML, Calvocoressi L, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, et al. Exogenous hormone use and meningioma risk: what do we tell our patients? Cancer. 2007;110(3):471–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Biglia N, Gadducci A, Ponzone R, Roagna R, Sismondi P. Hormone replacement therapy in cancer survivors. Maturitas. 2004;48(4):333–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.09.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ettinger B, Barrett-Connor E, Hoq LA, Vader JP, Dubois RW. When is it appropriate to prescribe postmenopausal hormone therapy? Menopause. 2006;13(3):404–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gme.0000188735.61994.5b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Deli T, Orosz M, Jakab A. Hormone replacement therapy in cancer survivors - review of the literature. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26(1):63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-00569-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Goldrat O, Kroman N, Peccatori FA, Cordoba O, Pistilli B, Lidegaard O, et al. Pregnancy following breast cancer using assisted reproduction and its effect on long-term outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(12):1490–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bergoglio MT, Gomez-Balaguer M, Almonacid Folch E, Hurtado Murillo F, Hernandez-Mijares A. Symptomatic meningioma induced by cross-sex hormone treatment in a male-to-female transsexual. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60(5):264–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endonu.2012.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Gazzeri G. Growth of a meningioma in a transsexual patient after estrogen-progestin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2411–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc071938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Deipolyi AR, Han SJ, Parsa AT. Development of a symptomatic intracranial meningioma in a male-to-female transsexual after initiation of hormone therapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(10):1324–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.01.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Mancini I, Rotilio A, Coati I, Seracchioli R, Martelli V, Meriggiola MC. Presentation of a meningioma in a transwoman after nine years of cyproterone acetate and estradiol intake: case report and literature review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(6):456–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2017.1395839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ter Wengel PV, Martin E, Gooren L, Den Heijer M, Peerdeman SM. Meningiomas in three male-to-female transgender subjects using oestrogens/progestogens and review of the literature. Andrologia. 2016;48(10):1130–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Carroll RS, Zhang J, Black PM. Expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human meningiomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 1999;42(2):109–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006158514866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Serena Girardelli: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing—original draft. Luigi Albano: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing—original draft. Giorgia Mangili: conceptualization, supervision, and writing—reviewing and editing. Luca Valsecchi: visualization and writing—reviewing and editing. Emanuela Rabaiotti: visualization and writing—reviewing and editing. Paolo Cavoretto: visualization and writing—reviewing and editing. Pietro Mortini: writing—reviewing and editing. Massimo Candiani: writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Girardelli.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Standards

No procedures on humans and/or animals were performed during in this study. For this type of study, our institution’s review board has confirmed that formal consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

All authors have provided consent for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Serena Girardelli and Luigi Albano are joint first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girardelli, S., Albano, L., Mangili, G. et al. Meningiomas in Gynecology and Reproduction: an Updated Overview for Clinical Practice. Reprod. Sci. 29, 2452–2464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00606-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00606-2

Keywords

Navigation