Despite significant advances in the phylogenomics of bivalves over the past decade, the higher-level phylogeny of Imparidentia (a superorder of Heterodonta) remains elusive. Here, a total of five new mitochondrial sequences (Chama asperella, Chama limbula, Chama dunkeri, Barnea manilensis and Ctena divergens) was added to provide resolution in nodes that required additional study. Although the monophyly of Lucinida remains less clear, the results revealed the overall backbone of the Imparidentia tree and the monophyly of Imparidentia. Likewise, most relationships among the five major Imparidentia lineages—Lucinida, Cardiida, Adapedonta, Myida and Venerida—were addressed with a well-supported topology. Basal relationships of Imparidentia recovered Lucinidae as the sister group to all remaining imparidentian taxa. Thyasiridae is a sister group to other imparidentian bivalves (except Lucinidae species) which is split into Cardiida, Adapedonta and the divergent clade of Neoheterodontei. Neoheterodontei was comprised of Venerida and Myida, the former of which now also contains Chamidae as the sister group to all the remaining venerid taxa. Moreover, molecular divergence times were inferred by calibrating nine nodes in the Imparidentia tree of life by extinct taxa. The origin of these major clades ranged from Ordovician to Permian with the diversification through the Palaeozoic to Mesozoic. Overall, the results obtained in this study demonstrate a better-resolved Imparidentia phylogeny based on mitochondrial genomes.
Euheterodonta is accomplished by two major clades (Anomalodesmata and Imparidentia) and is recognized as the most diverse group of Bivalvia (MolluscaBase 2021). Imparidentia is a diverse clade of marine, brackish and freshwater bivalve molluscs that was established by Bieler et al. (2014) and includes well-known and economically important groups such as shipworms, giant clams, geoduck clams and cockles. Imparidentia taxa are quite variable in their habits which include burrowing in sediments, attaching to intertidal reefs, boring into rock and wood, or living with other invertebrates. Therefore, Imparidentia adopts a multitude of different alimentation modes including filter feeding, algal photosymbiosis and bacterial chemosymbiosis (Campbell and Bottjer 1995; Li et al. 2018). Besides their considerable ecological importance in community structure, numerous Imparidentia species could be regarded as trophic resources. Thus, many efforts have been made to understand the phylogeny of the Imparidentia using shell morphology, anatomy and available molecular markers (Bieler et al. 2014; Lemer et al. 2019).
The internal structure of the group remained opaque to zootomic, mitochondrial, nuclear fragment-based or other approaches even though some phylogenetic patterns of Imparidentia have been identified. This group clearly contains the order Lucinida, Cardiida, Adapedonta, and the large Neoheterodontei clade (first defined by Taylor et al. 2007) and was composed of the orders Myida and Venerida and some families whose systematic position is uncertain (Bieler et al. 2014) although Lemer et al. (2019) subsequently determined the positions of some of these families. However, previous phylogenetic studies showed low resolution of deeply dividing lineages within the Imparidentia such as Adapedonta (Lemer et al. 2019). In addition, it is unclear whether Thyasiridae is included in Lucinda and the relationship between Lucinidae and Thyasiridae was poorly resolved in a previous analysis (Bieler et al. 2014). Furthermore, the systematic positions of a large number of families within Imparidentia could not be determined with certainty, for example, the position of the extremely long-branched Chamidae was conflictive in previous studies (González et al. 2015; Taylor et al. 2007). Pholadidae is a family of the order Myida adapted to boring into a range of substrates, however, there is no definitive conclusion as to when this habit evolved.
Mitochondrial genomes, which are characterized by their small size, maternal inheritance, rare recombination and high evolutionary rate (Boore 1999; Cameron 2014; Curole and Kocher 1999), provide a suitable data source for phylogenetic inference. Typical metazoan mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a compact circular molecule that comprises 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNA genes and 22 tRNAs used for translation within the organelle (Boore 1999; Breton et al. 2014). Mitochondrial genomes have higher mutation rates and smaller effective population sizes (Ne) than nuclear DNA (Cameron 2014; Curole and Kocher 1999; Eberle et al. 2020) and thus could provide more phylogenetic information compared with nuclear or mitochondrial gene fragments. Multiple levels of phylogenetic signal, such as nucleotide, amino acid, gene arrangement pattern, small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) mitogenome architecture and RNA secondary structure, have been used for analysising (Dowton and Austin 1999; Liu et al. 2022; Mikkelsen et al. 2018; Salvi and Mariottini 2012; Shao et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2020). Denser and strategic taxonomic sampling of mitogenomes for mitogenome characterization has been implemented by next-generation sequencing methods (Smith 2016). Complete sequences of mitochondrial genomes of Imparidentia bivalves have been determined to assess the variability of their gene contents and features of the genome organisation (Dreyer and Steiner 2006). The evolution of gene rearrangements and phylogenetic implications have been informed using the mitogenomes of Tellinoidea and Solenoidea (Sun et al. 2020; Yuan et al. 2012). A subsequent study based on mitogenomes provided much-expanded taxon sampling for the family Veneridae (Bivalvia) and explored the evolutionary relationships among subfamilies of Veneridae (Wang et al. 2021). Such enriched diversity and divergence in Imparidentia mitogenomes, for which many genomic resources are available, provide an opportunity to derive a better understanding of the internal phylogenetic inference within Imparidentia and the evolution of mitogenomes.
In the current study, five mitochondrial genomes of Imparidentia (Ctena divergens, Barnea manilensis, Chama asperella, Chama limbula, and Chama dunkeri) were newly sequenced to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship of the superorder Imparidentia. In addition, a comparative analysis of 86 Imparidentia mitogenomes was probed. Our aims are: (1) to improve the phylogenetic resolution within Imparidentia; and (2) to date the main cladogenetic events during the diversification of the superorder Imparidentia.
Mitochondrial genome organization
The complete mitochondrial genomes of C. asperella, C. dunkeri, C. divergens and B. manilensis, and the nearly complete mitochondrial genome of C. limbula (only lacking two tRNAs), were obtained and deposited in GenBank with accession number MZ701706, MZ557447, MZ540208, MZ701705, and MZ688407, respectively. They were analyzed together with an additional 81 mitochondrial genomes of Imparidentia downloaded from GenBank (for details and GenBank accession numbers, see supplementary Table S1). The complete mitochondrial genomes (mtDNAs) of these 86 bivalves varied in size from 14,979 bp (Cerastoderma edule) to 26,915 bp (C. asperella). The size of putatively unstranslated regions (Urs) spanned from < 1% (Villorita cyprinoides) to > 39% (Chamidae). The number of annotated genes was more stable, ranging from 33 (Sinonovacula constricta) to 42 (Fulvia mutica). As summarized in Fig. 1A, the median of URs (%) increased in the order: Cardiida > Lucinida > Venerida > Adapedonta, and in terms of mtDNA length: Venerida > Lucinida > Cardiida > Adapedonta. In addition, these orders differed significantly in terms of their A-T and G-C skews. Finally, the dN/dS ratio for each protein-coding gene (PCG) among the 86 mitochondrial genomes is given in Fig. 1B. The highest value was in nad2 (dN/ dS = 0.061), while the lowest was in cox3 (dN/dS = 0.022) (Supplementary Table S2).
Summarizing data: principal component analysis (PCA)
All Imparidentia bivalve (except two species of Myida and four species of Lucinida) mitogenomic features are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The results of the principal component analysis (PCA) are given in Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S1. The first two principal compnents account for 65.87% of the matrix data set variance. The larger taxonomic combinations are easy to identify: Adapedonta was at the top, Cardiida was on the left side and the wide cluster of Venerida was on the right side (Fig. 1C). The family Veneridae almost formed a single cluster, contrastingly, pointes of some families are sharply separated from other species belonging to the same family, e.g., Vesicomyidae and Chamidae. The superfamily Tellinoidea (except family Tellinidae) clustered into two groups: one represented by Donacidae, the other represented by Psammobiidae, Semelidae, Solecurtidae, and Scrobiculariidae (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Phylogenetic trees based on an amino acid matrix data set (containing 2998 sites) deduced from 12 PCGs (except atp8 gene due to many uncertainties in annotation and orthology) were inferred using BI and ML methods. The BI tree (Fig. 2) and ML phylogram (Supplementary Fig. S2) had analogical topologies but with some differences. Lucinida occupied the basal position clustering in a well-supported clade with Cardiidae, Adapedonta, Myida and Venerida. Thyasiridae, however, was a stable sister group to all the remaining Imparidentia instead of forming a clade with other lucinida taxa. Cardiida was subdivided into two clades, Cardioidea and Tellinoidea. The earliest diverging lineage of Cardioidea was Cardiidae which was divided into two subclades with full support. Nuttallia obscurata (Psammobiidae) occupied the basal position within the Tellinoidea clade, rather than clustered with other Psammobiidae taxa. Solecurtidae and Psammobiidae formed a well-supported clade. Members of the families Semelidae and Tellinidae grouped together in a maximally supported clade (100% PP) within the superfamily Tellinoidea. It is noteworthy that Iridona iridescens (Tellinidae) was a sister group to the Macoma balthica + Semelidae clade with well support both in the ML tree (Supplementary Fig. S2) and BI tree (Fig. 2), but the M. balthica + Semelidae clade was with poor support in the ML tree. Adapedonta, consisting of Solenidae, Hiatellidae and Pharidae, was resolved as a sister to the well-supported Myida + Venerida clade with weak support in the ML tree, but with maximal support in the BI tree. Within the Adapedonta, Hiatella is separated on a long branch from the two Solen species and Sinonovacula constricta, although with weak support. Panopea was a sister group to the Hiatella + Solen + Sinonovacula clade. Within the Myida branch, Barnea manilensis was sister to Mya arenaria. Myida was sister to Venerida with Adapedonta being their most immediate outgroup. The evolutionary relationship within Venerida shows more uncertainty, even after the addition of Chamoidea. Chamoidea occupied the basal position within Venerida. Pseudocardium sachalinense and Lutraria formed a weakly supported clade in the ML tree, however, P. sachalinense was sister to Mactra in the BI tree (PP = 0.87) within the Mactridae. Within Veneridae, Callistinae and Meretricinae formed a strongly supported clade that was sister to Cyclininae presented by Cyclina sinensis (PP = 1.00) in the BI tree, whereas the Callistinae + Cyclininae clade was sister to the Meretricinae with moderately supported (bootstrap support, BS = 73) in ML analysis.
