Abstract
Phytic acid (PA) in grain seeds reduces the bioavailability of nutrient elements in monogastric animals, and an important objective for crop seed biofortification is to decrease the seed PA content. Here, we employed CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a PA mutant population targeting PA biosynthesis and transport genes, including two multi-drug-resistant protein 5 (MRP5) and three inositol pentose-phosphate kinases (IPK1). We characterized a variety of lines containing mutations on multiple IPK and MRP5 genes. The seed PA was more significantly decreased in higher-order mutant lines with multiplex mutations. However, such mutants also exhibited poor agronomic performance. In the population, we identified two lines carrying single mutations in ipk1b and ipk1c, respectively. These mutants exhibited moderately reduced PA content, and regular agronomic performance compared to the wild type. Our study indicates that moderately decreasing PA by targeting single GmIPK1 genes, rather than multiplex mutagenesis toward ultra-low PA, is an optimal strategy for low-PA soybean with a minimal trade-off in yield performance.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Soybean (Glycine max) is recognized as a major source of plant-based protein for human diets and feedstocks (Montgomery 2003). Soybean contains phytic acid (PA), also referred to as D-myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate, or InsP6 (Gillman et al. 2009), which is the main form of stored inositol and phosphate. In soybean seeds, PA can count for 4–5% of the seed dry weight, and 50% of the seed total phosphorus content (Oatway et al. 2001). Having six phosphate groups, PA belongs to a class of metal-chelating compounds that may bind to iron, zinc, calcium, magnesium, and potassium, among other metal cations (Raboy 2009). During seed germination, the PA complex releases metal cations and provides energy to support seedling growth. However, PA is considered a non-negligible anti-nutritional factor. PA lowers the absorption and utilization of minerals (e.g., iron, zinc, calcium) and negatively affects human health for people subsisting on grain-based diets, mainly in developing countries (Zhou and Erdman 1995). In addition, livestock after feeding may excrete significant PA salts into nature, causing environmental issues of phosphorus pollution (Sharpley et al. 1994). Therefore, an important objective for crop seed biofortification is to decrease the seed PA contents. It was estimated that low-PA soybean potentially provides 5-billion-dollar worth value, as a result of increased P availability and biofortification (Raboy 2020).
Low-phytic acid (lpa) soybean varieties with decreased PA content were generated in natural mutation, mutagenesis breeding, and hybridization (i.e., CX1834 (Oltmans et al. 2004) and Gm-lpa-TW-1 (Yuan et al. 2007)). The major genes responsible for the lpa germplasm include myo-inositol phosphate synthase (MIPS) (Yuan et al. 2017), the inositol pentose-phosphate kinase gene (GmIPK1a) in PA biosynthesis (Yuan et al. 2012), and the vital multi-drug-resistant protein 5 gene (GmMRP5a) involved in PA transport (Gillman et al. 2009). Mutants in GmMIPS1 exhibited low PA yet tend to exhibit low yield performance, whereas gmipk1a and mrp5a mutants were shown to less affect agronomic traits (Song et al. 2022). Although the lpa varieties can provide benefits to the nutritional quality and to the environment, it remains challenging to develop high-yielding low-PA varieties due to a lack of germplasms. Moreover, the trade-off between low PA and yield traits in soybean remains elusive.
