Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Utility of starchy, lignocellulosics and cellulosics hydrolysates on cellulase production under liquid state fermentation

  • Article
  • Published:
Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Starch is one of the most abundant renewable carbohydrate reserves of higher plants. It can be used to produce many valuable food products in the food processing industry. Furthermore, starch is also used as an important feedstock in the fermentation industry to produce value-added products. Lignocellulosic materials such as agriculture and forestry wastes are considered as a renewable feedstock for bioenergy production through a biochemical conversion process. Converting lignocellulosic biomass into fuels and chemicals entail a physicochemical pretreatment of the biomass, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the polysaccharide components such as cellulose and hemicellulose into monomeric sugars. These sugars can then be further fermented into other desired compounds of interest. During the deconstruction processes, various inhibitory compounds are released due to the partial over-degradation of lignocellulose biomass, which inhibits the cell growth and metabolic capacity of fermenting strains. Cellulosic materials such as waste paper in large quantities can also be used as potentially cheap feedstock for sustainable production of value-added products. The present investigation is mainly focused on the utility of starchy hydrolysates (wheat, potato, and rice) and lignocellulosics hydrolysates (bagasse and wheat straw) in cellulase production under liquid state fermentation. It also depicts the potential of cellulosic hydrolysate (waste newspaper) in product formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Ali N, Athar MA, Khan YH, et al. Regulation and improvement of cellulase production: recent advances. Nat Res. 2014;5:857–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oszust K, Pawlik A, Siczek A, et al. Efficient cellulases production by Trichoderma atroviride G79/11 in submerged culture based on soy flour-cellulose-lactose. BioRes. 2017;12(4):8468–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adelabu BA, Kareem SO, Oluwafemi F, et al. Bioconversion of corn straw to ethanol by cellulolytic yeasts immobilized in Mucuna urens matrix. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2017;31:136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verma N, Bansal MC, Kumar V. Utility of Luffa cylindrica and Litchi chinensis peel, an agricultural waste biomass in cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei under solid state cultivation. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;16:483–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho JFA. Starch: major sources, properties and applications as thermoplastic materials, handbook of biopolymers and biodegradable plastics. Boston: William Andrew Publishing; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Razdan N, Kocher GS. Utilization of damaged and spoiled wheat grains for bioethanol production. Biosci Biotech Res Comm. 2018;11(4):658–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez S, Bertoft E. The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: a comprehensive review. Starch-Starke. 2010;62(8):389–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao M, Jiang B, Jin Z, et al. Microbial starch-converting enzymes: recent insights and perspectives. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018;17(15):1238–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh SV, Ali SZ. Properties of starches modified by different acid. Int J Food Prop. 2008;11:495–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo W, Zhao Z, Pan H, et al. Feasibility of butanol production from wheat starch wastewater by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Energy. 2018;154:240–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen S, Wayman M. Novel inducers derived from starch for cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. Process Biochem. 1992;27:327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Izmirlioglu G, Demirci A. Enhanced bio-ethanol production from industrial potato waste by statistical medium optimization. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10):24490–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tasić MB, Konstantinović BV, Lazic ML, et al. The acid hydrolysis of potato tuber mash in bioethanol production. Biochem Eng J. 2009;43(2):208–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yadav P, Majumder CB. Production of glucose syrup by the hydrolysis of starch made from rotten potato. J Integr Sci Technol. 2017;5(1):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soest JJGV, Benes K, Wit DD. The influence of acid hydrolysis of potato starch on the stress-strain properties of thermoplastic starch. Starch. 1995;47(11):429–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miao M, Jiang B, Zhang T, et al. Impact of mild acid hydrolysis on structure and digestion properties of waxy maize starch. Food Chem. 2011;126(2):506–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moniruzzaman M, Ingram LO. Ethanol production from dilute acid hydrolysate of rice hulls using genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 1998;20(10):943–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang CH, Hseu TH, Huang CM. Induction of cellulases by cellooligosaccharides in Trichoderma koninghii G-39. J Biotechnol. 