Abstract
In this paper we investigate the bifurcation structure of the crossdiffusion Shigesada–Kawasaki–Teramoto model (SKT) in the triangular form and in the weak competition regime, and of a corresponding fastreaction system in 1D and 2D domains via numerical continuation methods. We show that the software pde2path can be exploited to treat crossdiffusion systems, reproducing the already computed bifurcation diagrams on 1D domains. We show the convergence of the bifurcation structure obtained selecting the growth rate as bifurcation parameter. Then, we compute the bifurcation diagram on a 2D rectangular domain providing the shape of the solutions along the branches and linking the results with the linearized analysis. In 1D and 2D, we pay particular attention to the fastreaction limit by always computing sequences of bifurcation diagrams as the timescale separation parameter tends to zero. We show that the bifurcation diagram undergoes major deformations once the fastreaction systems limits onto the crossdiffusion singular limit. Furthermore, we find evidence for timeperiodic solutions by detecting Hopf bifurcations, we characterize several regions of multistability, and improve our understanding of the shape of patterns in 2D for the SKT model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Systems with multiple timescales appear in a wide variety of mathematical areas but also in many applications [38]. The basic class of multiple timescale systems has two timescales, which are socalled fast–slow systems given by
where u, v are the unknowns and \(\varepsilon >0\) is a small parameter so that u is fast while v is slow. There is quite substantial theory for the case of fast–slow ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Although there are many links of the ODE theory to multiscale partial differential equations (PDEs) [38, 39], a lot less is known about fast–slow PDEs. One important subclass are fastreaction PDEs given by
posed on a domain \({\mathbb {R}}_+\times \Omega \), where \(\Delta \) is the usual spatial Laplacian with respect to \(x\in \Omega \), \(t\in [0,T)\) for some \(T>0\), \(u=u(t,x)\), and \(v=v(t,x)\). In this work, one of the two key equations we study is a particular version of (1.2) arising in mathematical ecology [30]
where the quantities \(u(t,x),\, v(t,x)\ge 0\) represent the population densities of two species at time t and position x, confined and competing for resources on a bounded domain \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\). The population u is split into two states, distinguishing between less active and active individuals, respectively denoted by \(u_1\) and \(u_2\) (thus \(u=u_1+u_2\)). We assume throughout that \(0\le u_2(t,x)\le M\) on \([0,T]\times \Omega \) for a fixed constant \(M>0\). The positive coefficients \(d_i,\,r_i,\,a_i,\,b_i \, (i=1,2)\) describe the diffusion, the intrinsic growth, the intraspecific competition and the interspecific competition rates respectively. The coefficient \(d_{12}> 0\) stands for competition pressure between the two subclasses. Each individual in the subclasses converts its state into the other one depending on the spatial distribution of the competitor v.
Since \(\varepsilon >0\) is assumed to be small, it is natural to consider the fastreaction limit \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). This limit aims to model the dynamics of the fast variables as instantaneous and reduce the analysis to the slow timescale dynamics. Yet, one easily sees that this limit is very singular. To motivate this observation, suppose we discard the diffusion terms in (1.3) and linearize the fastreaction terms, then we get a matrix
which always has a zero eigenvalue. This means that the classical normal hyperbolicity condition [22] for fast–slow ODEs fails. Yet, the intuition is that the diffusion terms should help to still obtain a welldefined fastreaction limit as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\).
In the literature, several results for such fastreaction limits for various PDEs exist. One of the first works is the paper [29] presenting the fastreaction limit in a system of one parabolic and one ordinary differential equation. A reaction–diffusion system which models a fast reversible reaction between two mobile reactants was then treated in [4] and the limiting problem yields a nonlinear diffusion term. Also fast irreversible reactions (in which two chemical components form a product) were considered, where the limiting system is a Stefantype problem with a moving interface at which the chemical reaction front is localized [5]. Furthermore, in [27] a dynamical boundary condition has been interpreted as a fastreaction limit of a volume–surface reaction–diffusion system. It turns out that when the fastreaction system has three components, the limiting system are often of two types: free boundary problems [42] and crossdiffusion systems [6], which also arise in population dynamics [11, 17, 30]. In this framework, individuals of one or more species exist in different states and the small parameter represents the average switching time. In our context, it is known that the limiting system of (1.3) is a crossdiffusion PDE [28] given by
where the quantities \(u(t,x),\, v(t,x)\ge 0\) again represent the population densities of the same two species at time t and position x, confined and competing for resources on the bounded domain \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\). The coefficients as above are all supposed to be positive constants. The model (1.5) is known as Shigesada–Kawasaki–Teramoto (SKT) model as it was initially proposed in [45] in 1979 to account for stable nonhomogeneous steady states in certain ecological systems. These states describe, for suitable parameters sets, spatial segregation that is a situation of coexistence of two competitive species on a bounded domain. Historically, the SKT model was first postulated without any reference to a larger system such as (1.3). Only later, in 2006, the fastreaction system (1.3) was introduced in [30] in a more general setting.
In this paper, we aim to contribute the understanding of both variants of the SKT model: the threecomponent fastreaction PDE as well as its crossdiffusion singular limit. A primary focus from the ecological and mathematical viewpoints is evidently played by the steady states (or equilibria) of both of the models. So we briefly recall the wellknown structure of homogeneous steady states starting from the crossdiffusion SKT model (1.5).