In this study, our objective was to generate a varieties of new lpa mutants by multiplex mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas9, and characterize biofortified soybean with a minimal trade-off between low-phytic acid and yield. We first characterized the GmIPK1 and GmMRP5 family genes, and selected seed-specifical expressed gene members for genome editing. We identified three GmIPK1 homologs expressed predominantly in soybean seeds (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/), namely GmIPK1a (Glyma.14G072200), GmIPK1b (Glyma.04G030000), and GmIPK1c (Glyma.06G030100). Two seed-enriched GmMRP5 genes, GmMRP5a (Glyma.03G167800) and GmMPR5b (Glyma.19G169000) were also identified. We designed two constructs using the pGES401 vector, namely KO-PA-V1 targeting the IPK1 genes and the KO-PA-V2 targeting the MRP5 genes (Fig. 1A). To test the potential of multiplex mutants in lowering PA content, we transformed KO-PA-V1 and KO-PA-V2 by employing a pooled transformation method (Li et al. 2019). Among 35 T0 transgenic lines, we identified 8 plants with only KO-PA-V1, 17 plants with only KO-PA-V2, and 10 plants with both constructs. Among these lines, we characterized various mutant types containing mutations on GmIPK1 genes, GmMRP5 genes, or multiplex mutants on multiple GmIPK1 and GmMRP5 genes. In the T2 progeny, we obtained and investigated several homologous mutants with various frameshift mutations on target genes (Fig. S1), including the single mutants gmipk1b194D (designated lpa-1), gmipk1c1I (lpa-2), and gmmrp5b4D (lpa-3); double mutant gmmrp5a1I/gmmrp5b4D (lpa-4); triple mutant gmipk1a1I/gmmrp5a703D/gmmrp5b4D (lpa-5); and quadruple mutants gmipk1b1I/gmipk1c1I/gmmrp5a703D/gmmrp5b2D (lpa-6) and gmipk1a1I/gmipk1b1I/gmmrp5a1I/gmmrp5b4D (lpa-7) (Fig. 1B). We further analyzed the predicted off-target effects in the T2 generation among the multiple mutant lines, and no off-target mutations were detected (Fig. S2).
Generation and characterization of the PA mutant population in HC6. A Architecture of the pGES401 vector, and the sgRNA cassettes constructed on the genome editing plasmid, KO-PA-V1 and KO-PA-V2, respectively. B Genotype of the homozygous lines obtained in the T2 generation. C Determination of the PA content among the mutant lines, n = 3. D Determination of free phosphorus content in a variety PA mutant seeds, n = 3. E-I A comparative analysis of agronomic performance between PA mutants and the wild type HC6, including plant height (E), effective branch number per plant (F), pod numbers (G), grain yield per plant (H), and weight per hundred kernels (I). Significant differences were denoted by asterisks (P-values were determined by the two-way ANOVA test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001), n = 15. J The germination rate of mature seeds exhibiting various mutations was compared to the baseline germination rate observed in the wild type, n = 3. K,L Determination of oil (K) and protein (L) content. M Seed size and shape of the PA mutant population lines and WT, n = 10. N Plant morphology of lpa-1, lpa-2 and WT at harvest
We next determined the PA content of these mutants; these results showed a decreasing trend of PA content in all the mutants compared to the wild-type seeds. Of these, the PA in lpa-1 declined by 12.3%, lpa-2 decreased by 17.8%, and lpa-3 decreased by 7.5%. The PA content in higher-order mutants carrying gmmrp5a and gmmrp5b mutants was more drastically reduced by 33.1% in lpa-4, 34.0% in lpa-5, 39.1% in lpa-6 and the greatest decrease, 43.3%, in lpa-7 (Fig. 1C). PA and free phosphorus contents were negatively correlated. We next measured the free phosphorus content in the mutants, and the trend was the reverse of the PA content, with an increase to 0.30 mg/g in lpa-1, 0.33 mg/g in lpa-2, 0.21 mg/g in lpa-3, 8.90 mg/g in lpa-4, 10.17 mg/g in lpa-5, 11.13 mg/g in lpa-6 and 12.41 mg/g in lpa-7 (Fig. 1D). Therefore, single mutations in the GmIPK1b or GmIPK1c genes moderately decreased PA content, whereas higher-order mutations significantly reduced PA and released large amount of free phosphorus.
To investigate the agronomic performance of these mutants, we assessed the plant height (Fig. 1E), number of effective branches per plant (Fig. 1F), pod numbers per plant (Fig. 1G), harvested grain weight per plant (Fig. 1H), hundred-grain weight (Fig. 1I), and germination rates of the mutant seeds (Fig. 1J). The single plant yield was not significantly affected in lpa-1 and lpa-2 carrying mutations in gmipk1b and gmipk1c, whereas lpa-3, with a single mutation in GmMRP5b, showed a slight reduction in grain production per plant. Moreover, the multiplex mutant lines lpa-4, lpa-5, lpa-6, and lpa-7 exhibited a notable reduction. The yield of both lpa-4 and lpa-5 showed a decline of approx. 10%, and the yield was about 42–43 g per plant (Fig. 1H). Additionally, it was noted that the lpa-6 and lpa-7 seeds displayed a decrease in 100-grain weight of more than 7%, accompanied by a reduction in seed size (Fig. 1I and M). The quadruple mutant lines, lpa-6, had significantly lower grain yield per plant, with a loss of 18% (Fig. 1H). In addition, we performed a small scale field trail in Sanya Hainan during the 2023 winter and the agronomic traits presented a similar tendency (Fig. S3).
Next, we evaluated the standard germination of PA mutants. These results were in line with prior research, and the germination rate of most multiplex mutants was significantly reduced (Fig. 1J). In contrast, lpa-1 and lpa-2 exhibited normal agronomic traits and a germination rate (98%) equivalent to the wild-type (Fig. 1J). At the harvest period, we assessed seed quality and observed an overall trend of decreasing oil content (Fig. 1K) and improving protein content (Fig. 1L) in most PA mutant seeds, except for ipk1b and ipk1c. Finally, overall plant appearance of the lpa-1 and lpa-2 lines was not significantly difference from that of the WT (Fig. 1N). Therefore, single mutants in ipk1b and ipk1c tend to exhibit moderately decreased PA content and minimal yield penalty, whereas multiplex mutations of IPK1/MRP genes more dramatically decreased PA yet significantly negatively impacted agronomic performance.
Here, we used a multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing approach to IPK1/MRP5 genes, resulting in a variety of PA mutants. Our findings showed that the low-PA trait is negatively related with yield traits, in a dosage-dependent manner. The potential impact of reduced PA levels on seed germination might be due to the degraded PA serving as an energy source. In addition, germplasms carrying mutations on MRP5 genes tend to exhibit negative effects on yield. In comparison with the ultra-low PA and comprised growth of multiplex mutants, single mutants in IPK1 genes tend to moderately decrease PA with less affect on yield performance. Thus, by means of gene editing, we could reduce PA in mutants, release more free phosphorus, and increase the high bioavailability of soybeans to allow breeding toward “SMART CROPs” (Wang et al. 2024). In the future, using precision editing tools, such as base editing, might more precisely tune PA content for biofortified soybean with improved agronomic value (Bai et al. 2024).
Materials and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Huachun 6 (WT), a soybean cultivar in south China, was utilized for the transformation. The mutant plants were grown in a greenhouse with a relative humidity of between 60 and 80% and 14/10 h of day/night temperature control of 27/25 °C. In addition, the yield evaluation of the PA homozygous mutants was completed in a transgenic field in Qingdao and Sanya, respectively, during which the planting conditions of the mutant and wild type were ensured to be consistent.
Acquisition of PA genes editing transformants
CRISPR/Cas9 mutation pools of phytic acid in HC6 were performed using the protocol reported previously (Bai et al. 2020), and the genome editing vectors that targeted the PA genes, KO-PA-V1 and KO-PA-V2 (Fig. 1A), were constructed by the Goldengate assembly method. Stable transformants were obtained from soybean cotyledons by the Agrobacterium-mediated mix, also as described previously (Bai et al. 2020).
DNA extraction and sequencing
To confirm the genotype of PA mutants, DNA from a soybean leaf two weeks after it germinated was extracted using the CTAB method. Sanger sequencing and Hi-TOM sequencing (Liu et al. 2019) were then used to find an exact mutation.
Determination of PA content in seeds
Determination of total phosphorus in mature mutant seeds of T2 generation using Grace PA/total phosphorus kit (Suzhou Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. And this kit is modified from the original determination method(Heubner and Stadler 1919; Marolt and Kolar 2021). Briefly, 5 g of each mutant seeds was ground into powder and 100 mg of them was taken and extracted by shaking with acidic extractant for 2 h at room temperature. And further, the ferric chloride-sulfosalicylic acid color developer was discolored by the chelating effect of phytic acid. The phytic acid content is directly proportional to the degree of discoloration, and according to the manufacturer's instructions, the supernatant was tested for the decrease in absorbance at 500 nm to determine the phytic acid content of the samples.
Evaluation of inorganic phosphorus in seeds
PA was indirectly assessed using the inverse relationship between inorganic phosphorus and PA in mature soybean seeds. The method was modified from the previous report (Raboy et al. 2000). The whole procedure consisted of mixing 1 mL of 10% (w/v) perchloric acid (PCA) with 0.5 g of mutant seed powder, which was then homogenized and crushed. Next, the homogenate was then diluted tenfold with 5% (w/v) PCA and refrigerated for 30 min. 10, 000 g centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min was performed and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. 2 mL of working solution was mixed with 1 mL of sample supernatant and incubated at 40 °C for 20 min. The reaction solution was cooled on ice and the absorbance was measured at 820 nm and converted to seed free phosphorus using a standard curve.