1998;9:47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wayman M, Chen S. Cellulase production by Trichodermma reesei using whole wheat flour as a carbon source. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 1992;14:825–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Y, Hu M, Tang Y, et al. Progress and perspective on lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitor tolerance improvement in Zymomonas mobilis. Biores Bioprocess. 2018;5:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant NO. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Canilha L, Rodrigues RDCLB, Antunes FAF, et al. Bioconversion of sugarcane biomass into ethanol: an overview about composition, pretreatment methods, detoxification of hydrolysates, enzymatic saccharification and ethanol fermentation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pessoa A Jr, Mancilha IM, Sato S. Acid hydrolysis of hemicellulose from sugarcane bagasse. Brazil J Chem Eng. 1997;14:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lavarack BP, Griffin GJ, Rodman D. The acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose to produce xylose, arabinose, glucose and other products. Biomass Bioenergy. 2002;23(5):367–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B, et al. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzym Microb Technol. 1999;24:151–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Adeboye PT, Bettiga M, Olsson L. The chemical nature of phenolic compounds determines their toxicity and induces distinct physiological responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in lignocellulose hydrolysates. AMB Express. 2014;4:46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paniagua AI, Diez-Antolinez R, Hijosa-Valsero M, et al. Response surface optimization of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum l.) for fermentable sugars production. Chem Eng Trans. 2016;49:223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sritrakul N, Nitisinprasert S, Keawsompong S. Evaluation of dilute acid pretreatment for bioethanol fermentation from sugarcane bagasse pith. Agric Nat Res. 2017;51(6):512–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luo Y, Li Z, Li X, et al. The production of furfural directly from hemicellulose in lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Catal Today. 2019;319:14–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stagge S, Adnan Cavka A, Jönsson LJ. Identification of benzoquinones in pretreated lignocellulosic feedstocks and inhibitory effects on yeast. AMB Express. 2015;5:62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Luís C, DuarteL C, Silva-Fernandes T, et al. Dilute acid hydrolysis of wheat straw oligosaccharides. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;153:116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dussan KJ, Silva DDV, Moraes EJC, et al. Dilute-acid hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose from sugarcane bagasse. Chem Eng Trans. 2014;38:433–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhuang J, Liu Y, Wu Z, et al. Hydrolysis of wheat straw hemicellulose and detoxification of the hydrolysate for xylitol production. BioResources. 2009;4(2):674–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guerra-Rodríguez E, Portilla-RiveraO M, Jarquín-Enríquez L, et al. Acid hydrolysis of wheat straw: a kinetic study. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;36:346–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marđetko N, Novak M, Trontel A, et al. Bioethanol production from dilute-acid pre-treated wheat straw liquor hydrolysate by genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2018;32(4):483–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baig MZ, Dharmadhikari SM. Optimization of detoxification with over liming and charcoal treatment for increasing the fermentability of cotton stalk hydrolyzate. Microbiology. 2014;4(7):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Lopes S, et al. Evaluation of the detoxification of brewery’s spent grain hydrolysate for xylitol production by Debaryomyces hansenii CCMI 941. Process Biochem. 2005;40:1215–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pattra S, Sangyoka S, Boonmee M, et al. Bio-hydrogen production from the fermentation of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by Clostridium butyricum. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:5256–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Llano T, Quijorna N, Coz A. Detoxification of a lignocellulosic waste from a pulp mill to enhance its fermentation prospects. Energies. 2017;10(3):348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bahiru TB, Balomajumder C, Roy P. Microbial delignification and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to enhance biofuel production: an overview and future prospect. Bull Natl Res Centre. 2019;43:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chandel AK, Silva SSRD, Singh O (2011) Detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysatesfor improved bioethanol production. In: MarcoAurelio Dos Santos Bernardes (Ed.) Biofuel production-recent developments and prospects, InTech, (ISBN: 978-953-307- 478-8).

  42. Mingming LM, Tu M. Effect of overliming and activated carbon detoxification on inhibitors removal and butanol fermentation of poplar prehydrolysates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Millati R, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ. Effect of pH, time and temperature of overliming on detoxification of dilute-acid hydrolyzates for fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 2002;38(4):515–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ranatunga TD, Jervis J, Helm RF, et al. The effect of overliming on the toxicity of dilute acid pretreated lignocellulosics: the role of inorganics, uronic acids and ether-soluble organics. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000;27(3–5):240–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Persson P, Andersson J, Gorton L, et al. Effect of different forms of alkali treatment on specific fermentation inhibitors and on the fermentability of lignocellulose hydrolysates for production of fuel ethanol. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;50:5318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chi Z, Rover M, Jun E, et al. Overliming detoxification of pyrolytic sugar syrup fordirect fermentation of levoglucosan to ethanol. Biores Technol. 2013;150:220–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kashi G. On the analysis of phenol removal from drinking water by batch reactor using powdered eggshell. Biosci Biotech Res Comm. 2017;10(2):287–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cavka A, Guo X, Tang S-J, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pecar D, Gorsek A. Enzymatic treatment of paper sludge. Chem Eng Trans. 2015;43:631–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Varotkar P, Tumane PM, Wasnik DD. Bioconversion of waste paper into bio-ethanol by co-culture of fungi isolated from lignocellulosic waste. J Pure App Biosci. 2016;4(4):264–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ju LK, Afolabi OA. Waste paper hydrolysate as soluble inducing substrate for cellulase production in continuous culture of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Progg. 1999;5:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Balagurumurthy B, Singh R, Bhaskar T. Catalysts for thermochemical conversion of biomass. Recent Adv Thermo-Chem Conv Biomass. 2015;2015:109–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Joksimovic G, Markovic Z. Investigation of the mechanism of acidic hydrolysis of cellulose. Acta Agric Serbica. 2007;12(24):51.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Franceschin G, Favaron C, Bertucco A. Waste paper as carbohydrate source for biofuel production: an experimental investigation. Chem Engg Trans. 2010;20:279–84.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Domingues FC, Queinoz JA, Cabral JMS, et al. The influence of culture conditions on mycelial structure and cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei RUT C 30. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2004;26:394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. 1987;59(2):257–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen S, Wayman M. Use of sorbose to enhance cellobiose activity in a Trichoderma reesei cellulase system produced on wheat hydrolysates. Biotechnol Technique. 1993;7:345–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cornejo-Ramírez YI, Martínez-Cruz O, Toro-Sánchez CLD, et al. The structural characteristics of starches and their functional properties. CyTA J Food. 2018;16(1):1003–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Chandel AK, Kapoor RK, Singh A, et al. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM3501. Biores Technol. 2007;98:1947–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Nitsos CK, Lazaridis PA, Mach-Aigner A, et al. Enhancing lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by hydrothermal pretreatment, extraction of surface lignin, wet milling and production of cellulolytic enzymes. ChemSusChem. 2019;12(6):1179–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Biores Technol. 2010;101:4744–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Cardona CA, Quintero JA, Paz IC. Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: status and perspectives. Biores Technol. 2010;101:4754–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Chansoliya PR, Anand R, Sharma S. Analysis of Bioethanol production from Newspaper by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis. Int J Eng Develop Res. 2016;4(3):517.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wyman M, Chen S. Cellulase production induced by carbon source derived from waste news paper. Process Biochem. 1991;26:93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors gratefully acknowledged the ministry of human resource and development, India for providing fellowship to carry out present research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Paper Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee Saharanpur Campus, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 247001, India

    Nitin Verma, Vivek Kumar & M. C. Bansal

Authors
  1. Nitin Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivek Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. C. Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Verma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, N., Kumar, V. & Bansal, M.C. Utility of starchy, lignocellulosics and cellulosics hydrolysates on cellulase production under liquid state fermentation. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 1, 289–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-019-00019-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-019-00019-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation