Skip to main content
Log in

Culturo-Behavior Science: Now is the Time to Focus on U.S. Immigration Policy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavior and Social Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The centuries-old debate over U.S. immigration policy reflects polarizing beliefs about the extent to which the United States is, and should remain, a White, European, and Christian nation. Those embracing this belief have argued, often by misusing science, that restricting immigration of “undesirables” is essential to preserving the nation’s character; they prevailed regularly over the years as numerous laws were enacted to limit immigration. In actuality, however, immigration, a natural subset of migration, is beneficial in numerous ways to both the host country and the immigrant and is increasing as people move in response to large-scale environmental changes. Current U.S. immigration policy is still framed to restrict rather than encourage immigration. The assumption of power by the Biden administration may open new opportunities for the United States to increase immigration. We propose that culturo-behavior science, unlike racist and culturist science of the past and present, offers a sound mechanism to increase immigration by establishing a new pathway to admission—one based on fostering mutually reinforcing transactional relationships between immigrants and the U.S. host communities. This pathway will require a great deal of research, so we call on culturo-behavior scientists, largely absent from the immigration debate for nearly 100 years, to take up the challenge to apply science in an egalitarian, nonrestrictive, and socially just manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. This article does not address the issues confronting refugees and asylum seekers, whose reasons for moving typically are different from those seeking more hospitable lands, though from the motivational perspective, “the distinction between refugee and nonrefugee migration is continuous rather than categorical” (cf. Echterhoff et al., 2020, p. 857).

  2. From an immigration policy perspective, this paradigm shift from filtering out “undesirable people” to restricting “undesirable practices” allowed Donald Trump to insist “I’m not a racist” and “I’m the least racist person ” (Scott, 2018) while debasing people identified and labeled within a cultural group (e.g., Mexicans (Sakuma, 2016), people from “shithole countries” (Dawsey, 2018)) and wishing they were more like others who currently are not immigrating in great numbers (e.g., Norwegians; Dawsey, 2018)).

  3. According to Echterhoff et al. (2020), “Integration is understood as an interactively achieved, multi-level process aimed at a desirable outcome [that results in] increasing the participation and inclusion of groups or people who are initially distant and excluded from a dominant society” (p. 857).

  4. This approach is sharply distinguished from exploitative programs, such as the Bracero Program, which operated from 1942 to 1964 to bring in low-wage, temporary Mexican labor to work in 25 states, primarily in agriculture and railroad maintenance (Bracero History Archive, 2021).

  5. Watson (1924) argued that intragroup differences are much greater than intergroup ones for most behavioral characteristics, and Skinner (1974) noted that genes establish conditioning possibilities and, like behavior, are subject to environmental selection.

  6. A truism in behavior science is that “the organism is always behaving as it should” even if not as someone (including ourselves) would like; therefore, “misbehavior” exists only as a socially constructed category that defines the behavior as unwanted in some way.

  7. For example, a diagnosis of major depressive disorder requires the presence of five of nine empirically supported criteria: depressed mood, loss of interest/pleasure, weight loss, insomnia/hypersomnia, psychomotor agitation/retardation, fatigue, worthlessness, cognitive disruption, and self-harm ideation—with either depressed mood or loss of interest/pleasure as one of the five.

  8. We contend that the CBS pathway can accept as many immigrants as there are resources to support their integration needs, including resources to help host country residents adjust to changing social and cultural milieus. We also believe that these resources can be derived from the return to the economy provided by immigrants.

  9. Again, we stress that these resources should be conceptualized broadly to include not only the support and training directly needed by the immigrants to integrate into the host community but also the interventions needed to help citizens adapt to the immigrants’ impacting their milieu.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard F. Rakos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Richard F. Rakos states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

A previous version of this article was presented as part of a symposium at the October 2020 convention of the Virtual Culturo-Behavior Science Conference.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rakos, R.F., Switzer, K. Culturo-Behavior Science: Now is the Time to Focus on U.S. Immigration Policy. Behav. Soc. Iss. 30, 148–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00062-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00062-2

Keywords

Navigation