Molecular dating of Imparidentia reveals ancient diversification
Divergence times of clades were performed using nine fossil calibrations (Fig. 3). Dating performed under a relaxed molecular clock model recovered a Precambrian age for the crown group of Imparidentia, i.e., 632 Mya (million years ago) [Precambrian]. Diversification dates for major clades of Imparidentia were deduced as follows: Lucinida: 387 Mya; Cardiida: 450.76 Mya (highest posterior density interval (HPD): 449–594 Mya); Adapedonta: 315.1 Mya (HPD: 258–419 Mya); Myoida: 181 Mya (HPD: 179–183 Mya); Venerida: 411 Mya (HPD: 382–499 Mya); Neoheterodontei: 497 Mya (HPD: 450–565 Mya). Dates for all other nodes are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3.
Although the 12 protein-coding genes had various dN/dS ratios among several orders, all dN/dS ratios of Imparidentia bivalves obtained in this work were less than 1, indicating that they were all subjected to purifying selection. Overall, nad genes had more non-synonymous sites than cox genes and cob genes. This trend is consistent with the hypothesis that genes encoding subunits of cytochrome c oxidase and cytochrome b are more conserved than NADH dehydrogenase genes (Saccone et al. 1999). It is noteworthy that the nad2 gene had the highest dN/dS value, indicating that this gene has been subjected to the loosest purifying selection. Furthermore, compared with other PCGs (protein-coding genes), the nad2 gene has accumulated more non-synonymous mutations.
The results of the PCA showed that Cardiida was separated from Venerida on PC1 (36.76%), whereas some Venerida taxa clusted with Cardiida (Fig. 1C). Although Adapedonta species gather as a group, Adapedonta could not be distinguished from the remaining two orders due to the small sample size. Further studies applying more species and more features of the mitochondrial genome are required to better comprehend the factors affecting the mt genome in bivalves.
We reconstructed the phylogeny of Imparidentia bivalves using amino acid sequences of the 12 mitochondrial protein-coding genes and investigated the evolutionary patterns of Imparidentia mitochondrial genome. The BI analysis provided a remarkably well-supported and well-resolved phylogeny of the group, whereas in the ML analysis some higher-level clades of Imparidentia were only weakly supported.
The monophyly of the much-discussed clade Lucinida was rejected in the present study, which is consistent with the results of previous analyses (Taylor and Glover 2006; Taylor et al. 2007). Moreover, our analyses failed to support prior hypotheses that Thyasiridae and Lucinidae occupy the basal position of Imparidentia (Bieler et al. 2014; Combosch et al. 2017a). Nevertheless, the finding that Thyasiridae is the sister group to the rest of Imparidentia with Lucinidae excluded was strongly supported in both the ML and BI trees. Thus, the position of Thyasiridae in our analysis confirmed one of the two possibilities proposed by Lemer et al. (2019).
Cardiida formed a stable branch consisting of Cardioidea + Tellinoidea in both the BI and ML trees, albeit with variable support, which is consistent with previous studies (Bieler et al. 2014; Taylor et al. 2007; Williams et al. 2017). The relationship among these families of the superfamily Tellinoidea remains poorly resolved as reported previously (Sun et al. 2020; Yuan et al. 2012). Therefore, further phylogenetic studies including more taxa of the superfamily Tellinoidea are required.
The position of Adapedonta was inconclusive in previous analyses. Lemer et al. (2019) found that Adapedonta is the sister group to Cardiida, whereas Adapedonta is the sister group to Myida and Venerida in our analysis, which is consistent with previous analyses using mitochondrial genomes (Williams et al. 2017). Adapedonta was a well-supported clade comprising two superfamilies Hiatelloidea and Solenoidea (= Solenidae + Pharidae) in both the BI and ML trees (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S2), and this grouping has been recognized in previous phylogenetic studies (Bieler et al. 2014; Taylor et al. 2007, 2009; Yuan et al. 2012). Nevertheless, this result conflicts with previous findings based on morphology which suggest that the Hiatelloidea was a member of the Myida (Newell 1965). However, there is no strong morphological apomorphy that unites these two taxa. In the current mtDNA phylogenetic analyses, Hiatella is separated on a long branch from the three Solenoidea species (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S2), whereas in some previous molecular analyses Hiatella grouped with Panopea (Bieler et al. 2014; Taylor et al. 2007).
A putative clade, named Neoheterodontei by Taylor et al. (2007), including Myida and an array of families that we allocate to a redefined Venerida (Fig. 2), has been reported in other molecular phylogenies (Bieler et al. 2014; González et al. 2015; Lemer et al. 2019). The high-level taxonomic ranks of Neoheterodontei were likewise stable and highly supported, except Mactroidea formed a cluster to all other veneridans (exclude Chamidae taxa) with low support in the ML tree. Venerida was less clearly resolved, the placements of Chamoidea, Mactroidea, Arcticoidea, and Veneroidea still being problematic. The position of Chamidae has been long discussed (Combosch et al. 2017a; González et al. 2015; Taylor et al. 2007) but was well resolved as a member of Venerida in present analyses with full support. Chamaidae was the sister group to the rest of the Venerida taxa in this study. In previously published gene trees, Chamidae grouped with Hemidonacidae, Glossidae, Trapezidae, Cardiidae and Veneridae (Bieler et al. 2014; Combosch et al. 2017a; Lemer et al. 2019), so its definitive position is less clear. Furthermore, Arcticidae was sister group either to Vesicomyidae + Veneridae or to Trapezidae in previous studies (Bouchet et al. 2010; Lemer et al. 2019), but was closely related to Cyrenidae within a well-supported clade in the current study. Mactroidea represented by Mactridae was sister group to the rest of Neoheterodontei, excluding Chamoidea and Myida, which conflicted with a published hypothesis (Taylor et al. 2007). Vesicomyidae clustered with Veneridae rather than with Glossidae, which is in contrast to the findings of Bouchet et al. (2010). The evolutionary relationship of Veneridae has been investigated and contested in previous studies (Chen et al. 2011; Kappner and Bieler 2006; Mikkelsen et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2021). Veneridae is generally considered a complicated group with two subclades as reported here. However, relationships among venerid lineages differed slightly in the BI and ML trees (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S2). Investigations of other nominal venerid taxa will be necessary to fully resolve the phylogeny of Veneridae.
Divergence time estimation
The appearance of Cypricardites bidens in the fossil record clearly points out an early origin of Imparidentia bivalves before the Ordovician (Isberg 1934). The divergence of this clade was dated to the Precambrian (Ediacaran Period) with molecular techniques, although no undisputable fossil evidence for Imparidentia has ever been found in sediments older than the earliest Cambrian. Molecular divergence time estimation suggests that the superorder Imparidentia diversified steadily since its origin and continued generating higher diversity until the Cretaceous, seemingly unaffected by the Permian mass extinction event (Fig. 4). The long branches separating its origin and diversification from modern forms are likely indicative of major-lineage extinction.
The divergence time estimation for Lucinida has shown this group originated during the Ediacaran and first diversified before the end-Permian mass extinction. However, the fossil record of Lucinida could reach the early Silurian, about 443.7 Ma, exemplified by Illionia canadensi from Estonia, Sweden and the USA (Michigan). Generally, the fossil record for many invertebrate groups is scarce (Ballesteros et al. 2020). Cardiida was represented by Cypricardites bidens from the Early Silurian onwards (Isberg 1934). The first diversification of Cardiida during the Ordovician as shown in time trees is concordant with the fossil record, and further diversification occurred steadily until the Cretaceous.
Our estimation of divergence time undoubtedly indicated Cambrian to Ordovician ages of Neoheterodontei origin. The timing of the split between Adapedonta and remaining Neoheterodontei bivalves was estimated to have occurred during the Ordovician in our time-calibrated phylogenetic analysis. Adapedonta first became abundant during the Triassic after the end-Permian event. The divergence of Myida from Venerida is dated to the Ordovician Period (447 Ma) using molecular techniques in our analysis. Clavate boring in wood (lignic) substrates has been attributed to bivalve trace-makers (Teredinidae and Pholadidae) from Middle Jurassic to the present day (Bromley 2004; Evans 1999). However, a trace fossil bored by bioeroding bivalves could extend to the Ordovician (Taylor and Wilson 2003). These borers are morphologically indistinguishable, usually being differentiated by substrate or the mode of the boring process (Donovan and Ewin 2018). Thus, these putative ichnospecies may be the ancestor of Myida, although this needs further verification. The fossil record of Venerida dates to the Late Ordovician in the form of Glauconome plumula (Skjeseth 1955) which is consistent with our molecular estimation. Despite these relatively deep origins, fossil record of Venerida was scarce throughout the period spanning the Silurian to the Carboniferous. The rare fossil record extending to the Paleozoic is inconclusive for determining whether the diversification of this group was ancient. Evolutionary relicts like Nautiloidea appeared early in the fossil record, the oldest fossils belonging to the Late Cambrian, but this lineage has survived to the present day as a small number of species that diverged recently (Combosch et al. 2017b). However, patterns of Venerida species richness observed in our analysis dates the beginning of the rapid radiation of venerids to the middle of Devonian conflicts with the fossil record.
