Abstract
We study the possible blow-up behavior of solutions to the slightly subcritical elliptic problem with Hardy term
in a bounded domain \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N (N\ge 7)\) with \(0\in \Omega\), as \(\mu ,\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+\). In [6], we obtained the existence of nodal solutions that blow up positively at the origin and negatively at a different point as \(\mu =O(\epsilon ^\alpha )\) with \(\alpha >\frac{N-4}{N-2}\), \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+\). Here we prove the existence of nodal bubble tower solutions, i.e. superpositions of bubbles of different signs, all blowing up at the origin but with different blow-up order, as \(\mu =O(\epsilon )\), \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+\).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubin, Th: Problèmes isopérimétriques et espaces de Sobolev. J. Differ. Geom. 11, 573–598 (1976)
Bahri, A., Li, Y., Rey, O.: On a variational problem with lack of compactness: the topological effect of the critical points at infinity. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 3, 67–93 (1995)
Bartsch, T., Micheletti, A., Pistoia, A.: On the existence and the profile of nodal solutions of elliptic equations involving critical growth. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 26, 265–282 (2006)
Bartsch, T., D’Aprile, T., Pistoia, A.: Multi-bubble nodal solutions for slightly subcritical elliptic problems in domains with symmetries. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30, 1027–1047 (2013)
Bartsch, T., D’Aprile, T., Pistoia, A.: On the profile of sign-changing solutions of an almost critical problem in the ball. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 45, 1246–1258 (2013)
Bartsch, T., Guo, Q.: Nodal blow-up solutions to slightly subcritical elliptic problems with Hardy-critical term. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 17, 55–85 (2017)
Bianchi, G., Egnell, H.: A note on the Sobolev inequality. J. Funct. Anal. 100, 18–24 (1991)
Brézis, H., Peletier, L.A.: Asymptotics for Elliptic Equations Involving Critical Growth, Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, Vol. I, Progr. Nonlinear Diff. Equ. Appl., vol. 1, pp. 149–192. Birkhäuser, Boston (1989)
Cao, D., Han, P.: Solutions for semilinear elliptic equations with critical exponents and Hardy potential. J. Differ. Equ. 205, 521–537 (2004)
Cao, D., Peng, S.: A note on the sign-changing solutions to elliptic problems with critical Sobolev and Hardy terms. J. Differ. Equ. 193, 424–434 (2003)
Catrina, F., Wang, Z.-Q.: On the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities: sharp constants, existence (and nonexistence), and symmetry of extremal functions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 54, 229–258 (2001)
del Pino, M., Dolbeault, J., Musso, M.: “Bubble-tower” radial solutions in the slightly supercritical Brezis–Nirenberg problem. J. Differ. Equ. 193(2), 280–306 (2003)
Ekeland, I., Ghoussoub, N.: Selected new aspects of the calculus of variations in the large. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 39(2), 207–265 (2002)
Felli, V., Pistoia, A.: Existence of blowing-up solutions for a nonlinear elliptic equation with Hardy potential and critical growth. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 31, 21–56 (2006)
Felli, V., Terracini, S.: Fountain-like solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations with critical growth and Hardy potential. Commun. Contemp. Math. 7, 867–904 (2005)
Ferrero, A., Gazzola, F.: Existence of solutions for singular critical growth semilinear elliptic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 177, 494–522 (2001)
Flucher, M., Wei, J.: Semilinear Dirichlet problem with nearly critical exponent, asymptotic location of hot spots. Manuscripta Math. 94, 337–346 (1997)
Ghoussoub, N., Robert, F.: Sobolev inequalities for the Hardy–Schrödinger operator: extremals and critical dimensions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 6, 89–144 (2016)
Ghoussoub, N., Robert, F.: The Hardy–Schrödinger operator with interior singularity: the remaining cases. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 56, 54 (2017). (Paper No. 149)
Ghoussoub, N., Yuan, C.: Multiple solutions for quasi-linear PDEs involving the critical Sobolev and Hardy exponents. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 352, 5703–5743 (2000)
Grossi, M., Takahashi, F.: Nonexistence of multi-bubble solutions to some elliptic equations on convex domains. J. Funct. Anal. 259, 904–917 (2010)
Guo, Q., Niu, P.: Nodal and positive solutions for singular semilinear elliptic equations with critical exponents in symmetric domains. J. Differ. Equ. 245, 3974–3985 (2008)
Han, Z.-C.: Asymptotic approach to singular solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 8, 159–174 (1991)
Jannelli, E.: The role played by space dimension in elliptic critical problems. J. Differ. Equ. 156, 407–426 (1999)
Musso, M., Pistoia, A.: Multispike solutions for a nonlinear elliptic problem involving critical Sobolev exponent. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 5, 541–579 (2002)
Musso, M., Pistoia, A.: Tower of bubbles for almost critical problems in general domains. J. Math. Pures Appl. 93, 1–40 (2010)
Musso, M., Wei, J.: Nonradial solutions to critical elliptic equations of Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg type. Int. Math. Res. Not. 18, 4120–4162 (2012)
Pistoia, A., Weth, T.: Sign changing bubble tower solutions in a slightly subcritical semilinear Dirichlet problem. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 24, 325–340 (2007)
Rey, O.: Proof of two conjectures of H. Brézis and L. A. Peletier. Manuscripta Math. 65, 19–37 (1989)
Rey, O.: The role of the Green’s function in a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical Sobolev exponent. J. Funct. Anal. 89, 1–52 (1990)
Rey, O.: Blow-up points of solutions to elliptic equations with limiting nonlinearity. Differ. Integral Equ. 4, 1155–1167 (1991)
Ruiz, D., Willem, M.: Elliptic problems with critical exponents and Hardy potentials. J. Differ. Equ. 190, 524–538 (2003)
Smets, D.: Nonlinear Schrödinger equations with Hardy potential and critical nonlinearities. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 357, 2909–2938 (2005)
Talenti, G.: Best constant in Sobolev inequality. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 110, 353–372 (1976)
Terracini, S.: On positive entire solutions to a class of equations with a singular coefficient and critical exponent. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2, 241–264 (1996)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Daomin Cao for many helpful discussions during the preparation of this paper. This work was carried out while Qianqiao Guo was visiting Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, to which he would like to express his gratitude for their warm hospitality.