Evaluation of germination rate between PA mutants
Germination rate is an important indicator of seed growth and development potential. Here, we modified the method published by international seed testing association (ISTA) to determine the standard germination rate of PA mutants. We used simultaneously harvested seeds in this experiment. From each PA mutant, 600 seeds were chosen at random, split into three replicates on average, and put in a germination box that was 80% wet. The standard germination rate was evaluated after 5 days of germination in an incubator at 25 °C.
Determination of protein and oil content in seeds
Here, 15 individual plants of each PA mutant were randomly selected from the above materials that have been assessed for agronomic traits, and 20 g seeds were weighed for each strain. With the use of a MATRIX-I Fourier transform near infrared reflectance spectrometer (FT-NIRS) (Bruker Optics, Bremen, Germany), the protein and oil content tendency among mutants were determined.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplementary information.
References
Bai M et al (2020) Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR-Cas9 in soybean. Plant Biotechnol J 18:721–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13239
Bai M et al (2024) Development of PmCDA1-based high-efficiency cytidine base editors (ChyCBEs) incorporating a GmRad51 DNA-binding domain in soybean. New Crops 1:100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncrops.2023.07.001
Gillman JD et al (2009) The low phytic acid phenotype in soybean line CX1834 is due to mutations in two homologs of the maize low phytic acid gene. Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome.2008.03.0013
Heubner W, Stadler H (1919) Eine titrationsmethode zur bestimmung des phytins. Z Anal Chem 58:191–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01470090
Li R et al (2019) Pooled CRISPR/Cas9 reveals redundant roles of plastidial phosphoglycerate kinases in carbon fixation and metabolism. Plant J 98:1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14303
Liu Q et al (2019) Hi-TOM: a platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems. Sci China Life Sci 62:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9402-9
Marolt G, Kolar M (2021) Analytical methods for determination of phytic acid and other inositol phosphates: a review. Molecules 26:174. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010174
Montgomery KS (2003) Soy protein. J Perinat Educ 12:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812403X106946
Oatway L et al (2001) Phytic acid. Food Rev Int 17:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-100108531
Oltmans SE et al (2004) Inheritance of low-phytate phosphorus in soybean. Crop Sci 44:433–435. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.4330
Raboy V (2009) Approaches and challenges to engineering seed phytate and total phosphorus. Plant Sci 177:281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.012
Raboy V (2020) Low phytic acid crops: observations based on four decades of research. Plants 9:140. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020140
Raboy V et al (2000) Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1–1 and low phytic acid 2–1. Plant Physiol 124:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.1.355
Sharpley A et al (1994) Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: issues and options. J Environ Qual 23:437–451. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300030006x
Song JH et al (2022) Mutation of GmIPK1 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 reduced phytic acid content in soybean seeds. Int J Mol Sci 23:10583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810583
Wang P et al (2024) SMART CROPs. New Crops 1:100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncrops.2023.12.002
Yuan FJ et al (2007) Generation and characterization of two novel low phytate mutations in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet 115:945–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0621-2
Yuan FJ et al (2012) Identification and characterization of the soybean IPK1 ortholog of a low phytic acid mutant reveals an exon-excluding splice-site mutation. Theor Appl Genet 125:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1922-7
Yuan F et al (2017) Whole genome-wide transcript profiling to identify differentially expressed genes associated with seed field emergence in two soybean low phytate mutants. BMC Plant Biol 17:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0953-7
Zhou JR, Erdman JW Jr (1995) Phytic acid in health and disease. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35:495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399509527712
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Guangzhou Science Grant (2024A03J0010) to YG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YG designed the research; WL, MB, and CP performed experiments; HK and YL provided stable transformants; WL, MB, and YG analyzed data; WL and YG wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, W., Bai, M., Peng, C. et al. Genome editing toward biofortified soybean with minimal trade-off between low phytic acid and yield. aBIOTECH (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-024-00158-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-024-00158-4