The homogeneous solutions are the total extinction (0, 0) (always unstable), two noncoexistence states \(({\bar{u}},0)=(r_1/a_1,0)\) and \((0,{\bar{v}})=(0,r_2/a_2)\), and one coexistence state (when it exists)
While the noncoexistence equilibria exist for all the parameter values, the coexistence is admissible (positive coordinates) only in two cases.

weak competition or strong intraspecific competition, namely \(a_1a_2b_1b_2>0\).
Under the additional condition on the growth rates \(b_1/a_2<r_1/r_2<a_1/b_2\), without diffusion the coexistence homogeneous steady state is stable, while the noncoexistence ones are unstable. With standard diffusion in a convex domain and with zeroflux boundary conditions, any nonnegative solution generically converges to homogeneous one, and this implies that the two species coexist but their densities are homogeneous in the whole domain [36]. With crossdiffusion, the model exhibits stable nonhomogeneous steady states if \(d_1,\; d_2\) are small enough or \(d_{12}\) is large enough [30].
If \(r_1/r_2<b_1/a_2\) or \(r_1/r_2>a_1/b_2\), the coexistence homogeneous steady state is not positive and the noncoexistence ones are stable for the reaction part (in absence of diffusion).

strong competition or strong interspecific competition, namely \(a_1a_2b_1b_2<0\).
When \(a_1/b_2<r_1/r_2<b_1/a_2\), the coexistence homogeneous steady state is unstable, while the noncoexistence ones are stable. With only standard diffusion, in a convex domain and with zeroflux boundary conditions, it has been shown that if positive and nonconstant steady states exist, they must be unstable [36], and numerical simulations suggest that any nonnegative solution generically converges to either \(({\bar{u}},0)\) or \((0,{\bar{v}})\), that is, the competitive exclusion principle occurs between the two species. However, adding the crossdiffusion term, it is numerically shown that even if the domain is convex, there exists stable nonhomogeneous solutions exhibiting spatially segregating coexistence when \(d_{12}\) is suitable large [32].
Analogously to the previous regime, if \(r_1/r_2<a_1/b_2\) or \(r_1/r_2>b_1/a_2\), the coexistence homogeneous steady state is not positive and the noncoexistence ones are stable for the reaction part (in absence of diffusion).
We remark that the stationary problem of the classical Lotka–Volterra competition model with linear diffusion endowed with Dirichlet boundary conditions has been extensively studied (see [3, 12, 13] and references therein), and it shows different features to the SKT crossdiffusion model. For the fastreaction PDE (1.3), the homogeneous steady state is
where \(u_*,\;v_*\) have the same expression as in the crossdiffusion case. In particular, the homogeneous steady state turns out to be independent of \(\varepsilon \), which is a nice starting point for a comparative study as it remains to investigate also the nonhomogeneous steady states.
Before proceeding to summarize the main results of our work, we briefly put it into context with the existing literature. Both systems, the crossdiffusion model and the fastreaction model, are interesting from different mathematical viewpoints. From the modeling point of view the justification of crossdiffusion terms by means of semilinear reaction–diffusion systems including simple reactions and linear diffusion is fundamental to the understanding of the hidden processes that they can capture. Vice versa, their approximation with simpler models (not in the number of equations but due to the possibility to remove the nonlinearity in the diffusion) is useful both for the analysis and the numerics.
On the one hand, theoretical results require sophisticated techniques. Regarding the crossdiffusion system, existence, smoothness and uniqueness of solutions have been widely investigated (see [1, 2, 16, 23, 33] and the references therein). In [30], where the fastreaction system (1.3) was introduced, it has been shown that the timedependent solutions of the triangular crossdiffusion system (1.5) can be approximated by those of (1.3) in a finite time interval if the solutions are bounded. The convergence of the solution of the stationary problem have been treated in [32], while the convergence of the solutions of the fastreaction system (1.3) towards the solutions of the crossdiffusion system (1.5) was shown in [10] in dimension one, and then generalized to a wider set of admissible reaction terms and in any dimension [19]. Similar results were obtained for a class of nontriangular crossdiffusion systems [41], assuming the same timescale for all the species. Finally, it has been proven that the limiting system inherits the entropy structure with an entropy that is not the sum of the entropies of the components [14].
On the other hand, the capability of the crossdiffusion system (1.5) to model the spatial segregation of competing species is related to the appearance of nonhomogeneous solutions. Although the system (1.5) does not have an activator–inhibitor structure (the most important mechanism in the Turing instability theory for pattern formation), the crossdiffusion term turns out to be the key ingredient to destabilize the homogeneous equilibrium [24, 30, 49]. This effect is wellknown as crossdiffusion induced instability. In this framework bifurcations diagrams are useful to present and explore the bifurcating branches and the nonhomogeneous steady state solutions. Numerical continuation techniques are going to allow us to obtain a more global picture far from the homogeneous branch. The bifurcation diagram of the triangular crossdiffusion system on a 1D domain was presented in [30]; the existence of these nonhomogeneous steady states significantly far from being perturbations of the homogeneous solutions, was proved in [7] applying a computer assisted method. A mathematically rigorous construction of the bifurcation structure of the threecomponent system was obtained in [9], while the convergence of the bifurcation structure on a 1D domain was investigated in [30], and then extended in [32] with respect to two different bifurcation parameters appearing in the diffusion part, both in the weak and strong competition case. Only recently, the influence of the additional crossdiffusion term in the system has been investigated, combining a detailed linearized analysis and numerical continuation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, not much has been done on 2D domains: the possible pattern admitted by the nontriangular SKT model was explored in [25], but the bifurcation structure on 2D domain is not known.