The findings of the present study support the overall backbone of the Imparidentia phylogeny. The monophyly of Imparidentia and four main lineages—Cardiida, Adapedonta, Myida and Venerida—was considered valid, although the monophyly of Lucinida remains uncertain. Our results strongly support Thyasiridae as the sister group to a clade that contains the rest of Imparidentia except Lucinida. Chamidae formed a clade with Mactridae as a member of the Venerida. Moreover, molecular divergence times were inferred by using extinct taxa to calibrate nine nodes in the Imparidentia tree. The origin of these major clades ranged from the Ordovician to the Permian with diversification through the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. However, we lack sufficiently broad geographic sampling of Imparidentia to reconstruct a more complete phylogenetic tree. Denser sampling of extant Imparidentia bivalve diversity in future studies will augment the predictive power of such approaches in deciphering the evolutionary history of this group.
Materials and methods
DNA extraction, library preparation, and next-generation sequencing
The newly sequenced specimens were obtained from the intertidal zones along the South China Sea coast in Hainan, China. Voucher specimens of C. asperella, C. limbula, C. dunkeri, B. manilensis and C. divergens are preserved in Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ocean University of China. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was obtained from tissues preserved in ethanol using a modified phenol–chloroform procedure (Li et al. 2002). Total genomic DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and then supplied to Novogene (Beijing, China) for library preparation and high-throughput sequencing. Libraries were prepared with an average fragment size of approximately 300 bp. The DNA libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform using parallel sequencing with 150 bp paired-end reads. The raw data produced for each library were filtered for further analysis. De novo assemblies of reads and annotation were conducted with Mitoz using the invertebrate genetic code. In the case of C. limbula and C. dunkeri, the largest mt genomes contig generated by Mitoz lacking several mt genes and Geneious Prime version 2020.1 (Hahn et al. 2013) was used for assembly.
The protein-coding genes (PCGs) predictions were mainly accomplished using the Open Reading Frame Finder and MITOS web server (Bernt et al. 2013) with the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. Gene boundaries were determined by comparison with the mitochondrial genome download from NCBI. The rRNA genes were recognized by BLAST search (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) employing their resemblance of inferred sequences and presumed to stretch out the boundaries of nearby genes (Boore et al. 2005). ARWEN (Laslett and Canbäck 2008) and DOGMA (Wyman et al. 2004) were used to determine the positions of tRNA genes using the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code and the default search mode.
Sequence analysis and principal component analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out with numerous diverse variables (Supplementary Table S1) including length of mt genome, percentage of major Unassigned Regions, A-T and G-C skews, AT content, the total number of genes, and mitochondrial gene rearrangements. The rRNAs and tRNAs were eliminated from the analysis due to many uncertainties in annotations, therefore the rearrangements rely solely on PCGs. The rates of mitochondrial rearrangement of the orders were quantified using the Amount of Mitochondrial Identical Gene Arrangements (AMIGA) according to Plazzi et al. (2016). This was given by AMIGA = (NIGA–1)/(N-1) where NIGA is the number of taxa in the analyzed sample that share an Identical Gene Arrangement and N is the total number of taxa. PCA was conducted in the R environment. MEGA 7 was used to calculate nucleotide compositions and A + T content values of mitochondrial genomes (Kumar et al. 2016). The dN/dS (ω) was determined for each PCG using codeml of PAML v. 4.8 (Yang 2007) along the phylogenetic tree (Supplementary Fig. S2) (dN is the ratio of non-synonymous substitutions and dS is the ratio of synonymous substitutions). Due to the poor sample size of Myida (N = 2), this order was excluded from dN/dS analyses. We performed a chi-square distribution with default settings to compare the lnL of null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis of dN/dS (ω) for each PCG in the R environment (Wong et al. 2004).
Amino acid sequences for the 12 mitochondrial PCGs were produced from new sequences of mitochondrial genomes, as well as 81 Imparidentia mitochondrial genomes available on NCBI (see Supplementary Table S1). Given the many uncertainties in annotation and high rate of evolution, atp8 gene, rRNA and tRNAs were discarded from the phylogenetic analyses. Laternula elliptica (order Anomalodesmata) and Perna viridis (order Mytilida) were selected as outgroup taxa in accordance with two recent phylogenomic studies (Plazzi et al. 2016; Williams et al. 2017). Alignments of single PCGs were produced for amino acid sequences with MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2005). Alignments were trimmed with Gbloks v.0.91b (Cruickshank 2000) cull overhanging ends. The concatenated amino acid supermatrix was created with Sequence Matrix 1.7.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011). The best-fit partition schemes and molecular evolution models were forecast using PartitionFinder 2.1.0 (PF2) based on the BIC approach. This analysis identified genes grouped by enzymatic complexes (atp, cox, cob, nad) as the best-fit partitions and the best-fit substitution model as shown in Supplementary Table S3.
The software IQ-TREE v.1.6.8 (Nguyen et al. 2015) was applied to infer ML phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed with 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inference analysis was conducted using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) with four parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains for 108 generations, sampling every 1000 generations and discarding the first 2,500,000 generations as burn-in. Above parameters were assessed with Tracer v. 1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018).
Divergence times estimation
BEAST v.1.7 (Drummond et al. 2012) implementing the model of the Yule process was utilized to estimate the divergence times among clades using the amino acid sequences of 12 PCGs. The tree topology and node ages were estimated using an uncorrelated lognormal clock model and birth–death model was set as the tree prior. Two independent Markov chains were run for 100 million generations, with sampling every 104 generations. The two independent runs were then combined, after discarding the first 10% generations as burn-in, using TreeAnnotator 1.10.4. The convergence of chains was visually inspected in Tracer v. 1.7.1. The ESS values of most of the parameters were greater than 200. MCC trees were produced in TreeAnnotator v. 1.10.4 and visualized in FigTree v.1.4.3 (Rambaut 2014).
Nine node calibrations were used to estimate divergence times. Available data in Paleobiology Database (https://paleobiodb.org/) were used to incorporate fossil ages. The oldest fossil assigned to the branch of Cardiidae is the fossil record of Pleurophoridae from the Upper Ordovician (445.6–455.8 Mya) which was used to calibrate the divergence of this group (Isberg 1934). The divergence of Tellinoidea was constrained between 326.4 and 318.1 Mya (based on the fossil record of Solecurtus) (Elias 1957). The oldest fossil of Hiatellidae, namely Panopea anabarica, dates to the Triassic (242–247.2 Mya) (Konstantinov et al. 2007). The root age of Pholadidae based on the fossil of Martesia sp. was constrained spanning 189.6 to 183 Mya (Velazco 2008). For Veneridae, we constrained the basal diversification of this group between 339.4–336 Mya, based on the fossil Pullastra striatocostata (Coy 1847). The divergence of Cyrenidae was constrained between 189.6 and 183 Mya on the basis of Cyrena sp. (Bouchet et al. 2010). The branch age of Paphia was restricted to at least 112.6 Mya (age of Paphia peruana) (Kummel 1948). The divergence of Dosinia was set to 97 Mya, based on the age of Dosinia delettrei (99.7–94.3 Mya) (Perrilliat et al. 2006). The outgroup taxa were constrained to between 478.6–466 Mya based on the age of Dipleurodonta sp. (Vaccari and Waisfeld 1994).
The lineage through time plots (LTT) was conducted by the R package ape v. 5.0 (Paradis and Schliep 2019) based on the phylogentic tree to explore the diversification rates through time.
The raw reads used for mtDNA genome assemblies (MZ701706, MZ557447, MZ540208, MZ701705, MZ688407) have been deposited at Short Read Archive (SRA) at the National center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the accession SUB11188349.
Ballesteros JA, Setton EVW, Santibáñez-López CE, Arango CP, Brenneis G, Brix S, Corbett KF, Cano-Sánchez E, Dandouch M, Dilly GF, Eleaume MP, Gainett G, Gallut C, McAtee S, McIntyre L, Moran AL, Moran R, López-González PJ, Scholtz G, Williamson C et al (2020) Phylogenomic resolution of sea spider diversification through integration of multiple data classes. Mol Biol Evol 38:686–701
Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF (2013) MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 69:313–319
Bieler R, Mikkelsen PM, Collins TM, Glover EA, González VL, Graf DL, Harper EM, Healy J, Kawauchi GY, Sharma PP, Staubach S, Strong EE, Taylor JD, Tëmkin I, Zardus JD, Clark S, Guzmán A, McIntyre E, Sharp P, Giribet G (2014) Investigating the bivalve tree of life - an exemplar-based approach combining molecular and novel morphological characters. Invertebr Syst 28:32–115
Boore JL (1999) Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 27:1767–1780
Boore JL, Macey JR, Medina M (2005) Sequencing and comparing whole mitochondrial genomes of animals. Methods Enzymol 395:311–348
Bouchet P, Rocroi J, Bieler R, Carter JG, Coan EV (2010) Nomenclator of bivalve families with a classification of bivalve families. Malacologia 52:1–184
Breton S, Milani L, Ghiselli F, Guerra D, Stewart DT, Passamonti M (2014) A resourceful genome: updating the functional repertoire and evolutionary role of animal mitochondrial DNAs. Trends Genet 30:555–564
Bromley RG (2004) A stratigraphy of marine bioerosion. Geol Soc Spec Publ 228:455–479
Cameron SL (2014) Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annu Rev Entomol 59:95–117
Campbell KA, Bottjer DJ (1995) Brachiopods and chemosymbiotic bivalves in phanerozoic hydrothermal vent and cold seep environments. Geology 23:321–324
Chen J, Li Q, Kong L, Zheng X (2011) Molecular phylogeny of venus clams (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Veneridae) with emphasis on the systematic position of taxa along the coast of mainland China. Zool Scr 40:260–271
Combosch DJ, Collins TM, Glover EA, Graf DL, Harper EM, Healy JM, Kawauchi GY, Lemer S, McIntyre E, Strong EE, Taylor JD, Zardus JD, Mikkelsen PM, Giribet G, Bieler R (2017a) A family-level tree of life for bivalves based on a Sanger-sequencing approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol 107:191–208
Combosch DJ, Lemer S, Ward PD, Landman NH, Giribet G (2017b) Genomic signatures of evolution in Nautilus—an endangered living fossil. Mol Ecol 26:5923–5938
Cruickshank R (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552
Curole JP, Kocher TD (1999) Mitogenomics: digging deeper with complete mitochondrial genomes. Tree 14:394–398
Donovan SK, Ewin TAM (2018) Substrate is a poor ichnotaxobase: a new demonstration. Swiss J Palaeontol 137:103–107
Dowton M, Austin AD (1999) Evolutionary dynamics of a mitochondrial rearrangement “hot spot” in the hymenoptera. Mol Biol Evol 16:298–309
Dreyer H, Steiner G (2006) The complete sequences and gene organisation of the mitochondrial genomes of the heterodont bivalves Acanthocardia tuberculata and Hiatella arctica - and the first record for a putative Atpase subunit 8 gene in marine bivalves. Front Zool 3:13
Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29:1969–1973
Eberle J, Ahrens D, Mayer C, Niehuis O, Misof B (2020) A plea for standardized nuclear markers in metazoan DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 35:336–345
Elias MK (1957) Late Mississippian fauna from the redoak hollow formation of southern Oklahoma, Part I. J Paleontol 31:370–427
Evans S (1999) Wood-boring bivalves and boring linings. Bull Geol Soc Denmark 45:130–134
González VL, Andrade SCS, Bieler R, Collins TM, Dunn CW, Mikkelsen PM, Taylor JD, Giribet G (2015) A phylogenetic backbone for Bivalvia: an RNA-seq approach. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:1–9
Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B (2013) Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e129
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755
Isberg O (1934) Studien über die Lamellibranchiaten des Leptaenakalkes in Dalarna. Håkan Ohlssons Buchdruckerei, Lund
Kappner I, Bieler R (2006) Phylogeny of venus clams (Bivalvia: Venerinae) as inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:317–331
Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518
Konstantinov AG, Sobolev ES, Yadrenkin AV (2007) Detailed biostratigraphy of triassic deposits in the Lena lower reaches (northern Yakutia). Russ Geol Geophys 48:721–736
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874
Kummel B (1948) Geological reconnaissance of the contamana region, Peru. Geol Soc Am 59:1217–1266
Laslett D, Canbäck B (2008) ARWEN: a program to detect tRNA genes in metazoan mitochondrial nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 24:172–175
Lemer S, Bieler R, Giribet G (2019) Resolving the relationships of clams and cockles: dense transcriptome sampling drastically improves the bivalve tree of life. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 286:20182684
Li Q, Park C, Kijima A (2002) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the Pacific abalone, Haliotis discus hannai. J Shellfish Res 21:811–815
Li J, Volsteadt M, Kirkendale L, Cavanaugh CM (2018) Characterizing photosymbiosis between Fraginae bivalves and Symbiodinium using phylogenetics and stable isotopes. Front Ecol Evol 6:1–11
Liu M, Liu Y, Zhang T, Lu B, Gao F, Gu J, Al-Farraj S, Hu X, Song W (2022) Integrative studies on the taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of four new Pleuronema species (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia). Mar Life Sci Technol 4:179–200
M’Coy F (1847) XXVIII.— On the fossil botany and zoology of the rocks associated with the coal of Australia. Ann Mag Nat Hist 20:298–312
Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R, Kappner I, Rawlings TA (2006) Phylogeny of Veneroidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) based on morphology and molecules. Zool J Linn Soc 148:439–521
Mikkelsen NT, Kocot KM, Halanych KM (2018) Mitogenomics reveals phylogenetic relationships of caudofoveate aplacophoran molluscs. Mol Phylogenet Evol 127:429–436
MolluscaBase (2021) Euheterodonta (Giribet & Distel, 2003). Accessed through: world register of marine species. Retrieved from http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=382296 Accessed on 01 July 2021
Newell ND (1965) Classification of the Bivalvia. Am Mus Novit 2206:1–25
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274
Paradis E, Schliep K (2019) ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35:526–528
Perrilliat MC, Ahmad F, Vega FJ (2006) Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) bivalves from northern Jordan, Middle East. Rev Mex Ciencias Geol 23:96–106
Plazzi F, Puccio G, Passamonti M (2016) Comparative large-scale mitogenomics evidences clade-specific evolutionary trends in mitochondrial DNAs of Bivalvia. Genome Biol Evol 8:2544–2564
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67:901–904
Rambaut A (2014) Fig Tree. Version 1.4.2. Retrieved from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. Accessed 09 July 2014
Saccone C, Giorgi C, Gissi C, Pesole G, Reyes A (1999) Evolutionary genomics in Metazoa: the mitochondrial DNA as a model system. Gene 238:195–209
Salvi D, Mariottini P (2012) Molecular phylogenetics and evolution molecular phylogenetics in 2D : ITS2 rRNA evolution and sequence-structure barcode from Veneridae to Bivalvia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 65:792–798
Shao R, Campbell NJH, Schmidt ER, Barker SC (2001) Increased rate of gene rearrangement in the mitochondrial genomes of three orders of hemipteroid insects. Mol Biol Evol 18:1828–1832
Skjeseth S (1955) The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo region, Norway, 5. The trilobite family Styginidae. Nor Geol Tidsskr 35:1–29
Smith DR (2016) The past, present and future of mitochondrial genomics: have we sequenced enough mtDNAs. Brief Funct Genomics 15:373
Sun S, Jiang L, Kong L, Li Q (2020) Comparative mitogenomic analysis of the superfamily Tellinoidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia): insights into the evolution of the gene rearrangements. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics 36:100739
Taylor JD, Glover EA (2006) Lucinidae (Bivalvia)—the most diverse group of chemosymbiotic molluscs. Zool J Linn Soc 148:421–438
Taylor PD, Wilson MA (2003) Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth-Sci Rev 62:1–103
Taylor JD, Williams ST, Glover EA, Dyal P (2007) A molecular phylogeny of heterodont bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Heterodonta): new analyses of 18S and 28S rRNA genes. Zool Scr 36:587–606
Taylor JD, Glover EA, Williams ST (2009) Phylogenetic position of the bivalve family Cyrenoididae-removal from (and further dismantling of) the superfamily Lucinoidea. Nautilus 123:9–13
Vaccari NE, Waisfeld BG (1994) Nuevos trilobites de la Formacion Suri (Ordovicico temprano) en la region de Chaschuil, Provincia de Catamarca, implicancias bioestratigraficas. Ameghiniana 31:73–86
Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27:171–180
Velazco YP (2008) Some invertebrate fossils from Huacrapuquio, province of Huancayo, Junin, Peru. Revista Del Instituto De Investig De La Facultad De Minas 11:39–48
Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu H, Kong L, Yu H, Liu S, Li Q (2021) Phylogeny of Veneridae (Bivalvia) based on mitochondrial genomes. Zool Scr 50:58–70
Williams ST, Foster PG, Hughes C, Harper EM, Taylor JD, Littlewood DTJ, Dyal P, Hopkins KP, Briscoe AG (2017) Curious bivalves: systematic utility and unusual properties of anomalodesmatan mitochondrial genomes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 110:60–72
Wong WSW, Yang Z, Goldman N, Nielsen R (2004) Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites. Genetics 168:1041–1051
Wu T, Li Y, Lu B, Shen Z, Song W, Warren A (2020) Morphology, taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of three marine peritrich ciliates, including two new species: Zoothamnium apoarbuscula n. sp. and Z. apohentscheli n. sp. (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Peritrichia). Mar Life Sci Technol 2:334–348
Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL (2004) Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252–3255
Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591
Yuan Y, Li Q, Yu H, Kong L (2012) The complete mitochondrial genomes of six heterodont bivalves (Tellinoidea and Solenoidea): variable gene arrangements and phylogenetic implications. PLoS ONE 7:e32353
The authors would like to thank Dr. Weibo Song and Ms. Gongaote Zhang for improving the quality of the figures in the manuscript. This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972789), Industrial Development Project of Qingdao City (20-3-4-16-nsh), and the Science and Technology Development Project of Weihai City (2018NS01).
Conflict of interest
The authors verify that there is no incompatibility of interest. Author Qi Li is a member of the Editorial Board, but he was not involved in the journal’s review of, or decision related to this manuscript.
Animal and human rights statement
This article does not contain any experiments with human participants conducted by the authors. All the experiments were conducted following standard procedures.
Edited by Jiamei Li
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Kong, L. et al. Phylogenomic resolution of Imparidentia (Mollusca: Bivalvia) diversification through mitochondrial genomes. Mar Life Sci Technol 5, 326–336 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-023-00178-x
- Mitochondrial genome