Funding
Qianqiao Guo was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11971385) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant no. 2019JM275).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the topical collection dedicated to Prof. Dajun Guo for his 85th birthday, edited by Yihong Du, Zhaoli Liu, Xingbin Pan, and Zhitao Zhang.
Appendices
Appendix A: Some lemmas from [6]
In this part we collect some lemmas from [6]. We define for \(\eta \in (0,1)\):
Lemma A.1
(i) For \(i=1,2,\dots ,k,\) and \(j=0,1,\dots ,N\), there holds
as \(\delta _i\rightarrow 0\) uniformly for \(\xi _i\) in a compact subset of \(\Omega\).
(ii) There holds
as \(\sigma \rightarrow 0\), uniformly for \(0<\mu <{\overline{\mu }}\).
Lemma A.2
For \(i=1,2,\cdots ,k,\) the following estimates hold uniformly for \((\lambda ,\xi )\in {{\mathcal {T}}}_\eta\):
- (i):
-
For \(\mu ,\sigma \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Omega }|\nabla P V_\sigma |^2-\mu \frac{|P V_\sigma |^2}{|x|^2}= & {} S_\mu ^{\frac{N}{2}}-C_0C_\mu ^{2^*-1} H(0,0)\sigma ^{N-2}\\&\times \int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N} \frac{1}{({|z|^{\beta _1}}+|z|^{\beta _2})^{\frac{N+2}{2}}}+O(\mu \sigma ^{N-2})+O(\sigma ^N). \end{aligned}$$ - (ii):
-
For \(\delta _i,\sigma \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Omega }|\nabla P U_{\delta _i,\xi _i}|^2=S_0^{\frac{N}{2}}-C_0^{2^*}H(\xi _i,\xi _i)\delta _i^{N-2}\int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N} \frac{1}{(1+|z|^2)^{\frac{N+2}{2}}}+o(\delta _i^{N-2}). \end{aligned}$$
Lemma A.3
For \(\mu ,\sigma \rightarrow 0\) there holds
Lemma A.4
For \(\mu \rightarrow 0^+\) there holds
for \(p>1\) as well as
for some positive constant \(\overline{S}\) independent of \(\mu\).
Appendix B: Proof of the lemmas from Sect. 3
Lemma B.1
For \(i,l=1,2,\dots ,k,\) and \(j,h=0,1,\dots ,N\), with \(i\ne l\) or \(j\ne h\), there are constants \(\widetilde{c}_0>0, \widetilde{c}_{i,j}>0\) such that the following estimates hold uniformly for \(0<\mu <\overline{\mu }\):
Proof
We omit the proof since it is similar to [6, Lemma A.1]. \(\square\)
Lemma B.2
(i) For \(i,l=1,2,\cdots ,k\) there holds
as \(\sigma , \delta _i, \delta _l \rightarrow 0\) uniformly for \(0<\mu <\overline{\mu }\) and \(\xi _i\) in a compact subset of \(\Omega\).
(ii) There holds
as \(\sigma , \delta _i\rightarrow 0\) uniformly for \(0<\mu <\overline{\mu }\) and \(\xi _i\) in a compact subset of \(\Omega\).
Proof
We only prove (i) for \(h\ne 0\).
As in [26, Lemma A.3], by (2.3) and (2.4) we have
where we use
for \(i\ne l\),
and similarly,
The same arguments as for (B.1) yield for \(i\ne l\):
Finally,
Then (i) follows. \(\square\)
Lemma B.3
There holds
as \(\mu ,\sigma ,\delta _i\rightarrow 0\) uniformly for \(\xi _i\) in a compact subset of \(\Omega\).
Proof
It is similar to [6, Lemma A.4]. \(\square\)
Lemma B.4
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\), the following estimates hold uniformly for \(0<\mu <\overline{\mu }\) and \((\lambda ,\zeta )\in {{\mathcal {O}}}_\eta\):
Proof
The first two are from [3]. The last one can be proved as (4.5) in [26]. \(\square\)
Lemma B.5
Let \(k\ge 1\). Assume without loss of generality that \(1\le i<j\le k\).Then the following estimates hold uniformly for \((\lambda ,\zeta )\in {{\mathcal {O}}}_\eta\):
- (i):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Omega }|\nabla P V_\sigma |^2-\mu \frac{|P V_\sigma |^2}{|x|^2}=S_\mu ^{\frac{N}{2}}+o(\varepsilon ). \end{aligned}$$ - (ii):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\int _{\Omega }\nabla P V_\sigma \nabla PU_{\delta _i,\xi _i}-\mu \frac{P V_\sigma PU_{\delta _i,\xi _i}}{|x|^2}\\&\quad = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} C_0^{2^*}(\frac{\overline{\lambda }}{\lambda _k})^{\frac{N-2}{2}}\int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N}\frac{1}{(1+|y|^2)^{\frac{N+2}{2}}}\frac{1}{(1+|\zeta _k|^2)^{\frac{N-2}{2}}}\cdot \varepsilon +o(\varepsilon ) \quad &{} \text {if} ~~i=k,\\ o(\varepsilon )\quad &{} \text {if} ~~i\ne k. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$ - (iii):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \mu \int _{\Omega }\frac{|PU_{\delta _i,\xi _i}|^2}{|x|^2}=\mu C_0^2\int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N}\frac{1}{|y|^2(1+|y-\zeta _i|^2)^{N-2}}+o(\varepsilon ). \end{aligned}$$ - (iv):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \mu \int _{\Omega }\frac{PU_{\delta _i,\xi _i}PU_{\delta _j,\xi _j}}{|x|^2} =o(\varepsilon ),~~~i\ne j. \end{aligned}$$ - (v):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Omega }|\nabla P U_{\delta _i,\xi _i}|^2 = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} S_0^{\frac{N}{2}}-C_0^{2^*}H(0,0)\lambda _1^{N-2}\int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N} \frac{1}{(1+|z|^2)^{\frac{N+2}{2}}}\cdot \varepsilon +o(\varepsilon ) \quad &{} \text {if} \,\,i=1,\\ S_0^{\frac{N}{2}}+o(\varepsilon )\quad &{} \text {if} \,\,i\ne 1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$ - (vi):
-
For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\):
$$\begin{aligned}&\int _{\Omega }\nabla P U_{\delta _i,\xi _i}\nabla P U_{\delta _j,\xi _j}\\&\quad = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} C_0^{2^*}(\frac{\lambda _{i+1}}{\lambda _i})^{\frac{N-2}{2}}\int _{{\mathbb {R}}^N}\frac{1}{(1+|y|^2)^{\frac{N+2}{2}}}\frac{1}{(1+|\zeta _i|^2)^{\frac{N-2}{2}}}\cdot \varepsilon +o(\varepsilon ) \quad &{} \text {if} ~~j=i+1,\\ o(\varepsilon )\quad &{} \text {otherwise}. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$
Proof
(i) and (v) follow from Lemma A.2.
Now we prove (ii). Using (2.4), integration by parts yields
It is easy to show, using (2.3) and (2.4), that
and
On the other hand,
If \(i=k,j=k+1\), then
If \(i\ne k\) or \(j\ne k+1\), then similar arguments as for (B.6) yield
Then we conclude by (B.2)–(B.7).
Next (iii) follows from:
Similar arguments imply (iv).
For the proof of (vi), without loss of generality let \(1\le i<j\le k\). Then
\(\square\)
Lemma B.6
Let \(k\ge 1\). For \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\) there holds, uniformly for \((\lambda ,\zeta )\in {{\mathcal {O}}}_\eta\), setting \(\lambda _{k+1}=\overline{\lambda }\):
Proof
It is easy to see that
Observe that
and
From [26], for \(1\le i<j\le k\) we also have
Using (B.6), (B.8) and the above three equalities, the proof of (B.9) is contained in Lemma 6.2 in [26]. \(\square\)
Lemma B.7
For \(\mu , \sigma , \delta _i \rightarrow 0\) there holds, uniformly in compact subsets of \(\Omega\),
Proof
The proof is similar to the one of [6, Lemma A.9]. \(\square\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartsch, T., Guo, Q. Nodal bubble tower solutions to slightly subcritical elliptic problems with Hardy terms. SN Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 1, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42985-020-00029-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42985-020-00029-9
Keywords
- Hardy term
- Critical exponent
- Slightly subcritical problems
- Nodal solutions
- Bubble towers
- Singular perturbation methods.