To study the bifurcation structure, we use the continuation software for PDEs pde2path [20, 46, 48], based on a FEM discretization of the stationary problem. Since the general class of problems which can be numerically analyzed by the software does not include the crossdiffusion term appearing in (1.5), it requires an additional setup to be able to compare the fastreaction PDE results with the singular limit crossdiffusion systems. Yet, it has been shown in the past for other classes of PDEs related to classical elliptic problems that pde2path can be combined with other methods beyond its standard setting [37]. This is the key reason, why we have chosen to carry out numerical continuation within this framework.
Here is a summary of the main contributions of this paper.

We explain how to set up the continuation software pde2path in order to treat crossdiffusion terms. Then we crossvalidate and extend previous computations for various regimes of the timescale separation parameter for 1D domains.

We compute a new bifurcation diagram with respect to a parameter appearing in the reaction part. We show how the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system modifies when \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). In particular, a novel “brokenheart” structure of nonhomogeneous steady state bifurcation branches is observed in the singular limit.

Then we compute and interpret the various bifurcation diagrams and the nonhomogeneous solutions of the triangular SKT model on a 2D rectangular domain. Also in this case the convergence towards the singular limit is analyzed carefully.

We show a link between the computed bifurcation diagrams in 1D and 2D domains, and the linearized analysis as a tool to fully understand and validate the numerical continuation calculations.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we present the numerical continuation results obtained with pde2path in the 1D case: we provide a detailed picture of the different types of stable unstable nonhomogeneous solutions to the crossdiffusion system arising at each bifurcation point, and we quantify the convergence of the fast–slow system to the crossdiffusion one. Section 3 is devoted to the 2D case: we show the bifurcation diagram and different patterns, as well as the bifurcation diagrams of the fastreaction system. In Sect. 4 some concluding remarks can be found. Appendix A contains the pde2path setup for crossdiffusion systems, while in Appendix B we report the linearized analysis of the crossdiffusion system for reference and validation.
2 Numerical continuation on a 1D domain
The numerical analysis of systems (1.5) and (1.3) is performed using the continuation software pde2path, originally developed to treat standard reaction–diffusion systems and here used to investigate crossdiffusion systems. The software setup required for system (1.5) can be found in Appendix A. For the numerical results we use the set of parameter values widely used in literature for the weak competition regime [7, 9, 30, 32], here reported in Table 1. We set \(d_1=d_2=:d\) and use d as one main bifurcation parameter. It follows that
which is one possible starting point for the continuation.
In this section we consider a 1D domain (interval) \(\Omega =(0,1)\), as in [7,8,9, 30, 32]. We provide in Sect. 2.1 a detailed characterization of different steady state types of the crossdiffusion system (1.5). In Sect. 2.2 we study the convergence of the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system (1.3) to the crossdiffusion system (1.5), taking the standard diffusion coefficient d as bifurcation parameter. In this framework, reproducing such diagrams is crucial to test the numerical continuation software; we add to the existing literature a quantification of the convergence of the bifurcation structure when \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), a clear picture of the behavior of the nonhomogeneous solutions along the bifurcation branches and their stability properties, and the corresponding bifurcation diagram in the \(L_1\)norm. Finally, in Sect. 2.3 we consider the growth rate \(r_1\) as bifurcation parameter: also in this case we present the bifurcation diagram of the crossdiffusion system and the stable steady states appearing beyond the usual range of parameters, as well as the convergence of the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system to the crossdiffusion one.
2.1 Bifurcation diagram of the crossdiffusion system
We numerically compute the bifurcation diagram of the crossdiffusion system (1.5) using the continuation software pde2path and we provide a clear picture of the different solution types.
In Fig. 1 the bifurcation diagram of the crossdiffusion system is plotted with respect to different quantities on the yaxis, namely v(0), corresponding to the density of the second species at the left boundary value of the domain, and the \(L^1\)norm of species u. From now on, the homogeneous solution is denoted by the black line, while the other branches correspond to nonhomogeneous solutions originating by successive bifurcations. The bifurcations corresponding to branch points are marked with circles, while fold/limit points are marked with crosses. Thick and thin lines denote stable and unstable solutions, respectively. Note that in the (d, v(0))plane at each bifurcation point, two separate branches appear, corresponding to two different solutions. In the \((d,u_{L^1})\)plane, the two branches are overlayed, since the solutions on the branches are symmetric on the domain. The shape of the nonhomogeneous steady states originating along the branches are reported in Fig. 2. Markers on the branches indicate the positions on the bifurcation diagram of different solutions reported in Fig. 2a–h (squares corresponds to solid lines, triangles to dashed ones).
Starting from \(d=0.04\) and decreasing its value, we can see that the homogeneous solution is stable and no other solutions are present. At \({\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{1}}\) the homogeneous solution undergoes to a primary bifurcation losing its stability, and two stable nonhomogeneous solutions appear (blue lines). Along those branches the density of species v is greater in a part of the domain, while species u occupies the other one. Note that the stable solutions on those branches are symmetric (solid and dashed lines in Fig. 2a). At \({\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{2}}\), further nonhomogeneous solutions appear (red lines), initially unstable; the solutions are again symmetric but now the species density is concentrated either in the central part of the domain or close to the boundary. Those solutions become stable for smaller values of d at a further bifurcation point. We observe the same behavior at the successive bifurcation points from the homogeneous branch: new branches appear (green, yellow and cyan), one each branch the new solutions add half a bump to their shape (Fig. 2c–e). Along the bifurcation branches, the differences between peaks and valleys increases, as the bifurcation parameter d becomes smaller. Finally, for small values of the bifurcation parameter d there can be many different locally stable nonhomogeneous solutions. Moreover, there are bifurcation curves connecting three different branches of the homogeneous solutions (magenta and orange lines): along the branches the solution changes shape in order to match the solution profile on the primary branches (Fig. 2g, h). Black circles on the homogeneous branch for small values of d indicate the presence of further bifurcation points that we have not continued.
2.2 Convergence of the bifurcation diagram
The idea to study bifurcation diagrams and the associated singular limit bifurcation diagram as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\) has been successfully carried out for fast–slow ODEs in several examples [26, 31]. Yet, more systematic studies for fastreaction limits for PDEs are missing. Here we numerically compute the convergence of the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system (1.3) to the one of the crossdiffusion system (1.5), as already reported in [30, 32], quantifying the convergence of the bifurcation points.
In Fig. 3 the bifurcation diagrams corresponding to the fastreaction system (1.3) for different values of \(\varepsilon \) are reported, showing the convergence of the bifurcation structure of system (1.3) to the one of the crossdiffusion system (1.5). For the sake of clarity of the visualization, we have reported here just the first few branches. In detail, for \(\varepsilon =0.1\), system (1.3) does not exhibit nonconstant solutions (or they exist for small values of the parameter d and it is difficult to numerically detect them), and the homogeneous steady state is stable for all the values of the bifurcation parameter d. For \(\varepsilon =0.05\), the homogeneous steady state becomes unstable for small values of d but we can see that the bifurcation structure corresponding to the fastreaction system is already qualitatively similar to the one of the crossdiffusion system, but it is squeezed into a small region near \(d=0\). The stability properties also match with the crossdiffusion bifurcation structure. For smaller values of \(\varepsilon \) the bifurcation structure is expanding to the right, towards the bifurcation structure of the crossdiffusion system. Note that Fig. 3c, obtained with \(\varepsilon =0.001\), is almost indistinguishable from Fig. 3d corresponding to the crossdiffusion system (\(\varepsilon =0\)). Hence, from the viewpoint of the bifurcation structure, the threecomponent fastreaction system is indeed a good approximation for the crossdiffusion one (at least concerning stationary steady states).
In Fig. 4 we quantitatively show the convergence of the first three bifurcation points on the homogeneous branch, namely \({\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{1}}\), \({\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{2}}\), \({\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{3}}\), using the difference between the bifurcation values \(d^0_{{\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{i}}}\) and \(d^\varepsilon _{{\texttt{B}}_{\texttt{i}}}\). The order of convergence is approximately one.
2.3 Changing the bifurcation parameter
After we have set up the system in pde2path, we can also change the bifurcation parameter. One possible choice is \(r_1\), the growth rate of population u. This parameter appears in the reaction part of the system and the homogeneous coexistence state \((u_*,v_*)\) depends on its value. Note that, without diffusion, in the weak competition case (namely \(a_1a_2b_1b_2>0\)) the homogeneous coexistence state is positive (and stable) when \(b_1/a_2<r_1/r_2<a_1/b_2\), otherwise it is not meaningful and the noncoexistence states \(({\bar{u}},0)\) and \((0,{\bar{v}})\) are stable. With crossdiffusion, it has been shown in [8] that the homogeneous equilibrium can be destabilized and stable nonhomogeneous solutions arise, which survive in a region of the parameter space in which the homogeneous solution is no longer admissible, namely \(r_1/r_2>a_1/b_2\).
In Fig. 5 we report the bifurcation diagram of the crossdiffusion system with respect to the bifurcation parameter \(r_1\) and some solutions, obtained with the set of parameters of Table 1 and \(d=0.02\). Note that it is possible to compare it with the one reported in Fig. 1a, since they are different crosssections of a twoparameter bifurcation surface. The bifurcation diagram is composed by three rings and the solutions profile is shown in Fig. 5a–d. In particular, the two outer (blue) rings contain qualitatively similar solutions (Fig. 5a, b). Furthermore, Fig. 5b shows a stable nonhomogeneous steady state corresponding to a parameter value outside of the usual weak competition regime. Furthermore, the (red) branches originating from the second bifurcation point are nonsymmetric regarding the stability properties even if they correspond to symmetric solutions (with respect to the homogeneous one) on the domain (Fig. 5c, d).
In Fig. 6, we show how the bifurcation diagram with respect to \(r_1\) behaves when the fast timescale parameter \(\varepsilon \) decreases. On the vertical axis the value v(0) is reported. Also in this case we observe convergence of the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system to the one of the crossdiffusion system of Fig. 5e (well approximated by taking \(\varepsilon =10^{4}\), corresponding to Fig. 6f). However, we observe that the bifurcation structure is not only expanding as in the previous section, but it is qualitatively changing as \(\varepsilon \) decreases. In particular, in Fig. 6a, b there are only two nonhomogeneous branches connecting two primary branch points on the homogeneous branch and forming a bifurcation ring. For smaller values of \(\varepsilon \) other bifurcation points (and consequently other rings) appear inside the main bifurcation ring; the inner rings expand while the outer ring folds in the middle part forming a heart shape. Then the outer ring interacts with the inner ring and separates into two rings, giving rise to the bifurcation structure of the crossdiffusion system, i.e., the heartshaped structure breaks.
Also in this case we quantitatively show the convergence of the first bifurcation points on the homogeneous branch in Fig. 7. Although the bifurcation structure is qualitatively changing, the convergence rate is comparable to Fig. 4. This clearly shows that locally one can expect a convergence rate near the homogeneous branch. In fact, this leads one to the conjecture that even the global diagram could be captured asymptotically by a convergence rate towards the singular limit but since we have only captured part of the full diagram, this is hard to validate completely numerically. Furthermore, many different convergence metrics are conceivable if one moves beyond single points so we leave this conjecture as a topic for future work.
3 Numerical continuation on a 2D rectangular domain
In this section we consider a 2D rectangular domain with edges of length \(L_x=1\) and \(L_y=4\). This choice reduces the presence of multiple branch points. As in the previous section, we set the standard diffusion coefficient d as our main bifurcation parameter. The bifurcation analysis close to the homogeneous branch can be performed (see Appendix B). It allows to compute the values of the parameter d at the bifurcation points on the homogeneous branch, which can be compared to the values numerically obtained. It also predicts the shape of the steady state for each bifurcation point close to the homogeneous branch, by looking at the eigenvalues of the Laplacian at the bifurcation point and the associated eigenfunctions [35, 39].
In Fig. 8 we show part of the bifurcation diagram close to the homogeneous branch with respect to the \(L^2\)norm of the species u. As in the 1D case, for decreasing values of d the homogeneous solution destabilizes at the first bifurcation point, and stable nonhomogeneous steady states appear (blue branch). For smaller values of d other bifurcation points occur. We show in the figure just some of the successive branches and we report the corresponding solution at the gray points (Fig. 8a–f), which turn out to be unstable. Note that certain crosssections of the 2Dsolutions have a similar shape as the steady states of 1D steady states.
Different from the 1D case, in Fig. 9 the enlargement of the initial part of the first (blue) branch is reported. It shows that the first bifurcation point is supercritical, but then two successive fold bifurcations (indicated with a cross) appear leading to multistability of solutions: in a small range of the bifurcation parameter the system admits four (two symmetric) stable nonhomogeneous steady states. Their shape is reported in Fig. 9a–d. Close to the homogeneous branch (Fig. 9a, b) the steady states have half a bump on both edges (in agreement with the eigenvalues corresponding to the first bifurcation point, see Appendix B), while going further along the branch the shape modifies.
Finally, Fig. 10 shows four different branches, computed far away from the homogeneous one. The first (blue) branch undergoes a further bifurcation and a secondary stable branch arises (marked in green). Then, on this branch a Hopf bifurcation point has been detected. Note that this type of bifurcation is not present in the 1D case in the weak competition regime and yields the existence of timeperiodic solutions. Furthermore, the bifurcation diagram in the 2D case seems to be even more intricate compared to the 1D case, many branches are curly and they swirl back and forth. The solution along the branches deforms (see Fig. 10a–i), and various patterns are evident. Stripes occur in Fig. 10b, f and spots in Fig. 10g, i, although they are unstable.
3.1 Convergence of the bifurcation structure
As in the 1D case, we investigate how the bifurcation structure deforms on a 2D domain with respect to the timescale separation parameter \(\varepsilon \). In Fig. 11a–d the bifurcation diagrams for different values of \(\varepsilon \) are reported showing the convergence of the bifurcation structure of the fastreaction system (1.3) to the crossdiffusion one (1.5), shown in Fig. 11e. For the sake of clarity of the visualization we only show stable branches. For \(\varepsilon =0.05\) the instability region of the homogeneous branch is reduced, and the two primary branches roughly sketch the crossdiffusion one: the first bifurcation point is supercritical, the first branch is stable and the other (red) represents a stable part. However, there is no a secondary bifurcation branch giving rise to a Hopf point. For decreasing values of \(\varepsilon \), the crossdiffusion bifurcation structure is well recognizable.
Finally, in Fig. 12 we show three different stable stationary solutions of the fastreaction system with \(\varepsilon =0.0001\): they corresponds to points on the blue, green and red branches of Fig. 11d, showing different (stable) patterns. It is interesting to observe the distribution of the two different states of species u on the domain. It turns out that the “excited individuals” and the competing species v are more abundant in the same region of the domain. Furthermore, the steady state solutions satisfy the algebraic equation derived by a quasisteady state ansatz from the threespecies system (1.3)
In addition, we have found other stable nonhomogeneous solutions of the crossdiffusion system, and the corresponding steady states are stripe patterns.
4 Conclusion and outlook
In this paper we have investigated the bifurcation structure of the triangular SKT model and of the corresponding fastreaction system in 1D and 2D domains in the weak competition case via numerical continuation. Despite the fact that part of the bifurcation structure of this system in 1D has been already computed [7, 9, 30, 32], the key points of our work can be here summarized.

We have exploited the continuation software pde2path to treat crossdiffusion terms. Providing the code in the appendix, this work can be used as a guide to implement such class of problems.

We have reproduced the already computed bifurcation diagrams for the triangular SKT model on a 1D domain with respect to d. Even though this is not per se a new result, we have quantitatively checked, how accurate the computation of bifurcation points is. It is worthwhile to note that we have also provided information about the stability of nonhomogeneous steady states, which are in agreement with previous results [7, 30] and confirms the reliability of our new software setup for crossdiffusion systems.

Once the software setup has been established, we have changed the bifurcation parameter to obtain novel structures. We have selected as new bifurcation parameter the growth rate of the first species, which appears in the reaction part. We have shown that the bifurcation structure qualitatively changes as the small parameter tends to zero leading to a “brokenheart” bifurcation structure.

With respect to both of the considered bifurcation parameters, we have also provided a novel precise quantification of the convergence of the bifurcation points on the homogeneous branch of the fastreaction system to the crossdiffusion ones.

A major new contribution is that we have computed the bifurcation diagram and the nonhomogeneous steady states of the triangular SKT model on a 2D domain (rectangular). This case is intricate; the resulting bifurcation diagram is not as clear as in 1D. We have highlighted the main characteristics of the diagrams, and we have presented different types of nonhomogeneous steady states, with a focus on stability and pattern formation. We have seen that solutions can exhibit spots or stripes, depending on the parameters, but such solutions turn out to be unstable (at least as far as we have computed the bifurcation branches).

We have provided a link between the computed bifurcation diagrams in 1D and 2D domains, and the Turing instability analysis as a tool to fully understand and validate the software output. It is worthwhile to note that the results obtained with the Turing instability analysis only provide insights close to the homogeneous branch. However, the global bifurcation structure has to be numerically computed to achieve a full comprehension of the possible (stationary) outcomes of the system.

Our numerical calculations can now provide also guidelines and conjectures for analytical approaches to crossdiffusion systems, e.g., where in parameter space one can expect entropy structures to behave differently, or where multistability and deformation of global branches has to be taken into account.
Several research directions arise at this point. On the one hand, it is natural to further combine analytical methods and numerical continuation techniques to the study of the full crossdiffusion systems in order to understand the role of crossdiffusion terms on pattern formation and their influence on the bifurcation diagram [8]. On the other hand, continuing our work to numerically investigate of the convergence of the bifurcation structure of a fourequation fastreaction system leading to the full crossdiffusion SKT system, not only the triangular one, is a straightforward continuation of this work. In this context, analytical proofs of convergence of the solutions of the four species system with two different timescales to the nontriangular crossdiffusion one is an open problem [17].
Furthermore, the 2D case we have computed has shown that Hopf bifurcations can appear, which can give rise to timeperiodic solutions. Their presence could then also be investigated further using the continuation software pde2path, in order to provide a clearer picture on possible longtime asymptotic dynamics of the model. Another direction is to explore other crossdiffusion systems which have been derived by timescale arguments [11, 17, 18], or simply proposed to describe different processes [34, 40]. To this end, we have shown that the continuation software is easily applicable to different models and it can be used to treat systems that do not exactly belong to the class of problems for which it has been developed. For instance, another direction could be its extension to other nonstandard diffusion processes such as fractional reaction–diffusion equations [21].
References
Amann, H.: Dynamic theory of quasilinear parabolic equations. I. Abstract evolution equations. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 12(9), 895–919 (1988)
Amann, H.: Dynamic theory of quasilinear parabolic equations. II. Reaction–diffusion systems. Differ. Integr. Equ. 3(1), 13–75 (1990)
Blat, J., Brown, K.J.: Bifurcation of steadystate solutions in predator–prey and competition systems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A Math. 97, 21–34 (1984)
Bothe, D., Hilhorst, D.: A reactiondiffusion system with fast reversible reaction. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 286(1), 125–135 (2003)
Bothe, D., Pierre, M.: The instantaneous limit for reactiondiffusion systems with a fast irreversible reaction. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 5(1), 49–59 (2012)
Bothe, D., Pierre, M., Rolland, G.: Crossdiffusion limit for a reaction–diffusion system with fast reversible reaction. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 37(11), 1940–1966 (2012)
Breden, M., Castelli, R.: Existence and instability of steady states for a triangular crossdiffusion system: a computerassisted proof. J. Differ. Equ. 264(10), 6418–6458 (2018)
Breden, M., Kuehn, C., Soresina, C.: On the influence of crossdiffusion in pattern formation. arXiv:1910.03436 (2019)
Breden, M., Lessard, J.P., Vanicat, M.: Global bifurcation diagrams of steady states of systems of PDEs via rigorous numerics: a 3component reactiondiffusion system. Acta Appl. Math. 128(1), 113–152 (2013)
Conforto, F., Desvillettes, L.: Rigorous passage to the limit in a system of reaction–diffusion equations towards a system including cross diffusions. Commun. Math. Sci. 12(3), 457–472 (2014)
Conforto, F., Desvillettes, L., Soresina, C.: About reactiondiffusion systems involving the Hollingtype II and the Beddington–DeAngelis functional responses for predatorprey models. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. NoDEA 25(3), 24 (2018)
Conti, M., Terracini, S., Verzini, G.: Asymptotic estimates for the spatial segregation of competitive systems. Adv. Math. 195(2), 524–560 (2005)
Cosner, C., Lazer, A.C.: Stable coexistence states in the Volterra–Lotka competition model with diffusion. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 44(6), 1112–1132 (1984)
Daus, E.S., Desvillettes, L., Jüngel, A.: Crossdiffusion systems and fastreaction limits. arXiv:1710.03590 (2017)
de Witt, H., Dohnal, T., Rademacher, J.D.M., Uecker, H., Wetzel, D.: pde2path 2.4 — Quickstart guide and reference card. http://www.staff.unioldenburg.de (2017)
Desvillettes, L., Lepoutre, T., Moussa, A., Trescases, A.: On the entropic structure of reactioncross diffusion systems. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 40(9), 1705–1747 (2015)
Desvillettes, L., Soresina, C.: Nontriangular crossdiffusion systems with predator–prey reaction terms. Ricerche di Matematica 68(1), 295–314 (2018)
Desvillettes, L., Soresina, C.: On the entropic structure of a crossdiffusion system for competing species arising by time scale arguments. (forthcoming)
Desvillettes, L., Trescases, A.: New results for triangular reaction cross diffusion system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 430(1), 32–59 (2015)
Dohnal, T., Rademacher, J.D.M., Uecker, H., Wetzel, D.: pde2path 2.0: Multiparameter continuation and periodic domains. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Nonlinear Dynamics Conference, ENOC, vol. 2014 (2014)
Ehstand, N., Kuehn, C., Soresina, C.: Numerical continuation for fractional PDEs: sharp teeth and bloated snakes (forthcoming)
Fenichel, N.: Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 31, 53–98 (1979)
Galiano, G., Garzón, M.L., Jüngel, A.: Semidiscretization in time and numerical convergence of solutions of a nonlinear crossdiffusion population model. Numer. Math. 93(4), 655–673 (2003)
Gambino, G., Lombardo, M.C., Marco, S.: Turing instability and traveling fronts for a nonlinear reaction–diffusion system with crossdiffusion. Math. Comput. Simul. 82(6), 1112–1132 (2012)
Gambino, G., Lombardo, M.C., Sammartino, M.: Pattern formation driven by crossdiffusion in a 2D domain. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 14(3), 1755–1779 (2013)
Guckenheimer, J., Kuehn, C.: Homoclinic orbits of the FitzHugh–Nagumo equation: the singular limit. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2(4), 851–872 (2009)
Henneke, F., Tang, B.Q.: Fast reaction limit of a volumesurface reaction–diffusion system towards a heat equation with dynamical boundary conditions. Asymptot. Anal. 98(4), 325–339 (2016)
Hilhorst, D., Mimura, M., Ninomiya, H.: Fast reaction limit of competitiondiffusion systems. Handb. Differ. Equ. Evol. Equ. 5, 105–168 (2009)
Hilhorst, D., Van Der Hout, R., Peletier, L.A.: The fast reaction limit for a reaction–diffusion system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 199(2), 349–373 (1996)
Iida, M., Mimura, M., Ninomiya, H.: Diffusion, crossdiffusion and competitive interaction. J. Math. Biol. 53(4), 617–641 (2006)
Iuorio, A., Kuehn, C., Szmolyan, P.: Geometry and numerical continuation of multiscale orbits in a nonconvex variational problem. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 13(2), 1–21 (2020)
Izuhara, H., Mimura, M.: Reaction–diffusion system approximation to the crossdiffusion competition system. Hiroshima Math. J. 38(2), 315–347 (2008)
Jüngel, A.: Entropy Methods for Diffusive Partial Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Jüngel, A., Kuehn, C., Trussardi, L.: A meeting point of entropy and bifurcations in crossdiffusion herding. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 28(2), 317–356 (2017)
Kielhoefer, H.: Bifurcation Theory: An Introduction with Applications to PDEs. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Kishimoto, K., Weinberger, H.F.: The spatial homogeneity of stable equilibria of some reaction–diffusion systems on convex domains. J. Differ. Equ. 58, 15–21 (1985)
Kuehn, C.: Efficient gluing of numerical continuation and a multiple solution method for elliptic PDEs. Appl. Math. Comput. 266, 656–674 (2015)
Kuehn, C.: Multiple Time Scale Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (2015)
Kuehn, C.: PDE Dynamics: An Introduction. SIAM, Philadelphia (2019)
Lacitignola, D., Bozzini, B., Peipmann, R., Sgura, I.: Crossdiffusion effects on a morphochemical model for electrodeposition. Appl. Math. Model. 57, 492–513 (2018)
Murakawa, H.: A relation between crossdiffusion and reaction–diffusion. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. 5(1), 147–158 (2012)
Murakawa, H., Ninomiya, H.: Fast reaction limit of a threecomponent reaction–diffusion system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 379(1), 150–170 (2011)
Prufert, U.: OOPDE—an object oriented approach to finite elements in MATLAB. Quickstart guide. http://www.mathe.tufreiberg.de (2014)
Rademacher, J.D.M., Uecker, H.: The OOPDE setting of pde2path—a tutorial via some Allen–Cahn models. http://www.staff.unioldenburg.de (2018)
Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K., Teramoto, E.: Spatial segregation of interacting species. J. Theor. Biol. 79(1), 83–99 (1979)
Uecker, H.: Hopf bifurcation and time periodic orbits with pde2path—algorithms and applications. Commun. Comput. Phys. (2018) (to appear)
Uecker, H.: Pattern formation with pde2path—a tutorial. http://www.staff.unioldenburg.de (2019)
Uecker, H., Wetzel, D., Rademacher, J.D.M.: pde2path—a Matlab package for continuation and bifurcation in 2D elliptic systems. Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 7(1), 58–106 (2014)
Zou, R., Guo, S.: Bifurcation of reaction crossdiffusion systems. Int. J. Bifurc Chaos 27(04), 1750049 (2017)
Acknowledgements
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL. CK have been supported by a Lichtenberg Professorship of the VolkswagenStiftung. CS has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska–Curie Grant Agreement No. 754462. Support by INdAMGNFM is gratefully acknowledged by CS. CK also acknowledges partial support of the EU within the TiPES project funded the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 820970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
“This article is part of the section “Computational Approaches” edited by Siddhartha Mishra.”
Appendices
Appendix A: Software setup
We provide here an explanation how to implement our problem in pde2path in the OOPDE setting [43], in particular how to treat the crossdiffusion term. Since the purpose of this work is not to give a complete overview of the software for beginner users, we do not explain in detail the basic setup; see [15, 44, 48] for complete guides on the continuation software and for the notation adopted in the following.
In [44] the software setup for the quasilinear Allen–Cahn equation is explained, and only recently this approach was used to treat a chemotaxis reaction–diffusion system involving a quasilinear crossdiffusion term of the form \(\nabla \cdot (u \nabla v)\) [47]. However, the previous approach is not directly applicable to the crossdiffusion system (1.5), since the crossdiffusion term is not written in divergence form. Then we need to rewrite it as
The steady state problem reads
and on the FEM level it becomes
where K is the standard onecomponent Neumann–Laplacian (stiffness matrix), \(K_{21}(v)u\) and \(K_{12}(u)v\) implement \(\nabla \cdot (c(v) \nabla u)\) and \(\nabla \cdot ({\tilde{c}}(u) \nabla v)\) respectively, while \(F_1,\,F_2\) belong to the reaction part. In detail,
depend on v and on u. Hence, they have to be computed at each step. In the OOPDE setting, we can employ the routine assema to compute those matrices, but this needs c(v) and \({\tilde{c}}(u)\) on each element center, which is obtained interpolating u and v from the nodes to the element centers, as it can be seen in Listings 1 and 2, which show the main files implementing the triangular crossdiffusion system (1.5) in pde2path.
Appendix B: Linearized analysis
In this section the detailed linearized analysis of system (1.5) can be found, in order to localize regions in the parameter space where crossdiffusion induced instability can appear. Although it is a simpler case than the one treated in [8], this computation allows us to identify the bifurcation points along the homogeneous branch. These values can be compared to the ones numerically obtained using pde2path, so we present the analysis for reference here.
We recall that in the weak competition case (\(a_1a_2b_1b_2>0\)) there exists a homogeneous equilibrium \((u_*,v_*)\), which is stable for the reaction under the additional condition on the growth rates \(b_1/a_2<r_1/r_2<a_1/b_2\). Then, the Jacobian matrix of the reaction part and the linearization of the diffusion part of the crossdiffusion system (1.5) evaluated at the equilibrium \((u_{*},v_{*})\) are
where \(\text {tr}J_*<0, \, \det J_*>0\). Hence, the characteristic matrix is
where \(\lambda _k\) denotes an eigenvalue of the Laplacian on the domain. The trace of the characteristic matrix remains negative, while the determinant can be written as a second order polynomial in \(\lambda _k\) (as usual in Turing instability analysis)
where \(\alpha :=(2b_2u_*r_2)v_*\). In order to have crossdiffusion induced instability, the determinant of the characteristic matrix has to be negative for some \(\lambda _k\). This is possible when \(\alpha >0\). The sign of the quantity \(\alpha \) is not fixed but it depends on the parameter values \(r_i,\,a_i,\, b_i,\, (i=1,2)\); we have a positive \(\alpha \) when
Remark
Note that the parameter set used in [7, 9, 30, 32] and reported in Table 1 gives \(\alpha >0\).
If we rewrite (B.1) as a secondorder polynomial in d
it is possible to locate the bifurcation points solving \(\det M_k^*=0\); we obtain
depending on the parameters and on the eigenvalue of the Laplacian. With homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions and choosing a 1D domain with length \(L_x\), the eigenvalues are
while on a rectangular 2D domain
In Table 2a we report the bifurcation values \(d_B(\lambda _k)\) corresponding to the eigenvalue \(\lambda _k\) of the Laplacian for the 1D domain (0, 1) and obtained by formula (B.3), for different values of k, compared with the numerical values estimated by the software pde2path. The obtained values are in good agreement. The scenario is more complicated in a rectangular 2D domain, reported in Table 2b for different values of n and m. Also in this case we compare the values obtained by formula (B.3) with the numerical values. Note that the values are ordered with respect to the bifurcation values \(d_B\), which does not translate into an order of the indices \(n,\,m\): for instance the couple (0, 3) corresponds to a smaller bifurcation value than (0, 7). The reason is evident in Fig. 13, due to a nonmonotonicity of the function \(d_B(\lambda _k)\) w.r.t. \(\lambda _k\).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuehn, C., Soresina, C. Numerical continuation for a fastreaction system and its crossdiffusion limit. SN Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 1, 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s4298502000087
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s4298502000087