Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing has been extensively employed in the breeding and genetic improvement of trees, yet precise editing remains challenging in these species. Prime editing (PE), a revolutionary technology for precise editing, allows for arbitrary base substitutions and the insertion/deletion of small fragments. In this study, we focused on the model tree poplar 84K (Populus alba × P. glandulosa). We used the 2 × 35S promoter to express a fusion protein of spCas9 nickase (nCas9) and engineered Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV), and the Arabidopsis thaliana AtU6 promoter to express an engineered PE guide RNA (epegRNA) and Nick gRNA, pioneering the establishment of the Prime Editor 3 (PE3) system in dicot poplar. Single-base substitutions, multiple-base substitutions, and small-fragment insertions/deletions were edited into three endogenous target genes. The desired edits were identified in hygromycin-resistant (transformed) calli at seven out of nine target sites, with an average editing efficiency ranging from 0.1 to 3.6%. Furthermore, stable T0 plants contained the desired edits at four out of nine targets, with editing efficiencies ranging from 3.6 to 22.2%. Establishment of the PE3 system provides a powerful tool for the precise modification of the poplar genome.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Trees are an invaluable resource on Earth, providing substantial economic and ecological benefits. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing has tremendous potential for the breeding and genetic improvement of tree species (Sulis et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023b). Poplar (Populus) species are excellent dicot tree models and have been extensively studied; however, precise genome editing of these plants remains challenging. Recently, a revolutionary precise editing technology called “prime editing (PE)” has emerged, enabling user-defined DNA sequence alterations including arbitrary base substitutions and small-fragment insertions/deletions (Anzalone et al. 2019). Known for its accuracy and versatility, PE has been extensively applied in mammalian cells and major crops (Anzalone et al. 2019; Jiang et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022a; Lin et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2021); however, the long generation cycles, high genomic heterozygosity, and poor genetic transformation stability of trees have hampered its use in these plants. Here, we successfully applied PE to dicot poplar using a Prime Editor 3 (PE3) system (Fig. 1A).
Prime editing in poplar. A Schematic diagram of the poplar PE3 system. It comprises three components: nCas9-MMLV, epegRNA, and Nick gRNA. B Plant genetic transformation process and evaluation of editing efficiency in poplar 84K. C Sequence after PE using RT templates with mutated bases, counting the first base 3′ of the epegRNA-induced nick as position + 1. Base mutations are highlighted in blue. Type I: single-base mutation. Type II: multiple-base mutation. Type III: small-fragment insertion/deletion. D Location of epegRNA and Nick gRNA. The two gene models represent the genomes of P. alba and P. glandulosa. Blue arrows indicate the location of specific primers. E Phenotypes of resistant calli and stable transgenic T0 plants. Bars = 2 cm. F Efficiency of precise editing at nine targets in stably transformed calli. Efficiencies were calculated from the ratios of edited reads to total clean reads via a Hi-TOM analysis (n = 20). G Frequencies of successful PE in T0 plants using the PE3 system. Frequencies = (number of plants with the desired edit)/(number of total plants). H Sanger sequencing of representative desired edits in T0 plants. Red letters represent the PAM sequence, blue letters represent mutated bases, and numbers and arrows indicate the positions of mutations
The poplar PE3 system was based on our previously established efficient PPE3-evopreQ1 system in monocot rice (Oryza sativa) (Zou et al. 2022) and the CRISPR/Cas system in poplar (An et al. 2020, 2021). It comprises three components: nCas9-MMLV (a fusion protein of spCas9 nickase and engineered Moloney murine leukemia virus), epegRNA (an engineered PE guide RNA containing single-guide RNA (sgRNA), a primer binding site (PBS), and a reverse transcriptase (RT) template with editing and RNA motif evopreQ1), and Nick gRNA (a sgRNA for DNA nicking) (Fig. 1A, Fig. S1). The Arabidopsis thaliana AtU6 promoter was used to efficiently express the epegRNA and Nick gRNA, while the nCas9-MMLV was expressed under the control of the 2 × 35S promoter. Subsequently, the PE3 system was transformed into a poplar hybrid (Populus alba × P. glandulosa hybrid clone poplar 84K) via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and PE efficiencies were estimated (Fig. 1B).
Three endogenous genes were selected as PE targets: PHYTOENE DESATURASE (PagPDS; Potri.014G148700), a homolog of Arabidopsis AtYUCCA4 (PagYUC4; Potri.006G248200), and SHORT ROOT (PagSHR; Potri.007G063300) (An et al. 2020; Triozzi et al. 2021). To assess the editing capabilities of this method, we designed three types of RT template: Type I contained only one single-base substitution, Type II involved multiple-base substitutions, and Type III consisted of small DNA fragment insertions/deletions (Fig. 1C; Fig. S2; Table S1). Poplar 84K is a hybrid diploid with allelic variations; thus, all epegRNAs and Nick gRNAs were designed to target both the P. alba and P. glandulosa genomes to avoid editing failure resulting from mismatches between the target sites and genomic sequences (Fig. 1D).
To assess the feasibility of the PE3 system in 84K early on, we prioritized evaluating PE efficiencies in resistant callus. Twenty independent resistant calli were selected as individual replicates for each target and subjected to separate DNA extraction and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis using a Hi-TOM platform (Fig. 1E, Table S2) (Sun et al. 2024). We calculated the proportion of successful precise editing in each individual callus, and averaged the editing efficiency across all edited calli to determine the editing efficiency at that target site (Fig. 1F). For Type I mutations, all three targets exhibited the desired edits with average efficiencies of 0.49% (PagPDS), 0.08% (PagYUC4), and 1.83% (PagSHR). For Type II edits, the PagPDS-g2 and PagYUC4-g2 targets were edited with average efficiencies of 3.82% and 3.62%, respectively, but the PagSHR-g2 target did not exhibit any desired edits. Desired Type III edits were detected for the PagPDS-g3 and PagYUC4-g3 targets, with average efficiencies of 1.59% and 0.22%, respectively (Fig. 1F). These results demonstrated that the PE3 system is capable of completing PE; however, as only a small number of cells are edited in one callus, the efficiencies achieved do not represent the editing efficiency in T0 plants. Relatively low efficiencies of Type III edits compared with those of Type I and Type II are consistent with previous findings in monocot rice and wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Lin et al. 2020).
To validate the reliability of PE, we regenerated stable transgenic T0 plants for all targets (Fig. 1E) and used NGS to identify the editing types in all plants. The desired edits were detected at the PagPDS-g1 and PagSHR-g1 Type I targets, as well as at the PagPDS-g2 and PagYUC4-g2 Type II targets (Fig. 1G). T0 plants with the desired edits were selected for further confirmation using Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1H; Fig. S3, Table S3). We identified one desired edit (1/25, 4.0%; homozygous) at the PagPDS-g1 target and five desired edits (5/32, 15.6%; chimeric) at the PagPDS-g2 target. No desired edits (0/35, 0.0%) were identified at the PagPDS-g3 target. Desired edits at the PagPDS sites were limited to base substitutions of Type I and Type II, resulting in no observed plant albinism. For PagYUC4 and PagSHR targets, desired edits were obtained at the Type I PagSHR-g1 target (1/28, 3.6%; heterozygous) and the Type II PagYUC4-g2 target (8/36, 22.2%; two heterozygous and six chimeric) (Fig. 1G, 1H; Fig. S3). This indicates that resistant calli with high PE efficiency are likely to differentiate into edited T0 plants, representing an even higher editing efficiency, consistent with previous studies in rice (Zou et al. 2022). Type I and Type II edits were obtained with greater efficiency than Type III mutations, consistent with the results in resistant callus (Fig. 1F). Beyond the desired edits, only one byproduct was detected at the PagPDS-g1 target, with no byproducts detected at the other targets (Fig. S4).
In summary, we successfully established a PE3 system in dicot poplar and obtained stable T0 plants with the desired edits. Currently, the efficiency of the PE3 system in poplar is low and unstable, particularly for small-fragment insertions/deletions. Moreover, PE-mediated precise editing still leads to a high proportion of chimerism (Fig. 1G, 1H), which significantly hinders the effective application and advancement of PE technology in poplar. These issues could be attributed to the leaf disk method used for genetic transformation, which results in poor regenerative capacity of the callus and consequently impacts the performance of PE. Furthermore, the components of the PE system, apart from the promoter, are sourced from monocot rice and may not be optimal for dicot poplar. To date, the PE system has only been established in three dicot plants, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), for which efficiencies are also low (Lu et al. 2021; Perroud et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023a). PE systems for dicot plants thus require further improvement if they are to be broadly used for basic research and precise breeding. The PE3 system could be further optimized through methods effective in major crops, such as increasing epegRNA expression, enhancing MMLV activity, or implementing appropriate heat treatments (Jiang et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022b; Zong et al. 2022; Zou et al. 2022).
Materials and methods
Vector construction
The poplar PE3 system comprised three vectors: pC1300-PE, SK-epegRNA, and SK-Nick gRNA. In the pC1300-PE binary vector, the 2 × 35S promoter was used to express the nCas9-MMLV fusion protein. The AtU6-26 promoter was used to express the epegRNA in the SK-epegRNA vector and the Nick gRNA in the SK-Nick gRNA vector. The Nick gRNA fragment (digested with XhoI and BglII) and the epegRNA fragment (digested with KpnI and SalI) were assembled into the pC1300-PE vector (digested with KpnI and BamHI) using T4 ligase to obtain the PE3 system. Sequences of the three vectors are shown in Fig. S1.
Design of pegRNAs
PagPDS, PagYUC4, and PagSHR were identified from the Populus trichocarpa genome in the Phytozome v13 database (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/). Specific primers were designed to amplify the target sequences (Table S2; Table S3). Three types of pegRNAs were randomly designed for each target sequence: single-base substitutions, multiple-base substitutions, and small-fragment insertions/deletions. The pegRNA design scheme was optimized using the PlantPegDesigner website, which was developed specifically for plants (Jin et al. 2023).
Agrobacterium-mediated callus transformation of poplar 84K
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harboring the binary expression vector PE3 containing the hygromycin (Hyg+) reporter gene was used for genetic transformation of poplar 84K calli, which was performed as previously reported with some modifications (Wen et al. 2022). Rapidly growing and well-separated calli were used for transformation. After infection, calli were selected using 2.5 mg/L hygromycin B for 5 weeks to obtain resistant calli, which were further differentiated into stable transgenic T0 plants. One T0 plant from each transgenic event was selected for rooting and genotyping. Plant materials were grown under a 16:8-h light:dark photoperiod at 25 °C.
Sampling and genotyping
Genomic DNA of resistant calli and T0 plants was extracted using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method and subjected to NGS analysis using the Hi-TOM platform (Sun et al. 2024). PE efficiency in resistant calli = (number of reads with the desired edits)/(number of total reads). Frequency of PE in transgenic T0 plants = (number of plants with the desired edits)/(number of total plants). Mutation reads representing less than 5% of reads in transgenic T0 plants were filtered out during data analysis. The desired mutations in T0 plants were validated using PCR and Sanger sequencing. A mutation frequency ≥ 70% was considered a homozygous mutation, ≥ 30% and < 70% was a heterozygous mutation, ≥ 5% and < 30% was a chimeric mutation, and < 5% was counted as the wild type. Primers used in this study are listed in Table S2 and Table S3.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software.
Data availability
The authors confirm that all data from this study are available and can be found in this article and in the supplementary information.
References
An Y, Geng Y, Yao J et al (2020) Efficient genome editing in Populus using CRISPR/Cas12a. Front Plant Sci 11:593938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.593938
An Y, Geng Y, Yao J, Wang C, Du J (2021) An improved CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Populus by using mannopine synthase (MAS) promoter. Front Plant Sci 12:703546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.703546
Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR et al (2019) Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576(7785):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4
Jiang YY, Chai YP, Lu MH et al (2020) Prime editing efficiently generates W542L and S621I double mutations in two ALS genes in maize. Genome Biol 21(1):257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02170-5
Jin S, Lin Q, Gao Q, Gao C (2023) Optimized prime editing in monocot plants using PlantPegDesigner and engineered plant prime editors (ePPEs). Nat Protoc 18(3):831–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00773-9
Li H, Zhu Z, Li S et al (2022a) Multiplex precision gene editing by a surrogate prime editor in rice. Mol Plant 15(7):1077–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2022.05.009
Li J, Chen L, Liang J et al (2022b) Development of a highly efficient prime editor 2 system in plants. Genome Biol 23(1):161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02730-x
Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C et al (2020) Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol 38(5):582–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x
Lu Y, Tian Y, Shen R et al (2021) Precise genome modification in tomato using an improved prime editing system. Plant Biotechnol J 19(3):415–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13497
Ni P, Zhao Y, Zhou X et al (2023) Efficient and versatile multiplex prime editing in hexaploid wheat. Genome Biol 24(1):156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02990-1
Perroud PF, Guyon-Debast A, Veillet F et al (2022) Prime editing in the model plant Physcomitrium patens and its potential in the tetraploid potato. Plant Sci 116:111162
Sulis DB, Jiang X, Yang C et al (2023) Multiplex CRISPR editing of wood for sustainable fiber production. Science 381:216
Sun T, Liu Q, Chen X, Hu F, Wang K (2024) Hi-TOM 2.0: an improved platform for high-throughput mutation detection. Sci China Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-024-2555-x
Triozzi PM, Schmidt HW, Dervinis C, Kirst M, Conde D (2021) Simple, efficient and open-source CRISPR/Cas9 strategy for multi-site genome editing in Populus tremula × alba. Tree Physiol 41(11):2216–2227. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpab066
Wen SS, Ge XL, Wang R et al (2022) An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for hybrid poplar 84K (Populus alba × P. glandulosa) using calli as explants. Int J Mol Sci 23(4):2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042216
Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang C et al (2023a) Developing an efficient and visible prime editing system to restore tobacco 8-hydroxy-copalyl diphosphate gene for labdane diterpene Z-abienol biosynthesis. Sci China Life Sci. 66(12):2910–2921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-022-2396-x
Zhang T, Zhang W, Ding C et al (2023b) A breeding strategy for improving drought and salt tolerance of poplar based on CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol J 21(11):2160–2162. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14147
Zong Y, Liu Y, Xue C et al (2022) An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants. Nat Biotechnol 40(9):1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01254-w
Zou J, Meng X, Liu Q et al (2022) Improving the efficiency of prime editing with epegRNAs and high-temperature treatment in rice. Sci China Life Sci 65(11):2328–2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-022-2147-2
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Mengzhu Lu from Zhejiang A&F University for providing the 84K callus. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD2200201), the China National Rice Research Institute Key Research and Development Project (CNRRI-2020-01) and the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, China (CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RZ, CW, and KW designed the project. JZ and YL performed the experiments. JZ and YL wrote the manuscript. RZ, CW, and KW revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zou, J., Li, Y., Wang, K. et al. Prime editing enables precise genome modification of a Populus hybrid. aBIOTECH (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-024-00177-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-024-00177-1