Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model-Learning-Based Partitioned Control of a Human-Powered Augmentation Lower Exoskeleton

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new model-learning-based partitioned control strategy of a wearable lower exoskeleton. Here, the dynamics of the coupled human-exoskeleton system along with the corresponding resulting interaction torques are learned based on nonparametric regression technique and then incorporated in the control system for swing phase. This promising combination of partitioned control scheme and incremental model learning has provided the exoskeleton with the ability to adapt to various dynamics of human operators, to reduce the physical interaction between the operator and the exoskeleton, and minimize the sensory system used in the system. In this method, movement data containing the information of dynamics and interaction was collected in a number of walking cycles, and then training and prediction procedure were performed to aid the controller. We have demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed method through an exoskeleton prototype that employs walking sessions on a bench-testing over different ranges of walking speeds (0.8–1.2 m/s) with various subjects. In the simulation results, the control performance of the proposed algorithm was qualitatively compared to other fundamental controllers including a classical impedance control and a Rigid-Body-Dynamics model-based control. The resulting interaction torque reduced to greater than 32%. These results were re-evaluated in the real system and similar performance was achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kazerooni H, Steger R, Huang L (2006) Hybrid control of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). Int J Robot Res 25(5–6):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Riener R, Lünenburger L, Jezernik S et al (2005) Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental result. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst Rehabilitat Eng 13(3):380–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Lee and Y. Sankai (2002) Power Assist Control for Walking Aid with HAL-3 Based on EMG and Impedance Adjustment around Knee Joint. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Lausanne Switzerland, pp 1499–1504

  4. Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EEG et al (2007) Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst Rehabilitat Eng 15(3):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Guan X, Han X et al (2020) Design and preliminary validation of a lower limb exoskeleton with compact and modular actuation. IEEE Access 8:66338–66352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nunes PF, Ostan I, Siqueira AAG (2020) Evaluation of motor primitive-based adaptive control for lower limb exoskeletons. Front. Robot. AI 7:575217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz Garate V, Parri A, Yan T et al (2017) Experimental validation of motor primitive-based control for leg exoskeletons during continuous multi-locomotion tasks. Front Neurorobot 11:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chao-Feng C, Zhi-Jiang D, Long H et al (2019) Development and hybrid control of an electrically actuated lower limb exoskeleton for motion assistance. IEEE Access 7:169107–169122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh CJ, Endo K, Herr H (2007) A quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. Int J Humanoid Rob 4(3):487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Racine JL (2003) Control of a lower extremity exoskeleton for human performance amplification, doctoral diss., Berkeley, CA: University of California

  11. Ugurlu B, Oshima H, Sariyildiz E (2020) Active compliance control reduces upper body effort in exoskeleton-supported walking. Int J Biomed Biol Eng IEEE Trans Human Mach Syst 50(2):144–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cao Y, Huang J (2020) Neural-network-based nonlinear model predictive tracking control of a pneumatic muscle actuator-driven exoskeleton. IEEE/CAA JAutomatica Sinica 7(6):1478–1488

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gui K, Tan U-X, Liu H (2020) Electromyography-driven progressive assist-as-needed control for lower limb exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Med Robots Bionics 2(1):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Villa-Parra AC, Delisle-Rodriguez D, Botelho T et al (2018) Control of a robotic knee exoskeleton for assistance and rehabilitation based on motion intention from sEMG. Res Biomed Eng 34(3):198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Staman K, Veale AJ, van der Kooij H (2021) Design control and evaluation of the electro-hydrostatic actuator, PREHydrA for gait restoration exoskeleton technology. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 3(1):156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazerooni H, Racine JL et al. (2005) On the control of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp 4353–4360

  17. Yu SN, Lee HD, Lee SH et al (2012) Design of an under-actuated exoskeleton system for walking assist while load carrying. Adv Robot 26(5–6):561–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutrisno A, David J (2019) Braun, enhancing mobility with quasi-passive variable stiffness exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 27(3):487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aguirre-Ollinger G, Colgate J, Peshkin M, Goswami A (2012) Inertia compensation control of a one-degree-of-freedom exoskeleton for lower-limb assistance: initial experiments. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilitat Eng 20(1):68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vantilt J, Tanghel K, Afschrift M et al (2019) Model-based control for exoskeletons with series elastic actuators evaluated on sit-to-stand movements. J NeuroEng Rehabilitat, vol 16, no 65

  21. Meier F, Hennig P, Schaal S (2014) Incremental local gaussian regression. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 972–980

  22. Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters J, Seeger M (2008) Computed torque control with nonparametric regression models. In: Proceedings of 2008 American Control Conference, Seattle, American, pp 212–217

  23. Stulp F, Sigaud O (2015) Many regression algorithms, one unified model: a review. Neural Netw 69:60–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaal S, Atkeson CG, Vijayakumar S (2002) Scalable techniques from nonparametric statistics for real-time robot learning. Appl Intell 17:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghan J, Steger R, Kazerooni H (2006) Control and system identification for the berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). Adv Robot 20(9):989–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petkos G, Toussaint M, Vijayakumar S (2006) Learning multiple models of non-linear dynamics for control under varying contexts. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Greece, pp 898–907

  27. Armstrong B (1989) On finding exciting trajectories for identification experiments involving systems with nonlinear dynamics. Int J Robot Res 8:28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tran HT, Cheng H, Lin XC et al (2014) The relationship between physical human-exoskeleton interaction and dynamic factors: using a learning approach for control applications. Sci China Inf Sci 57(12):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th edn. Jonh Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Anthropometric source book, Volume I: Anthropometry for designers, (NASA Ref. Pub: Webb Associates, No. 1024, 1978)

  31. Craig JJ (2004) Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kelly R, Santibáñez V, Loría A (2005) Control of robot manipulators in joint space. Adv Textbooks in Cont and Sig Proc Series, Springer, London

  33. Khosla PK (1988) Some experimental results on model-based control schemes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, America, pp 1380–1385

  34. Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters J (2011) Model learning for robot control: a survey. Cognitive Processing Springer 12:319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao T, Yin S, Gao H et al (2018) A locally weighted project regression approach-aided nonlinear constrained tracking control. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(12):5870–5879

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ho JDL, Lee K-H, Tang WL et al (2018) Localized online learning-based control of a soft redundant manipulator under variable loading. Adv Robot 32(21):1168–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Haykin S (1999) Neural network: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Atkeson CG, Moore AW, Schaal S (1997) Locally weighted learning. Artif Intell Rev Spec Issue Lazy Learn 11:11–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vijayakumar S, Schaal S (2000) Locally weighted projection regression: an O(n) algorithm for incremental real time learning in high dimensional space. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 1076–1089

  40. Nguyen-Tuong D, Seeger M, Peters J (2009) Model learning with local Gaussian process regression. Adv Robot 23:2015–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakanishi J, Farrell JA, Schaal S (2005) Composite adaptive control with locally weighted statistical learning. Neural Netw 18:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vijayakumar S, D’Souza A, Schaal S (2005) Incremental online learning in high dimensions. Neural Comput 12:2602–2634

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Klanke S, Vijayakumar S, Schaal S (2008) A library for locally weighted projection regression. J Mach Learn Res 9:623–626

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Rose J, Gamble JG (2006) Human walking, 3th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

  45. Bamberg SJM, Benbasat AY, Scarborough DM et al (2008) Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12(4):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shu L, Hua T, Wang Y et al (2010) In-shoe plantar pressure measurement and analysis system based on fabric pressure sensing array. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(3):767–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tran HT, Cheng H, Huang R et al (2016) Evaluation of a fuzzy-based impedance control strategy on a powered lower exoskeleton. Int J Soc Robot 8:103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jezernik S, Colombo G, Morari M (2004) Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis. IEEE Trans Rob Automation 20:574–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim JH, Han JW, Kim DY et al (2013) Design of a walking assistance lower limb exoskeleton for paraplegic patients and hardware validation using CoP. Int J Adv Robotic Syst 10:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Erdemir A, McLeanet S, Herzog W et al (2007) Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech 22:131–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tran H-T, Cheng H, Duong M-K et al (2014) Fuzzy-based impedance regulation for control of the coupled human-exoskeleton system. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO 2014), pp 986–992

  52. Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters DJ (2011) Incremental online sparsification for model learning in real-time robot control. Neurocomputing 74:1859–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electronic Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam

    Huu-Toan Tran & Luy Nguyen Tan

  2. Mechanical System Engineering Department, Tongyeong Campus, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong, 53064, Republic of Korea

    Seung-Hun Han

Authors
  1. Huu-Toan Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luy Nguyen Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seung-Hun Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Hun Han.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, HT., Tan, L.N. & Han, SH. Model-Learning-Based Partitioned Control of a Human-Powered Augmentation Lower Exoskeleton. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 17, 533–550 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-021-00842-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-021-00842-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation